Page 1 of 1

Eternius laments "shitsec!!" (The peanut thread)

Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2022 8:49 pm
by Timonk
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=31619

In my opinion the officer was no longer an officer the second he assumed the identity of a cargo tech

Re: Eternius laments "shitsec!!" (The peanut thread)

Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2022 9:56 pm
by datorangebottle
the secoff that kept his ID(and likely ahelped it) was banbaiting.
pretty sure the escalation rules literally stated, "If you don't like getting dunked, consider not stealing peoples' IDs next round!" for a long time.

Re: Eternius laments "shitsec!!" (The peanut thread)

Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2022 10:20 pm
by Pandarsenic
If we're getting everything in the appeal, the sec officer deserved to eat shit for metagaming MUST BE TRAITOR off the hand teleporter and sending OP to a nonexistent HOP to replace it.

Re: Eternius laments "shitsec!!" (The peanut thread)

Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2022 2:35 am
by blackdav123
100% chance that if he doesnt kill the officer and just crits-cuffs-heals him that the officer will immediately tell the rest of sec he is valid salad and they will all laser him to death the next time they see him.

Re: Eternius laments "shitsec!!" (The peanut thread)

Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2022 2:36 am
by iamgoofball
I'm surprised the officer didn't just immediately execute him on the spot for having the hand teleporter

Re: Eternius laments "shitsec!!" (The peanut thread)

Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2022 2:38 am
by blackdav123
Forgot to mention that none of the other officers will ask what he did, why he is wanted, or any further questions. They will gun down the man with the red W and claim his head as a trophy

Re: Eternius laments "shitsec!!" (The peanut thread)

Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2022 4:06 am
by Kendrickorium
this is why you do your security work in the brig, preferably in front of the warden.

rules for dealing with shitsec are as follows:

1. ahelp the shitsec in question

if no admins are on:

1. kill the shitsec in question

Re: Eternius laments "shitsec!!" (The peanut thread)

Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2022 6:16 am
by Tearling
Security officer attacked first with a chainsaw. Security officer is new, therefor deserves some leeway, but Onjec was clearly not in the wrong for responding with lethals to lethals.

Re: Eternius laments "shitsec!!" (The peanut thread)

Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2022 10:01 am
by Annihilite111
Timonk wrote: Thu Apr 28, 2022 8:49 pm viewtopic.php?f=7&t=31619

In my opinion the officer was no longer an officer the second he assumed the identity of a cargo tech
"EMPLOYMENT AIN'T FREE. The marvels of plasma and bluespace gotta be litterd with the blood of greyshirts. Captain AKA "Condom" is not my commander. He is nonsec pussy and probbaly valid as well :DD. LETHALS and harmbaton not DISABLER and brig ok. Praise nanotrasen"

Re: Eternius laments "shitsec!!" (The peanut thread)

Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2022 11:46 am
by sinfulbliss
Seccie's mistake was starting with the saw. Should've started with the batong, arrested, brought to brig, then he can whip out the saw (since hand tele is capital). Would've been cringe killing for hand tele though.
If sec uses lethals on you immediately with no prior provocation then yeah you can escalate back against them and their meta-protections disappear.

Re: Eternius laments "shitsec!!" (The peanut thread)

Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2022 3:08 pm
by Fatal
This is where people need to adminhelp the officer, any situation where you genuinely think you have a justification for killing a security officer, you should be adminhelping

Re: Eternius laments "shitsec!!" (The peanut thread)

Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2022 3:16 pm
by Itseasytosee2me
Fatal wrote: Fri Apr 29, 2022 3:08 pm This is where people need to adminhelp the officer, any situation where you genuinely think you have a justification for killing a security officer, you should be adminhelping
He stole the hand tele, he was already eligible for on the spot execution, the sec officer hadn't done anything explicitly against the rules from what I've seen.

Re: Eternius laments "shitsec!!" (The peanut thread)

Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2022 4:02 pm
by Annihilite111
Fatal wrote: Fri Apr 29, 2022 3:08 pm This is where people need to adminhelp the officer, any situation where you genuinely think you have a justification for killing a security officer, you should be adminhelping
If an officer assaults you with a chainsaw your first assumption would be that it's an antag disguised as one. It's not like the chamo kit isn't literally 2tc

Re: Eternius laments "shitsec!!" (The peanut thread)

Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2022 4:30 pm
by iamgoofball
Fatal wrote: Fri Apr 29, 2022 3:08 pm This is where people need to adminhelp the officer, any situation where you genuinely think you have a justification for killing a security officer, you should be adminhelping
If he ahelped the admin would of banned him anyways for banbaiting because he had the hand tele and that """""confirms"""""" you're an antag in today's hyper competitive ss13 meta that your admin coworkers enforce

Re: Eternius laments "shitsec!!" (The peanut thread)

Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2022 8:46 pm
by cacogen
I looked at the text wall this guy posted and instead of reading it or any of the posts here I did the responsible thing and decided the admin was in the wrong.

Re: Eternius laments "shitsec!!" (The peanut thread)

Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2022 4:47 am
by Boot
Itseasytosee2me wrote: Fri Apr 29, 2022 3:16 pm
He stole the hand tele, he was already eligible for on the spot execution, the sec officer hadn't done anything explicitly against the rules from what I've seen.
I don't think that's true. I don't think that being caught with a high risk item marks you for on the spot killing.

Re: Eternius laments "shitsec!!" (The peanut thread)

Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2022 10:12 am
by cacogen
The hand teleporter is fun and this game is boring 99% of the time. You shouldn’t execute people for taking it.

Re: Eternius laments "shitsec!!" (The peanut thread)

Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2022 10:21 am
by Misdoubtful
iamgoofball wrote: Fri Apr 29, 2022 4:30 pm
Fatal wrote: Fri Apr 29, 2022 3:08 pm This is where people need to adminhelp the officer, any situation where you genuinely think you have a justification for killing a security officer, you should be adminhelping
If he ahelped the admin would of banned him anyways for banbaiting because he had the hand tele and that """""confirms"""""" you're an antag in today's hyper competitive ss13 meta that your admin coworkers enforce
No one here in their right mind is going to ban someone just for seeking clarification on how to proceed with a situation before they actually act on that situation.

Re: Eternius laments "shitsec!!" (The peanut thread)

Posted: Mon May 02, 2022 10:50 am
by BlevRuz
skill issue, if the secoff didnt want to risk getting killed he shouldnt have used lethals