User rejects one week UTO, argues with HR instead
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2023 5:27 am
please for the love of god tell me the name of the discord was NOT ACTUALLY /TG/ FELINID METAGANG
PLEASE SOMEONE TELL ME THIS IS NOT THE CASE
/tg/Station 13
tgstation13.org
https://tgstation13.org/phpBB/
User rejects one week UTO, argues with HR instead
Page 1 of 1
Re: User rejects one week UTO, argues with HR instead
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2023 7:20 am
Re: User rejects one week UTO, argues with HR instead
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2023 7:28 am
Kendrickorium wrote: ↑Sun Sep 10, 2023 7:20 am please for the love of god tell me the name of the discord was NOT ACTUALLY /TG/ FELINID METAGANG
PLEASE SOMEONE TELL ME THIS IS NOT THE CASE
Re: User rejects one week UTO, argues with HR instead
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2023 8:18 am
Now do the lizard metagang
Re: User rejects one week UTO, argues with HR instead
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2023 8:20 am
Good news. It was a group dm called the felinid MEATGANG. Not a metagang. Big Difference.Kendrickorium wrote: ↑Sun Sep 10, 2023 7:20 am please for the love of god tell me the name of the discord was NOT ACTUALLY /TG/ FELINID METAGANG
PLEASE SOMEONE TELL ME THIS IS NOT THE CASE
Re: User rejects one week UTO, argues with HR instead
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2023 8:27 am
thanksSapphoQueer wrote: ↑Sun Sep 10, 2023 8:20 amGood news. It was a group dm called the felinid MEATGANG. Not a metagang. Big Difference.Kendrickorium wrote: ↑Sun Sep 10, 2023 7:20 am please for the love of god tell me the name of the discord was NOT ACTUALLY /TG/ FELINID METAGANG
PLEASE SOMEONE TELL ME THIS IS NOT THE CASE
thats almost worse
Re: User rejects one week UTO, argues with HR instead
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2023 8:28 am
Definitely worse.Kendrickorium wrote: ↑Sun Sep 10, 2023 8:27 amthanksSapphoQueer wrote: ↑Sun Sep 10, 2023 8:20 amGood news. It was a group dm called the felinid MEATGANG. Not a metagang. Big Difference.Kendrickorium wrote: ↑Sun Sep 10, 2023 7:20 am please for the love of god tell me the name of the discord was NOT ACTUALLY /TG/ FELINID METAGANG
PLEASE SOMEONE TELL ME THIS IS NOT THE CASE
thats almost worse
Re: User rejects one week UTO, argues with HR instead
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2023 8:40 am
SapphoQueer wrote: ↑Sun Sep 10, 2023 8:20 amGood news. It was a group dm called the felinid MEATGANG. Not a metagang. Big Difference.Kendrickorium wrote: ↑Sun Sep 10, 2023 7:20 am please for the love of god tell me the name of the discord was NOT ACTUALLY /TG/ FELINID METAGANG
PLEASE SOMEONE TELL ME THIS IS NOT THE CASE
Re: User rejects one week UTO, argues with HR instead
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2023 9:40 am
Re: User rejects one week UTO, argues with HR instead
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2023 9:48 am
Did he really get banned just for EXISTING near people who were breaking the rules? I'm baffled.
Re: User rejects one week UTO, argues with HR instead
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2023 9:50 am
Re: User rejects one week UTO, argues with HR instead
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2023 9:56 am
If this was a permaban, I too would be questioning it. But a week ban seems appropriate, metacomms are an extremely serious rule to skirt around. I defended 13thSky only because of the context provided, the player's account age at the time it took place and even then, I was hoping only for a reduction from a perma, not a complete reversal of the ban, which was eventually the outcome. You also have to remember that apparently there were many more people in that server, none of whom received bans due to the fact that they legitimately did not know/see any metacomms nor did they participate in such.
Re: User rejects one week UTO, argues with HR instead
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2023 11:28 am
A week ban is really minor (compared to what some others got) and the note is super specific. Admins will probably keep an eye on them for a bit after their ban expires, but as long as they don't literally metacomm again they'll be fine.
Re: User rejects one week UTO, argues with HR instead
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2023 12:56 pm
Re: User rejects one week UTO, argues with HR instead
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2023 1:01 pm
Double posting for clarity: yes, this is entirely correct. Not everyone in that group was permabanned. Heck, not everyone in the group was banned. As far as we know, the investigation was granular and bans/notes were placed based on the degree in which Rule 2 was broken.AsbestosSniffer wrote: ↑Sun Sep 10, 2023 9:56 amIf this was a permaban, I too would be questioning it. But a week ban seems appropriate, metacomms are an extremely serious rule to skirt around. I defended 13thSky only because of the context provided, the player's account age at the time it took place and even then, I was hoping only for a reduction from a perma, not a complete reversal of the ban, which was eventually the outcome. You also have to remember that apparently there were many more people in that server, none of whom received bans due to the fact that they legitimately did not know/see any metacomms nor did they participate in such.
Re: User rejects one week UTO, argues with HR instead
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2023 2:39 pm
Yeah, I only got a note, not even a weekban, because I was part of the general friendgroup but only after any incidents took place. I'll even share it because I can.conrad wrote: ↑Sun Sep 10, 2023 1:01 pm Double posting for clarity: yes, this is entirely correct. Not everyone in that group was permabanned. Heck, not everyone in the group was banned. As far as we know, the investigation was granular and bans/notes were placed based on the degree in which Rule 2 was broken.
Part of an external Discord with friends where there were multiple instances of metacomms. Did not appear to be involved, however the player should be cautious about participating in communities that break the rules. Generally shouldn't be worried about.
Re: User rejects one week UTO, argues with HR instead
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2023 5:00 pm
lol. tatebriar screeched on several occasions that the felind metagang wasnt real and we all just wanted an enemy
Re: User rejects one week UTO, argues with HR instead
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2023 11:10 pm
The name doesn't mean jack diddly shit- I mean fuck, we had a major US intel breach from a server named THUG SHAKER CENTRAL.Kendrickorium wrote: ↑Sun Sep 10, 2023 9:50 amHE WAS IN A FUCKING DISCORD THAT LITERALLY WAS NAMED FELINID METAGANG EKAT
I'd wager that it was made as a side server for various players to be able to actually go "[shitter of the week] is such a shithead holy fuck" without getting their nuts slapped on the Manuelcord for "callouts", and either as it was being made or after it was made, someone went "oh god we have a lot of felinid statics in here" and named/renamed it because funny.
The failure to keep it from unironically living up to the name is the issue, sadly.
Re: User rejects one week UTO, argues with HR instead
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2023 11:19 pm
so after talking with one of the people in the cat-cord. the group DM was named the felind meta-gang and later evolved into the cat-discord after they ran out of group DM slots for people
Re: User rejects one week UTO, argues with HR instead
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2023 4:38 am
Many such cases (See: manuelcord)EmpressMaia wrote: ↑Mon Sep 11, 2023 11:19 pm so after talking with one of the people in the cat-cord. the group DM was named the felind meta-gang and later evolved into the cat-discord after they ran out of group DM slots for people