/tg/Station 13

Bottom post of the previous page:

Requested by cobby and this thread is in reference to a current issue.

Basically, it seems that this was not expressly outlined by the rules that "piling onto" someone else who is ick ooking is bannable. I have a personal stake in the matter because this relates to a current ban ongoing so I will leave this to discussion.

John_Oxford wrote:slippery slope into banning for not using correct pronouns or calling someone a fag.

please don't use the f word i am offended

Isn't saying icky ocky/ooky icky/licky my cocky a meme at this point. What harm does it really do

John_Oxford wrote:slippery slope into banning for not using correct pronouns or calling someone a fag.

fallacy

NoH8OnlyLove wrote:Isn't saying icky ocky/ooky icky/licky my cocky a meme at this point. What harm does it really do

httP://digg.com/r/memes

Vekter wrote:

oranges wrote:yeah but you've always been a sensitive faggot who muted ooc when people blasted you so it makes sense

That was three years ago, oranges, damn.

I hold grudges

I think it's part of server culture and shouldn't be bannable. It's just a harmless joke made in good fun, and a long-standing tradition. It's one of the few happy things that give you the warm feeling of home: the comfort of ritual.

Grazyn wrote:I think it's part of server culture and shouldn't be bannable. It's just a harmless joke made in good fun, and a long-standing tradition. It's one of the few happy things that give you the warm feeling of home: the comfort of ritual.

are you people not even reading the thread

I just looked at the first three posts tbh

cedarbridge wrote:The biggest issue I have is that it takes what could be a minor slip up that threatens to break player immersion and turns it into a huge wall of "huehuehuehuehue he broke da rooools" that does break player immersion. The rule exists for a reason and even the breach of the rule doesn't always do half the damage that the followup does.

OOC will break immersion regardless of whether it is used properly or not.

IT'S NOT PART OF THE GAME IT'S NOT IMMERSIVE!

Mute ooc you weak minded immersoid swine.

Incomptinence wrote:OOC will break immersion regardless of whether it is used properly or not.

IT'S NOT PART OF THE GAME IT'S NOT IMMERSIVE!

Mute ooc you weak minded immersoid swine.

I don't even know how to fucking respond to this

If 4-5 lines of bluetext really have that much impact on your game experience then just turn OOC off and yeah there we go APC destroyed mission accomplished.

ExcessiveJMadison wrote:

John_Oxford wrote:slippery slope into banning for not using correct pronouns or calling someone a fag.

please don't use the f word i am offended

Fuck you faggot glow in the dark cia nigger

I just like how the talk about the ICKY OCKY meme turned into "but my rights to say fag" at some point.

Incomptinence wrote:

cedarbridge wrote:The biggest issue I have is that it takes what could be a minor slip up that threatens to break player immersion and turns it into a huge wall of "huehuehuehuehue he broke da rooools" that does break player immersion. The rule exists for a reason and even the breach of the rule doesn't always do half the damage that the followup does.

OOC will break immersion regardless of whether it is used properly or not.

IT'S NOT PART OF THE GAME IT'S NOT IMMERSIVE!

Mute ooc you weak minded immersoid swine.

Imagine being this dumb on purpose.

If you can't tell the difference between one line of text that can easily get lost of the shuffle of the log and 1/6 of the server pop dropping what they're doing to call attention to it by shitting up the log I'm concerned for your well being.

cedarbridge wrote:

Incomptinence wrote:

cedarbridge wrote:The biggest issue I have is that it takes what could be a minor slip up that threatens to break player immersion and turns it into a huge wall of "huehuehuehuehue he broke da rooools" that does break player immersion. The rule exists for a reason and even the breach of the rule doesn't always do half the damage that the followup does.

OOC will break immersion regardless of whether it is used properly or not.

IT'S NOT PART OF THE GAME IT'S NOT IMMERSIVE!

Mute ooc you weak minded immersoid swine.

Imagine being this dumb on purpose.

If you can't tell the difference between one line of text that can easily get lost of the shuffle of the log and 1/6 of the server pop dropping what they're doing to call attention to it by shitting up the log I'm concerned for your well being.

oh that's how i should have responded, ty cedar

Sligneris wrote:I just like how the talk about the ICKY OCKY meme turned into "but my rights to say fag" at some point.

if you ban me for saying something on your privately run server you're violating my right to free speech which protects me from government censorship

why is this thread still getting new replies

captain sawrge wrote:why is this thread still getting new replies

Love2Post

Can't argue with that.

maybe I'm retarded on how these things work but what causes this discussions to actually change rules? Do headmins need to vote on it or do we take what is said inside these threads as said by headmins as policy? I still am not sure.

CitrusGender wrote:maybe I'm retarded on how these things work but what causes this discussions to actually change rules? Do headmins need to vote on it or do we take what is said inside these threads as said by headmins as policy? I still am not sure.

I got you fam

>these threads have a clear answer
>yet some admins ignore it
>people get warned/banned by admins disregarding policies
>they open new threads with the same questions about policies
>go to 1

from what I understand there's nothing but the rules page that documents rules, which isn't actually updated with these sorts of rulings

the rules page is kinda long as is, maybe the silicon policy could just get a link to it's own new page and then there would be room to put in new rulings made in the policy form somewhere and not have the rules page be fucking absurdly huge? I dunno

EDIT: ok there is a post in the admin forums about rulings like this but it's not public facing

Qbopper wrote:from what I understand there's nothing but the rules page that documents rules, which isn't actually updated with these sorts of rulings

the rules page is kinda long as is, maybe the silicon policy could just get a link to it's own new page and then there would be room to put in new rulings made in the policy form somewhere and not have the rules page be fucking absurdly huge? I dunno

EDIT: ok there is a post in the admin forums about rulings like this but it's not public facing

give us the scoop

I am actually genuinely interested.

it's not that interesting

there's a stickied post in the admin forums with these policies, eg. the no muderboning admin spawned shit one is in there, or what ausops said in this thread about not making ick ock shit bannable

I'd rewrite the rules pages with my incredibly high intelligence and IQ and clarity of thought but the admins won't let me edit the pages

oranges wrote:I'd rewrite the rules pages with my incredibly high intelligence and IQ and clarity of thought but the admins won't let me edit the pages

There’s nothing that says you (or anyone else) can’t copy the page and edit the rules. I think that would be a good idea, if for no other reason than to have some polite discourse.