Page 2 of 2

Define OOC in IC.

Posted: Thu May 16, 2019 8:50 pm
by Shadowflame909

Bottom post of the previous page:

I've fallen into a pitfall that only Rule 0 should address. It's one of the drawbacks of the anti-rule-lawyering approach, and I see why it fits.

Doesn't stop me from being angry as all hell though.

So players and admins, what the hell do you define as Ooc in Ic? For me, it'd have to be a term that doesn't logically exist in ss13.

I was also thinking of a way to say, "A term that signifies knowledge of IC events of past rounds." But that also has its pitfalls. Considering we encourage ic knowledge of antagonist items and features, in another ruleset.

What do you guys think? Should this vague rule have more limitations, so the scenario of getting in trouble of one admin but not another has a minimized chance of occurring?

Might provoke anti-rule-lawyering arguments with this one. But I point towards admin shopping, which is also against the rules. As the other end of the stick.


Edit: To summarize why I think this deserves a Policy Discussion. Currently, OOC in IC is literally a more used Rule 0. Pretty big issue huh.

Re: Define OOC in IC.

Posted: Fri May 17, 2019 6:07 pm
by Shadowflame909
You can't be wrong if no one tells you why.

Re: Define OOC in IC.

Posted: Sat May 18, 2019 3:47 am
by subject217
i cannot believe ive been goaded to occupy this hellhole once more however shadowflame consider this: you are way overthinking it and you should chill out. if you have this much time to make posts like this you should get a job or go study or something.

Re: Define OOC in IC.

Posted: Sat May 18, 2019 4:21 am
by Shadowflame909
I honestly do not believe that this discussion will go anywhere anymore.

Be it the insults directed at this simple idea or the nitpicking out of hatred.

It is clear to me that you think it's dumb, and that I have a brain deficiency for suggesting it.

My mistake. I shall take into account how this server thinks before making any more policy discussions.