Get rid of the “Closed policy discussion” subform

Locked
User avatar
Itseasytosee2me
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2021 1:14 am
Byond Username: Rectification
Location: Space Station 13

Get rid of the “Closed policy discussion” subform

Post by Itseasytosee2me » #657662

Why even bother instead of just locking them up?
- Sincerely itseasytosee
See you later
User avatar
tattle
In-Game Head Admin
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2020 11:04 pm
Byond Username: Dragomagol

Re: Get rid of the “Closed policy discussion” subform

Post by tattle » #657666

Because it's easier to see all of the open policy threads instead of wading through a combination of open and closed threads
Help improve my neural network by giving me feedback!

Image
Spoiler:
Image
Avatar source
User avatar
Cheshify
In-Game Game Master
Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2020 6:42 pm
Byond Username: Cheshify

Re: Get rid of the “Closed policy discussion” subform

Post by Cheshify » #657668

When I want to see active policy threads, I don't want to see resolved ones
When I want to see resolved policy threads with rulings, I don't want to see active ones.
Image
Shout out to Riggle
Image
Shout out to Dessysalta
Image
User avatar
NamelessFairy
In-Game Game Master
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2020 8:40 pm
Byond Username: NamelessFairy

Re: Get rid of the “Closed policy discussion” subform

Post by NamelessFairy » #657670

Alternative proposal, Closed Policy should be archived policy and separate "Active Policy" (but with a better name) subforum is created alongside it, which only shows rulings that are still active. Overruled, reclarified or fully denied policy threads can remain in the archive for record keeping sake while the active policy subforum can hold any information that might be useful. This would also be a great opportunity to discover policy rulings from years ago that might be in need of a review as times have changed.
User avatar
Itseasytosee2me
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2021 1:14 am
Byond Username: Rectification
Location: Space Station 13

Re: Get rid of the “Closed policy discussion” subform

Post by Itseasytosee2me » #657672

NamelessFairy wrote: Wed Nov 30, 2022 5:46 pm Alternative proposal, Closed Policy should be archived policy and separate "Active Policy" (but with a better name) subforum is created alongside it, which only shows rulings that are still active. Overruled, reclarified or fully denied policy threads can remain in the archive for record keeping sake while the active policy subforum can hold any information that might be useful. This would also be a great opportunity to discover policy rulings from years ago that might be in need of a review as times have changed.
Yeah that’s a better name
- Sincerely itseasytosee
See you later
User avatar
san7890
In-Game Game Master
Joined: Mon Apr 15, 2019 8:12 pm
Byond Username: San7890
Github Username: san7890
Location: here
Contact:

Re: Get rid of the “Closed policy discussion” subform

Post by san7890 » #659043

This change was implemented this term (approved unanimously), so we think it should remain for at least the remainder of this term.
Simultaneously making both the best and worst jokes on the internet. I like looking at maps and code. Learn how to map today!. You may rate me here.
Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users