/tg/Station 13

As topic says, AC's have no place to provide feedback and can be difficult to provide information into the right places.

I would like to provide a solution, a Candidate User Master.

If a candidate has been causing issues the Candidate User Master can easily be pinged with appropriate information to be properly actioned.

While I understand that this can be a long and difficult process I would like to think we could find a strong, firm, admin to take up this mantle. As such I would like to nominate myself to oversee the admin candidates.

Naturally I would have the power to immediately demote any AC for any reason with impunity as well as complete control over their permissions in-game and in the discord.

Thank you for reading my proposal and I hope to better serve this community when this is inevitably accepted.

To speed along the process I have included an easy copy/paste for the headmins to use:

Ferret: Agree
DumbTiger:Agree
DumberOcelot:Agree

We could just throw up feedback posts from the point the admin gets perma AC and can operate on the servers unsupervised.

Timberpoes wrote: ↑Wed May 03, 2023 12:39 am We could just throw up feedback posts from the point the admin gets perma AC and can operate on the servers unsupervised.

Too elegant and not nearly enough bureaucracy.

Also doesn't give me the power to kill AC's with lasers from my eyes.

Also please ignore the unused viewtopic.php?f=37&t=3741.

Truly you are one the former headmins called Dumbidiots of all time.

I never even realised admincandidate was a rank you could get on longer than a per-round basis under trainer supervision. If they're trusted enough to get admin perms unsupervised on an indefinite basis isn't that the point at which they're effectively a trial admin?

Not-Dorsidarf wrote: ↑Thu May 04, 2023 9:17 am I never even realised admincandidate was a rank you could get on longer than a per-round basis under trainer supervision. If they're trusted enough to get admin perms unsupervised on an indefinite basis isn't that the point at which they're effectively a trial admin?

It's usually just for a week during the onboarding but we should still give me the power to wipe them off the face of the planet for looking at me wrong.

We don't particularly see the need for this.

As pointed out the candidate feedback thread existed despite being mostly unused: viewtopic.php?f=37&t=3741

The reality is that admin candidates have plenty of eyes on and receive plenty of feedback during their candidacy, which tends to be short in nature.