Rebalancing Bluespace Pipes

A place to record your ideas for the game.
Post Reply
User avatar
AnonymousNow
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 1:41 pm
Byond Username: AnonymousNow
Location: Neptune

Rebalancing Bluespace Pipes

Post by AnonymousNow » #348142

Bluespace pipes have recently been added, but it seems that they've already caused a considerable amount of salt, to the degree that a PR is already up for their removal.

It seems rather sad that a feature with such potential could be removed because a few people have figured out how to use it to great effectiveness, especially so shortly after its addition. I said as such in the PR, and Fwoosh invited me to post my suggestions here; I figured that this would be a great opportunity to invite other suggestions as to rebalancing this feature.

The main points of contention were that it "Literally lets you teleport gas anywhere on the station with zero gating, research requirements or mineral requirements". If this is the case, then there's plenty of opportunities for rebalancing in making it more difficult to acquire.

- First of all, a mineral gate would be a good idea. It would require materials to build, including bluespace crystals - likely more than other items which also require such crystals, due to being a constant portal open at a considerable pressure.
- A research gate is also wise, particularly if it involves relatively high bluespace research, such as requiring bluespace crystals.
- To this end, the Rapid Pipe Dispenser Machine could be upgraded to produce Bluespace piping, with the above materials and research requirements.
- The number of bluespace pipes that could be created could be set to a cap, even a low one at a pinch. It would be handwaved by dimensional stability or requiring paired-up frequencies in order to operate, attached via a multitool.
- Finally, removing the ability to build them, and instead making the only instances 1. Random Occurences/loot in Lavaland and 2. A single, consistently placed pair of bluespace pipes on the map every round, at a fair distance to each other, already built into the system and likely to cause catastrophic and obvious disaster if improperly removed.

These simple solutions help to, at the least, come up with ideas for fixing bluespace pipes without them needing to be removed. Of course, this isn't just limited to my ideas - you likely have better ones swimming around somewhere. Feel free to post them!

This thread is dedicated to Fwoosh, who went from zero to pissed so fast that I'm wondering if bluespace pipes killed his family.
Hornygranny wrote:It's not your codebase. It's our codebase. You can imply soft power as much as you want, but you don't have it. Division between the server and project is absolute. I'm not interested in reading dezzmont platitudes for the billionth time and won't be checking back in this thread.
Image

Image
Spoiler:
~Simplified for the sake of Wyzack's delicate feelings~
Fuck anti-roleplay suggestions and fuck Bay.

Xenomorphs a shit.
User avatar
christ110
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2016 4:40 am
Byond Username: Christ110

Re: Rebalancing Bluespace Pipes

Post by christ110 » #348144

Add a bluespace routing Machine to engineering that sucks up power (so much that it has to be wired into the engine) to keep the pipes running, add channels, and have the required power for the router increase as channels are added.
Dr_bee
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2016 6:31 pm
Byond Username: DrBee

Re: Rebalancing Bluespace Pipes

Post by Dr_bee » #348174

I mentioned in the other thread that cargo gating may be a good idea.

However thinking about it, just having 2 pipes at roundstart available to the CE with no ability to get more would be another solution. It would mean you need to do at least SOME pipework to flood burn mix. It could also be added as a traitor objective if you do that solution. Think, are they as powerful as other traitor objectives like the advanced magboots? if yes, limiting them to a certain, unreplacable amount would be a good idea.

Having them require significant power should be added either way, So much so that it would drain the APC in under 3 minutes without the engine running full blast and the APCs set correctly. It would give a tell as to where they are via the power monitoring console.
User avatar
Cobby
Code Maintainer
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:19 pm
Byond Username: ExcessiveUseOfCobby
Github Username: ExcessiveUseOfCobblestone

Re: Rebalancing Bluespace Pipes

Post by Cobby » #348181

QoL features with no gating...
Voted best trap in /tg/ 2014-current
User avatar
Armhulen
Global Moderator
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2016 4:30 pm
Byond Username: Armhulenn
Github Username: bazelart
Location: The Grand Tournament

Re: Rebalancing Bluespace Pipes

Post by Armhulen » #348182

ExcessiveJMadison wrote:QoL features with no gating...
yea
lzimann
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2014 5:13 am
Byond Username: Lzimann
Github Username: lzimann

Re: Rebalancing Bluespace Pipes

Post by lzimann » #348183

Limiting it to a pair would already make wonders, and a range limit would also be nice imo.
User avatar
Armhulen
Global Moderator
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2016 4:30 pm
Byond Username: Armhulenn
Github Username: bazelart
Location: The Grand Tournament

Re: Rebalancing Bluespace Pipes

Post by Armhulen » #348187

lzimann wrote:Limiting it to a pair would already make wonders, and a range limit would also be nice imo.
The whole point is that it has infinite range
User avatar
Anonmare
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2015 8:59 pm
Byond Username: Anonmare

Re: Rebalancing Bluespace Pipes

Post by Anonmare » #348191

What about having two bluespace pipes, connecting atmospherics and the mining base together?
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
CPTANT
Joined: Mon May 04, 2015 1:31 pm
Byond Username: CPTANT

Re: Rebalancing Bluespace Pipes

Post by CPTANT » #348192

Large power drain would be good.

Like serious power drain.
Timberpoes wrote: Tue Feb 14, 2023 3:21 pm The rules exist to create the biggest possible chance of a cool shift of SS13. They don't exist to allow admins to create the most boring interpretation of SS13.
User avatar
Cobby
Code Maintainer
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:19 pm
Byond Username: ExcessiveUseOfCobby
Github Username: ExcessiveUseOfCobblestone

Re: Rebalancing Bluespace Pipes

Post by Cobby » #348193

Then you could sabotage by just spamming pipes? They should be gated through availability rather than high maintenance
Voted best trap in /tg/ 2014-current
User avatar
cedarbridge
Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 12:24 am
Byond Username: Cedarbridge

Re: Rebalancing Bluespace Pipes

Post by cedarbridge » #348202

Armhulen wrote:
lzimann wrote:Limiting it to a pair would already make wonders, and a range limit would also be nice imo.
The whole point is that it has infinite range
They were pitched in the original PR as a means to get atmos fixed after being bombed (lol) but really they were added so you could flood plasma from science maint.
User avatar
Qbopper
Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2015 6:34 pm
Byond Username: Qbopper
Github Username: Qbopper
Location: Canada

Re: Rebalancing Bluespace Pipes

Post by Qbopper » #348210

make it so that if you try to pipe plasma through it the receiving pipe just explodes and kills the person who laid it, this is foolproof
Limey wrote:its too late.
User avatar
Anonmare
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2015 8:59 pm
Byond Username: Anonmare

Re: Rebalancing Bluespace Pipes

Post by Anonmare » #348211

Qbopper wrote:make it so that if you try to pipe plasma through it the receiving pipe just explodes and kills the person who laid it, this is foolproof
>Using plasma
>Not using superheated CO2
>Not using super cold N2
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Qbopper
Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2015 6:34 pm
Byond Username: Qbopper
Github Username: Qbopper
Location: Canada

Re: Rebalancing Bluespace Pipes

Post by Qbopper » #348216

Anonmare wrote:
Qbopper wrote:make it so that if you try to pipe plasma through it the receiving pipe just explodes and kills the person who laid it, this is foolproof
>Using plasma
>Not using superheated CO2
>Not using super cold N2
yeah, exactly

so if you're dumb and low effort enough to hook it up to the plasma tank you get punished as you deserve
Limey wrote:its too late.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users