Security/Command Exclusive Antag (but not really (but a little)), THE LAW

A place to record your ideas for the game.
Post Reply
User avatar
Pandarsenic
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 11:56 pm
Byond Username: Pandarsenic
Location: AI Upload

Security/Command Exclusive Antag (but not really (but a little)), THE LAW

Post by Pandarsenic » #637040

Rough idea: Roundstart security and command staff, depending on role, has a small chance of making exactly one player a thief-level antag, THE LAW, whose objective is to punish gray tide with excessive gulag sentences.

Why: Because if the tide doesn't fear the admins, they should at least fear THE LAW

Slightly more elaboration:

My suggestion would be to weight normal Sec Officers > Warden > HOS > other command staff ONLY IF NOT SELECTED AS ACTING CAPTAIN for this role. No Captain, and no latejoin/midround threat generation of this... unless y'all think it would be cool to have it generate late-round based on the "Station integrity" stat perhaps?

THE LAW isn't a true antag, but they're allowed and encouraged to foist excessive gulag sentences on anyone they believe is a threat to the stability of the station, confiscate items unrelated to the crimes someone has committed, lobby the Captain for approval of execution of people who probably aren't antags but who "deserve it," etc.

They receive a line in the round-end stats (not green or red, just a score card) of how many gulag points they assigned, how many of those points were actually fulfilled by prisoners, and possibly even how many antags (and nonantags) die in the map's "prisoner transfer" chamber, if that's not too hard to arrange.

My idea is brilliant, please applaud
(2:53:35 AM) scaredofshadows: how about head of robutts
I once wrote a guide to fixing telecomms woohoo
User avatar
terranaut
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2014 11:43 pm
Byond Username: Terranaut

Re: Security/Command Exclusive Antag (but not really (but a little)), THE LAW

Post by terranaut » #637194

yeah man giving someone free reign for gulagging people for 1000 points over littering cool idea
[πŸ…² 1] [πŸ†„ 1] [πŸ…Ό 1]

Image
User avatar
Stickymayhem
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 6:13 pm
Byond Username: Stickymayhem

Re: Security/Command Exclusive Antag (but not really (but a little)), THE LAW

Post by Stickymayhem » #637196

terranaut wrote: ↑Mon Apr 11, 2022 6:37 am yeah man giving someone free reign for gulagging people for 1000 points over littering cool idea
I also think it's a very cool idea!
Image
Image
Boris wrote:Sticky is a jackass who has worms where his brain should be, but he also gets exactly what SS13 should be
Super Aggro Crag wrote: ↑Wed Oct 13, 2021 6:17 pm Dont engage with sticky he's a subhuman
User avatar
datorangebottle
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2019 9:53 am
Byond Username: Datorangebottle

Re: Security/Command Exclusive Antag (but not really (but a little)), THE LAW

Post by datorangebottle » #637203

terranaut wrote: ↑Mon Apr 11, 2022 6:37 am yeah man giving someone free reign for gulagging people for 1000 points over littering cool idea
clonk
Pick up that can.
Timberpoes wrote: ↑Sat Jul 29, 2023 10:33 pm ImageAnother satisfied Timberpoes voter.Image
Timberpoes wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2023 9:16 pm I highly doubt any other admin on the team would have given you this chance, except maybe Kieth because his brain worms are almost as bad as mine.
Vekter wrote: ↑Tue May 16, 2023 4:45 pm At what point does someone's refusal or failure to improve become malice in and of itself? If you give someone a year to stop shitting on the carpet and they keep doing it but get slightly closer to the bathroom every time and sometimes they get to the toilet before it happens, at what point does it become acceptable to just ask them to go shit in someone else's house?
Timberpoes wrote: ↑Fri Apr 28, 2023 7:00 pm I'm sorry, can we get a real player to resolve this appeal? I don't like this trial player. They can't even set their own name.
Chadley wrote: ↑Thu Apr 27, 2023 4:00 am WENDEZ, cute, cute. I imagine the sleeper activation code when I hear it. That's pretty cool. qB). But I don't like that it doesn't line up to be anything obsurd like WEWLAD. 6/10

SUGMA, nevermind it makes sense now. fuckyou/10
kieth4 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 15, 2023 2:34 pm If it goes to appeals I will stand as the shield and protect this man's right to shit himself. Heavy is the head that wears the crown.
sinfulbliss wrote: ↑I almost prefer Rave's AI-generated "We cannot accept this appeal at this time. If you would like assistance appealing in the future, please dial 1-800-1984-1488."
Pandarsenic wrote: ↑Mon Dec 12, 2022 2:25 pm I think we can all agree that someone throwing a reverse revolver at Zyb as a secret test of character, and Zyb immediately fucking himself with it, is the best thing we all could have received for Christmas this year
User avatar
terranaut
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2014 11:43 pm
Byond Username: Terranaut

Re: Security/Command Exclusive Antag (but not really (but a little)), THE LAW

Post by terranaut » #637205

if you try that with me i will hold you in violation of the NAP and exterminate your bloodline
[πŸ…² 1] [πŸ†„ 1] [πŸ…Ό 1]

Image
User avatar
FantasticFwoosh
Joined: Mon May 04, 2015 11:25 pm
Byond Username: FantasticFwoosh

Re: Security/Command Exclusive Antag (but not really (but a little)), THE LAW

Post by FantasticFwoosh » #637240

I feel like you've read my thread then paraphrased the gimmick of "true-law" into its own thing without the afterthought that with that one particular revolution outcome, i made the station be harmless criminal atagonists to justify all of the security force being "LAW"'ers in normal parameters. Everyone enjoys both halves
Normally im all for silly things, but i don't like this idea very much in a normal station setting because of how singular it is, and it will probably clog up administrator attention given how little autonomy regular antagonists are given on servers like manuel.
Off Topic
Post edited, i was having a bad day.

Spoiler:
Image
Image
User avatar
Pandarsenic
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 11:56 pm
Byond Username: Pandarsenic
Location: AI Upload

Re: Security/Command Exclusive Antag (but not really (but a little)), THE LAW

Post by Pandarsenic » #637245

FantasticFwoosh wrote: ↑Mon Apr 11, 2022 1:32 pm I feel like you've read my thread then paraphrased the gimmick of "true-law" into its own thing without the afterthought that with that one particular revolution outcome, i made the station be harmless criminal atagonists to justify all of the security force being "LAW"'ers in normal parameters. Everyone enjoys both halves
Normally im all for silly things, but i don't like this idea very much in a normal station setting because of how singular it is, i think there will be drama about petty-peanuts metaplayers who will constantly catapult themselves into trouble knowing how meta-far to take it (uhuh im going to maxcap myself for lawful purposes) or salty admins will see red and with a usual lack of confidence, make themselves look silly as securitnuts pile up on faulty notes. /rant over.
If I'm totally honest, this thread is mostly the fault of the suggestion to remove security's antag protections.

Back in The Day, a lot of players would roll sec antag not with the goal of fucking over the station, but simply having Unlimited License to fuck over serial tiders, and I think that was important. You just didn't know if you were going to HEEHAW SLIP AND STUN THE SEC OFFICER DURING ARRESTS only to get brought to the brig, taken into maintenance, and absorbed by the Changeling Warden.

What I want here is:

1) The arrest must be good in the first place. You must be able to explain why they deserve it beyond "lol lizard" or "he shoved me out of the way so he could use the vendor when I was AFK in front of it."
2) The tider should have the fear of god put into them. If you're dicking around and being unpleasant, not every round but some rounds there will be THE LAW who can do whatever they want to shut down your shittery. Previously, I would say "Gib them with a shuttle" (almost invariably what I do when I get Command Antag status and there's a tider) but for this not-really-antag role, I want them to be extremely mean to the tide without going into the possibility of round removal.
(2:53:35 AM) scaredofshadows: how about head of robutts
I once wrote a guide to fixing telecomms woohoo
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users