[No Longer Admin] Cedarbridge

User avatar
cedarbridge
Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 12:24 am
Byond Username: Cedarbridge

Re: Cedarbridge

Post by cedarbridge » #333090

Bottom post of the previous page:

Sligneris wrote:appears to like a dead game
I can even blame it for getting me a girl.
bman
Github User
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 4:55 pm
Byond Username: Basilman
Github Username: Militaires

Re: Cedarbridge

Post by bman » #333266

cedarbridge wrote:
Sligneris wrote:appears to like a dead game
I can even blame it for getting me a girl.
he got a multicolor-haired, nose-pierced, obese game grill
User avatar
Lazengann
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 2:26 pm
Byond Username: Lazengann

Re: Cedarbridge

Post by Lazengann » #333271

Cedar confirmed for our guy
User avatar
Deitus
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2015 5:26 pm
Byond Username: Deitus

Re: Cedarbridge

Post by Deitus » #354163

one of my least favorite admins to deal with. dont see him on often and ahelps are usually met with sarcasm, condescension, and general unprofessionalism. im sure this will be chalked up to "deitus is just being salty" but i've felt this way for some time now, just never cared enough to post it here.
Image
User avatar
BeeSting12
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2016 1:11 am
Byond Username: BeeSting12
Github Username: BeeSting12
Location: 'Murica

Re: Cedarbridge

Post by BeeSting12 » #354169

I usually see cedar as the only admin online whenever i log into sybil
Edward Sloan, THE LAW
Melanie Flowers, Catgirl
Borgasm, Cyborg
Spoiler:
OOC: Hunterh98: to be fair sloan is one of the, if not the, most robust folks on tg

DEAD: Schlomo Gaskin says, "sloan may be a faggot but he gets the job done"

DEAD: Rei Ayanami says, "YOU'RE EVERYWHERE WHERE BAD SHIT IS HAPPENING"
DEAD: Rei Ayanami says, "IT'S ALWAYS FUCKING EDWARD SLOAN"
oranges wrote:Bee sting is honestly the nicest admin, I look forward to seeing him as a headmin one day
[2020-05-21 01:21:48.923] SAY: Crippo/(Impala Chainee) "Shaggy Voice - She like... wants to get Eiffel Towered bro!!" (Brig (125, 166, 2))
hows my driving?
User avatar
oranges
Code Maintainer
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
Byond Username: Optimumtact
Github Username: optimumtact
Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED

Re: Cedarbridge

Post by oranges » #354188

hard to tell if thats a compliment though
User avatar
cedarbridge
Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 12:24 am
Byond Username: Cedarbridge

Re: Cedarbridge

Post by cedarbridge » #354198

Deitus wrote:one of my least favorite admins to deal with. dont see him on often and ahelps are usually met with sarcasm, condescension, and general unprofessionalism. im sure this will be chalked up to "deitus is just being salty" but i've felt this way for some time now, just never cared enough to post it here.
When I give a straight forward ruling and you respond implying that there's some sort of admin conspiracy to change the rule for you and only you, you bet I'm going to be as sarcastic as the implication deserves.
User avatar
oranges
Code Maintainer
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
Byond Username: Optimumtact
Github Username: optimumtact
Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED

Re: Cedarbridge

Post by oranges » #354228

deitus hating an admin is a compliment
User avatar
Deitus
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2015 5:26 pm
Byond Username: Deitus

Re: Cedarbridge

Post by Deitus » #354308

cedarbridge wrote:
Deitus wrote:one of my least favorite admins to deal with. dont see him on often and ahelps are usually met with sarcasm, condescension, and general unprofessionalism. im sure this will be chalked up to "deitus is just being salty" but i've felt this way for some time now, just never cared enough to post it here.
When I give a straight forward ruling and you respond implying that there's some sort of admin conspiracy to change the rule for you and only you, you bet I'm going to be as sarcastic as the implication deserves.
>be rev
>kill nonrev who is attacking other revs
>*BWOINK* hey why are you attacking unimplanted nonrevs?
>be unimplanted nonrev
>guy i dunked in previous round oh-so-happens to be in my department this shift
>leaves immediately upon hearing of revs
>comes back later, slips me, welds me in a locker, and taunts me before spacing me
>"no thats ok"
>"no you're paranoid we're not cherrypicking rulings"

really gets my noggin joggin.

also, you were immediately sarcastic in reply to my initial ahelp, and when i noted this you replied with, and i quote, "your salt is noted xd." this generally snarky attitude is something that i see regularly both in discord, site, and game, and my feedback reflects that.

be sure to pull up all my past notes to try and discredit me, though. surprised it didnt happen with the first reply.
Image
User avatar
cedarbridge
Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 12:24 am
Byond Username: Cedarbridge

Re: Cedarbridge

Post by cedarbridge » #354329

Deitus wrote:be sure to pull up all my past notes to try and discredit me, though. surprised it didnt happen with the first reply.
Who needs your notes for that?

If you wanted to discredit yourself you should have just asked for the logs of that conversation.
Spoiler:
[21:30:08]ADMINPRIVATE: PM: Deitus/(Jonathan Talist)->Cedarbridge/(Dreams-of-Trees): since when is being rev a go-ahead to grief random people if they're not heads?
[21:30:32]ADMINPRIVATE: PM: Cedarbridge/(Dreams-of-Trees)->Deitus/(Jonathan Talist): Since when were revs limited to only attacking/killing/spacing heads?
[21:30:58]ADMINPRIVATE: PM: Deitus/(Jonathan Talist)->Cedarbridge/(Dreams-of-Trees): ive been bwoinked before for killing nonrevs and now it so happens its ok when it happens to me. wew lad
[21:31:11]ADMINPRIVATE: PM: Cedarbridge/(Dreams-of-Trees)->Deitus/(Jonathan Talist): You're right. Its a conspiracy
[21:31:29]ADMINPRIVATE: PM: Deitus/(Jonathan Talist)->Cedarbridge/(Dreams-of-Trees): no, its cherrypicking stupidity. but i expect no less
[21:31:41]ADMINPRIVATE: PM: Cedarbridge/(Dreams-of-Trees)->Deitus/(Jonathan Talist): Your salt is noted
[21:31:50]ADMINPRIVATE: PM: Deitus/(Jonathan Talist)->Cedarbridge/(Dreams-of-Trees): as is your incompetence
[21:31:55]ADMINPRIVATE: PM: Cedarbridge/(Dreams-of-Trees)->Deitus/(Jonathan Talist): xd
You asked a question that I then answered with a question. The answer to my question (they aren't limited to only headhunting heads.) answers your question. You take this ruling to imply that you're subject to some sort of cherrypicking admin conspiracy because people don't like you. I confirm your fears of said admin conspiracy while really having no real reason to care who you are or what rep you've built around here short of your notes (which I checked at that time because frankly I don't have enough contact with you to know or care who you are.) You call me a mean word. I respond with "xd" and that's really more response than the barb deserved.

If you want to be taken seriously, I'd suggest not making dumb accusations that instantly discredit your inquiry. Your response that I would have to cite to your other notes (which are, for the record, ample even apart from the meme notes/bans) is pretty telling, frankly. You find a lot of really dumb ways to get into trouble on your own. If I knew or cared enough about you individually to care about banning you, I'd certainly not need to invent reasons to do so.
Last edited by cedarbridge on Mon Nov 06, 2017 2:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Nilons
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2016 5:38 pm
Byond Username: NIlons
Location: Canada

Re: Cedarbridge

Post by Nilons » #354330

Deitus how far do you intend to get when your primary complaint is "was very sarcastic to me"

Some feedback for cedar is goodmin as fuck tells shitters like it is

Edit: Being bwoinked =/= action was taken. It just means an admin wanted to clear something up. An admin bwoinking you in and of itself does not mean what you're doing is against the rules.
I play Ostrava of Nanotrasen (good name) and Rolls-The-Bones (Crag Given name god bless)
Signature Memes
Image

Image
Image
User avatar
Qbmax32
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 4:05 am
Byond Username: Qbmax32
Github Username: qbmax32
Location: in your walls

Re: Cedarbridge

Post by Qbmax32 » #354333

The deitard gets salty for no reason sometimes, he will calm down eventually
my admin feedback thread


quotes
Spoiler:
wesoda25 wrote: Wed Mar 03, 2021 5:02 am Qbmax32 is quite literally one of the dumbest individuals I have ever had the misfortune of coming into contact with. He has zero redeemable traits, and honestly I have to suppress my gag reflex every time he shows up in a conversation.
Malkraz wrote:YES
DRINK THE PISS QB
angelstarri wrote:qbmax is a retard
imsxz wrote:mythic please stop you’ve hit rock bottom and you KEEP DIGGING
deedubya wrote:I'll defend to the death your right to scream "NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER" on a constant basis, but I'll also equally defend the right of people to call you a fuckin' pillock for doing it.
datorangebottle wrote:what, not having to act like customer service in a volunteer customer service position?

Here's a rebuttal: you're literally in a customer service slash celebrity position. Volunteer or not.
Malkraz wrote:can you stop posting this shit
Nalzul wrote:Fuck Blob (can you imagine how hot it would be to be gangbanged by a bunch of blobbernauts, the blob, and spores)
Wyzack wrote:qbmax your pathetic display of abhorrent burgercraft has brought shame onto the omnivores
Plapatin wrote:i AM the senate
BONERMASTER wrote:I am a big thinker, and it would only be logical if my character had a big head as well. And glasses. Because only people that think, wear glasses.
feem wrote:i tried to send canisters of urine to the station but ended up turning all oxygen into urine and breaking lavaland and also breathing
Anonmare wrote:Each post in this thread can't settle on what it wants to be, but yet, each one is more cursed than the last.
Beesting12 wrote:please write an apology to this forums, this community, the host, and the internet as a whole for the data storage space you wasted with this complaint.
Vile Beggar wrote:i don't like this thread
imsxz wrote:nervore
FantasticFwoosh wrote:I will whisper sweet nothings that will confuse and perhaps scare you a little, but enhance the experience no-less.
afelinidisfinetoo wrote:By the way, the person who posted that catgirl porn on the github page was me. If anyone wants my private stash just PM me
Nervere wrote:Anything for a femoid.....
Qbopper wrote:I'm a dumb poopy butthead
CitrusGender wrote:god i love it when people feed me my own fried legs
User avatar
Deitus
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2015 5:26 pm
Byond Username: Deitus

Re: Cedarbridge

Post by Deitus » #354341

Nilons wrote:Deitus how far do you intend to get when your primary complaint is "was very sarcastic to me"

Some feedback for cedar is goodmin as fuck tells shitters like it is

Edit: Being bwoinked =/= action was taken. It just means an admin wanted to clear something up. An admin bwoinking you in and of itself does not mean what you're doing is against the rules.
as ive said, its an attitude they have shown multiple times in and out of my interactions with them. being snarky right off the bat isn't "telling shitters like it is," its just having a poor attitude. and yes, i was bwoinked and warned not to hurt nonrevs as a rev before, so a stance was made clear at the time.
for the record, the conversation went something along the lines of
-"hey can you ask [player] why they spaced me? i get that they're rev but it seems kind of shitty they come after me specifically as nonrev"
-"since when are revs not completely able to attack nonrevs?"
-"well i've been bwoinked for it before so i thought it should be the same here"
-"you're right it some massive conspiracy against you"
-"well it seems kind of stupid that admins cherrypick rulings like that"
-"your salt is noted"
-"as is your attitude"
-"xd"
-(your ticket has been closed)

most admins i deal with are
question>clarification>answer
but cedar tends to be
question>sarcasm>attempted clarification>lol whatever>ticket closed

sorry, but thats not cool. maybe cedar's a super nice guy to others but they're usually an unsolicited dick to me.

Qbmax32 wrote:The deitard gets salty for no reason sometimes, he will calm down eventuallu
fugg u qbnerd >:^((((
Image
User avatar
cedarbridge
Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 12:24 am
Byond Username: Cedarbridge

Re: Cedarbridge

Post by cedarbridge » #354343

Deitus wrote: for the record, the conversation went something along the lines of
The logs are literally in my post. Its really hard to take you seriously when you do this.
User avatar
Deitus
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2015 5:26 pm
Byond Username: Deitus

Re: Cedarbridge

Post by Deitus » #354369

cedarbridge wrote:
Deitus wrote: for the record, the conversation went something along the lines of
The logs are literally in my post. Its really hard to take you seriously when you do this.
not even an argument, but sure, i'll take the bait.

setting aside the fact that the post was edited, i find it rather amusing that you are so quick to bring up missed points in posts given the recent cat thread where i repeatedly stated my opinion multiple times despite you and other posters ignoring it and your arguments simply boiling down to little more than "lol deitus is bad disregard," something that you continue to do now. past behavior does not discredit current topics, and believe it or not, i have been trying to change my behavior recently, which makes it all the more aggravating when literally years-old notes are brought up for no reason. your replies here also speak volumes to my points that you are generally condescending and apathetic towards the playerbase and your job on a whole with the "ehhh im ABOVE caring about such small matters you lowly player!" attitude.

this is an admin feedback thread, and here's my feedback: you are not a good admin. you need a major attitude adjustment and you need to drop the snarky holier-than-thou approach to your interactions with other players. this has been a continued behavior on your part and it needs to stop.
Image
User avatar
captain sawrge
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 6:13 pm
Byond Username: Sawrge

Re: Cedarbridge

Post by captain sawrge » #354370

I know him and I have disagreed in the past but Im gonna come out and say it: deitus is 100% in the right
Image
User avatar
Qbopper
Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2015 6:34 pm
Byond Username: Qbopper
Github Username: Qbopper
Location: Canada

Re: Cedarbridge

Post by Qbopper » #354379

i feel like this should be an admin complaint
Limey wrote:its too late.
User avatar
cedarbridge
Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 12:24 am
Byond Username: Cedarbridge

Re: Cedarbridge

Post by cedarbridge » #354417

Deitus wrote:this is an admin feedback thread, and here's my feedback: you are not a good admin.
Your feedback has been noted. Thanks for posting!
User avatar
Lazengann
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 2:26 pm
Byond Username: Lazengann

Re: Cedarbridge

Post by Lazengann » #354460

Cedar posts like he's burned out
User avatar
cedarbridge
Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 12:24 am
Byond Username: Cedarbridge

Re: Cedarbridge

Post by cedarbridge » #354461

Lazengann wrote:Cedar posts like he's burned out
Not yet but probably getting there. Mostly, I have very little patience for inane conspiracy theories.
User avatar
Shadowflame909
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2017 10:18 pm
Byond Username: Shadowflame909
Location: Think about something witty and pretend I put it here

Re: Cedarbridge

Post by Shadowflame909 » #392210

They're a good firm, but fair admin. Pretty active on Sybil as well.
► Show Spoiler
User avatar
oranges
Code Maintainer
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
Byond Username: Optimumtact
Github Username: optimumtact
Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED

Re: Cedarbridge

Post by oranges » #427231

Image
User avatar
cedarbridge
Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 12:24 am
Byond Username: Cedarbridge

Re: Cedarbridge

Post by cedarbridge » #484194

Bumping my own thread because you can't tell me what to do.
User avatar
Nabski
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 5:42 pm
Byond Username: Nabski
Github Username: Nabski89
Location: TN

Re: Cedarbridge

Post by Nabski » #484198

This "man" is a bully and always would steal my agendas.
User avatar
cedarbridge
Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 12:24 am
Byond Username: Cedarbridge

Re: Cedarbridge

Post by cedarbridge » #484352

Nabski wrote:This "man" is a bully and always would steal my agendas.
NESEI making new sets in FFG's place friendo. The dream lives on.
User avatar
Nabski
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 5:42 pm
Byond Username: Nabski
Github Username: Nabski89
Location: TN

Re: Cedarbridge

Post by Nabski » #484435

I liked the runners that retired and came back as connections. I read the spoilers but haven't touched the game in like a year.
User avatar
elyina
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 7:30 pm
Byond Username: Elyina
Location: burning in hell for my sins

Re: Cedarbridge

Post by elyina » #485784

I really like Cedarbridge, every interaction I've had with him in adminhelp has been pleasant, and he has good judgement. When he is handling an adminhelp I sent or I was involved in I know I'm in good hands.
Image
User avatar
lmwevil
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2015 3:09 pm
Byond Username: Lmwevil

Re: Cedarbridge

Post by lmwevil » #485788

obsessively reads FNR like me, makes me feel less weird +1 for bridges but i dunno about cedars :geek:
User avatar
cedarbridge
Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 12:24 am
Byond Username: Cedarbridge

Re: Cedarbridge

Post by cedarbridge » #570538

Don't post in my thread.
User avatar
Domitius
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2019 3:30 am
Byond Username: Domitius
Github Username: DomitiusKnack

Re: Cedarbridge

Post by Domitius » #570581

Revives dead threads and talks about their pogs too much. 8/10.
User avatar
Domitius
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2019 3:30 am
Byond Username: Domitius
Github Username: DomitiusKnack

Re: [No Longer Admin] Cedarbridge

Post by Domitius » #590048

Gave me my first note. Can't wait for you to come back and put people through some walls. Take care!
Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot]