Poopy pants nut.

[Turbonerd]

Bottom post of the previous page:

viewtopic.php?f=7&t=33817

Goon seems like the perfect place for him.

[iwishforducks]

lots of opinions about the clown pooping

[kayozz]

If we're not allowing scatalogical humour then why do we even have toilets on the station? Do our characters poo or not?

[Jacquerel]

If we're not allowing scatalogical humour then why do we even have toilets on the station? Do our characters poo or not?

The reason scientists are always making toilets out of different materials and scanning them is to try to figure out what they are for. It's basically the main reason the department exists, and by extension the rest of the station which is there to support their research.

[Striders13]

so called "shitters" when they need to enter the bathroom

[kieth4]

Wouldn't want to see it every round, but infrequently shitting yourself is fine imo

[LeekiLoku]

Wouldn't want to see it every round, but infrequently shitting yourself is fine imo

I feel like it was a fun and different gimmick, I think there was no harm done.

[massa]

BANNED FOR POOP JOKES AS CLOWN ON THE SPACE STATION GAME

HOLY FUCK BRUH

@headmins GET THESE MF ON A LEASH

[LeekiLoku]

BANNED FOR POOP JOKES AS CLOWN ON THE SPACE STATION GAME

HOLY FUCK BRUH

@headmins GET THESE MF ON A LEASH

It was a note not ban. I think at least.

[Jacquerel]

infrequently shitting yourself is fine imo

[conrad]

The next person who says it was a ban will have their entire neighbourhood carpet bombed with bouncy balls for being stoopid.

[sinfulbliss]

of course it wasn’t a ban because it wasn’t AGAINST THE RULES

personally i find it worse that it was a note instead of a ban because most people don’t appeal notes, so who knows how many other notes similar to this are levied without appeal…

[Turbonerd]

of course it wasn’t a ban because it wasn’t AGAINST THE RULES

personally i find it worse that it was a note instead of a ban because most people don’t appeal notes, so who knows how many other notes similar to this are levied without appeal…

Notes are just words.

[iwishforducks]

sinful chill bro it’s literally just a clown shitting himself

[BONERMASTER]

First shitty ruling of this term!


With floating regards
-BONERMASTER

[MooCow12]

The way the clown was describing themselves having to poop really makes me think they belong on an HRP server.

[Misdoubtful]

infrequently shitting yourself is fine imo

of course it wasn’t a ban because it wasn’t AGAINST THE RULES

personally i find it worse that it was a note instead of a ban because most people don’t appeal notes, so who knows how many other notes similar to this are levied without appeal…

No need to get all constipated about it.

[Armhulen]

The way the clown was describing themselves having to poop really makes me think they belong on an HRP server.

>clown pretending to constantly need to run to the bathroom and shit because of taco bell and welding fuel is roleplaying better than the majority of tg players

[iwishforducks]

@armhulen what monkey was the ban appealer

[Armhulen]

@armhulen what monkey was the ban appealer

i dont know what youre askking me

[iwishforducks]

bloons tower defense 6 monkey tower you fool. what is their pfp

[Armhulen]

they have no profile pic so no monkey sadly

[Thranos]

The way the clown was describing themselves having to poop really makes me think they belong on an HRP server.

>clown pretending to constantly need to run to the bathroom and shit because of taco bell and welding fuel is roleplaying better than the majority of tg players

That just makes it even funnier, honestly.
Putting high effort into the lowest effort kind of humor is peak clowning.

IE radio emoting hotmic'd 'Dream On' followed by a loud sizzling splash before your mic cuts off only for the crew to later realize you jumped into the Ice Moon lava river and suffer a comedy aneurism when they put two and two together.

[ZealousZeke]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FveF-we6lcE

[Fren256]

Let this mf poop!!!

[iwishforducks]

they have no profile pic so no monkey sadly

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=coY2IA-oBvw

[ZealousZeke]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vgM_ZOMFHZ8

[Indie-ana Jones]

Note should get removed, it's pretty much common knowledge that notes really are punishments (since they make it easier to dunk on you for unrelated things later) and I don't see why this deserves punishment. It's a clown. Doing a gimmick. If he does it again, you'll probably know about it and then noting or banning him would make sense. I think this was a bad choice by the headmin team.

[Striders13]

If he does it again, you'll probably know about it and then noting or banning him would make sense.

Admins are not a hivemind and don't intrinsically know about every ticket or appeal that ever happened.

[TheSmallBlue]

Wouldn't want to see it every round, but infrequently shitting yourself is fine imo

it is now policy that players can infrequently shit themselves in game thank you headmin

[Indie-ana Jones]

Admins are not a hivemind and don't intrinsically know about every ticket or appeal that ever happened.

That's fair, but how often you do genuinely think this guy is going to do this gimmick? I don't think it was worth the warning, if you really had to, a conversation about it would suffice.

[datorangebottle]

of course it wasn’t a ban because it wasn’t AGAINST THE RULES

personally i find it worse that it was a note instead of a ban because most people don’t appeal notes, so who knows how many other notes similar to this are levied without appeal…

They're also much harder to appeal because of the rules around appealing notes.
A remarkably shitty note, and also a remarkably shitty joke. What a crappy thread!

[BeeSting12]

Admins are not a hivemind and don't intrinsically know about every ticket or appeal that ever happened.

That's fair, but how often you do genuinely think this guy is going to do this gimmick? I don't think it was worth the warning, if you really had to, a conversation about it would suffice.

I personally think this is what expiration notes are for. Don't want to see the gimmick again for a month? Put a note that expires in a month. No mark on their permanent record and it still achieves the stated purpose of making sure it doesn't happen too often.

[Bawhoppennn]

Note should get removed, it's pretty much common knowledge that notes really are punishments (since they make it easier to dunk on you for unrelated things later) and I don't see why this deserves punishment. It's a clown. Doing a gimmick. If he does it again, you'll probably know about it and then noting or banning him would make sense. I think this was a bad choice by the headmin team.

Imagine being one of the admins that claims notes aren't actually punishments

[Misdoubtful]

Admins are not a hivemind and don't intrinsically know about every ticket or appeal that ever happened.

That's fair, but how often you do genuinely think this guy is going to do this gimmick? I don't think it was worth the warning, if you really had to, a conversation about it would suffice.

I personally think this is what expiration notes are for. Don't want to see the gimmick again for a month? Put a note that expires in a month. No mark on their permanent record and it still achieves the stated purpose of making sure it doesn't happen too often.

I'm gonna be real. In hindsight. I don't think we even considered this approach this time around, but we have considered it for other things.

Admins are not a hivemind and don't intrinsically know about every ticket or appeal that ever happened.

That's fair, but how often you do genuinely think this guy is going to do this gimmick? I don't think it was worth the warning, if you really had to, a conversation about it would suffice.

If it's not noted and they run into 20 different admins because we have 100+ admins how many times have they gotten away with it through a conversation without a noted record happening? What if some admins forget and it happens to be more than one conversation with them?

Please think more about this. We need notes because we are HUGE. This isn't a mom and pop single server environment with the same 50-60 people day in and day out. In those spaces I didn't even need to note people because I knew EVERYTHING that was going on regardless and I knew everyone personally. And accountability wasn't big like on TG.

[kayozz]

Remove fart emote when?

[Armhulen]

Note should get removed, it's pretty much common knowledge that notes really are punishments (since they make it easier to dunk on you for unrelated things later) and I don't see why this deserves punishment. It's a clown. Doing a gimmick. If he does it again, you'll probably know about it and then noting or banning him would make sense. I think this was a bad choice by the headmin team.

Imagine being one of the admins that claims notes aren't actually punishments

dear god man in the current year
WHOOOOO BAWHOPPEN WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

[Bawhoppennn]

does Vekter still say they aren't punishments

[Armhulen]

i'll let him speak for himself but as far as i'm aware, not for a year

[Bawhoppennn]

thank you Arm for enlightening me about the current dominant admin schools of thought

I feel we've all learned a lot from this thread

[sinfulbliss]

Admins are not a hivemind and don't intrinsically know about every ticket or appeal that ever happened.

That's fair, but how often you do genuinely think this guy is going to do this gimmick? I don't think it was worth the warning, if you really had to, a conversation about it would suffice.

If it's not noted and they run into 20 different admins because we have 100+ admins how many times have they gotten away with it through a conversation without a noted record happening? What if some admins forget and it happens to be more than one conversation with them?

Please think more about this. We need notes because we are HUGE. This isn't a mom and pop single server environment with the same 50-60 people day in and day out. In those spaces I didn't even need to note people because I knew EVERYTHING that was going on regardless and I knew everyone personally. And accountability wasn't big like on TG.

Makes sense for admins to note some conversations, else no one would know they happened, but not all conversations have to be noted. IMO it only makes sense to note it if it's something that's actually negatively impacted the round in some tangible way, otherwise it feels like a punishment for not much reason. And most players aren't going to appeal a simple note so it seems they should be treated seriously, not just as a checkbox to fill in after your ticket.

I find that the more you engage with the round, in a real way that impacts it and creates action/conflict, the more likely you are to run into bwoinks and by extension notes. And that's fine, but players should feel empowered to try out their slightly dangerous/odd/wacky ideas and gimmicks, and noting incredibly minor things like this ends up stifling them in the longrun and bubblewrapping the game for the 0.1% of people that decide to take issue with it.

[kieth4]

Look, the reason we upheld and edited the note is because I wouldn't want some guy shitting himself every single round. It's funny once or twice but can you imagine how stale it would get if it was allowed to be done often? All the creepy stuff is removed from the note too to signify that this was just a gimmick. Take the note as a mark of prise and move onto the next gimmick.

[BONERMASTER]

Look, the reason we upheld and edited the note is because I wouldn't want some guy shitting himself every single round. It's funny once or twice but can you imagine how stale it would get if it was allowed to be done often? All the creepy stuff is removed from the note too to signify that this was just a gimmick. Take the note as a mark of prise and move onto the next gimmick.

Was it funny? - Yes
Was it against the rules? - No
Was he punished anyway? - Yes

And now you're here justifying it like "We can NOT risk this man slipping through our net of hundreds of admins and soiling himself more than we want to." Like, can't a man even take a shit without administrative action around here? God damnit!


With stinky regards
-BONERMASTER

[sinfulbliss]

Look, the reason we upheld and edited the note is because I wouldn't want some guy shitting himself every single round. It's funny once or twice but can you imagine how stale it would get if it was allowed to be done often? All the creepy stuff is removed from the note too to signify that this was just a gimmick. Take the note as a mark of prise and move onto the next gimmick.

yeah that's fair, but he only did it a single time right? if making poop jokes gets a note then it sorta implies it's never ok for someone to make poop jokes unless they wanna catch a bwoink and note

especially considering it was a clown that did it as a clown gimmick and not just some weird assistant being gross

i wont shed tears over it though i really don't care about a lack of poop jokes. just kind of weird that it would require administrative action

[kieth4]

Look, the reason we upheld and edited the note is because I wouldn't want some guy shitting himself every single round. It's funny once or twice but can you imagine how stale it would get if it was allowed to be done often? All the creepy stuff is removed from the note too to signify that this was just a gimmick. Take the note as a mark of prise and move onto the next gimmick.

Was it funny? - Yes
Was it against the rules? - No
Was he punished anyway? - Yes

And now you're here justifying it like "We can NOT risk this man slipping through our net of hundreds of admins and soiling himself more than we want to." Like, can't a man even take a shit without administrative action around here? God damnit!


With stinky regards
-BONERMASTER

Look, the reason we upheld and edited the note is because I wouldn't want some guy shitting himself every single round. It's funny once or twice but can you imagine how stale it would get if it was allowed to be done often? All the creepy stuff is removed from the note too to signify that this was just a gimmick. Take the note as a mark of prise and move onto the next gimmick.

yeah that's fair, but he only did it a single time right? if making poop jokes gets a note then it sorta implies it's never ok for someone to make poop jokes unless they wanna catch a bwoink and note

especially considering it was a clown that did it as a clown gimmick and not just some weird assistant being gross

i wont shed tears over it though i really don't care about a lack of poop jokes. just kind of weird that it would require administrative action

The new note is, "As a clown, did a gimmick about bathroom humor and needing to go to the bathroom. Was understanding when asked not to make it a routine occurrence."

This doesn't stop him from doing his gimmick, it's just saying hey don't do this every round. I think that's okish, as I said earlier I don't want someone shitting themselves every round

[Timberpoes]

Kieth is now the system. How the burdens of responsibility change a man.

[Not-Dorsidarf]

Thanks kieth, my sig was getting stale.

Now I can shit post in style

[sinfulbliss]

The new note is, "As a clown, did a gimmick about bathroom humor and needing to go to the bathroom. Was understanding when asked not to make it a routine occurrence."

This doesn't stop him from doing his gimmick, it's just saying hey don't do this every round. I think that's okish, as I said earlier I don't want someone shitting themselves every round

I feel like — although the note implies he CAN do it again — if the same fatherless individual that ahelped this ahelps again, the admin would read between the lines and ban them for poop RP because they already got a note for it, and doing the same thing you got noted for is generally escalated to a ban. So they will probably be smart to never do it again, which is effectively banning the behavior by precedent.

[sinfulbliss]

Kieth is now the system. How the burdens of responsibility change a man.

I refuse to believe Kieth, in his heart of hearts, thinks poop RP is noteworthy. I suspect it is a matter of picking one’s battles where one would’ve otherwise been overruled regardless.

Not that any of this matters because it’s at the end of the day a pooping clown. I can make peace with the idea of poop RP being against the rules, even if my heart tells me “NO!!”

[sinfulbliss]

I’m going to triplepost because there’s nothing you can do to stop me.

This is sort of the issue with these “ERM… ITS TECHNICALLY TOTALLY FINE BUT…. EUGHH! DONT DO IT ANYMORE PLEASE” notes. It’s like. It ain’t against the rules but people sorta dislike it and there’s a decent argument to be made it’d be better for the servers if it didn’t exist, so it gets wham bam 1984 “frequency” noted thank you ma’am’d, since the rules weren’t invented to micromanage RP and gimmicks but sometimes admins want to reserve the right to do that For The Continued Health Of The Servers.

Which it’s like… Sure man. But if we’re drawing the quality control line at poop RP it makes me itchy, it makes me real itchy. The blackpill you fellas needa swallow is that the roleplay this clown did was higher quality roleplay than the vast majority of interactions conducted on LRP, and that is undeniable Facts 100 you can verify by perusing through any random LRP round’s say logs.

“Ayo?? Ayo? Real. So real. Zaza? Zaza? Batong. Amogus. Sus.” [Or if we start to move onto the multi-word sentences — already leaving familiar waters:] “Let him cook. Grand theft. Cap told me to. Sec to engi. Insuls thief. Maint access. Need meds.”

[Bawhoppennn]

The new note is, "As a clown, did a gimmick about bathroom humor and needing to go to the bathroom. Was understanding when asked not to make it a routine occurrence."

This doesn't stop him from doing his gimmick, it's just saying hey don't do this every round. I think that's okish, as I said earlier I don't want someone shitting themselves every round

I feel like — although the note implies he CAN do it again — if the same fatherless individual that ahelped this ahelps again, the admin would read between the lines and ban them for poop RP because they already got a note for it, and doing the same thing you got noted for is generally escalated to a ban. So they will probably be smart to never do it again, which is effectively banning the behavior by precedent.

I think this gets to a bigger issue than Poopy Pants

[kieth4]

The new note is, "As a clown, did a gimmick about bathroom humor and needing to go to the bathroom. Was understanding when asked not to make it a routine occurrence."

This doesn't stop him from doing his gimmick, it's just saying hey don't do this every round. I think that's okish, as I said earlier I don't want someone shitting themselves every round

I feel like — although the note implies he CAN do it again — if the same fatherless individual that ahelped this ahelps again, the admin would read between the lines and ban them for poop RP because they already got a note for it, and doing the same thing you got noted for is generally escalated to a ban. So they will probably be smart to never do it again, which is effectively banning the behavior by precedent.

I would want the admin to go, hey. This is what the note says then pull up logs to prove that it's been done often rlly as opposed to like once a week or w/e.

At the end of the day as long as he does it infrequently this note literally could not matter at all. If it goes to appeals I will stand as the shield and protect this man's right to shit himself. Heavy is the head that wears the crown.