Moderator: In-Game Head Admins
[10:55 AM] spookydonut: stonedmc is the work of a criminally insane mad genius
Stickymayhem wrote:you're right!
BeeSting12 wrote:Fun to work with. Has a good understanding of policy/ buttons from what I can tell
Nabski wrote:Seems to understand things from a codeside which is always a plus.
PKPenguin321 wrote:This is about nothing in particular, just advice: Not everything needs to be taken seriously. It can be healthy to take a step back now and then to remind yourself it's just a game
BONERMASTER wrote:I am a big thinker, and it would only be logical if my character had a big head as well. And glasses. Because only people that think, wear glasses.
feem wrote:i tried to send canisters of urine to the station but ended up turning all oxygen into urine and breaking lavaland and also breathing
Anonmare wrote:Each post in this thread can't settle on what it wants to be, but yet, each one is more cursed than the last.
Beesting12 wrote:please write an apology to this forums, this community, the host, and the internet as a whole for the data storage space you wasted with this complaint.
Vile Beggar wrote:i don't like this thread
imsxz wrote:nervore
afelinidisfinetoo wrote:By the way, the person who posted that catgirl porn on the github page was me. If anyone wants my private stash just PM me
Nervere wrote:Anything for a femoid.....
Qbopper wrote:I'm a dumb poopy butthead
CitrusGender wrote:god i love it when people feed me my own fried legs
Qbmax32 wrote:I hate catpeople but I would make an exception for dax
Affu wrote:Dishonest, Rude, Petty, Childish, Spiteful, Manipulative, Untrustworthy.
If you want my honest opinion.
oranges wrote:overadministrates, can't let things go, wastes note space on useless knowledge
Dax Dupont wrote:oranges wrote:overadministrates, can't let things go, wastes note space on useless knowledge
>wastes notes space
good joke oranges I almost thought you were serious.
Affu wrote:Dishonest, Rude, Petty, Childish, Spiteful, Manipulative, Untrustworthy.
If you want my honest opinion.
PKPenguin321 wrote:on the topic of being passive aggressive, you ought to not report posts that are on topic for being off topic simply because they mention you in a negative light. gives you a bad look and doesn't accomplish anything because i'm not gonna delete the post unless it's genuinely off topic or excessively low quality/inflammatory.
that said, when it comes to posts like this:Affu wrote:Dishonest, Rude, Petty, Childish, Spiteful, Manipulative, Untrustworthy.
If you want my honest opinion.
it is absolutely within your rights to be just as much of a snark back to them, which you seem to have done. so don't worry about it
Cobby wrote:In this appeal decided to give their 2 cents about an off-topic discussion then decided, in the same post mind you, to turn to admin mode and go "please don't derail", locking the thread and preventing any contention to their own post.
I would rather a thread go down the drain than an admin use their powers to get the last word about an off-topic discussion then hypocritically berate players for going off-topic within the same post.
I wouldn't of put this here had they just edited the post to remove the off-topic aspect (I would have myself if I had the power) instead of stubbornly saying something along the lines of "well because the headmin hasn't said anything to me it's not a problem" when I explained my concern.
This behavior makes you no better than the guy in the appeal claiming he's a crusader for the community while also in the same thread appealing a ban about near-crashing a server.
Dax Dupont wrote:I close tickets after it's resolved as such when a punishment is handed out or when it's ruled that something is valid or the question is answered. You can still press the ahelp button if you want to continue talking about it. A resolved ticket is resolved. Some admins never close their tickets but even with gameplay questions I answer and close it usually. Same with bugs, I even have a macro that explains to you how to report a bug. I've got several other text expanders or macros set up.
I love being efficient.
iksyp wrote:Dax Dupont wrote:I close tickets after it's resolved as such when a punishment is handed out or when it's ruled that something is valid or the question is answered. You can still press the ahelp button if you want to continue talking about it. A resolved ticket is resolved. Some admins never close their tickets but even with gameplay questions I answer and close it usually. Same with bugs, I even have a macro that explains to you how to report a bug. I've got several other text expanders or macros set up.
I love being efficient.
okay but this doesn't really address the criticism about your attitude
Stickymayhem wrote:you're right!
BeeSting12 wrote:Most people tend to want to fire back when you act snarky toward them and even if they're being rude you should have the courtesy to let them respond.
Cobby wrote:You're welcome to show me the post in which I was snarky to you regarding my gripe to warrant the attitude I've received.
Dax Dupont wrote:Whatever you say cobby.
PKPenguin321 wrote:Dax Dupont wrote:Whatever you say cobby.
ignores feedback dismissively
wesoda25 wrote:This seems emblematic of your adminning style. Sure, you’re on point with understanding of rules and policy. But if a valid complaint is leveled or a contestment of one of your rulings, you shrug it off or turn insanely passive-aggressive and snarky.
Dax Dupont wrote:iksyp wrote:Dax Dupont wrote:I close tickets after it's resolved as such when a punishment is handed out or when it's ruled that something is valid or the question is answered. You can still press the ahelp button if you want to continue talking about it. A resolved ticket is resolved. Some admins never close their tickets but even with gameplay questions I answer and close it usually. Same with bugs, I even have a macro that explains to you how to report a bug. I've got several other text expanders or macros set up.
I love being efficient.
okay but this doesn't really address the criticism about your attitude
I'm allowed to be somewhat snarky when if you're like nilons and you're overly hostile and rude in ahelps.
I think most people don't have a problem with my ahelps but some of the ruder people will receive snark and then complain.
Devily wrote:What is less subjecting is the time you once murdered me for defending myself from another shitter (who was non antag).
And I remember you taking the ticket even though you were the one I was complaining about.
Maybe don't do that in future, I feel like an admin handling a ticket about their actions as a player isn't completely fair.
Nilons wrote:Devily wrote:What is less subjecting is the time you once murdered me for defending myself from another shitter (who was non antag).
And I remember you taking the ticket even though you were the one I was complaining about.
Maybe don't do that in future, I feel like an admin handling a ticket about their actions as a player isn't completely fair.
big if true, handling your own tickets is a massive no no for admins and you should make a complaint if youre telling the truth
Devily wrote:The issue then comes that people are allowed to grief but not to defend themselves from griefing and so you're not looking at the circumstance and outright you're ignoring who started the whole mess.
If as a non-antag I steal the spare, Captain attack me and then I kill him, shouldn't that warrant a bwoink?
Sure, the Captain tried to cut me up but I'm the self-antag guy, I started it by doing something a traitor would do.
Just saying "using lethal violence opens you up to lethal violence" feels like you don't care to actually admin the situation but rather you shoo it off and assume the guy ahelping is stupid, which could very well be true for a majority of the server but as I said before eventually you may end up cutting down people that have legitimate complains.
You can absolutely just tell people off if you want but then I'm wondering why you're an admin if you think being an admin is bothersome, feels like instead of getting 50 of those a day you could stop being an admin and get zero of them a day.
This again is not a complain but more of a re-call of my previous point about you charging ahead with tunnel vision and the possibility of a brick wall awaiting you a few meters ahead.
I dealt with a couple other administrators in this server and only with you I felt this problem, with the other two I was explained in better detail the situation and I was asked what was going on or what was my side of the story.
So again, in my opinion you could use to try and get the context before you give an answer, I'm sure laying off the "quick and short" setup would make players feel taken a bit more seriously and would make you look a bit more professional or at the very least interested, because there is nothing worse than you having an issue and the guy in charge just dismissing it and shooing you off.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests