Roleplays on Centcom.
Disgusting, Good admin though
Search found 28 matches
- Fri Feb 23, 2024 5:06 am
- Forum: Admin Feedback
- Topic: Higgin
- Replies: 12
- Views: 1104
- Mon Jan 08, 2024 6:42 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [lorwp] DrAmazing343 - Noted for Stealing Cargo Credits on SuccessionStation
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1862
Re: [lorwp] DrAmazing343 - Noted for Stealing Cargo Credits on SuccessionStation
The revised note is a step in the right direction, but I had NO idea that they were trying to save it. The sequence of events was grab, chased (no words that I saw), started being kicked to death, bwoinked in crit. There was no agency for me to take action in the latter half of that, and in the for...
- Mon Jan 08, 2024 6:23 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [lorwp] DrAmazing343 - Noted for Stealing Cargo Credits on SuccessionStation
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1862
Re: [lorwp] DrAmazing343 - Noted for Stealing Cargo Credits on SuccessionStation
Hey, i've thought about this since and in hindsight i'd agree that this would've been treated as a IC issue in a regular round. that's a miniscule amount for the cargo budget at the time, and the main reason for the note was due to us currently being in the process of saving the map for SuccessionSt...
- Fri Jan 05, 2024 8:44 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [lorwp] JupiterJaeden - The anti-shotgun mafia strikes once again
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3851
Re: [lorwp] JupiterJaeden - The anti-shotgun mafia strikes once again
I've reconsidered this a bit and have decided to lift this and remove the note, after reading internal discussions the issue here. This hasn't felt right since the initial ban, and while i still have issues with this interaction, i feel like some of my initial impressions from logs, the ahelp report...
- Fri Jan 05, 2024 8:00 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [lorwp] JupiterJaeden - The anti-shotgun mafia strikes once again
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3851
Re: [lorwp] JupiterJaeden - The anti-shotgun mafia strikes once again
Hey there. Apologies if this is repeating anything Anne mentioned, this was mostly written before their post. First, just an amendment to the ban reason, since admittedly it could be worded significantly better here. The issue here isn't flat powergaming, it's edging our standards for what we consid...
- Sun Dec 24, 2023 9:50 pm
- Forum: Admin Feedback
- Topic: WalterTruck
- Replies: 13
- Views: 4077
Re: WalterTruck
I occasionally spawn myself in a chicken suit while they’re playing and try and beat them up in a family guy chicken fight, and they robust me every time.
Also they’re a good admin or something
Also they’re a good admin or something
- Tue Dec 19, 2023 4:02 am
- Forum: Town Hall
- Topic: Trialmin Review: Lorwp
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3391
Re: Trialmin Review: Lorwp
Massive overuse of pushing buttons. I watched this admin spawn multiple deathsquads in a very short timeframe in for pretty weak reasons, then watched them hit an escape pod with a missile in transit. This was round 220751. This was a single 10 person deathsquad accounting for the amount of people ...
- Wed Nov 01, 2023 3:41 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [AwkwardStereo] SneedemFeedem - Metagaming ban plz lift
- Replies: 1
- Views: 996
Re: [AwkwardStereo] SneedemFeedem - Metagaming ban plz lift
I'm pretty happy with this, and it's been quite a while. Lifted.
lorwp edit: i should note that Stereo is retired, per me taking this appeal.
lorwp edit: i should note that Stereo is retired, per me taking this appeal.
- Fri Oct 20, 2023 5:50 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Lorwp] xlink97 Ban Appeal
- Replies: 24
- Views: 3788
Re: [Lorwp] xlink97 Ban Appeal
Hey,
I've had time to think about this owing to the long delay here, and have decided it's better worth the the time here to just remove the note at this stage. The reasoning for the ban should've been accurate in the first place, so i don't see it worth it to continue pushing it here.
I've had time to think about this owing to the long delay here, and have decided it's better worth the the time here to just remove the note at this stage. The reasoning for the ban should've been accurate in the first place, so i don't see it worth it to continue pushing it here.
- Thu Oct 19, 2023 9:45 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Lorwp] xlink97 Ban Appeal
- Replies: 24
- Views: 3788
Re: xlink97 Ban Appeal [Lorwp]
Sorry, i was under the impression this was waiting on Headmins. Are you certain that your behavior at the start of the shift didn't influence the later conflict at all? I could see the angle of employees sharing or witnessing their boss acting afool from the sideline and letting that lower the bar f...
- Mon Oct 16, 2023 10:50 am
- Forum: TGMC Resolved Appeals, Complaints and Reports
- Topic: [Ridgyax] Thomas Morley - Whoops
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3575
Re: [Ridgyax] Thomas Morley - Whoops
Moved to TGMC Subforum.
- Sat Oct 14, 2023 8:41 am
- Forum: Town Hall
- Topic: Trialmin Review: Isratosh
- Replies: 10
- Views: 3247
Re: Trialmin Review: Isratosh
Quite based.
- Fri Oct 13, 2023 10:27 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: Xeapor Note Appeal
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1144
Re: Xeapor Note Appeal
No problem, i'll be locking and moving this.
- Fri Oct 13, 2023 5:05 am
- Forum: Player's Club
- Topic: "I didn't do anything to harm a person's round" peanut
- Replies: 33
- Views: 6367
Re: "I didn't do anything to harm a person's round" peanut
"As a Non-Antag QM, harassed one of their cargo techs into escalating a conflict with them, until said cargo tech called them a slur and gave them an excuse to kill them" What??? So it's homies fault he got called a slur???? What brainrot logic is this. So if I start shoving someone and t...
- Fri Oct 13, 2023 12:04 am
- Forum: Closed Complaints
- Topic: Nukie grief
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2786
Re: Nukie grief
Hey, this was an L on me. I misremembered our policy on this (after being prompted to gib them in what was not obvious as a joke at the time in asay) and gibbed them for it. My intention was to spawn in a replacement nukie due to this, but i got quickly corrected in asay. Isratosh had to respawn the...
- Thu Oct 12, 2023 9:30 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: Xeapor Note Appeal
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1144
Re: Xeapor Note Appeal
Having looked at the log for this, this is a certified lorwp L. i didn't notice anything about them setting people on fire because they were using the spell: [2023-10-11 10:47:32.202] ATTACK: Slayer123129/(Saul Straub) cast the spell Sacred Flame. (Departure Lounge (196,136,4)) And i skimmed over th...
- Thu Oct 12, 2023 9:03 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: Xeapor Note Appeal
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1144
Re: Xeapor Note Appeal
Hey, i'm looking into this now, but this needs to follow the format here: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=44
- Thu Oct 12, 2023 1:32 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Lorwp] xlink97 Ban Appeal
- Replies: 24
- Views: 3788
Re: xlink97 Ban Appeal [Lorwp]
Bottom line is, the conflict shouldn't even be included in the ban reason; it wasn't against the rules. This: As a Non-Antag QM, demonstrated very NRP behavior at the start of the shift and wordlessly started a conflict with one of their Cargo techs. I'm not sure if the intention here was to be a d...
- Wed Oct 11, 2023 11:21 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Lorwp] xlink97 Ban Appeal
- Replies: 24
- Views: 3788
Re: xlink97 Ban Appeal [Lorwp]
This ban expired not long ago, so unless you're interested in having the note removed (which i'm not particularly interested in doing after reviewing your say history before this round), i'll be locking and moving this in 24 hours. What do you mean by "before this round", by the way? Havi...
- Wed Oct 11, 2023 7:13 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Lorwp] xlink97 Ban Appeal
- Replies: 24
- Views: 3788
Re: xlink97 Ban Appeal [Lorwp]
This ban expired not long ago, so unless you're interested in having the note removed (which i'm not particularly interested in doing after reviewing your say history before this round), i'll be locking and moving this in 24 hours.
- Tue Oct 10, 2023 7:36 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Lorwp] xlink97 Ban Appeal
- Replies: 24
- Views: 3788
Re: xlink97 Ban Appeal [Lorwp]
Not once was my speech mentioned in the ban quote at all. Your new reasoning is a complete turnaround from anything even resembling the original ban reason. I said "laughing out loud" during a shoving match and joked around with another cargo tech at round-start. "reason for the ban ...
- Tue Oct 10, 2023 6:08 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Lorwp] xlink97 Ban Appeal
- Replies: 24
- Views: 3788
Re: xlink97 Ban Appeal [Lorwp]
Hey there, thanks for appealing. I should apologise, because the reason for the ban isn't 100% accurate here. My issue is primarily with your behavior leading up to this, and the initial start of the conflict itself, so to that end, i'm happy to edit the ban reason to this: As a Non-Antag QM, demons...
- Mon Oct 09, 2023 7:38 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Lowrp] - Not related to my sec jobban I swear to god
- Replies: 10
- Views: 3095
Re: [Lowrp] - Not related to my sec jobban I swear to god
Hello! I was the acting captain for this round, and I was recording the whole thing. Here it is. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNHrc3KoiPQ Also, some notes about the edit: I cut some of the interactions of jeff short as it does not pertain to the ban appeal. Also, while I was eating the watermelo...
- Mon Oct 09, 2023 1:44 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Lowrp] - Not related to my sec jobban I swear to god
- Replies: 10
- Views: 3095
Re: [Lowrp] - Not related to my sec jobban I swear to god
Hey, thanks for appealing this. First, all of these logs are from here: https://tgstation13.download/parsed-logs/manuel/data/logs/2023/10/07/round-216234/ So i'm just going to address this step by step. First of all, on the first part: It was an excessively minor theft (which falls under an IC issue...
- Sun Oct 08, 2023 10:31 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Lorwp] Kacper890p - One PC
- Replies: 2
- Views: 992
Re: [Lorwp] Kacper890p - One PC
Hey there, thanks for appealing. After some discussion on how to handle this, i'll be lifting this with the following conditions: 1. If one of you gets banned, you both get banned, since we can't verify via normal means you're separate people here. 2. You do not both play in the same round. if this ...
- Sun Oct 08, 2023 10:18 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Lorwp] Violaceus - note appeal
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1542
Re: [Lorwp] Violaceus - note appeal
An important rule for this appeal which hasn't really been addressed yet: https://tgstation13.org/wiki/Rules#Silicon_Policy Asimov and Human Harm ... 3. An Asimov silicon cannot punish past harm if ordered not to, only prevent future harm. I'm honestly not sure how i missed this, good catch. With t...
- Sat Oct 07, 2023 2:39 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Lorwp] Violaceus - note appeal
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1542
Re: [Lorwp] Violaceus - note appeal
Hey, thanks for appealing this. With the benefit of hindsight, i'm going to amend this note. As this seems to be more a RPR 6 issue than a Rule 1 one here. Specifically staring when the mime got bolted into medical's break room, and the silicons trying to vent them (For context here, you also had a ...
- Thu Sep 21, 2023 10:32 am
- Forum: Former Admins
- Topic: [No Longer Admin] GeneralThrax
- Replies: 20
- Views: 8833
Re: GeneralThrax
Listened to my request to turn me into a pickle. Funniest shit i’ve ever seen.