Search found 1094 matches
- Sat Apr 10, 2021 10:33 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Ausops] - Tornadium - Server Ban Appeal
- Replies: 12
- Views: 3898
Re: [Ausops] - Tornadium - Server Ban Appeal
3 times a week over several years should be plenty of time to see how you play, if they want more before vouching for you that’s between you and them (not like we hold them to anything lol). Basically we just want a loose summary of playtime and how much of that playtime is giving people (including...
- Tue Apr 06, 2021 9:00 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Ausops] - Tornadium - Server Ban Appeal
- Replies: 12
- Views: 3898
Re: [Ausops] - Tornadium - Server Ban Appeal
A reminder that a voucher doesn't need to be someone that knows you or likes you. As long as it's someone in a position of trust from a server you played on and they can chime in and say "Yup this guy hasn't had any notable misconduct history nor any warning/note/ban for the last 'x amount of ...
- Sun Apr 04, 2021 2:56 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Ausops] - Tornadium - Server Ban Appeal
- Replies: 12
- Views: 3898
Re: [Ausops] - Tornadium - Server Ban Appeal
I probably don't play enough on any server (I would mostly play on CM but even then it's maybe 3-4 times a week at the moment) for anyone to even know who I am let alone provide a vouch unfortunately. I also don't have enough free time to dedicate to playing more just to generate enough playtime for...
- Sat Apr 03, 2021 9:10 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Ausops] - Tornadium - Server Ban Appeal
- Replies: 12
- Views: 3898
Re: [Ausops] - Tornadium - Server Ban Appeal
Hey, the ban reason was : (MANUAL BAN) Failing terms of HG's probation. "2016-03-21 21:14:01 | Sybil | hornygranny MEGA PROBATION: If he does ANYTHING wrong throw him out. This extends to being a pain in the ass outside of the game." Notes by Krusvik and Okand as well as recent forum beha...
- Sat Apr 03, 2021 8:59 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Ausops] - Tornadium - Server Ban Appeal
- Replies: 12
- Views: 3898
[Ausops] - Tornadium - Server Ban Appeal
b]BYOND account:[/b] Tornadium Character name: Unknown (Was 5 years ago) Ban type: Server Ban length: Permanent Ban reason: (MANUAL BAN) Failing terms of HG's probation. hornygranny MEGA PROBATION: If he does ANYTHING wrong throw him out. This extends to being a pain in the ass outside of the game.&...
- Wed Mar 13, 2019 2:32 am
- Forum: Thinking Cap
- Topic: he locked the thread
- Replies: 485
- Views: 139749
Re: he locked the thread
Does anyone else ever feel a burning sensation when they ejaculate?
- Tue Mar 12, 2019 12:18 pm
- Forum: Thinking Cap
- Topic: he locked the thread
- Replies: 485
- Views: 139749
Re: he locked the thread
so should people like groijoy (made himself a godmode wizard and ran around the server ei nathing people, then used adminverbs and gibbed the one guy who managed to get the upper hand on him) be given admin again because it was 6 years ago you'd be surprised with how willingly old admins are readmi...
- Tue Mar 12, 2019 11:44 am
- Forum: Thinking Cap
- Topic: he locked the thread
- Replies: 485
- Views: 139749
Re: he locked the thread
Not exactly a statement about the entire admin team but why are people like Elyina, Ausops, Scones etc allowed on the admin team let alone become a headmin in the first place? Their personal conduct (not even going into admin conduct) is disgusting and worse than most players that end up perma'd for...
- Tue Jan 01, 2019 9:31 pm
- Forum: For No Reason Trash
- Topic: [Ausops] - Tornadium - Worst Fleet Commander Eve In History
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1803
[Ausops] - Tornadium - Worst Fleet Commander Eve In History
Byond account and character name: Tornadium / Tornadium Banning admin: Ausops Ban type (What are you banned from?): Server - Rule Zero Ban reason and length: Permanent Time ban was placed (including time zone): Server you were playing when banned (Sybil or Bagil): Perma banned for a forum post criti...
- Wed Aug 01, 2018 2:47 pm
- Forum: Video Games
- Topic: What are you nerds playing?
- Replies: 3344
- Views: 930529
Re: What are you faggots playing?
Here's hoping the stellaris changes turn it into Vicky 2 in space.
Game is still a bit of a trainwreck.
Game is still a bit of a trainwreck.
- Sun Jul 29, 2018 10:42 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Ausops] - Tornadium - Permanent Pan
- Replies: 18
- Views: 6563
Re: [Ausops] - Tornadium - Permanent Pan
From the bans I've observed I would say they were absolutely merited. You lied, exaggerated and cherry-picked, constantly and consistently, to deflect blame and responsibility for your actions. I've been at the receiving end of such behavior in a borg/AI/sec conflict in the past that then spilled o...
- Sun Jul 29, 2018 1:32 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Ausops] - Tornadium - Permanent Pan
- Replies: 18
- Views: 6563
Re: [Ausops] - Tornadium - Permanent Pan
It isn't exactly a waste of time, It took me all of 10 minutes to write the appeal and I'm checking the forum every so often inbetween conference calls. Not like it's a heavy inconvenience just to ask. I just like having the ability to play, I probably wouldn't even play as much as I did before but ...
- Sun Jul 29, 2018 12:59 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Ausops] - Tornadium - Permanent Pan
- Replies: 18
- Views: 6563
- Sun Jul 29, 2018 12:17 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Ausops] - Tornadium - Permanent Pan
- Replies: 18
- Views: 6563
Re: [Ausops] - Tornadium - Permanent Pan
I know some bans were lifted but as far as I'm aware, the only one with malicious and misleading attempts was the scones ban. It's so hard to look up your history on the forums because you rules lawyer constantly and have 10 billion threads all over the place. There may have been bad bans, but I'm ...
- Sat Jul 28, 2018 11:37 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Ausops] - Tornadium - Permanent Pan
- Replies: 18
- Views: 6563
Re: [Ausops] - Tornadium - Permanent Pan
Bringing up the Eve stuff doesn't hold a lot of ground or relevance because 1. besides ausops being "involved", it isn't super relevant to your ban and 2. all we have is your word to go on so basically without factual and concrete conclusions, it basically sums up to zero relevance I woul...
- Sat Jul 28, 2018 7:10 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Ausops] - Tornadium - Permanent Pan
- Replies: 18
- Views: 6563
Re: [Ausops] - Tornadium - Permanent Pan
prev appeals: https://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=34&t=7240 https://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=34&t=8296 also, from the second one: >accuse me of stuff from Eve >> >>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>turns out I've never played Eve Yup, He's outright denied but I'm well aware ...
- Sat Jul 28, 2018 4:27 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Ausops] - Tornadium - Permanent Pan
- Replies: 18
- Views: 6563
Re: [Ausops] - Tornadium - Permanent Pan
(MANUAL BAN) Failing terms of HG's probation. "2016-03-21 21:14:01 | Sybil | hornygranny MEGA PROBATION: If he does ANYTHING wrong throw him out. This extends to being a pain in the ass outside of the game." Notes by Krusvik and Okand as well as recent forum behaviour indicates little has...
- Sat Jul 28, 2018 1:52 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Ausops] - Tornadium - Permanent Pan
- Replies: 18
- Views: 6563
[Ausops] - Tornadium - Permanent Pan
Byond account and character name: Tornadium/Tornadium Axonium Banning admin: Ausops Ban type (What are you banned from?): Game/Forum Ban reason and length: Permanent, Unable to get full reason as travelling with work. Short answer, Escalating series of targeted bans. Apparently failing a probation ...
- Fri Oct 21, 2016 10:21 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Headmins] - Tornadium - Still no idea
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2714
Re: [Headmins] - Tornadium - Still no idea
A 4 month+ absence from the server has not helped you in any way with lying, unfounded accusations of metagrudging, and an inability to see that not only were you wrong, that your personality is entirely unsuitable for /tg/ given admins saw fit to remove you independent of any influence from me. Wh...
- Fri Oct 21, 2016 6:28 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Headmins] - Tornadium - Still no idea
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2714
[Headmins] - Tornadium - Still no idea
Byond account and character name: Tornadium - (Ban was for a forum post, character name irrelevant) Banning admin: Ausops Ban type (What are you banned from?): Server/IRC Ban reason and length: Perma. Still don't have an actual reason for the ban beyond Ausops disliking that I was questioning an adm...
- Thu Jul 21, 2016 11:02 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Ausops] - Need more information V2
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1366
[Ausops] - Need more information V2
Since Ausops has gone full on grudge mode I figure I'll try to contact MSO to get him to cut this shit out. I would like to again request the reasoning given for the headmins decision, that is not an unreasonable request I feel as their reasons are I'm sure perfectly reasonable and correct. I would ...
- Thu Jul 21, 2016 10:51 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Ausops] - Need more information
- Replies: 1
- Views: 886
[Ausops] - Need more information
No sense making a long winded topic, I asked for information as to why the new set of headmins denied the appeal. This information will be useful in understanding why the ban was upheld and what I need to appeal come the next headmin cycle. Please do not close the thread as I do not consider it fair...
- Thu Jul 21, 2016 7:07 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Ausops] - Deciding I failed probation
- Replies: 30
- Views: 10104
Re: [Ausops] - Deciding I failed probation
Le digg bump
- Fri Jul 15, 2016 11:50 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Ausops] - Deciding I failed probation
- Replies: 30
- Views: 10104
Re: [Ausops] - Deciding I failed probation
Alrighty,Kor wrote:New headmins voted, it's a no. Better luck in 4 months.
Could they post their reasoning? Just will be helpful in four months.
- Thu Jul 14, 2016 6:51 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Ausops] RetardedBaby - Bullshit ban
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1480
Re: [Ausops] RetardedBaby - Bullshit ban
Did you actually tell them you were a rev at the time of cremation?
- Sun Jul 10, 2016 6:06 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Ausops] - Deciding I failed probation
- Replies: 30
- Views: 10104
Re: [Ausops] - Deciding I failed probation
Yeah I had considered it and discussed it many times. However there is also the flip side of that coin where this is the only community where I seem to have this issue and this issue only started occurring in 2015 onward. Played here fine without a single issue for years prior, no issues on any othe...
- Sun Jul 10, 2016 1:08 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Ausops] - Deciding I failed probation
- Replies: 30
- Views: 10104
Re: [Ausops] - Deciding I failed probation
I've been banned prior for excessive arguments with the Admin team. Ausops placed a rule zero ban a week before he stepped down as headmin for no other reason than he wanted to get rid of me.TheColdTurtle wrote:What is tornadium's history that he talked about in the OP?
- Sun Jul 10, 2016 3:43 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Ausops] - Deciding I failed probation
- Replies: 30
- Views: 10104
Re: [Ausops] - Deciding I failed probation
I'm just going to kick the can down the road and say the next set of headmins should be the one to decide this. I have less than a week left, should be up to the guys who are facing four months how/if they want to deal with the inevitable conflict between you and admins. They could immediatley undo...
- Sat Jul 09, 2016 6:55 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Ausops] - Deciding I failed probation
- Replies: 30
- Views: 10104
Re: [Ausops] - Deciding I failed probation
You can't keep going on like this, regardless of whether you think you're right or not. Tornadium, you told me you'd rather go out in a blaze and stand up for what you think is right, rather than buckle down and avoid trouble. That's fine, that's even a position I can respect, even when we disagree...
- Sat Jul 09, 2016 5:48 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Ausops] - Deciding I failed probation
- Replies: 30
- Views: 10104
Re: [Ausops] - Deciding I failed probation
yes sometimes admins tell you to accept it because that's their decision However, you have been given ample explainations on a fair amount of cases. Wyzack explained why they made their decision and you STILL weren't satisfied with that answer Uh, Did I miss that somewhere in that thread? I didn't ...
- Sat Jul 09, 2016 5:31 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Ausops] - Deciding I failed probation
- Replies: 30
- Views: 10104
Re: [Ausops] - Deciding I failed probation
THIS is why people keep banning you and not wanting to deal with you. you keep NEEDING the why. And you keep bothering people about it. It's like a 2 year old asking why about everything. Instead of just saying "oh well, it's only a game, shit happens" you keep making threads. See Rule 10...
- Sat Jul 09, 2016 5:11 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Ausops] - Deciding I failed probation
- Replies: 30
- Views: 10104
Re: [Ausops] - Deciding I failed probation
I had decided to wash my hands of this whole mess, but i can not help but point out the fact that every single fucking time this happens you act like a total shitter until the ban hammer comes down for violating your probation, at which point you try and be polite. I don't think I'm being overly po...
- Sat Jul 09, 2016 4:50 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Ausops] - Deciding I failed probation
- Replies: 30
- Views: 10104
Re: [Ausops] - Deciding I failed probation
2016-03-21 21:14:01 | Sybil | hornygranny [Remove Note] [Edit Note] MEGA PROBATION: If he does ANYTHING wrong throw him out. This extends to being a pain in the ass outside of the game. Never mentions requiring HG's input but we can wait for a headmin. Two new admins, none of which I've spoken to a...
- Sat Jul 09, 2016 4:39 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Ausops] - Deciding I failed probation
- Replies: 30
- Views: 10104
Re: [Ausops] - Deciding I failed probation
Anything even worth noting is a note. We put anything down we feel is relevant or would possibly come up in the future. Doesn't matter what it is. Well if it helps I can go pull the logs from that exchange. I do not feel I was in any way rude or in any way entitled. I spoke to him in a polite adult...
- Sat Jul 09, 2016 4:35 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Ausops] - Deciding I failed probation
- Replies: 30
- Views: 10104
Re: [Ausops] - Deciding I failed probation
The notes: http://i.imgur.com/JPQQsm5.png Thanks for this. The note is inaccurate and I could happily go into detail on that one but I honestly don't think that would do me much good to start a massive argument regarding that. I will say the first note is missing a LOT of information regarding that...
- Sat Jul 09, 2016 4:28 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Ausops] - Deciding I failed probation
- Replies: 30
- Views: 10104
[Ausops] - Deciding I failed probation
Byond account and character name: Tornadium - Multiple Banning admin: Ausops and Teward - Tedward placed the IRC ban/Ausops placed everything else Ban type (What are you banned from?): Everything - Servers/Forums/IRC Ban reason and length: Permanent Time ban was placed (including time zone): 7/9/201...
- Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:09 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Lethal Escalation Against Security
- Replies: 42
- Views: 13573
Re: Lethal Escalation Against Security
Tor, I have very little patience for forum lawyers. You're one of them. Just play the game, and enjoy it. If you want to bitch and moan about admins and their decisions take it somewhere else. You need to stop creating policy "discussions" in which you trash an admins decision and claim t...
- Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:04 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Lethal Escalation Against Security
- Replies: 42
- Views: 13573
Re: Lethal Escalation Against Security
Ban me for raising a legitimate concern.tedward1337 wrote:More like how long is this thread going to continue before someone bans tornadium from the gameIrishWristWatch0 wrote:How long is this thread going to go on before everyone hates themselves and nothing comes out of it?
Sounds legit.
- Sat Jul 09, 2016 2:40 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Lethal Escalation Against Security
- Replies: 42
- Views: 13573
Re: Lethal Escalation Against Security
Thanks for pointing that out, I forgot to finish that sentence.Saegrimr wrote:Tornadium wrote:because if people can go on murder boners because I confiscate shit then things will need changed in security policy to allowThis is fucking golden.Tornadium wrote:please grow up Saeg.
- Sat Jul 09, 2016 2:30 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Lethal Escalation Against Security
- Replies: 42
- Views: 13573
Re: Lethal Escalation Against Security
I'm not sure who that was directed at but please grow up Saeg.Saegrimr wrote:i was only k-kidding guys
just a p-prank
You can assume intend and try to pin shit like that on me all you want, just do it somewhere that isn't derailing the point of the thread thanks.
- Sat Jul 09, 2016 2:29 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Lethal Escalation Against Security
- Replies: 42
- Views: 13573
Re: Lethal Escalation Against Security
Do you want to know the best part about all this. When it came up in game, i did a little more looking in to it. Originally i did not know about the emag. I am not certain i would have made the call any differently but the fact remains i made the call on incomplete information. I apologized to Torn...
- Sat Jul 09, 2016 2:21 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Lethal Escalation Against Security
- Replies: 42
- Views: 13573
Re: Lethal Escalation Against Security
Sorry I thought it was rather obvious I was being sarcastic because of the ridiculousness of the point being made.IrishWristWatch0 wrote:Don't make sarcastic fucking shit in something you want taken seriously.
- Sat Jul 09, 2016 2:12 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Lethal Escalation Against Security
- Replies: 42
- Views: 13573
Re: Lethal Escalation Against Security
6. In-game administration rulings are final. Incidences of admin abuse, negligence or disputed rulings can be taken to the forums. If an admin says something was 'looked into, handled, resolved' etc, regarding an issue, it is unlikely an admin will provide any further information. Admins are under ...
- Sat Jul 09, 2016 7:31 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Lethal Escalation Against Security
- Replies: 42
- Views: 13573
Re: Lethal Escalation Against Security
See above post,NikNakFlak wrote:Because they are a cancerous player
What about using sarcasm and hyperbole to point out flaws and contradictions in a situation such as this constitutes cancerous behavior.
- Sat Jul 09, 2016 7:30 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Lethal Escalation Against Security
- Replies: 42
- Views: 13573
Re: Lethal Escalation Against Security
So you're telling me immediate lethal escalation is kosher now for all crew who have shit they shouldnt have? Alright cool. Why do you always do this? I'm guessing you've ever heard of hyperbole or making a sarcastic comment to point out the idiocy in what someone is saying huh. Well let me explain...
- Sat Jul 09, 2016 4:11 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Lethal Escalation Against Security
- Replies: 42
- Views: 13573
Re: Lethal Escalation Against Security
It was an IC conflict and i wanted it to remain IC. I considered telling them not to go lethal at all and realized that would be kind of dumb considering sec would unzip the valid baton posthaste regardless. Hell, you were the one bitching that there was not enough conflict outside of antag busines...
- Sat Jul 09, 2016 4:05 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Lethal Escalation Against Security
- Replies: 42
- Views: 13573
Re: Lethal Escalation Against Security
Good thing this is a fucking video game and not a court of law. If a headmin wants to come slap me on the wrist or deadmin me or something they can feel free, but i am not getting in to an autistic shouting match over this This isn't an autistic shouting match, this is me asking for clarification r...
- Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:58 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Lethal Escalation Against Security
- Replies: 42
- Views: 13573
Re: Lethal Escalation Against Security
It was an IC conflict and i wanted it to remain IC. I considered telling them not to go lethal at all and realized that would be kind of dumb considering sec would unzip the valid baton posthaste regardless. Hell, you were the one bitching that there was not enough conflict outside of antag busines...
- Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:47 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Lethal Escalation Against Security
- Replies: 42
- Views: 13573
Re: Lethal Escalation Against Security
So you're telling me immediate lethal escalation is kosher now for all crew who have shit they shouldnt have? Alright cool.
- Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:12 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Lethal Escalation Against Security
- Replies: 42
- Views: 13573
Re: Lethal Escalation Against Security
To clarify, i am the admin who made the call and the contraband in question was a tarot deck You should probably also add that he was looking to trade the tarot deck for an emag with a known traitor, and also stole an emag from the contraband locker when he broke into the brig. Something he wasn't ...