/tg/Station 13

Tearling

When did the QM express an intent to kill? As they stated in the thread, it seems like they were going to fight for self defense because they couldn't tell the detective was security. When they drew the lethal weapon that does severe wounding damage they expressed the intent to seriously harm or ki...

Tearling

You cannot go "Because they're not red!!" They are sec gears that can be gotten roundstart. In the eyes of the rules when they pulled a gun and tried (but failed) to shoot sec 1. Yes, you can. Remember, they didn't shoot the detective, they only drew the gun. The fact is that it was a spl...

Tearling

of the QM that pulled a gun on them with intent to kill. When did the QM express an intent to kill? As they stated in the thread, it seems like they were going to fight for self defense because they couldn't tell the detective was security. Given the detective was apparently in blue, and in swat ar...

Tearling

Vekter wrote: ↑Sat Mar 12, 2022 12:35 am 1) Why the fuck do you have 1200 hours in a role you don't enjoy

Vekter hasn't had the displeasure of talking to a league of legends or dead by daylight player before, clearly.

Tearling

Archie700 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 10, 2022 3:43 am To clarify this should be in the context of MRP, LRP doesn't have restrictions on round removal as an antag.

I gotta keep it open-ended otherwise someone is gonna jump in here and say something like "we don't have any lrp servers, terry is mrp and manuel is hrp"

Tearling

Borging can be undone by removing the brain and they have enough tools and such to let keep you doing stuff Slime cant be undone, and all they can do is ventcrawl, eat and reproduce If people hate playing cyborg thats on them Antag gonna Antag Once borged, they can't go out of their way to be un-bo...

Tearling

Although the rules don't directly mention what round removal is (afaik) it has been mentioned multiple times in ban appeals, and countless times in salty discussions in deadchat. For an example, for the one which directly raised an interest in this topic, take this ban appeal: Ryan Creamer Ban Appea...

Tearling

YBS wrote: ↑Thu Feb 24, 2022 5:25 am I will paypal you 20.00 USD if you have a single fully written roleplay interaction in your last 3 rounds where you actually try to write something vaguely IC, consecutively and coherently.

Is this offer only for Kieth4?

Tearling

Armhulen wrote: ↑Sun Feb 20, 2022 5:37 am
BeeSting12 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 20, 2022 4:52 am we literally have like six servers and ghost roles lol
And back in the day people still didn't want respawn when there were almost no ghost roles and two servers

The difference is now I'm here, so obviously people would want to respawn to continue playing with me

Tearling

Why would we allow suiciding to avoid a roundtype you don't like if we don't allow suiciding to antag roll. This encourages a rigidity and entitlement I'm not a fan of. In the former instances it's entitlement to a specific environment to roleplay at the expense of mechanics and in the latter it's ...

Tearling

Alright sorry that was my mistake, These logs are referring to the first the cult attempted conversion that I was aware of, which I didn't bwoink him for although it was suspicious. The second time he gave himself up were the logs I posted originally. The logs you posted originally were... these, r...

Tearling

While I appreciate the effort put in here, this event is the second time that Dalton was stunned in the restroom to be converted, after a previous attempt was thwarted by the detective. He was well aware that the cult were active there. When was the first time then? Because the event in which I was...

Tearling

which clown then said 'draw rune' if you look at the log screenshots I have provided above its somewhere there I believe. Here is the exact moment in the logs where the clown began to stun, shackle, and tell the other cultist to "draw rune" as Anonhault says. [2022-02-05 18:09:09.117] ATT...

Tearling

If the point of this was a jab at me and the thread I made, I play quite often and was the one responsible for implementing the Player's Club in the first place. Not sure what you meant by this It was not. I agree with your initial post, and believed that replacing "banned players" with &...

Tearling

Coders do not provide interesting or relevant discourse to the future health of the server. They are, at best, off topic or misinformed, and at worst, actively harmful to the discussion. The Player's Club intentionally limits posting (but not viewing) only to those who have played recently, of which...

Tearling

This is a roleplaying game. The purpose of the game is to have fun roleplaying. - preamble establishing intent and reasoning Being an asshole, who ruins other player’s roleplay experience , - piece 1 just to win, - piece 2 is considered a ‘play-to-win’ style of playing. You can and will be banned f...

Tearling

iamgoofball wrote: ↑Thu Jan 20, 2022 9:40 pm we checked the code and uhh

Who is "we"?
Do you have a team of coders on stand-by to try and find snippets of code for your argument? Is this some kind of secret goofball coder cabal conspiracy?

Tearling

If a threat is big enough to warrant the mech (like Xenos or the like) then yeah, they can absolutely have the mech. It's very simple. For some context here. The round in question that inspired this had both a revolution and a cult active, plus the OTHER lone antags, Well, that solves that argument...

Tearling

ROBOTICS DOESN'T NEED A GIANT DEATH MECH IF THEY AREN'T GOING TO BE ENGAGING THE THREAT. Which they shouldn't be! That's not their job! They should be defending themselves! Which they can't do without having a weapon. But, according to you, weapons shouldn't be allowed even in their own departments.

Tearling

Admins are constantly telling me to ahelp if people build lethally armed combat mechs for no reason. It's, at least by MRP rules, the very definition of powergaming. If it's powergaming, then it's a OOC problem, not a IC one that security should handle. In fact, being security and trying to take a ...

Tearling

CQC's not exactly a weapon, it's restricted entirely to their workplace, and it's something they start with. To say that it's fine for them to use is to say that it's fine for Cargo to go Gun Cargo. After all, given they can build and do everything they need to get those weapons within Cargo, I bel...

Tearling

You're not SUPPOSED to have a weapon. Nobody tell the european security mains about toxins, please. Given that robotics can print everything they need to make a lethal mech in robotics I believe that, roleplay wise, it's completely natural to assume they ARE suppose to have a weapon. Perhaps not ou...

Tearling

People won't want to play security because how this will practically play out is one of their comrades being a dumb ass and calling out that grey mctide is a traitor when they're not is basically going to give grey mctide a murderbone pass against sec. It won't "practically play out" like...

Tearling

MrStonedOne wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 8:37 pm The use of the L word on our servers predates the rise in people saying the n word and the rise in bigots on the server.

It was here before the bigots, it will be here after the bigots, and I refuse to let them take our fun.

Based MSO

Tearling

Super Aggro Crag wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 7:02 am SKINKS

Isn't this just changing a few of the letters of the slur "Chink"? Isn't this just as bad, going by your logic?

Tearling

you are saying that I said people should be actively trying to fix the gamemode, whereas the claim I made is that you should provide actionable feedback, that is not the same thing as actively fixing it. I quoted you in saying "If people aren't seeking out the coder of the gamemode to provide ...

Tearling

The only strawman here is the one you invented, I actually care very little about this half baked rework of a gamemode we already have (rev) If people aren't seeking out the coder of the gamemode to provide feedback that is useful (and by useful I mean isn't just - Your gamemode is shit remove it)....

Tearling

im not sure what paradise you live in where the city just fixes holes in the roads but 90% of the time holes in roads never get fixed because "someone else will call city hall about it" repeats through every person who sees the hole's head for 10 years straight Irrelevant. Oranges was mak...

Tearling

which revokes anybodies right to complain that nobody is fixing it. No it doesn't. Most players don't even visit the forums, let alone know who the coder for families is. Expecting people to actively try to fix a problem they have no control over in return for the ""right"" to c...

Tearling

XivilaiAnaxes wrote: ↑Tue Jan 04, 2022 8:12 am So who IS going to play security?

Hopefully non-shitters, but given how many people would still play security, I'm sure there would be plenty of shitters still up for the challenge of trying to get away with it.

Tearling

oranges wrote: ↑Tue Jan 04, 2022 12:11 am good way to make even less people play security

If people don't want to play security because it's becoming more strict and harder to get away with bad faith behavior, then those people shouldn't have been playing security in the first place.

Tearling

I want to hear some ideas from the creator and other posters on how they'd fix it I would fix families by increasing the quality of players that are able to join the families. However, as this is not realistically feasible, I think families should have a poll to be removed. The main reason families...

Tearling

I'm wondering how you can make the "assumption that things would get better through policy" without actually doing anything to make things better through policy, on the board whose sole job it is is to make things better through policy! They are trying to make things better through policy...

Tearling

Mothblocks wrote: ↑Sun Dec 26, 2021 4:16 am Have you started a policy discussion thread discussing the policy of how to treat a families antagonist with respect to MRP?

Are you trying to suggest that anyone who doesn't like families should try to get it fixed before trying to get it removed?

Tearling

Mothblocks wrote: ↑Sat Dec 25, 2021 1:20 am Would be nice to rename the board to something like "Policy Discussion & Headmin Requests", or something, to represent this.

I agree with this, but since it's christmas, I think "Policy Discussion & Santa's Wishlist" would be more seasonal.

Tearling

Should a scenario like this occur off the basis of one person's actions framing another as an antagonist through the misuse of the security protections, the target of this attempt should be given some permission to respond to any arrest/field execution attempts with equal force so as to give themse...

Tearling

During the confrontation the Warden seems to have broke rule 11 by calling Shelton "gayboy". Regularly cases where rule 11 are broken IC the offending party is made valid, however as it seemingly wasn't brought up in the ticket I'm not sure if it's relevant, if not, feel free to remove thi...

Tearling

Take a photo of X's dead body |Medium TC| Low progression Some nobody from [RANDOM FARAWAY PLACE] offered us a lot of [REWARD] for crewmember X to be assassinated. We would like to get our payment, but we don't really care about the end results. All we need is a picture of a dead body that is somew...

Tearling

I'll reiterate what I said before--I would love for slurs (such as tranny and faggot) to just be hard filtered, and I fail to be convinced otherwise. Do you think that people who use slurs like "tr--ny" and "fa--ot" shouldn't be banned? Because hard filtering them out won't ban ...

Tearling

On the other comms agents just using the AI as a vehicle to inflict minor grief is obnoxious sooo I'd say it's okay. If the comms agent is using the AI for minor grief the AI* can fight back the same way if anyone uses the AI for minor grief, which is to announce what orders they're giving the AI*,...

Tearling

Should an AI be allowed to refuse or ignore law 2 orders from Comms Agent, or anyone that cannot confirm they are human through cameras? According to most policy threads I've read, if there is any confusion over whether or not someone is human, the AI should assume they are human, however is just a ...

Tearling

it depends if the borg (known as "Default Android 97") was syncd to the AI or not (I`m not sure where to find this information in the logs but I do know for a fact that I subverted the ai this round before this point) While I'm also not sure, I managed to dig this up in the logs as one of...

Tearling

In my opinion, the perfect permabrig Looks like this. - Difficult and risky to break out of on your own without smuggled goods. - Incredibly difficult to break out if being surveyed by the warden. I agree with this, and would like to point out that most permabrigs can be easily broken out by mutati...

Tearling

One of the best admins in my opinion. Does fun ghost-role events, thinks about how to make things more fun for everyone, and has handled every situation I've seen them in- in a mature fashion.

Tearling

New server (Lets call it Neverland for now). Different ban database from main servers, only rule 7, 8, and 9 are permanent (Rule 1 permanent if IRL threats, doxing, etc.. are made) , all other rules are max 1 week bans (Still punish based on rules as regular). --- Pros: Acts as a containment server ...

Tearling

I'm honestly unclear on what the analogy there is trying to communicate The couch analogy? Nanites might not have been perfect, and sure they had their flaws, but they were still fun. Why would you throw out a couch, if it's still comfortable, just because it might have a broken armrest? Why would ...

Tearling

Nanites had 3 years to improve and they only got worse and nobody wanted to do anything with them and then when someone opens a removal they're like YOU SHOULD HAVE IMPROVED IT FIRST My couch had 3 years to improve but it only got worst. I had the ability to fix it, but I chose not to, because I'm ...

Tearling

Timberpoes gave me a positive note for a good round I had, and I'm still proud of that note today. I can't say if he's a good admin, or bad admin, or anything else- but I can say he has made me more happy with that note than anything any other player has done in ss13 over the last 2 years I've been ...

Tearling

when you get pulled over for not having a license plate on your noisy death trap of a dump truck you don't get to keep driving while the cop sits there trying to look up the obscure farm vehicle law that lets you get away with it Vekter once stated "you don't get a freebie revive if you die wh...

Tearling

I believe that the trauma aspect of abductors ruins the entire premise This. Although unlikely, it's possible for an abductee's round to be ruined by bad trauma rolls. It's very easy for the trauma rolls to make the round worst for the abductee, even if their entire round isn't ruined by it. Abduct...

Search found 361 matches