FOR YOUKavaloosh wrote:im a big guy
Search found 556 matches
- Wed May 28, 2014 7:34 pm
- Forum: Off Topic
- Topic: What do you nerds look like (REDUX)
- Replies: 1290
- Views: 384996
- Fri May 23, 2014 6:42 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Stickymayhem] AI ban appeal
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2021
Re: AI ban appeal
"As far as law 2 ordering your way in somewhere, SECURE areas (EVA, departments, etc.) are not off limits unless there is an IMMEDIATE law 1 threat present. DANGEROUS areas (Armory unless good reason, Atmospherics, Toxins, etc.) should be off-limits to people unless they know what they're doing...
- Thu May 22, 2014 6:24 pm
- Forum: Coding Feedback
- Topic: "Stealth" traitor items.
- Replies: 13
- Views: 4506
"Stealth" traitor items.
I think it's fair to say at this point that people generally do not use "stealth" traitor items, except for the parapen and noslips (muh murderbone). I believe this is because each and everyone one of them has an altered description that allows people to acceptably meta that you are a trai...
- Thu May 22, 2014 12:58 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [deuryn] - Anthony Foyer - Banned for spam
- Replies: 18
- Views: 6458
Re: [deuryn] - Anthony Foyer - Banned for spam
Admins are usually observing like dead players. We also see everything that gets said in every chat channel. You're absolutely allowed to read WGW as long as you're not flooding the radio, you just have to accept the fact that you will eventually die for doing so.
- Thu May 22, 2014 12:42 am
- Forum: Resolved Requests
- Topic: Ban Request: Dawgas | Admitting to Suiciding after convert
- Replies: 13
- Views: 4175
Re: Ban Request: Dawgas | Admitting to Suiciding after conve
I am 100% against suicide to prevent conversion. If we don't allow converts to suicide, we should not allow this.
- Wed May 21, 2014 5:21 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [hornygranny] QU4D - Bomb permaban
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1948
Re: [hornygranny] QU4D - Bomb permaban
I don't believe you. Can you prove this in any way?
- Wed May 21, 2014 11:08 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [deuryn] - Anthony Foyer - Banned for spam
- Replies: 18
- Views: 6458
Re: [deuryn] - Anthony Foyer - Banned for spam
The issue isn't that you were a prisoner, people try and escape from permabrig all the time. Specifically, you broke rule 8 of the roleplay policy: http://tgstation13.org/wiki/Rules#Roleplay_Policy You're not allowed to read WGW/whatever over the radio and fight back, because people did this to bait...
- Mon May 19, 2014 4:37 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?
- Replies: 43
- Views: 10695
Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?
Yes, it did.
- Sun May 18, 2014 3:48 am
- Forum: Video Games
- Topic: Crusader Kings II (Gay son simulator)
- Replies: 12
- Views: 4734
- Sun May 18, 2014 3:45 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Administrative Section "Must be Involved" - How involved?
- Replies: 136
- Views: 48051
Re: Administrative Section "Must be Involved" - How involved
I was referring to the fear that admins would bandwagon people and give them longer bans. It doesn't happen.
- Sun May 18, 2014 2:36 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Administrative Section "Must be Involved" - How involved?
- Replies: 136
- Views: 48051
Re: Administrative Section "Must be Involved" - How involved
Once again, people are worried about something that doesn't actually happen. The system works.
- Sat May 17, 2014 9:35 am
- Forum: Former Admins
- Topic: [No longer admin]Deuryn
- Replies: 9
- Views: 3435
Re: Deuryn
He's actually not the most active headmin on the server, apparently. as always, please play the game.
- Wed May 14, 2014 6:38 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [bluespace] Sneaqi - Banned but I don't understand why
- Replies: 14
- Views: 3938
Re: [bluespace] Sneaqi - Banned but I don't understand why
Brotemis, if you search for the computer id associated with Sneaqi's account in the connection log you'll see the issue. I can only assume it's some kind of byond bug, because connections from multiple continents have been logged without any obvious pattern. Nic131 is the banned account responsible ...
- Tue May 13, 2014 9:53 pm
- Forum: General Chat
- Topic: Quey the Comdom - A Civil Discussion
- Replies: 11
- Views: 4989
Re: Quey the Comdom - A Civil Discussion
http://tgstation13.org/wiki/Rules#Letha ... Executions
Note that the section is titled Command/Security Policy. This supercedes space law 100% of the time.
Note that the section is titled Command/Security Policy. This supercedes space law 100% of the time.
- Tue May 13, 2014 8:50 pm
- Forum: Coding Feedback
- Topic: The time has come, nerf magic missile
- Replies: 84
- Views: 21974
Re: The time has come, nerf magic missile
I probably should have made magic missile shorter than what is now the normal stun, as was the case before.
- Mon May 12, 2014 8:06 pm
- Forum: General Chat
- Topic: Your Nuke OPs strategies
- Replies: 30
- Views: 8824
Re: Your Nuke OPs strategies
1. Move ship to SW 2. One operative flies through space to steal the AI upload board 3. Build an upload on the ship and hack the AI 4. ??? 5. Victory You monster. I'm totally trying that one next time. It can be done extremely quickly. The AI locking up security tends to make the round go very poor...
- Mon May 12, 2014 7:08 pm
- Forum: General Chat
- Topic: Your Nuke OPs strategies
- Replies: 30
- Views: 8824
Re: Your Nuke OPs strategies
1. Move ship to SW
2. One operative flies through space to steal the AI upload board
3. Build an upload on the ship and hack the AI
4. ???
5. Victory
2. One operative flies through space to steal the AI upload board
3. Build an upload on the ship and hack the AI
4. ???
5. Victory
- Sat May 10, 2014 8:16 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Why Weak Policies are Bad
- Replies: 54
- Views: 15888
Re: Why Weak Policies are Bad
Stop reading after the section about dealing with workplace break-ins. You're complaining about weak policy, but you draft one that includes a line that allows murdering trespassers by RAW? edit: Kept reading, this is completely shit. Sorry Neerti. This is not strong policy, this is explicit policy....
- Fri May 09, 2014 1:21 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: I was banned for no reason.
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3661
Re: I was banned for no reason.
I removed the CID from the ban on Bluespace's behalf, you should be able to play again.
- Fri May 09, 2014 1:14 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: I was banned for no reason.
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3661
Re: I was banned for no reason.
No, it's the IPs that are confusing to me. The most common listed are you, then the UK, then Cyprus, then Los Angeles. It makes no sense.
- Fri May 09, 2014 12:56 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: I was banned for no reason.
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3661
Re: I was banned for no reason.
That would explain the appearance of multiple CIDs on your shared IP. The CID ban that's keeping you out is associated with another IP address from a different state that only played on one day before getting banned. The strange thing is that it does appear to belong to one of your computers, but th...
- Fri May 09, 2014 12:35 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: I was banned for no reason.
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3661
Re: I was banned for no reason.
You are being blocked because you were playing on the same computer ID as Nic131, who was banned for griefing. Given the amount of keys and IPs associated with that CID, I'm inclined to think it's a bug with the database. I do have some concerns about your connection history, however. 475 days ago w...
- Thu May 08, 2014 5:26 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [mrglasses91] Lawlessgreenday's ban appeal
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3015
Re: [mrglasses91] Lawlessgreenday's ban appeal
You literally had a law telling you not to kill anyone. This is completely inexcusable, you managed to blatantly break both your laws and the server rules.
- Wed May 07, 2014 12:08 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Aurx] Kodeth101 - Overzealous adminning
- Replies: 12
- Views: 4178
Re: [Aurx] Kodeth101 - Overzealous adminning
You're complaining about a justified 15 minute ban?
- Tue May 06, 2014 11:51 pm
- Forum: NTStation Ideas
- Topic: Personal Universal Guardian Suit
- Replies: 18
- Views: 7121
Re: Personal Universal Guardian Suit
Requested by Goofball, this is his problem now ;^)
- Tue May 06, 2014 9:04 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Administrative Section "Must be Involved" - How involved?
- Replies: 136
- Views: 48051
Re: Administrative Section "Must be Involved" - How involved
I don't agree at all. Historically, the most active forum users were the ones who did not really play the game. One of the most vocal users had played the game less than 30 times, and hadn't connected for weeks. Even if the forum is now comprised of the diehard players, it doesn't change my opinion....
- Tue May 06, 2014 6:50 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Borging and Memory
- Replies: 37
- Views: 12714
Re: Borging and Memory
Nothing.
- Tue May 06, 2014 5:56 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Administrative Section "Must be Involved" - How involved?
- Replies: 136
- Views: 48051
Re: Administrative Section "Must be Involved" - How involved
This is a good opportunity to remind you that the forum is a service for the game, and not the other way around. FNR exists solely so we can handle administrative issues. If the rest of the forum dies because there's no stenography, I absolutely do not care.
- Mon May 05, 2014 7:36 pm
- Forum: General Chat
- Topic: Community advocates?
- Replies: 48
- Views: 12686
Re: Community advocates?
If you do not ask, you will not receive.
- Mon May 05, 2014 6:26 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: "It's silicon policy time!" "No CentCom no!"
- Replies: 301
- Views: 87921
Re: "It's silicon policy time!" "No CentCom no!"
I'm not advocating anything, just advising of the original intent of the game. I wouldn't miss secborgs if they went the way of the dodo.
- Mon May 05, 2014 6:06 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: "It's silicon policy time!" "No CentCom no!"
- Replies: 301
- Views: 87921
Re: "It's silicon policy time!" "No CentCom no!"
If we switch to Safeguard, I would bet money that Secborgs get removed.
- Mon May 05, 2014 5:51 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: "It's silicon policy time!" "No CentCom no!"
- Replies: 301
- Views: 87921
Re: "It's silicon policy time!" "No CentCom no!"
The entire point of using Asimov is that it's a square peg for a round hole. If we changed the default lawset to one that allows antag murderboning, we'd have to do some serious silicon balance changes.
- Sun May 04, 2014 3:14 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: "It's silicon policy time!" "No CentCom no!"
- Replies: 301
- Views: 87921
Re: "It's silicon policy time!" "No CentCom no!"
I don't agree. To my understanding "inaction" refers to the silicon not doing something it could do to stop the harm.
- Sat May 03, 2014 12:07 am
- Forum: Resolved Requests
- Topic: Ban Request - Ben Dover, Penn Striker
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1867
Re: Ban Request - Ben Dover, Penn Striker
Ben Dover is not who he purports to be, and has been permabanned.
- Fri May 02, 2014 9:15 pm
- Forum: Resolved Requests
- Topic: test
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1537
Re: test
wot the fok did ye just say 2 me m8? i dropped out of newcastle primary skool im the sickest bloke ull ever meet & ive nicked 300 candy bars from tha corner store. im trained in street fitin’ & im the strongest foker in tha entire newcastle gym. yer nothin to me but a cheeky lil dickhead w/ ...
- Fri May 02, 2014 9:11 pm
- Forum: NTStation Coding
- Topic: [PR] Syndicate Operative Changes
- Replies: 40
- Views: 30020
Re: [PR] Syndicate Operative Changes
Projectile weapons that don't stun are pretty meh, the C20r is not one of those. Making someone drop their gun every time they get hit is brutal.
- Fri May 02, 2014 8:04 pm
- Forum: Resolved Requests
- Topic: test
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1537
test
fk u
- Fri May 02, 2014 5:50 pm
- Forum: Resolved Requests
- Topic: Ban Request - Ben Dover, Penn Striker
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1867
Re: Ban Request - Ben Dover, Penn Striker
Ben Dover's IC conduct is pretty bad throughout that day, more than just during that round. Repeatedly advocating for greytide and killing all of security. Pen Striker seems to have only played that round, but he did so almost entirely without speaking. Can you give a detailed summary of what exactl...
- Fri May 02, 2014 5:34 pm
- Forum: Resolved Requests
- Topic: Ban Request - Jamison Oneal (ASJHKL asdf)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1159
Re: Ban Request - Jamison Oneal (ASJHKL asdf)
Fun fact: The briefcase is not a normal melee weapon. You can't hit someone with it unless they're below 50% HP, in which case it knocks them unconscious for a couple seconds. I've read through the logs, and Jamison acted way outside the bounds of the rules for a non-antag. You're not allowed to mut...
- Thu May 01, 2014 7:22 pm
- Forum: General Chat
- Topic: The safe in the vault
- Replies: 36
- Views: 19013
Re: The safe in the vault
A fireaxe and a bear pelt hat.
- Thu May 01, 2014 6:47 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: "It's silicon policy time!" "No CentCom no!"
- Replies: 301
- Views: 87921
Re: "It's silicon policy time!" "No CentCom no!"
Not really the same thing. Bombs can theoretically be used to prevent human harm to an Asimov AI, the upload board can't.
- Thu May 01, 2014 5:42 pm
- Forum: Resolved Requests
- Topic: Ban Request - Gunner Mull/Smallbubba
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2005
Re: Ban Request - Gunner Mull/Smallbubba
From my reading, Gunner was being pretty aggressive and instigated this situation, but I'm not sure that he deserves to be banned for it.
- Thu May 01, 2014 5:37 pm
- Forum: Resolved Requests
- Topic: ASIMOV AI killed me
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1813
Re: ASIMOV AI killed me
Locking topic, if Nope22 wants this lifted they can appeal.
- Thu May 01, 2014 5:30 pm
- Forum: Resolved Requests
- Topic: [Gadd?] Beating people FNR as Chaplain
- Replies: 12
- Views: 4711
Re: [Gadd?] Beating people FNR as Chaplain
I'm applying a ban to Gadd for rule 1 violation.
1.We’re all here to have a good time. If you’re intentionally trying to ruin everyone else’s good time, you won’t have a place here. Being a jerk in-character is fine to a point, but being a jerk out of character is not welcome at all.
- Thu May 01, 2014 8:02 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: "It's silicon policy time!" "No CentCom no!"
- Replies: 301
- Views: 87921
Re: "It's silicon policy time!" "No CentCom no!"
That's because in almost every situation all you have to do is follow your laws and the server rules. This exhaustively thorough list is a reference document for any possible uncertainty you may have.
- Wed Apr 30, 2014 8:01 pm
- Forum: Resolved Requests
- Topic: Scott Osterweis - Shooting security because mech
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3512
Re: Scott Osterweis - Shooting security because mech
I'm pretty satisfied from the evidence presented thus far that this was improperly escalated by Wiz. Even if the first shot was an accident and you get attacked, it's really not appropriate to shit on the crew this way. Unless he has anything else to say about the matter, I'm going to apply a short ...
- Wed Apr 30, 2014 6:56 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Administrative Section "Must be Involved" - How involved?
- Replies: 136
- Views: 48051
Re: Administrative Section "Must be Involved" - How involved
Those clearly do not meet the standards for starting a thread. If they did, they would have been split.
- Wed Apr 30, 2014 6:54 am
- Forum: Resolved Requests
- Topic: Scott Osterweis - Shooting security because mech
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3512
Re: Scott Osterweis - Shooting security because mech
[15:02:23]ATTACK: <font color='red'>Scott Osterweis(wizardjenkins66) shot Saiga Pishuaipiao(tokiko1) with The heavy laser [15:02:34]SAY: Saiga Pishuaipiao/Tokiko1 : WOAH [15:02:41]SAY: Saiga Pishuaipiao/Tokiko1 : DURAND HOSTILE [15:02:38]ATTACK: <font color='red'>Scott Osterweis(wizardjenkins66) sho...
- Wed Apr 30, 2014 12:54 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Administrative Section "Must be Involved" - How involved?
- Replies: 136
- Views: 48051
Re: Administrative Section "Must be Involved" - How involved
My disagreement with CC will never be resolved because it is essentially "I want this" "We don't want that" repeated over and over again. In Psyentific's example, the third party added posts with "times, information and people" regarding similar incidents from the same ...
- Tue Apr 29, 2014 11:18 pm
- Forum: Resolved Requests
- Topic: Scott Osterweis - Shooting security because mech
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3512
Re: Scott Osterweis - Shooting security because mech
I've directed him to this thread so we can hear his side of the story.