/tg/Station 13

Wordle 389 4/6*

Thieves sould be limited to like one or two in a round. It's a neat idea, but the only real impact I ever see is when one is being overly aggressive with their ID objective and an angry mob forms. I often observe rounds (mostly on low-ish pop) with one traitor and 3+ thieves and basically nothing h...

Wordle 388 5/6*

im like 95% sure me, oranges, and maptainers agreed that the best path is to buff normal windows from being more than like ~3 hits from destruction, then replacing most of the r-windows on the map with windows outside of places that actually warrant the security like brig or the bridge

Misdoubtful wrote: ↑Mon Jul 11, 2022 7:15 pm Repetitive content with social interaction:
Every job.

Fight me.

This post is funnier if you take "fight me" to mean that the best job content is punching people in the halls

We're not going to do this

Wordle 387 4/6*

Is this the one where you can program it? If so then we don't want this and instead would rather that effort be put into letting circuits be more expressive

Wordle 386 6/6*

Removed don't be dumb

Wordle 385 5/6*

It's been a week and so far nothing so I'm just going to resolve this

They're human, but admins should be sympathetic to silicons who don't realize if it isn't obvious.

Wordle 384 5/6*

No to less head of staff antags, yes to different/harder objectives--this was brought up as the solution at the last community meeting as well

fwiw if this topic becomes the third to be about weird sex creep stuff I'm going to explode so don't do it

Wordle 383 6/6*

We are opting to overrule this appeal and return the ban placed on your past account, including placing it onto your new one. This is primarily due to your previous actions being both severe and recent enough to warrant you sitting out for more than you were given. Here are some excerpts. Most of th...

Wordle 382 3/6*

They're not supposed to be useful for combat

we're moots on twitter

i've had Nutella as a moth name for the longest time i think that clamping down on moth names that arent explicitly ooc is cringe i hope that drag just decides to let this one go tbqh +1 to this, My personal moth naming policy has always been "don't be extremely stupid, and don't ruin it for t...

Wordle 381 4/6*

This ban appeal is devoid of anything useful I hope you realize. Can you just log on and take a picture of what the ban reason is?

Wordle 380 5/6*

This thread is atrocious and I keep getting notifications of people reporting posts in here, and the appeal itself is over so I'm just going to close this peanut as an embarrassment

SS13 player worried about furries in their game:

Wordle 379 3/6*

Sylphet has retired

Sylphet retired

Wordle 378 4/6*

Any chance you can find or remember (so I can find) the OOC message you were thinking of? You can check your rounds here: https://scrubby.melonmesa.com/ckey/letrolemastur If it's of sensitive nature because you thought it was your dox, you can send me a PM here or on Discord (Mothblocks#9162) instea...

every time a revanent roles it is a malice to the fun of the round, random killing, spacing the stations air supply, and emagging every bot happens every time a revanent roles. These are things an antagonist does, you don't explain why this is bad to the round. and giving them more non lethal abili...

Wordle 377 5/6*

Spoiler:

You are perhaps worried about your financial status to the point where you worry that going outside of your bubble will put you far outside your price range

Just because nobody's made it an action button yet, but that being said you also need to factor in that multiple embeds can be in someone at once, and sometimes a LOT of them at once.

We have a rewrite of a lot of MRP specific stuff planned, especially regarding powergaming/murderboning/what have you. We are not going to be taking this as is at this time, but will likely be hosting a broad discussion thread on our changes when we get closer to finalizing them.

We don't have interest in this, we want there to be more heads of staff in rounds and not fewer.

I see this, I will look into it soon.

couldn't admin trainers vet and approve mentors without the need for headmins to step in. Only to some extent. I alluded to it here: Head admins, and even just normal trainers/admins (if you are thinking that head admins can just defer it off), have a lot of responsibilities and adding mentors is d...

CentCom knows how many "emergency" retreats are just the captain being bored. Supermatter cascades are proof of an actual emergency.

Wordle 376 6/6*

the "bureaucracy" added could be as simple as 1. apply on forums if you have a good record and sufficient playtime and 2. dont answer mentorhelps as a way to shitpost This is a huge oversimplification when you factor in the behind the scenes stuff. Applying on the forums means needing a s...

Wordle going fucking crazy recently

Wordle 375 X/6*

...

I think that the game is so complex already that not requiring the wiki for all but the most basic jobs (Read: Cargo) is a completely unreasonable standard that will never be realized, and is very likely harmful to the game due to the likely end result of over-simplification. It's not an unreasonab...

I used auto-scan cloning with friends so we could hang out more and I don't regret anything

I am of the belief that systems should not demand the wiki in order to be used. That is disconnected from the suggestion that wiki should be updated alongside code changes (they should, wiki should be up to date), but I definitely think the wiki being out of date making the system worse is definitel...

If you're going to enter policy discussion, you should actually engage with the discussion because for the sake of head admins evaluating mentors, your post is completely useless as you do not provide a counter argument to anything said and might as well be noise.

Search found 2109 matches