/tg/Station 13

Screemonster

even if the ban has expired it's still a misleading note because "doing stuff in the cargo bay" implies the chef was merely in his department and not, you know, stealing shit from the department and stabbing him in the eyes when he attempted to remove him

Screemonster

how the fuck is refusing an order from a fucking dog bannable

like yes a talking dog is something that only tends to appear in the game through admin intervention but that does not mean that a dog talking to you has the same weight as a fucking bwoink

Screemonster

bumping this thread to say that I saw these raspberry multi-layered magnums in the supermarket earlier and that's some fucking good shit thanks for the heads up

Screemonster

I've heard worrying things about the textboxes being really jarring

like highres fonts on top of pixel art that make it look like an rpg maker game

Screemonster

holy fucking shit equating being ejected from a videogame server for inappropriate behaviour to capital fucking punishment If somebody uninvolved with the game would have read your screeching and crying when a clown was punished for murdering a security officer, they just might believe that. With w...

Screemonster

https://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=29549 I have a degree in law so of course I understand the meaning of things. To be honest the concept of having to appeal to the same exact person who enforced the ban is really stranger to me... but anyway it's a game. Does perma ban means I w...

Screemonster

marmite is better than vegemite

Screemonster

fucking lol

Screemonster

Also whether or not the banana peel is ruled valid/invalid that ban note is highly misleading and inaccurate if the chef was the actual instigator, and would need updating. lmao yeah, "Killed a chef for doing things in cargo" what things I guess "stabbing you in the eyes" is thi...

Screemonster

Agux909 wrote:
Screemonster wrote:the real question is why bother dragging the body to the gibber when on most maps the disposals driver is more accessible from cargo
Because it's more satisfying, and you can serve them as food.

you know what I'll concede that

Screemonster

the real question is why bother dragging the body to the gibber when on most maps the disposals driver is more accessible from cargo

Screemonster

god that's an awful lot of words for "I took something that belonged to someone, refused to give it back when asked by the fucking captain, then ahelped when someone later attacked me for it"

you can't lawyer your way out of being a cunt

Screemonster

how very dare you not obtain permission to play the game also if the chef ahelped getting gibbed for putting someone's eyes out with a screwdriver without provocation then the chef can eat a bag of rusty dicks too because if there's one thing we all love it's another episode of "someone started...

Screemonster

I myself don't even ahelp sec for minor abuses, I resolve it IC , personally. My point is if you want to have a normal round after being wronged, you shouldn't resolve it IC. Can you read something with nuance for 20 seconds or does everything have to be "HURR SEC GOOD DON'T HURT SEC EVER"...

Screemonster

Oh and keep in mind, (this is just a joke since its just spessman game, dont use it as an arguement) the human race has a history of people doing things that they normally wouldnt when an authoritative figure repeatedly tells them to, like ww2. There was even an experiment where one person would ha...

Screemonster

Security has to operate on incomplete information. Going from 90% sure someone did something to 100% sure is nearly impossible and would require a degree of research and investigation that is essential impossible or, at the very least, completely impractical given the environment of a typical LRP r...

Screemonster

Imagine if he'd just used the say verb to communicate with the clown instead the thing is, that "almost like it was wrong to give it to the clown in the first place!" thing is like... that comes across to me as the guy basically acting like he's untouchable because of his red shirt and no...

Screemonster

lmao now the volunteer lawyers are showing up An issue at stake in this appeal is the rule of “act like an antag, get treated like an antag”, and the idea that illegitimate arrests can be escalated as any conflict, even to a surprise instant death attack. how the fuck is this a problem if you're wor...

Screemonster

if there's one thing that's worse than sec mains that get it into their heads that they're untouchable because they can just round-remove anyone that tries to fight back and loses, it's command mains that enable them by refusing to believe the sec officer could have done wrong and stonewalling any c...

Screemonster

Kendrickorium wrote:>I've been an admin on a bayfork HRP server

can't imagine why you aren't one anymore.

who the fuck said I stopped

Screemonster

if the fucking clown had a problem with the access being taken from him HE SHOULD HAVE TAKEN IT UP WITH THE CAPTAIN, WHICH IS THEN AN ISSUE OF SEC VS CAPTAIN. NOT BLOW HIM THE FUCK UP AND REMOVE HIM FROM THE ROUND. Very strange point to make considering the sec officer lied to the cap about having ...

Screemonster

if the fucking clown had a problem with the access being taken from him HE SHOULD HAVE TAKEN IT UP WITH THE CAPTAIN, WHICH IS THEN AN ISSUE OF SEC VS CAPTAIN. NOT BLOW HIM THE FUCK UP AND REMOVE HIM FROM THE ROUND. Very strange point to make considering the sec officer lied to the cap about having ...

Screemonster

yeah, no. you dont just get to kill a sec officer because he lied about who has or where an ID is. if an officer is being blatantly shitsec he'll usually get lynched by the crew, if a sec officer "attacks" you (the term attack is up for debate since a literal mountain of shitters will scr...

Screemonster

yeah, no. you dont just get to kill a sec officer because he lied about who has or where an ID is. if an officer is being blatantly shitsec he'll usually get lynched by the crew, if a sec officer "attacks" you (the term attack is up for debate since a literal mountain of shitters will scr...

Screemonster

I'm allowed to act on the information I have (the clown has the spare, an item the clown does not normally have) but the clown isn't allowed to act on the information they have (the security officer took his legitimately obtained belongings from him, which escalation policy dictates makes them valid...

Screemonster

i'm fucking confused, since when can non antags kill sec? when sec do literally anything that would make anyone else valid, barring "actually responding to a definite crime" edit: and holy fuck you chimps the ban wasn't for stealing shit as security it was for ahelping and saying the clow...

Screemonster

i'm fucking confused, since when can non antags kill sec? when sec do literally anything that would make anyone else valid, barring "actually responding to a definite crime" edit: and holy fuck you chimps the ban wasn't for stealing shit as security it was for ahelping and saying the clow...

Screemonster

yeah feel free to be a dirty cop just don't bitch when the dirt gets up your own nose

Screemonster

the issue isn't that the sec officer swiped the ID it's that he whined to teacher like a little bitch when he got his knocks for it

Screemonster

sinfulbliss wrote:So now the seccie who ahelped is getting banned for the ahelp?
That's kind of excessive. I mean the clown chose to resolve it ICly by blowing him up, so doesn't that mean it was IC?

if it's IC then he shouldn't fucking ahelp and lie to the admins telling them it wasn't provoked

Screemonster

bull fucking shit. You steal someone's shit, you're valid. Being security doesn't change that. What a horrible take. By that logic, sec should let people run around with stunbatons, shotgun, disablers, and whatever other shit they have because "you steal someone's shit, you're valid." See...

Screemonster

Although that is pretty damning it doesn't really effect the facts of the case at the end of the day. Is lying to your fellow secoffs against spacelaw? Nah. Maybe if it was the HoS asking, and he lied, or the cap asking, you would have an argument, because they stand in a higher authority and lying...

Screemonster

since when are security immune to escalation You may instigate conflict with another player within reason (you can't completely destroy their department, kill them unprovoked, or otherwise take them out of the round for long periods of time) but they are entitled to respond with violence. If you thi...

Screemonster

On another note, Pepsi's meme image response caused him to start raging and throwing away any legitimate chance he had of appealing the ban. This happened also on other ban appeal threads with other admins. The admin replies with something a bit cheeky which just enrages the appealer who is, theore...

Screemonster

The laws shouldnt matter because you as someone observing someone interacting with an AI upload cannot know the laws until they are uploaded (Freeform specifically, you can examine to find out board names), and in the case core laws, may require modules that the uploader has not made. Again, you sh...

Screemonster

Non-antagonists can do whatever they want to antagonists as per lone antagonists, but non-antagonists are not allowed to pre-emptively search for, hinder or otherwise seek conflict with antagonists without reasonable prior cause. Non-antags acting like an antag can be treated as an antag. I don't s...

Screemonster

I stand by my statement. Words are words are words. Also I bet if they had made a proper appeal and didn't lie they'd have a shot of being unbanned for it, considering it was a year ago. Not a fucking gain sinful Full disclosure, I don't support pedophiles, doxers, or smut pedo porn on TG... THERE ...

Screemonster

is the law being uploaded the kind of thing an antag would upload

if not, then it's not acting like an antag

Screemonster

you can count on one hand the number of people submitting ERP books, they are likely deeply deeply mentally damaged. Making them disappear will make this entire debate irrelevant. nooo noooooooooooooooooo but it's a slippery slope to not being allowed to explicitly go out of my way to do other thin...

Screemonster

If a ruling is made that you cannot write books about Player Characters without consent this rule will also apply to non-sexual books. For example if I write about Lepi Mewtera eating an apple and Naloac says I didn't have permission they can delete it. no one is advocating for such a blanketed all...

Screemonster

To add to the negatives, maybe one of the reasons we stagnate in a toxic puddle is all of this weird 4chan culture shit that's lingered purely due to tradition and a deliberate desire by a loud minority to keep the server as esoteric, unapproachable and bizarre as possible to stop any mainstream in...

Screemonster

My personal take; 18+ content is part of SS13, see WGW (https://tgstation13.org/wiki/Woody%27s_Got_Wood) or the fact that homocide is part of every round. While Erotic Roleplay is not acceptable, books, unless read, are not forced into players and generally require seeking out. There is an argument...

Screemonster

chocolate_bickie wrote: Copyright rules generally make exceptions for ''parody, caricature or pastiche'' that do not require the owners permission.

just because something is technically legal doesn't prevent it from being a dickhead fucking move

Screemonster

fire up openttd
play for about 5 minutes then realise I fucked up somehow in a way that's going to be a pain to undo
close openttd

Screemonster

Do not be creepy. Apparently my position on protections for static characters not only makes me less than a person, but a creep too. Got it. Better just rule 8 ban me right now. It baffles me how some people can claim to champion empathy in one breath and casually throw these nasty little quips in ...

Screemonster

Wubli, this may appear to be an ad hominem argument, but I promise that it is not. Please look at this graph. [snip] Would you be open to the possibility that your strong reaction to character-based smut is, in part, a result of your strong attachment to your OC? The OC you frequently draw and play...

Screemonster

no why would I give a shit about athath's plight, dude doesn't do anything of value to me. the thing I don't get is why his coding ability or contributions are even relevant like he could be the best coder on the planet and that still wouldn't be relevant to a ban for ingame conduct we can debate t...

Screemonster

Animation and digital art are becoming more and more recognized within the last 10 years. the quality and availability of the tools needed to create them has gone up while the cost has come down an A4 sized pen tablet cost an arm and a leg in 2011 and didn't even have a screen so you had to do that...

Screemonster

Reminds me of all the types of ice cream that were pretty much exclusive to the continent years back: the watermelon ones were probably my favourite as a kid, and they're available now in the UK which is just wonderful. That said, there was also an ice cream I've never been able to find since my ch...

Screemonster

I remember going to portugal as a kid and they had these chocolate-coated sponge cake bars in the supermarket with robots on the cover that me and my brother thought looked cool so we got some and when we bit into them we found that there was something solid in there which turned out to be a little ...

Search found 3161 matches