Well maybeD&B wrote:How nice of you to make a thread where you can call out people with a small chance of getting any retaliation since they probably don't read the forums.
They should
Well maybeD&B wrote:How nice of you to make a thread where you can call out people with a small chance of getting any retaliation since they probably don't read the forums.
I'm okay with this, nerd.D&B wrote:This shit is Fucking ANNOYING
Reece wrote:Just kill the spare stealer.
No.BeeSting12 wrote:...space them.
Seems nonsensical, since creating an autocloner improves the station without interacting with any organic beings.Deitus wrote:isnt that actually bannable? i remember ahelping once if i could make an autocloner and was told that it would be against drone laws
That... is a good idea.Screemonster wrote:How about a specific greentext for "ensure the station goal is not completed"?
Stubbed-toe shuttlecalls MIGHT MAKE THE BADDY WIN
OR MAYBE THE PERSON CALLING EARLY FOR FLIMSY REASONS IS THE BADDY TRYING TO WIN OH NO LYNCH THEM
captain sawrge wrote:Having things be overly secure makes the game dull ... it's the core design of the game. For there to be the conflict that drives the round and player interactions, things need to not work as well as they should.
I was that captain. Central Command sent us extra cloner parts just for the people on the ride, so it was fine by me, so long as people did it to themselves.AdAstraPerAspera wrote:~
Are we going to just kill off every roundtype bar traitorchan?Kor wrote:Red alert and smash the consoles then pray for a better round type
Dr_bee wrote:Amusing or silly station goals would be fun!