Search found 269 matches

by Aurx
Wed May 07, 2014 4:31 pm
Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
Topic: Borging and Memory
Replies: 37
Views: 12490

Re: Borging and Memory

Given the amount of grief -- both literal and figurative -- they cause, it might make sense to quietly have a rev policy (i.e. admins hands-off) for rounds where staffs of change are spammed to the extent they tend to be. It doesn't happen that often anymore. Policy's pretty simple as I understand ...
by Aurx
Tue May 06, 2014 8:28 pm
Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
Topic: Administrative Section "Must be Involved" - How involved?
Replies: 136
Views: 47477

Re: Administrative Section "Must be Involved" - How involved

This is a good opportunity to remind you that the forum is a service for the game, and not the other way around. FNR exists solely so we can handle administrative issues. If the rest of the forum dies because there's no stenography, I absolutely do not care. Do you not give a shit about the communi...
by Aurx
Tue May 06, 2014 3:17 am
Forum: Resolved Appeals
Topic: [Aurx] Kodeth101 - Overzealous adminning
Replies: 12
Views: 4143

Re: [Aurx] Kodeth101 - Overzealous adminning

There were people in conflict with security. You came out of nowhere to mention lasers and security. No prior thread of conversation I could see that would lead to it. And "Not IC" said in OOC is a big red flag. It looked like textbook IC in OOC.
by Aurx
Sun May 04, 2014 6:42 pm
Forum: Admin Feedback
Topic: Admin Feedback Poll
Replies: 27
Views: 8082

Re: Admin Feedback Poll

It's a matter of what's the lesser of two evils, abuse of anonymity, or abuse of administrative power. But one of those things already has a pretty damn effective system in place to prevent it. And if you want to be anonymous and have relevant info, PM an uninvolved 'min and request they post your ...
by Aurx
Sun May 04, 2014 5:37 am
Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
Topic: "It's silicon policy time!" "No CentCom no!"
Replies: 301
Views: 86807

Re: "It's silicon policy time!" "No CentCom no!"

So an admin saying that "a Sec-borg seeing a sec officer beat a nukeop and simply taking the action of stating "Please do not harm that human" is violating law 1" is incorrect as the borg is not inactive but in a state of ineffectual activity, and as the robot isn't the one caus...
by Aurx
Fri May 02, 2014 10:10 pm
Forum: General Chat
Topic: Harmless prank ideas
Replies: 37
Views: 12390

Re: Harmless prank ideas

Code: Select all

$placeholder=$content;
$content=$source;
$source=$placeholder;
by Aurx
Thu May 01, 2014 4:07 pm
Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
Topic: "It's silicon policy time!" "No CentCom no!"
Replies: 301
Views: 86807

Re: "It's silicon policy time!" "No CentCom no!"

Policy doesn't cover what a silicon should do if it does wind up breaking one of its laws. As an example: Confirmed ling sprinting around the halls. Sec hot in pursuit. AI shocks a main hallway door right in front of the ling. ZAP, ling goes down. ZAP, officer right on the ling's tail hits the same ...
by Aurx
Thu May 01, 2014 3:41 am
Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
Topic: "It's silicon policy time!" "No CentCom no!"
Replies: 301
Views: 86807

Re: "It's silicon policy time!" "No CentCom no!"

MrStonedOne brought up that some AIs will try to use nonhumanity as a reason to deny doorknobbing or simple law 2 orders (";AI, please build this at the R&D lab") just to be belligerent to nonhumans. Any recommendations for if/how to deem that a rule 1 violation? I don't want to see, ...
by Aurx
Thu May 01, 2014 2:14 am
Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
Topic: "It's silicon policy time!" "No CentCom no!"
Replies: 301
Views: 86807

Re: "It's silicon policy time!" "No CentCom no!"

1): I'm 100% with you on hulks.
2): I see absolutely no good reason to make an AI be schizophrenic about uploads. I'd say anywhere with an upload board stored in it or a constructed upload console should be able to be treated exactly the same as the upload itself.
by Aurx
Wed Apr 30, 2014 5:26 am
Forum: General Chat
Topic: [POLL] Put one of the servers on the pub hub for a day
Replies: 54
Views: 20982

Re: Put one of the servers on the pub hub for a day

You mean Griefer, Too lazy to grief, and Griefer in training.
by Aurx
Tue Apr 29, 2014 8:51 pm
Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
Topic: Administrative Section "Must be Involved" - How involved?
Replies: 136
Views: 47477

Re: Administrative Section "Must be Involved" - How involved

This stuff shouldn't be done behind closed doors At the very fucking least, if you're changing the interpretation a section of text, make it damn clear you've changed the interpretation. At the very fucking least, let the people who are supposed to act on a what's posted on a forum voice opinions b...
by Aurx
Mon Apr 28, 2014 6:47 am
Forum: Former Admins
Topic: [No Longer Admin] Pandarsenic
Replies: 30
Views: 10547

Re: Pandarsenic

cultist-chan wrote:You're a admin? I never knew pomfsenic :3
No no, Pomf's the /vg/ host. No clue who this panda fuck is.
by Aurx
Mon Apr 28, 2014 5:08 am
Forum: Archived/Deleted
Topic: Pandarsenic
Replies: 5
Views: 1801

Re: Pandarsenic

cultist-chan wrote:You're a admin? I never knew pomfsenic :3
No no, Pomf's the /vg/ host. No clue who this panda fuck is.
by Aurx
Mon Apr 28, 2014 1:05 am
Forum: Site, Forums, And Wiki
Topic: Site ideas
Replies: 388
Views: 211717

Re: Site ideas

For threads such as http://www.coderbus.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=216, I believe it would be best if each post moved there was tagged with the thread it was moved from in addition to the ban reason, so as to provide proper context.
by Aurx
Thu Apr 24, 2014 5:16 pm
Forum: Archived/Deleted
Topic: Silicon Shitstorm 2014
Replies: 16
Views: 5560

Re: Silicon Shitstorm 2014

I disagree with 2.1.5. Same. The policy also COMPLETELY ignores the possibility of non-human PCs. Example: If some tator orders the borgs to kill all golems, banning the golems for defending themselves would be utterly retarded. Also: This dehumanizes hulks. Is that fully agreed upon by the head ad...
by Aurx
Thu Apr 24, 2014 4:10 am
Forum: General Chat
Topic: [POLL] Put one of the servers on the pub hub for a day
Replies: 54
Views: 20982

Re: Put one of the servers on the pub hub for a day

One of the iterations of /vg/station was publicly listed for a short time. It was the absolute WORST experience of my entire SS13 history. It took weeks to weed out all the shit players that joined. Some pubbies are perfectly decent people, but the majority are utterly HORRIBLE. I am completely oppo...
by Aurx
Wed Apr 23, 2014 5:49 am
Forum: General Chat
Topic: [POLL] Hotkey/No Hotkey
Replies: 44
Views: 15562

Re: Hotkey/No Hotkey

I've memorized most of the auto-complete shortcuts for admin commands and in-game verbs, so it's more efficient for me to use normal mode. It's like having every button in every tab available within half a dozen keystrokes.
by Aurx
Sat Apr 19, 2014 12:08 am
Forum: NTStation Ideas
Topic: Singularity and the Gravity generator
Replies: 4
Views: 2060

Re: Singularity and the Gravity generator

I guess so. Perhaps make it work like NarNars and pick a random person to follow if there are no beacons. Thereby crew trying to work out who it is and making them stick on a suit and dance around the singulo like a monkey to prevent the shuttle from being nommed? Do you have any idea what a pain i...
by Aurx
Fri Apr 18, 2014 7:00 pm
Forum: Site, Forums, And Wiki
Topic: Site ideas
Replies: 388
Views: 211717

Re: Site ideas

Remove tracking of post counts. Remove tracking of join date. Remove smilies. REMOVE SMILIES. Remove avatars. Use the space gained by removing avatars to allow for each post to have an image attached and thumbnailed. Add an option to post anonymously. Moderators would still see account names on anon...