/tg/Station 13

Bans threats are bad but so is being a shitter and hindering an inquiry. Nabski blew up in a bad way but all that was needed is oldman not being an egolord too. Both people are in the wrong here. I think most of us are in agreement from this. The complaint is due to the fact that admins should be h...

I don't know why you and others reference not answering an admin as "not covered by the rules." I'm not saying nabski handled this the best, but that argument is just pants on really dumb. Because it isn't. If you're being talked to about something bannable and you blow off the admin, exp...

The first time that I "threatened to ban you" was here, after I realized that things were becoming argumentative and tried to state that our two options were collaborative or hostile, with hostile being the one that ends poorly. For a reason that isn't covered by any of the rules. Can you...

Hes a good player though. Rare type of sec main who doesn’t live from valid to valid. He's very back and forth with this. Sometimes he puts good effort in and plays the role mindful of how it impacts other players. Other times he'll execute people with complete dumb fuck reasoning. Definitely has t...

ishortjr33 wrote:Can't security players just [Anything that requires more than 90 IQ]

no

Using a bug to influence your IC decisions pulls it into the OOC realm. Had this been with me I’d have banned you until the GitHub issue came since you weren’t going to explain it to me. This reasoning is totally understandable, because the threat of ban is founded upon an actual rule violation and...

I would however say that yes, you are obligated to share information you possess when it comes to the game. If you want to play the free game you give the free answers. There's a difference there and it's not minor. Whether or not you feel he's obligated to do so, you banned him for a reason that i...

11. You weren't "dead". Someone was still in your body running around since it was a revolution. What would happen to that person if Oldman had given you an answer you wanted to a question you already knew the answer to? 12. If you had left out the "quit being a cunt for 24 hours&quo...

Wizard should be 0%

Deliberately lying or misrepresenting facts in adminhelps will be dealt with harshly. Can you point to where he lied or misrepresented anything that happened? Admin PM from-Nabski: I'm pretty sure I know what the answer is already, I just want to confirm it "I remind him that it was an IC-stat...

Nabski wrote:The part where he declared he wasn't going to answer me.

Which rule did that break?

Nabski wrote:so I replaced you to avoid making the round fucky for everyone else involved.

Which part of that required you to ban him from the server?

I wasn't in the following round due to leaving work and going to bed. I don't even remember the round starting so banning the AI without replacing it was dumb but kind of unavoidable with no other admin on to replace it. Are you sure about that? I could've sworn I saw your ghost orbiting somebody. ...

This may be weird coming from me since I love breaking into the armory (though maybe it's because I have that experience with it), but the default armory as it stands is WAY too easy for any grey-wearing chump to get into and clean out, especially on Meta. Once you find test and bolt wires (about a ...

Banned our AI early into the round (95338) following a situation in the previous round, no attempt was made to replace the AI before he was killed 20 minutes later despite me eagerly asking to replace him as a ghost. The round went to shit in part due to our AI getting erased by Kang, so please make...

AI for that round. Witnessed the whole situation with the RD in the brig and saw cuffed Brick and the ninja. Couldn't hear them from my sat and moved along before he was captured. Manley was the only substitute security for the first 98% of the round and had to deal with quite a lot of hectic stuff ...

Yeah, I learned that purge doesn't remove Law 0 later (note is from over a month ago). I know it's scummy which is why I figured I shouldn't ask for complete removal of the note since even though I told him not to harm, I still one-human'd.

Byond account and character name: Malkraz, Rock Steel Banning admin: Alexch2 Ban type (What are you banned from?): Note Ban reason and length: Stern warning - As a non-antag roboticist, onehumaned the asimov silicons and added a fourth law telling it to pull pranks on the crew. Silicons decided that...