/tg/Station 13

Hmm "enable tgui" on input is supposed to make those normal say boxes. Maybe it only changes the *other* tgui input prompts. I think it should revert it to old chat as well

i join all the time to run sdql queries

the preference i listed does exist because i went into game to find it

it uh, I don't think that pref exists. I, like a fool, told shadow that it was cringe and boomerfodder to keep around an old system that's been totally replaced, especially if it can be used to circumvent glorfing. So uh, yeah I'm dumb I guess my earlier post was me remembering the code BEFORE I fu...

also we're not designing around changelings always going loud because we would ideally be incentivizing people to stay stealthy through other means

setting is game preferences > ui > enable tgui. it works fine for most people and allows us to do more like easily display radio channels to people who havent yet memorized them all. turn off the preference if you do not like it, it's as client side as it can possibly be right now from what i unders...

zephyrtfa is now a maintainer

5. Make the atmosphere easier to return to non alarm thresholds. 👍 yet more proof that reconstruction being bad in ss13 is the root of all problems The actual root of the problem is that calling the shuttle and not bothering with it is always the better solution. I sometimes think fixed length roun...

Cobby wrote: ↑Mon Feb 13, 2023 6:53 pm
Mothblocks wrote: ↑Sun Feb 12, 2023 8:51 am if you renamed "admin help" in the escape menu to just "get help" i would want to seeh ow much that solves
wyci

thgeres a freeze

oranges wrote: ↑Wed Feb 08, 2023 9:00 pm 5. Make the atmosphere easier to return to non alarm thresholds.

yet more proof that reconstruction being bad in ss13 is the root of all problems

Yes, it is better for people to be stuck on a broken round once while I solidly deduce the issue and make sure it never happens to anyone again than to let it restart and happen to everyone else god knows how many times while they hope to pull in someone who will waste their time independently figu...

if you renamed "admin help" in the escape menu to just "get help" i would want to seeh ow much that solves

Yes, it is better for people to be stuck on a broken round once while I solidly deduce the issue and make sure it never happens to anyone again than to let it restart and happen to everyone else god knows how many times while they hope to pull in someone who will waste their time independently figur...

if im trying to investigate a game breaking bug and the round restarts because i didnt click "no" because i was focusing on the bug, you would see a revert pr in the following 20 seconds

i love vox but no more species that are just an animal

What about this for a solution then? Anyone playing a non-head, non-security role has the option to disable their chance of becoming a primary/secondary target in the character creation screen. However this will also disable your chance of rolling an antagonist. Anyone who wants the chance to becom...

the point of blob in today's dynamic is that it is a wonderful distraction for antagonistic mischief. it's not a huge threat if people are actively trying to stop it, but people HAVE to be actively trying to stop it. that means there's other stuff they're not doing, like watching the armory, or mayb...

The Blob? If you hear "Blob in Atmos!" then as long as you stay away from Atmos and make sure to get off the station before it hits Round End, you'll face zero problems from it. They're, imo, wasted threat you go out of their way to ignore the thing that you have to fight or else it ends ...

if your idea of improving the game is restraining people into the bespoke uplink more then you have a fat chance of getting your ideas past me

tbf i completely believe that we'd have perf problems at such high pop, i simply think it's a bad reason to reduce pop

If batons just required an extra hit or didnt have knockdown or something then it shouldnt be an issue whatsoever

there is no issue and both of these are things i have blocked in the past for being terrible ham fisted ideas

3000h players guess at the skill of an average player

perf shouldn't really be a reason for lowering pop, it should be a reason for charging forwards efforts to make the game more performant. we need to support even higher player counts for things like events, and we need incentive to do it. i'd be much more interested if you had gameplay reasons behin...

no fuck off

this is exactly why the supermatter delam is such dogshit always because engineering is always in some fuck off part of the map that nobody cares about

that sounds like a more pressing problem then

assuming the actual gameplay pre-ascension is still fun anyway

5% of people ascending for a fairly common antagonist doesnt sound terrible to me

click the image button

you know this already since i believe we agreed on it but for the record this adds no additional obligation for maintainers to keep around quirks used as bans

Capsandi wrote: ↑Sun Jan 08, 2023 3:55 pm
blackdav123 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 08, 2023 5:12 am You'll probably get banned doing this
Not on a lrp server, and mrp players signed up for ineffective antagonists.

If you think LRP admins are that dumb, wait until they meet you

I'm trying to remember the circumstances on which I suggested this...but yeah the idea was always it would be a temporary panic bunker like thing that wouldn't be on for too long at any given time (though obviously subject to admin/headmin whims as config)

If I was a new player and got hit with something like this I would probably just be confused and move to a different server where I can play immediately and likely just stay there instead. I dont think gatekeeping is the step forward we need to integrate new players faster. not to say one thing or ...

this sounds familiar, didnt i suggest this once

I'll be honest folks I clicked this thread on accident trying to find a different thread and read none of it, but when asked as head admin last term in Manuel discord I think I answered that it's against the rules, but that admins should be wary about how hard it is to prove. I think Drag or Cheshif...

We is maintainers. We want more minor antagonists, which is why things like thieves get merged, but it has so far been tricky to find an antagonist that is minor, not complex, and doesn't overwhelm administration. We will keep trying, though. They aren't forced to choose paradox clone, if they selec...

That being said if it's true that paradox clones don't copy clothing then that is gonna be pretty nutty. I'm CMO basically every round I play and it's not like they'll be able to get a second set of CMO gear.

I have encountered this issue in my own experience were I become Axle Brady and a chemist associated with him asked me "how much is the zaza" and after responding wrong he figured out I wasent the real one and so I was killed If the implication is that this was a meta trick then this is a...

Wordle 545 6/6* 🟨🟨⬛⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩⬛🟩 🟩🟩🟩⬛🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Wordle 546 4/6* 🟨🟨⬛⬛⬛ ⬛🟨🟩⬛⬛ ⬛⬛🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Wordle 547 3/6* 🟨⬛🟨⬛🟨 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Wordle 548 3/6* ⬛⬛🟩🟨🟨 🟩🟨🟩⬛🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Wordle 549 3/6* 🟨⬛⬛⬛🟨 🟩🟨🟩⬛🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Wordle 550 4/6* 🟨⬛🟨⬛⬛ ⬛🟨🟨⬛⬛ ⬛⬛⬛🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Wordle 551 5/6* ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ ⬛⬛⬛⬛🟨 🟨⬛🟨⬛⬛ ⬛⬛🟩🟩⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Wordle 552 2/6* 🟨🟩🟨⬛...

Wordle 516 4/6* 🟨⬛⬛⬛🟨 🟩🟨⬛⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟨🟨🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Wordle 517 4/6* ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ ⬛⬛⬛🟨⬛ 🟨⬛🟨🟨🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Wordle 518 4/6* 🟨⬛🟨⬛🟩 ⬛🟨🟨🟨🟩 ⬛🟨🟩🟨🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Wordle 519 4/6* 🟨⬛🟩⬛⬛ ⬛🟩🟩⬛⬛ ⬛🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Wordle 520 4/6* ⬛🟨🟨⬛⬛ ⬛⬛🟨🟨⬛ 🟩⬛⬛🟩⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Wordle 521 4/6* 🟨⬛⬛⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩⬛🟩 🟩🟩🟩⬛🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Wordle 522 4/6* 🟨⬛⬛⬛⬛ ⬛🟩🟩⬛🟩 ⬛🟩🟩🟨🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Wordle 523 4/6* ⬛⬛🟩🟩...

Don't let this drop Wordle 487 4/6* 🟨⬛⬛⬛⬛ ⬛🟨🟨⬛⬛ ⬛🟩⬛🟩⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Wordle 488 4/6* ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ ⬛⬛🟨⬛🟨 ⬛🟨🟩🟨🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Wordle 491 3/6* ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ ⬛🟩⬛⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Wordle 492 3/6* ⬛⬛🟨⬛🟩 ⬛🟩⬛⬛🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Wordle 493 5/6* ⬛🟩⬛⬛⬛ ⬛🟩⬛⬛⬛ ⬛🟩⬛⬛🟨 🟨🟩⬛🟨🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Wordle 495 3/6* 🟨⬛🟨⬛⬛ 🟩⬛⬛🟨🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Wordle 497 6/6* ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ ⬛⬛⬛⬛🟨 ⬛🟨⬛⬛⬛ 🟨⬛🟨🟨⬛ 🟩🟩⬛🟩⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 ...

editing cost p much never has the effect people think it does. just chanigng weight is fine

Bump (Bring Up My Post)

It seems like most of this suggestion is about removing/neutering the current objectives in place, when we already have an issue of not having enough impactful objectives. We need to like, double our objectives before we even start to consider killing existing ones. Bonus idea one exists on Skyrat a...

It's not going to change until inventory as a whole changes

Everyone ruined it for everyone

Nuke ops being a huge threat that often requires evacuation is orthogonal to having an above 50% winrate. This is proven by the fact that they are already the former without the latter

Winrates look fine to me, not 50/50 but not a blowout either https://moth.fans/data/nukes-n-flukes/

All while constantly fluctuating as time goes on and different players come in

I would like to point out it's still a fairly common occurrence for nukies to forget that they can't breathe in space and don't set their internals. UX problem, not player problem What if warops prevented the shuttle from leaving until the (human) ops were dead? Then you would be breaking the only ...

the win rate doesn't need to be 50/50

Search found 2109 matches