Search found 438 matches
- Fri Sep 13, 2019 2:17 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Enforce higher expectations for heads of staff and security roles
- Replies: 112
- Views: 22799
Re: Enforce higher expectations for heads of staff and security roles
I feel like we have this topic at least once a headmin term. To put it simply; general incompetence isn't and shouldn't be against the rules. We already have experience requirements and it's possible to change those if we feel players are getting to head of staff positions too quickly. You'll still ...
- Fri Sep 13, 2019 12:38 am
- Forum: General Chat
- Topic: Serial tiders
- Replies: 112
- Views: 43830
- Thu Sep 12, 2019 5:43 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Mortosasye] I learned my lesson about self antagging
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1225
Re: I learned my lesson about self antagging [I dont know the admin's name please do not delete]
Just to help you fill in your appeal properly, the ban reason is:
Mortosasye was the banning admin.
Code: Select all
Asked to be converted to the cult as a non antagonist. This is considered self antagging; don't do it again.
- Tue Sep 10, 2019 3:46 pm
- Forum: General Chat
- Topic: oh boy here we go again
- Replies: 24
- Views: 5160
Re: oh boy here we go again
I mean, I'm glad this isn't a complaint and is more of a long, dumb shitpost in general chat. I think we even have a thread specifically for these >greentext rage stories. Sometimes I feel like I've locked down who is the biggest shitposter on the forums only for half a dozen people to puke up their...
- Tue Sep 10, 2019 2:03 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [NecromancerAnne] DeeDubya - note appeal
- Replies: 2
- Views: 824
Re: [NecromancerAnne] DeeDubya - note appeal
It hasn't even been a month since the original appeal was rejected.
- Mon Sep 09, 2019 1:56 am
- Forum: Closed Complaints
- Topic: [Krusvik] Shikarego - Inappropriate Behavior and Note
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2155
Re: [Krusvik] Shikarego - Inappropriate Behavior and Note
Should anyone need the round ID to search logs for this one, it seems to have occurred on round-118000. Timonk is right, Brick Carr is NOT Krusvik. As for the complaint itself I'm not really sure what you're looking for. You've stated in different parts of your long post that you aren't complaining ...
- Sun Sep 08, 2019 5:38 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Can the AI harm harmful non humans?
- Replies: 50
- Views: 9768
Re: Can the AI harm harmful non humans?
but you twisted that into killing every non human on board or for punching someone, it's indeed not hard to understand your strawman scenarios. I brought up extreme examples of bad faith from a silicon player to show that we require silicons use some better judgement in how they act when human harm...
- Sun Sep 08, 2019 4:28 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Can the AI harm harmful non humans?
- Replies: 50
- Views: 9768
Re: Can the AI harm harmful non humans?
A lot of situations can justify using lethal force to prevent harm. What we require is proper reasoning and ideally some good faith from the silicon player. Killing someone with flash resistance who clearly doesn't intend to stop causing harm is usually fine Which funnily enough means Gigapuddi wou...
- Sun Sep 08, 2019 2:33 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Can the AI harm harmful non humans?
- Replies: 50
- Views: 9768
Re: Can the AI harm harmful non humans?
So? There are plenty of ways to do anything. Silicon adhere to their laws, there is nothing wrong with killing IF it furthers said laws. This isn't a particularly hard concept to grasp; Asimov's laws potentially allow you to take a large range of actions to protect the lives of humans. This can inc...
- Sun Sep 08, 2019 1:11 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Can the AI harm harmful non humans?
- Replies: 50
- Views: 9768
Re: Can the AI harm harmful non humans?
Law 1 doesn't compel you to kill. It requires you act to prevent harm. There are plenty of ways to do so without killing.CPTANT wrote:Human harm isn't a whim, its literally law 1.
- Sun Sep 08, 2019 1:03 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Can the AI harm harmful non humans?
- Replies: 50
- Views: 9768
Re: Can the AI harm harmful non humans?
Keep in mind when playing silicon that you have to consider both your laws and the server rules. Just because there is nothing preventing a Asimov silicon from killing non-human crew doesn't mean it's okay to do so on a whim. This is why purged silicons are still expected to follow a relaxed escalat...
- Thu Sep 05, 2019 2:47 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Thunder12345] PolishUser - Innocent perma removal server ban/jobban
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3307
Re: [Thunder12345] PolishUser - Innocent perma removal server ban/jobban
The role ban reason is the same as the server ban. As for policy on using bombs to kill antagonists: Headmin Rulings page. Weapons of Mass Destruction to counter antagonists: An example of this is suicide bombing a wizard or BoH bombing the cult base. If use of the weapon does not win the round for ...
- Wed Sep 04, 2019 10:18 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Escalation against security falsely arresting you
- Replies: 59
- Views: 13924
Re: Escalation against security falsely arresting you
In the above scenario, you will be banned if you do anything about the sec swarming into your workplace because the arrest is "warranted". If by 'do anything' you mean if you kill all of them then yes it's certainly possible it might end up that way. It largely depends on how the situatio...
- Wed Sep 04, 2019 4:04 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Escalation against security falsely arresting you
- Replies: 59
- Views: 13924
Re: Escalation against security falsely arresting you
So what is reasonable escalation against security falsely arresting you? For example a couple days ago an officer falsely called me a cultist and tried to baton me. What is reasonable self defense? When does it become acceptable to kill an officer trying to take you down? I'd suggest non-lethal res...
- Wed Sep 04, 2019 1:02 pm
- Forum: Town Hall
- Topic: Trialmin Review: NecromancerAnne
- Replies: 22
- Views: 7537
Re: Trialmin Review: NecromancerAnne
A very active admin that puts in plenty of time during hours we typically don't have much coverage. I think some unfairly judge them based on the high frequency of appeals but they rarely take into account the sheer amount of tickets the admin handles when basically solo during lesser covered hours....
- Tue Sep 03, 2019 5:32 pm
- Forum: Closed Complaints
- Topic: [NecromancerAnne] Dorkenstein - Banned for???
- Replies: 22
- Views: 6814
Re: [NecromancerAnne] Dorkenstein - Banned for???
in relation to that I absolutely hate this ban because in essence this player hasn't done anything that has affected anybody else. For fear of continuing the peanut posts with everyone else. It feels important to point out that the ban isn't just for quickly switching account after a ban was lifted...
- Sun Sep 01, 2019 4:09 pm
- Forum: Closed Complaints
- Topic: [NecromancerAnne] Dorkenstein - Banned for???
- Replies: 22
- Views: 6814
Re: [NecromancerAnne] Dorkenstein - Banned for???
Is having 2 accounts against the rules now? Yes, It is. We typically ask people to stick to one account, typically the one with a record on the server. While it's possible to change main account for various reasons (like a old account and forgetting the password) it isn't unusual for us to perma th...
- Sat Aug 31, 2019 12:41 pm
- Forum: Former Admins
- Topic: [No Longer Admin] TheChosenEvilOne
- Replies: 23
- Views: 8449
Re: TheChosenEvilOne
Whenever I go to play/admin on Terry during peak hours, I see TheChosenEvilOne as the active admin. The guy is eager and helpful and will talk with others in asay to check his reasoning if he's not sure. My only concern is that you don't burn yourself out, it's fine to take breaks even if it would r...
- Mon Aug 26, 2019 11:45 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: War Ops 2, electric boogaloo.
- Replies: 31
- Views: 8218
Re: War Ops 2, electric boogaloo.
Ahelping before you off yourself isn't a hard ask. Any admin can decide to make exceptions when it comes to holding heads of staff accountable for playing the role but it's just good practice to try and get command positions replaced; especially now that dynamic is coming along to mix it up. Honestl...
- Sun Aug 25, 2019 2:32 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Addendum to Rule 4
- Replies: 42
- Views: 10058
Re: Addendum to Rule 4
I can't say I'm interested in giving security even more freedom to cremate people who steal the hand teleporter. As is security already have rules exceptions made for them and players already dislike those, smart security officers seem to avoid the problems around this by not jumping to the first op...
- Sat Aug 24, 2019 4:20 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Pointlesswaste3] Ghilker/D.O.R.F. - Note Appeal
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1279
Re: [Pointlesswaste3] Ghilker/D.O.R.F. - Note Appeal
For those reasons, notes can be appealed if they match one of the following two cases: 1. The note is factually or materially incorrect. There must be a difference between how an admin who knew all the facts would view you vs how an admin who only had the note to go on would view you. If you were b...
- Fri Aug 23, 2019 4:44 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Syndicate Lavaland Comms Base Flavor And RP Nuances
- Replies: 21
- Views: 5417
Re: Syndicate Lavaland Comms Base Flavor And RP Nuances
Well to be honest the syndicate is hardly passive, but what matters is that they aren't allowed to reciprocate hostile actions taken against them, regardless of what was stolen. That is sort of the point I'd like to try to emphasize. I mean, if they run off back to the station with some of your stu...
- Thu Aug 22, 2019 11:33 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Basil] [OrdoM] CAPTTLasky - Note Appeal for Valid Escalation
- Replies: 22
- Views: 6444
Re: [Basil] [OrdoM] CAPTTLasky - Note Appeal for Valid Escalation
I feel like you're treating "self-defense with stun weapons against a sec officer" as way too severe a crime here. It isn't like I just ran up to you and started firing disabler bolts at you or the like; you escalated to stun combat first, and I followed suit (both times). By security pol...
- Wed Aug 21, 2019 4:18 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Are we beginning to police language?
- Replies: 45
- Views: 9845
Re: Are we beginning to police language?
Want to keep this trash heap on-topic about policy or is this basically just another peanut post thread now shitting up Policy Discussion. Someone calling you canuck offhandedly is fucking nothing. If you made it pretty clear you are deeply offended by the term and someone went out of their way to k...
- Wed Aug 21, 2019 1:34 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Are we beginning to police language?
- Replies: 45
- Views: 9845
Re: Are we beginning to police language?
Yes, it applies to all groups of people. The key here isn't the slur being said to someone in a vulnerable group; rather it's about finding a vulnerability and then going at it in a pretty personal way that goes beyond mere 'banter'. This isn't even a hard concept to grasp.
- Mon Aug 19, 2019 4:28 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Are we beginning to police language?
- Replies: 45
- Views: 9845
Re: Are we beginning to police language?
No, not really. Alphonzo made it pretty clear in the the appeal that the issue wasn't the use of slurs themselves but rather harassing someone for being trans. You can disagree with the amount of harassment required for a admin to intervene but the point was never that a slur was used, rather the di...
- Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:14 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Is chaplain with dark blessing human?
- Replies: 14
- Views: 4479
Re: Is chaplain with dark blessing human?
Here I was thinking this was a simple thread, but ohw boy I triggered the anti catpeople crowd without this even being about them in the first place. They triggered themselves, business as usual. Not really much to discuss here, dark blessing is just a null rod option, there is no reason it would d...
- Mon Aug 12, 2019 11:48 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Make Shoe-less Clowns Valid
- Replies: 11
- Views: 4241
Re: Make Shoe-less Clowns Valid
Nah. As much as I dislike it, Mime speaking is a choice from the mime. You can't force a mime to talk to make them valid. Clown shoes are something you could push the clown over for and remove from them. Aside from how easy it is to steal their shoes it is also bad for cosplaying clowns who want mor...
- Thu Aug 08, 2019 9:12 am
- Forum: Town Hall
- Topic: Trialmin Review: PeopleAreStrange
- Replies: 19
- Views: 5809
Re: Trialmin Review: PeopleAreStrange
Lately I've been admin alongside PeopleAreStrange and I appreciate the care and effort they put into the role while in high pressure environments like the Event Hall. Easy to work along side and considerate to boot. Their experience have proven helpful for getting back into the swing of things with ...
- Mon Aug 05, 2019 1:39 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: Jimmius - role ban
- Replies: 34
- Views: 9527
Re: Jimmius - role ban
Lore does matter in a role playing game thoug. My job description actually says that "They are peaceful unless disturbed" and my flavor text also say "Yeah go do whatever.". By that principle I could have killed everything that walked on lavaland because of my flavor text No, yo...
- Mon Aug 05, 2019 1:16 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: Jimmius - role ban
- Replies: 34
- Views: 9527
Re: Jimmius - role ban
this is a complaint how an admin doesnt take his job seriosly, doesnt read, not knowing lore in RP game ect Lore literally doens't matter though. The policy on lavaland roles is that you follow your flavor text and your flavor text states golems are peaceful and neutral to the station. Roleplaying ...
- Mon Aug 05, 2019 10:32 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: Jimmius - role ban
- Replies: 34
- Views: 9527
Re: Jimmius - role ban
I'm not here to rule on your complaint , just offering what I witnessed as a player in that round. The first thing that came to mind while you were shouting over the radio is that you wanted to shelter and work with the enemies of the station including people who's very end goal is summon Nar'sei an...
- Mon Aug 05, 2019 10:10 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: Jimmius - role ban
- Replies: 34
- Views: 9527
Re: Jimmius - role ban
I mean I just looked it up above from parsed logs on scrubby. You were even saying that cultists could make a base with you. Not sure how to take that as anything but allying yourself with antags.
- Mon Aug 05, 2019 9:56 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: Jimmius - role ban
- Replies: 34
- Views: 9527
Re: Jimmius - role ban
I was playing in this round as security and I remember you shouting over the general radio how you'll accept all enemies of Nanotransen and when one guy inevitably gets annoyed you're looking to ally with antagonists and makes threats you seemed to start talking about how this is war. I don't know h...
- Wed Jul 31, 2019 6:28 am
- Forum: Closed Complaints
- Topic: [NecromancerAnne] - Genevieve Bashline - got my body deleted without even getting talked to
- Replies: 12
- Views: 4519
Re: [NecromancerAnne] - Genevieve Bashline - got my body deleted without even getting talked to
Typically these threads just get locked until the round ends. That said: Precedents & exceptions: Examples and exceptions to the main rules. - Rule 1 Precedents. 2. Spamming any channel is not allowed, this goes for radio spam, AI vox announcement spam, paper at camera spam and other forms of sp...
- Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:24 pm
- Forum: Closed Complaints
- Topic: [MortoSasye] Narcissisko - Dismissive and Abusive
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2971
Re: [MortoSasye] Narcissisko - Dismissive and Abusive
Space Law is a RP guideline for security to consider when sentencing, it has no basis in OOC server rules. We have server rules for how players should act and a section for security to better define what security can and cannot do. Additionally, the flavor-text for ghost roles is enforced by policy....
- Mon Jul 29, 2019 2:37 am
- Forum: General Chat
- Topic: Space Law and Citations
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1286
Re: Space Law and Citations
Yeah, just use citations for minor shit you don't want to deal with for long like vandalism. Pricing is down to how security feels but a guideline might help them establish some kind of average base rate. Citations should just be a extra option for a pro-active officers on handling petty crimes; if ...
- Sun Jul 28, 2019 4:40 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Copypastas in IC chat
- Replies: 18
- Views: 4766
Re: Copypastas in IC chat
I've let it slide so long as it's feasibly just people in the round sarcastically repeating the words someone else said. If it refers to OOC concepts and I see it I'm going to at least message the guy and warn them. It's pretty contextual to what's happening in the round and what is being said. It's...
- Sun Jul 28, 2019 4:05 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Escalation discussion
- Replies: 51
- Views: 11518
Re: Escalation discussion
Most of that interaction is listed in Security Policy and Precedents , you can throw in a bit of the security escalation exceptions too if you like. So roughly speaking to 'qualify' for execution regarding security you need to have become valid to security. Typically this means acting like an antago...
- Sat Jul 27, 2019 1:52 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Escalation discussion
- Replies: 51
- Views: 11518
Re: Escalation discussion
That's as written but not how it's as enforced. You'll get banned for permaremoval even if they're the instigator. Personally I think this is dumb since the rules literally permit this but *shrug* Yeah, it's a known inconsistency with rules as written verses how it's enforced. The best explanation ...
- Fri Jul 26, 2019 9:30 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Escalation discussion
- Replies: 51
- Views: 11518
Re: Escalation discussion
Ok all the points worth mentioning have been mentioned now the thread is going to devolve into the same arguments but worse. Proof being the 80 other escalation threads that went nowhere. Just lock it now losers I don't know, might be better to let it play out so people can get it off their chests ...
- Fri Jul 26, 2019 9:13 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: I'm bored time to call shuttle
- Replies: 27
- Views: 5817
Re: I'm bored time to call shuttle
From a admin intervention perspective I usually leave shuttle calls to the players in game to resolve. The Heads of Staff (or the guy with their ID) are accountable to the crew and if they truly go against the will of the majority there are in game avenues that can be taken usually leading to some i...
- Thu Jul 25, 2019 3:20 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: free tritium (topic: i cant fit a proper title but should this sort of act really be bannable)
- Replies: 16
- Views: 3786
Re: free tritium (topic: i cant fit a proper title but should this sort of act really be bannable)
not really seeing a whole lot of policy discussion going on in this one to be honest, just a lot of complaining about a single ban. should admins ban stuff that nobody takes issue with, assuming the affected individuals are aware of who/why it was done? It's already common for admins to deal with is...
- Wed Jul 24, 2019 11:48 am
- Forum: General Chat
- Topic: Oranges did [almost] nothing wrong
- Replies: 35
- Views: 7444
Re: Oranges did [almost] nothing wrong
Screemonster wrote:imagine holding the opinion that teamkilling is okay if you decide your teammate isn't powergaming hard enough
fuck off
- Fri Jul 19, 2019 3:07 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Allow non-antag virologists to release cosmetic/meme viruses
- Replies: 39
- Views: 8771
Re: Allow non-antag virologists to release cosmetic/meme viruses
You guys should probably keep this thread on policy issues instead of just using it as a peanut post gallery for a ban appeal. Releasing a virus that functions only to grief the crew is kind of shitty and could come under rule 1 if the virus was shitty enough. I have to agree with PK-Penguin though,...
- Mon Jul 15, 2019 3:19 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Admin unknown] Asm7 - note regarding aimbot
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2029
Re: [Admin unknown] Asm7 - note regarding aimbot
It's a automatic note applied not by a admin but by a bot that responds to a particular exploit or at least something that looks like it. I imagine headmins will have to be the ones to pick this up.
- Fri Jul 12, 2019 6:08 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Reading smut/wgw/spamming comms as a comms agent
- Replies: 30
- Views: 6129
Re: Reading smut/wgw/spamming comms as a comms agent
I feel like comms agents should be able to get people killed still, but WGW is the wrong way to go. If that keeps happening it's likely headmins might decide that comms agents shouldn't be allowed to get people killed in the near future. I would have preferred to be some kind of gentleman's agreeme...
- Fri Jul 12, 2019 12:47 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Zxaber] Aspirine - maxcaps
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1086
Re: [Zxaber] Aspirine - maxcaps
The link I posted is of the Headmin (at the time the policy was made) ruling the policy I quoted. The rest of the thread linked is just the discussion around it. Our rules page has a link to a list of previous headmin rulings where I quoted the ruling you were likely banned under. https://tgstation1...
- Fri Jul 12, 2019 12:35 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Zxaber] Aspirine - maxcaps
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1086
Re: [Zxaber] Aspirine - maxcaps
Weapons of Mass Destruction (like max caps and detonating bags of holding) have been covered in policy and are listed in the Headmin Rulings page of the rules wiki. Weapons of Mass Destruction to counter antagonists - An example of this is suicide bombing a wizard or BoH bombing the cult base. If us...
- Wed Jul 10, 2019 12:55 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Gulagging should not be equivalent to a regular brig sentence.
- Replies: 33
- Views: 10923
Re: Gulagging should not be equivalent to a regular brig sentence.
I have to agree with wesoda on this one. If you don't mess about deciding to put criminals into the gulag properly, they can work off their sentence pretty quickly assuming they are prepared to do the work and not just piss their pants and break the machines. It also provided security a nice way to ...