Play2win, why shouldn't I?

General SS13 Chat
User avatar
Saegrimr
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2014 4:39 pm
Byond Username: Saegrimr

Re: Play2win, why shouldn't I?

Post by Saegrimr » #115230

Bottom post of the previous page:

Malkevin wrote:Reminder that lumni believes that implanting any random asshole makes them as trustworthy as a starting officer
For non-meta reasons, why wouldn't it?
tedward1337 wrote:Sae is like the racist grandad who everyone laughs at for being racist, but deep down we all know he's right.
User avatar
imblyings
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:42 pm
Byond Username: Ausops
Location: >using suit sensors

Re: Play2win, why shouldn't I?

Post by imblyings » #115233

The same reason cult don't implant brigged cultists and scream desperately for holy water while the chaplain's body has already made good progress traveling from the escape airlocks to the derelict.
The patched, dusty, trimmed, feathered mantle of evil +13.
User avatar
Saegrimr
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2014 4:39 pm
Byond Username: Saegrimr

Re: Play2win, why shouldn't I?

Post by Saegrimr » #115238

Speaking of cult, heres the type of powergaming I think is retarded and needs to go.

Cult round, i'm dicking off as the librarian and someone yells they found a tome. So I tell them to bring it to the library. I get my fingerprints all over the damn thing while talking and hand it back. A few minutes later beepsky comes chasing after me and I get dragged to the brig and searched because of my fingerprints on the tome. All cool so far, good on them for actually following up on that.

While i'm being searched for culty things, officer 2 says "Check the headset for a syndicate radio key too."
tedward1337 wrote:Sae is like the racist grandad who everyone laughs at for being racist, but deep down we all know he's right.
User avatar
Anonmare
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2015 8:59 pm
Byond Username: Anonmare

Re: Play2win, why shouldn't I?

Post by Anonmare » #115239

To be fair, you can get a cult tome from emagging the library computer but i it was a confirmed cult round then that Officer must be part of the Special Needs diversity program NanoTraesn apparently runs
Image
Image
Image
Malkevin

Re: Play2win, why shouldn't I?

Post by Malkevin » #115246

Saegrimr wrote:
Malkevin wrote:Reminder that lumni believes that implanting any random asshole makes them as trustworthy as a starting officer
For non-meta reasons, why wouldn't it?
Its accepted that ICly they only prevent brainwashing, they don't prevent personal desires to be a filthy traitor.
Which is why loyalty implants don't deantag traitors and traitor sec/captains are possible if antag is turned on for protected roles.
Sec/Captain not being antags is just due to good old fashioned vetting, background checks, and spying on their every move.

The lore is something we fudge around game mechanics to make them make sense ICly.
User avatar
Anonmare
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2015 8:59 pm
Byond Username: Anonmare

Re: Play2win, why shouldn't I?

Post by Anonmare » #115270

I always subscribed to the traitor's being Sleeper Agents with implants of their memories as a Syndicate that trigger at roundstart. Sec and the Captain having loyalty implants prevent them from firing so to speak since none of the implanted roles are capable of being tator tots outside of Admin Abuse
Image
Image
Image
lumipharon
TGMC Administrator
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 4:40 am
Byond Username: Lumipharon

Re: Play2win, why shouldn't I?

Post by lumipharon » #115296

Reminder that Malk is talking out of his ass.
Malkevin

Re: Play2win, why shouldn't I?

Post by Malkevin » #115303

Ad hominem
User avatar
Saegrimr
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2014 4:39 pm
Byond Username: Saegrimr

Re: Play2win, why shouldn't I?

Post by Saegrimr » #115304

Overruled. No ass-talking.

Image
tedward1337 wrote:Sae is like the racist grandad who everyone laughs at for being racist, but deep down we all know he's right.
User avatar
PKPenguin321
Site Admin
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2014 7:02 pm
Byond Username: PKPenguin321
Github Username: PKPenguin321
Location: U S A, U S A, U S A

Re: Play2win, why shouldn't I?

Post by PKPenguin321 » #115308

Saegrimr wrote:While i'm being searched for culty things, officer 2 says "Check the headset for a syndicate radio key too."
I know I said I would stop posting in this thread but I'd just like to point out that this is the same level of bannable as "HE HAS BROWN SHOES, HARMBATON HE"
or at least it should be
i play Lauser McMauligan. clown name is Cold-Ass Honkey
i have three other top secret characters as well.
tell the best admin how good he is
Spoiler:
Image
lumipharon
TGMC Administrator
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 4:40 am
Byond Username: Lumipharon

Re: Play2win, why shouldn't I?

Post by lumipharon » #115325

Malkevin wrote:Ad hominem
You made some wild accusation that I can ony assume is strawmanning something(s) I've in some other unrelated thread at some point, that is unrelated to what we are discussing here, so yes.

You are talking out of your ass.
Malkevin

Re: Play2win, why shouldn't I?

Post by Malkevin » #115343

We discussed the common practice of implanting sec infiltrators and expecting everything to be fine in depth not too long ago.
I said it was retarded, you said it was fine.
lumipharon
TGMC Administrator
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 4:40 am
Byond Username: Lumipharon

Re: Play2win, why shouldn't I?

Post by lumipharon » #115350

>Not too long ok

Ok.
What you said is you refused to implant new recruit sec 'incase they were antags'.

I argued that it made more sense to loyalty implant them because -
A: If you see a sec officer without an implant you are going to think they're an imposter/ling
B: On the flip side, if said unimplanted officer DOES get replaced/eaten by a ling, you won't be able to tell because hey, the original didn't have an implant!
C: If you really were suspicious of the new recruit (which begs the question why the fuck are you letting them in your sec force if you don't trust them), you can just tracking/chem implant them IN ADDITION to a loyalty implant.

This is very different from what you were implying, but please, find my posts where I say that I blindly trust people just because I put an implant in them.
Tornadium
Joined: Fri May 30, 2014 11:55 am
Byond Username: Tornadium

Re: Play2win, why shouldn't I?

Post by Tornadium » #115394

I'm starting to see why most people Loathe Lumi.
User avatar
CPTANT
Joined: Mon May 04, 2015 1:31 pm
Byond Username: CPTANT

Re: Play2win, why shouldn't I?

Post by CPTANT » #115397

Tornadium wrote:I'm starting to see why most people Loathe Lumi.
Lumi is right on the implants though.

Also unimplanted officers can be easily converted to rev/gang/cult when they were fine before.


also completely distrusting people without prior reason because they "might" be antags is just plain boring. Yes I know damn well that traitors regularly join sec, but ousting the occasional traitor from the force is part of the fun.
Timberpoes wrote: Tue Feb 14, 2023 3:21 pm The rules exist to create the biggest possible chance of a cool shift of SS13. They don't exist to allow admins to create the most boring interpretation of SS13.
Miauw
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 11:23 am
Byond Username: Miauw62

Re: Play2win, why shouldn't I?

Post by Miauw » #115399

are you still going on about that bullshit? we've been over that shit holy fuck
<wb> For one, the spaghetti is killing me. It's everywhere in food code, and makes it harder to clean those up.
<Tobba> I stared into BYOND and it farted
Malkevin

Re: Play2win, why shouldn't I?

Post by Malkevin » #115400

Revs can't convert sec officers because they're wearing glasses.
Gang has a tool to break loyalty implants anyway, and probably aren't going to randomly pen sec officers on the chance they're unimplanted.
Cult conversion is apparently too hard for people to do, so they're probably going to mash you into construct paste anyway.


Oh, and guess who the first people I'm going to stick loyalty implants into when the round is revealed to be a Convert 'Em Up.
If you're not adjusting your tactics to deal with threats as they arise you're a strategic failure.


If someone job swaps to security 9 times out of 10 they are a traitor, its not my job to make your life as an antag easier - in fact its the complete opposite.
User avatar
CPTANT
Joined: Mon May 04, 2015 1:31 pm
Byond Username: CPTANT

Re: Play2win, why shouldn't I?

Post by CPTANT » #115403

Malkevin wrote:Revs can't convert sec officers because they're wearing glasses.
Gang has a tool to break loyalty implants anyway, and probably aren't going to randomly pen sec officers on the chance they're unimplanted.
Cult conversion is apparently too hard for people to do, so they're probably going to mash you into construct paste anyway.


Oh, and guess who the first people I'm going to stick loyalty implants into when the round is revealed to be a Convert 'Em Up.
If you're not adjusting your tactics to deal with threats as they arise you're a strategic failure.


If someone job swaps to security 9 times out of 10 they are a traitor, its not my job to make your life as an antag easier - in fact its the complete opposite.
Revs frequently steal sechuds and they can cuff you to remove those glasses just fine.
And if that officer gets his implant broken by gangs YOU KNOW HE IS CONVERTED BECAUSE HE NO LONGER HAS AN IMPLANT.

Not implanting makes people impersonating sec officers just by taking their gear easy as fuck. If all officers are implanted the unimplanted one instantly stands out as an imposter.

Ive caught multiple lings impersonating sec because they didn't have implants. Not implanting recruits makes that basically impossible because you got multiple unimplanted officers running around.

Good luck getting people to report for implanting halfway through a round. The confusion about whether or not people should have an implant remains and confusion kills when playing sec.


If you just inform the security team that someone is a new recruit there is no downside to implanting except using up one.
Timberpoes wrote: Tue Feb 14, 2023 3:21 pm The rules exist to create the biggest possible chance of a cool shift of SS13. They don't exist to allow admins to create the most boring interpretation of SS13.
Tornadium
Joined: Fri May 30, 2014 11:55 am
Byond Username: Tornadium

Re: Play2win, why shouldn't I?

Post by Tornadium » #115405

I can't disagree that implanting is pretty key to catching out gangs or lings or people impersonating.

However, it doesn't do jack shit to stop Security being compromised. I feel that's the point that Malk was making.

Just because you implant some random fucker or traitor doesn't make that person trustworthy.

If they join as sec or are round start sec then they are, if not you simply cannot trust them.
Malkevin

Re: Play2win, why shouldn't I?

Post by Malkevin » #115409

CPTANT wrote:If you just inform the security team that someone is a new recruit there is no downside to implanting except using up one.
That only works if the sec team is full at round start (in which case you'd probably deny their transfer anyway) because in all likelihood you're only going to inform security of it once and then forget until it comes up again, I'd be incredibly surprised if new arrivals are informed of transferees every time they arrive in their dribs and drabs

Infiltrators and Impersonators are two completely different issues.
Infiltrators are people trying to pass themselves off as being as trustworthy as a normal round start officer
Impersonators are people attempting to pretend to be someone that is a round start officer.

Unsurprisingly this was brought up last time, and I said it (before Lumi) was easily resolved by using a tracker implant and/or chemical implant.
That way you've got the best of both worlds, you know they're not a round start officer because they don't have a loyalty implant, and you know its not someone impersonating a transferee because they're missing the tracker/chem implant.
Revs frequently steal sechuds and they can cuff you to remove those glasses just fine.
You're moving the goal posts, you said not having an implant makes them easy to convert - as in as easy as any other member of the crew.
SecHud prevents drive by flashes.

If they've got an officer down long enough to remove their sec hud then you've gotten them down long enough to remove their headset, cuff them, and then do loyalty implant removal surgery; because you've probably critted them if they haven't blabbed over the radio at being attacked.
Good luck getting people to report for implanting halfway through a round. The confusion about whether or not people should have an implant remains and confusion kills when playing sec.
You're doing it wrong.

You don't just ask them to come in to get implanted, you drag them back in forcefully.
And if they resist you summarily execute them as a suspected enemy agent, this is permissible under the rules because they're armed and dangerous and you don't need to take no chances in rev/gang/cult.
Malkevin

Re: Play2win, why shouldn't I?

Post by Malkevin » #115412

Tornadium wrote: However, it doesn't do jack shit to stop Security being compromised. I feel that's the point that Malk was making.
Exactly.

At the time I made the original thread in March (https://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic ... t=+loyalty) it was incredibly common to see traitors get a job transfer to security, get implanted, and then get the same level of trust as an actual officer whilst they went around making false arrests.

Now the reason the impersonator thing didn't occur to me at first was because I simply outright deny any transfer ins to security, but I did instantly bring up the alternative implants when that point was brought up.
User avatar
Drynwyn
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:09 pm
Byond Username: Drynwyn

Re: Play2win, why shouldn't I?

Post by Drynwyn » #115431

popcorn intensifies
In game, I play the A.I Firmware, the French cyborg C.U.R.I.E, Aubrie Allen, and the lizard scum Skulks-Through-Maintenance.
User avatar
Steelpoint
Github User
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 6:37 pm
Byond Username: Steelpoint
Github Username: Steelpoint
Location: The Armoury

Re: Play2win, why shouldn't I?

Post by Steelpoint » #115433

I said this months ago and I'll say it again since its relevant again.

Loyalty Implants are good for ensuring a traitor/changeling/whoever is not impersonating a ROUND START security officer, its also very powerful in Rev (and ehhh in Gang) in deconverting and holding onto loyal station personal. Loyalty Implants are useless aside from those two points.

Tracking and Chemical implants however are very powerful, and my defacto go to, when dealing with people who enlist in security during the round from the civilian population. In 99% of circumstances I will always reject someone trying to be promoted into security but in the 1% of times I let it slide (usually due to me trusting the person due to in game events or if its been forced on me by a higher authority and I can't be assed to spend 30 minutes contesting it) I'll always double tap a Chem and Track implant in them.
Image
User avatar
sirnat
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2014 8:27 pm
Byond Username: Sirnat

Re: Play2win, why shouldn't I?

Post by sirnat » #118519

Once I was HOS on a lowpop Sybil one night, and a person got arrested, well she had her changeling cloak armor on that hides her from AI. I then ahelp and ask if it'd be meta if I saw and knew she was a ling

Well me being dicked over plenty of times of my antag rounds, I actually released them after their sentence.

No idea if they got their green text but I felt good about not ruining someone's night.
User avatar
Takeguru
Joined: Wed May 07, 2014 5:20 pm
Byond Username: TakeGuru

Re: Play2win, why shouldn't I?

Post by Takeguru » #118528

You should have dunked her immediately.

Remove alien scum

Also, lings are shit, and even if I was RPing Officer Friendly I'd still incite the crew to form a lynch mob on the inhuman beast
Image
User avatar
iamgoofball
Github User
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:50 pm
Byond Username: Iamgoofball
Github Username: Iamgoofball

Re: Play2win, why shouldn't I?

Post by iamgoofball » #118548

so were my two subtle meme posts talking about how you fucks are off topic not enough

i guess I need to do the "big text angry" meme

this isn't Security VS Antag: The Game: The 3D Experience: On Ice: The Thread, this is "Play2win, why shouldn't I?"
User avatar
Saegrimr
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2014 4:39 pm
Byond Username: Saegrimr

Re: Play2win, why shouldn't I?

Post by Saegrimr » #118553

am i a meme yet
tedward1337 wrote:Sae is like the racist grandad who everyone laughs at for being racist, but deep down we all know he's right.
User avatar
Xhuis
Github User
Joined: Mon May 26, 2014 1:04 pm
Byond Username: Xhuis
Github Username: Xhuis
Location: North Carolina

Re: Play2win, why shouldn't I?

Post by Xhuis » #118564

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
I'm an ex-coder for /tg/. I made the original versions of clockcult, shadowlings, revenants, His Grace, and other stuff.
I don't play, code, or participate in the community, but I occasionally post dumb stuff in the hut.
Kraso wrote:hi gay
wubli wrote:xhuis you said you were feeling better but every thread you make makes me worry more about your sanity
ExcessiveUseOfCobblestone wrote:Sorry I was making fun of xhuis' """""compromise""""" who insisted that was the correct term to use.
CitrusGender wrote:We've ended up disabling clockcult on sybil and bagil now (terry is having some problems.) We will give Xhuis some time until he wishes to work upon it again. As of now, please use this thread for ideas and not for bickering.
wubli wrote:you are a cultist of the gay
IkeTG wrote:It's a reflection of humanity, like all of man's creation. You cannot divorce this act from yourself, in a way there's a big titty moth inside all of us.
wesoda25 wrote:yeah no one was curious what it was from. Imagine choosing being a degenerate as your forum gimmick, LOL
User avatar
Falamazeer
Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2014 12:05 am
Byond Username: Wootanon

Re: Play2win, why shouldn't I?

Post by Falamazeer » #118733

iamgoofball wrote:so were my two subtle meme posts talking about how you fucks are off topic not enough

i guess I need to do the "big text angry" meme

this isn't Security VS Antag: The Game: The 3D Experience: On Ice: The Thread, this is "Play2win, why shouldn't I?"
Take your meme-ry and go fuck a handful of spagetti,
It's on topic, antag security relations is literately and specifically what I'm bitching about in the OP.

This discussion is and has been on topic the entire time, right up until you took it off topic to discuss the status of the topic being on or off in the first place.
Ham Sammich, beating a dead horse since 2010.
NikNakFlak wrote:....It's true...that is why I removed my forum avatar
lumipharon wrote:ass parasite was pretty meh when I tried it.
User avatar
Oldman Robustin
Joined: Tue May 13, 2014 2:18 pm
Byond Username: ForcefulCJS

Re: Play2win, why shouldn't I?

Post by Oldman Robustin » #118771

I stopped reading halfway down the third page but I completely support anyone who refuses to accept security recruits.

1) Lore: The message you get at Code Blue makes it really clear that crew members are not to be trusted

2) Lore: Loyalty implants are mass-produced and deployed to your security team. The syndicate is a large inter-planetary criminal network/corporation. Realistically NT personnel would all be very aware of what loyalty implants worked to protect against, and that means being very aware that implanting a traitor isn't going to stop him.

3) Lore: All those given loyalty implants prior to boarding the station are subject to immense background checks and security clearances that prevent initial teams from being compromised by traitors, changelings, cultists, etc.

4) Meta: If someone wanted to be security at roundstart, they would've selected security, the fact they've had a sudden change of heart moments after arriving on the station is absolutely cause for skepticism.

5) Meta: Bad guys infiltrating security is basically an "iwin" button for any team antags and a virtual guarantee that the rounds going to hell even if its just solo antags. People put way too much faith in the security identity and security basically defaults to "Sec outfit + Implant = I trust this guy with my life and will give him anything he asks for". Accepting and implanting an officer who's an antag is signing your own death warrant. Perma will be released, the armory will be handed out to the cult/lings/etc., people will be arrested and then disappear over and over, loyal security will be butchered the moment theyre alone with the rogue officer - which leads to further dispersal of security equipment+access, and pretty soon the station is in a death spiral because the HoS let an assistant join security at roundstart.
Image
User avatar
Takeguru
Joined: Wed May 07, 2014 5:20 pm
Byond Username: TakeGuru

Re: Play2win, why shouldn't I?

Post by Takeguru » #118772

Oldman Robustin wrote:People put way too much faith in the security identity and security basically defaults to "Sec outfit + Implant = I trust this guy with my life and will give him anything he asks for".
Everything but this makes sense.

Most people trust security about as far as they can throw them, especially those of us who were around for antag sec.
Image
User avatar
srifenbyxp
Joined: Tue May 20, 2014 4:49 am
Byond Username: Srifenbyxp
Location: UK

Re: Play2win, why shouldn't I?

Post by srifenbyxp » #124696

Shitcurity has been on the rise with a "Because I could, I should" attitude, with a dash of powergaming from what I've seen of late. A crew member has a ripley? Better carry that Ion rifle with me at all times.
To be robust is not about combat prowess, it is the state of readiness for the situation at hand.
Malkevin

Re: Play2win, why shouldn't I?

Post by Malkevin » #124727

Sounds like its my time to return.
User avatar
Kangaraptor
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:33 am
Byond Username: Kangaraptor
Location: dank memes

Re: Play2win, why shouldn't I?

Post by Kangaraptor » #125092

The endgame for the crew as a whole -- including security -- has always been to survive, not to get as much redtext as possible. You SURVIVE the events of Space Station 13, you don't abate them. That's the whole point of the fucking game. The only arguable exceptions to this are wizard (where redtext is the roundend), revolution, gang, nukeops and cult. Surviving does not mean going out of your way to hunt all the antags 'just because'.

I don't know where this whole 'win/lose' attitude came from, but it's certainly not SS13. If you want to 'win' go play, fuck, idk... Counterstrike or something. If you want to survive crazy shit, play SS13.
Image
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot]