An0n3 wrote:He doesn't need to confirm access with anyone, and unless he's giving the clown all access every round it's not an actionable happening.
He is currently completely free to do whatever he wants with that console unless it results in something so game-breakingly bad it invokes Rule 1. Eg. giving everyone in the line all access in a single round. And even then, it's unlikely the people he gave access to would complain.
If the CE fucks off at roundstart and doesn't setup the engine, we all know that he'll get yelled at.
If the HoS permabrigs everyone, or orders his Sec force to ignore the station's problems to hang out in the brig playing D&D, he'll get yelled at.
Is it not apparent that the HoP has similar methods available to them to plunge the station into chaos "just cuz", and some of them even use it fairly regularly, yet there's no precedent or expectation of an OOC response?
Does that not strike you as a problem that ought to be fixed?
With the HoS and CE examples, rounds will be ruined and people will be permanently removed from rounds, and violate rule 1. I think that anything that the HoP does that does not reach the level of breaking rule 1 causes little enough harm and has sufficient IC fixes that we don't need new rules nor admin intervention to deal with it. HoP gives out sec or armory access to people? HoS, sec, and captain usually end up dunking HoP and demoting him. HoP gives out access willy nilly? Captain usually dunks him after getting enough complaints.
An0n3 wrote:But option 2 of the poll is exactly how it currently works.
Option 2 implies that you are not helping out the station. The real poll should be "Do we need a stricter code of conduct which allows for admin intervention in a wider variety of circumstances: Yes; No"
The current poll implies that there are no situations where the HoP assigns jobs as they see fit in a way that helps the station, which I think is what happens with 80%+ of HoPs.