Moderators: In-Game Game Master, In-Game Head Admins
Jack7D1 wrote:After reviewing the history of our previous host(s) I conclude that MSO is our most favorable host to date. To remove him would be very unwise.
Jack7D1 wrote:I seem to be mistaken
IcePacks wrote:>all you have is a taser and the cold realization that you're a haphazard bandaid over a problem that may or may not exist, applied by someone who doesn't know or care enough about their job to do it properly
tedward1337 wrote:Sae is like the racist grandad who everyone laughs at for being racist, but deep down we all know he's right.
J_Madison wrote:Captain's Charter
Bill Rowe has designated your station as DONT GO IN THE ARMORY NIGGER
I think your response to the guy that went into the armoury and found himself permabrigged is appropriate.
'J_Madison wrote:Captain's Charter
Bill Rowe has designated your station as DONT GO IN THE ARMORY NIGGER
I think your response to the guy that went into the armoury and found himself permabrigged is appropriate.
Alipheese wrote:Haven't seen him too extensively. Only around 20 rounds. But agood admin, interacts with the players, talks with them about fun / event rounds and helps out alot.
10/10 min.
John_Oxford wrote:-10/10 admin fuckery does not do it enough needs to push more buttonsSpoiler:
Wait was it on the shuttle? If so then i was the scientist beating you with a crowbarSpoiler:
Super Aggro Crag wrote:The best shitpost youll ever be responsible for will be your obituary.
Quality debate brought to you by ColonicAcid wrote:imagine having this little empathy
do you have autism bud? does your brain not see these people as humans? are they just a faceless statistic to you?
John_Oxford wrote:Spoiler:
John_Oxford wrote:-10/10 admin fuckery does not do it enough needs to push more buttonsSpoiler:Spoiler:
D&B wrote:Goes to immesurable debts to forego reading the context, or is simply oblivious enough not to read posts and acts based on biased shortening of actions. Truly sad to see in a headmin, hope this improves.
D&B wrote:Not a meme this time
metacide wrote:Seems not to want any scrutiny of that J_Mad incident where PKP and Danno week-banned J_Mad from sec after what seems like clear ban-baiting from (?fellow admin) Pax.
Why doesn't PKP want people to talk about the general issue of escalation and ban-baiting? Why lock that mention of this on the policy forum?
Where else is the place to discuss this sort of thing? It seems like valid and just criticism that is worth discussing openly elsewhere from the NTR hut.
It looks quite fair and reasonable to try to clarify what went on here and how it impacts current sec policy.Spoiler:
Limey wrote:its too late.
J_Madison wrote:I think you prematurely locked the thread.
There was still discussion to be had.
I think you should unlock the thread because it seems something happened to the ban.
The ban was removed before the week duration is over.
It seems someone reduced it without mentioning it, but it was a headmin reinforced ban.
Are you sure it's a clear and cut case if it was reduced early, and are you sure all headmins agreed on your decison?
The very matter that other players three weeks in find the ban unreasonable should indicate this is something to discuss and it shouldn't be locked. The headmins of the past very rarely locked threads in policy discussion prematurely.
captain sawrge wrote:J_Madison wrote:I think you prematurely locked the thread.
There was still discussion to be had.
I think you should unlock the thread because it seems something happened to the ban.
The ban was removed before the week duration is over.
It seems someone reduced it without mentioning it, but it was a headmin reinforced ban.
Are you sure it's a clear and cut case if it was reduced early, and are you sure all headmins agreed on your decison?
The very matter that other players three weeks in find the ban unreasonable should indicate this is something to discuss and it shouldn't be locked. The headmins of the past very rarely locked threads in policy discussion prematurely.
There has been an ongoing discussion regarding security moderation in the admin forum, it was pointless to have a second thread given that policy threads are exclusively just back-and-forth pointless arguing and have never solved anything.
lzimann wrote:unironically turned gang back on, very disappointed
Limey wrote:its too late.
Qbopper wrote:lzimann wrote:unironically turned gang back on, very disappointed
wait, like, the config?
pkp what the fuck I voted for you
PKPenguin321 wrote:Qbopper wrote:lzimann wrote:unironically turned gang back on, very disappointed
wait, like, the config?
pkp what the fuck I voted for you
http://ss13.eu/tgdb/tg/ingamepolls.php#p166
and player support when mode was ran, and a unanimous headmin decision
gang will be revived and is currently is only 1 tick more likely than Extended (so really rare)
PKPenguin321 wrote:Qbopper wrote:lzimann wrote:unironically turned gang back on, very disappointed
wait, like, the config?
pkp what the fuck I voted for you
http://ss13.eu/tgdb/tg/ingamepolls.php#p166
and player support when mode was ran, and a unanimous headmin decision
gang will be revived and is currently is only 1 tick more likely than Extended (so really rare)
Limey wrote:its too late.
Qbopper wrote:pkp what the fuck I voted for you
Sligneris wrote:Qbopper wrote:pkp what the fuck I voted for you
that's where you went wrong
PKPenguin321 wrote:Sligneris wrote:Qbopper wrote:pkp what the fuck I voted for you
that's where you went wrong
It was a unanimous vote, if my headmin spot was occupied by anybody else this still would have gone through by the other two, not sure why you have such a grudge
Limey wrote:its too late.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users