are multi-z stations actually a good thing?
-
- Confined to the shed
- Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2018 2:05 am
- Byond Username: Deedubya
- Location: shitting up your thread
are multi-z stations actually a good thing?
Recently, mappers have been playing around with the mechanics of having the station itself exist on connected and interactive z-levels. MMM's work on donut has been a particularly notable example of this. But, in all this excitement to see if we can, nobody's stopped to ask if we should.
Is adding a third dimension in a game strictly bound to two dimensions really a good idea, from both a design and gameplay perspective? I fear that the potential complications that this change can bring about are entirely unnecessary, and don't necessarily bring any meaningful mechanical depth to the game. It feels like more of a "hey look at this neat trick we can do in the code" than something designed to enhance the player experience.
Is adding a third dimension in a game strictly bound to two dimensions really a good idea, from both a design and gameplay perspective? I fear that the potential complications that this change can bring about are entirely unnecessary, and don't necessarily bring any meaningful mechanical depth to the game. It feels like more of a "hey look at this neat trick we can do in the code" than something designed to enhance the player experience.
Galatians 4:16 "Have I now become your enemy by telling you the truth?"
hey imma teegee admeme compliment me on my appearance here
flattering compliments people have given me:
hey imma teegee admeme compliment me on my appearance here
flattering compliments people have given me:
Spoiler:
-
- Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2017 12:16 am
- Byond Username: Tlaltecuhtli
Re: are multi-z stations actually a good thing?
pros: ceiling raids, realistic pit falls with traps, stairs, sewers, throwing bombs at people on the underfloor
cons: ceiling is ghetto telesci, being trapped in the upfloor because someone blew up the stairs, rcd grief
cons: ceiling is ghetto telesci, being trapped in the upfloor because someone blew up the stairs, rcd grief
- Ayy Lemoh
- Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2017 5:58 pm
- Byond Username: Jerry Derpington
Re: are multi-z stations actually a good thing?
Lifeweb has this and they're fine. I believe Bay and some other servers may have it as well, BUT I don't think any of those servers have to deal with:
1. Singularities
2. Teslas
3. Dragons swooping from above (this can be considered weird right now, but this would mean that our rooms and station would be really fucking tall)
4. Chasms (there used to be chasms that only dropped you down one z-level wtf where did they go)
5. Blobs
and probably some other shit that hasn't been thought about.
1. Singularities
2. Teslas
3. Dragons swooping from above (this can be considered weird right now, but this would mean that our rooms and station would be really fucking tall)
4. Chasms (there used to be chasms that only dropped you down one z-level wtf where did they go)
5. Blobs
and probably some other shit that hasn't been thought about.
-
- Confined to the shed
- Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2018 2:05 am
- Byond Username: Deedubya
- Location: shitting up your thread
Re: are multi-z stations actually a good thing?
The third dimension in general has been pretty easily handwaved due to it just not really existing in our mindset.Ayy Lemoh wrote:3. Dragons swooping from above (this can be considered weird right now, but this would mean that our rooms and station would be really fucking tall)
Galatians 4:16 "Have I now become your enemy by telling you the truth?"
hey imma teegee admeme compliment me on my appearance here
flattering compliments people have given me:
hey imma teegee admeme compliment me on my appearance here
flattering compliments people have given me:
Spoiler:
-
- Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2017 4:06 am
- Byond Username: SpaceManiac
- Github Username: SpaceManiac
Re: are multi-z stations actually a good thing?
chasms automatically switch to dropping you down one z-level if there is a z-level configured as "down"Ayy Lemoh wrote: 4. Chasms (there used to be chasms that only dropped you down one z-level wtf where did they go)
- Armhulen
- Global Moderator
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2016 4:30 pm
- Byond Username: Armhulenn
- Github Username: bazelart
- Location: The Grand Tournament
Re: are multi-z stations actually a good thing?
Here's your shit thread, where you have the gall to claim Mmmiracles has been making a multi z map since August of last year to show off. The complete nads on this guy to really say the numerous coders and mappers throughout the years (a lot of which fucked off, mind you) did it just for themselves, without even considering if it's an actual feature tg should have or the problems that come with it. The man who did not join the multi-z test server miracles threw up even for a second, and has otherwise not played a LICK of multi-z beyond winter ball believes that the """""potential complications""""" make it more of a hassle than it's worth.deedubya wrote:Recently, mappers have been playing around with the mechanics of having the station itself exist on connected and interactive z-levels. MMM's work on donut has been a particularly notable example of this. But, in all this excitement to see if we can, nobody's stopped to ask if we should.
Is adding a third dimension in a game strictly bound to two dimensions really a good idea, from both a design and gameplay perspective? I fear that the potential complications that this change can bring about are entirely unnecessary, and don't necessarily bring any meaningful mechanical depth to the game. It feels like more of a "hey look at this neat trick we can do in the code" than something designed to enhance the player experience.
tldr; deedubya is a fucking ungulate
- Screemonster
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 7:23 pm
- Byond Username: Scree
Re: are multi-z stations actually a good thing?
I played on a server where the brig had a walkway over it for the warden to watch everyone and I was detective so I didn't have brig access to actually put someone in a cell so instead I dragged them to the walkway and yeeted them over the edge
shit was cash
shit was cash
- Armhulen
- Global Moderator
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2016 4:30 pm
- Byond Username: Armhulenn
- Github Username: bazelart
- Location: The Grand Tournament
-
- Confined to the shed
- Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2018 2:05 am
- Byond Username: Deedubya
- Location: shitting up your thread
Re: are multi-z stations actually a good thing?
Or, rather than implying that this is a personal attack on anyone, perhaps it's a thread posted to solicit feedback and discussion on a feature that could become incredibly game-breaking while also being entirely unnecessary to the core experience. Your implication that I have something against MMM is also baseless and untrue. If anything, I respect his dedication and the effort he's put forth into trying to improve a map that the majority of the playerbase wants nothing to do with.Armhulen wrote:Here's your shit thread, where you have the gall to claim Mmmiracles has been making a multi z map since August of last year to show off. The complete nads on this guy to really say the numerous coders and mappers throughout the years (a lot of which fucked off, mind you) did it just for themselves, without even considering if it's an actual feature tg should have or the problems that come with it. The man who did not join the multi-z test server miracles threw up even for a second, and has otherwise not played a LICK of multi-z beyond winter ball believes that the """""potential complications""""" make it more of a hassle than it's worth.deedubya wrote:Recently, mappers have been playing around with the mechanics of having the station itself exist on connected and interactive z-levels. MMM's work on donut has been a particularly notable example of this. But, in all this excitement to see if we can, nobody's stopped to ask if we should.
Is adding a third dimension in a game strictly bound to two dimensions really a good idea, from both a design and gameplay perspective? I fear that the potential complications that this change can bring about are entirely unnecessary, and don't necessarily bring any meaningful mechanical depth to the game. It feels like more of a "hey look at this neat trick we can do in the code" than something designed to enhance the player experience.
tldr; deedubya is a fucking ungulate
tl;dr keep your shitposting in the hut, where it belongs, fucking mong
Galatians 4:16 "Have I now become your enemy by telling you the truth?"
hey imma teegee admeme compliment me on my appearance here
flattering compliments people have given me:
hey imma teegee admeme compliment me on my appearance here
flattering compliments people have given me:
Spoiler:
- CPTANT
- Joined: Mon May 04, 2015 1:31 pm
- Byond Username: CPTANT
Re: are multi-z stations actually a good thing?
I think it is a bad choice.
It makes orientation harder and less intuitive. You can't even represent the station in a flat image any more.
It makes orientation harder and less intuitive. You can't even represent the station in a flat image any more.
Timberpoes wrote: ↑Tue Feb 14, 2023 3:21 pm The rules exist to create the biggest possible chance of a cool shift of SS13. They don't exist to allow admins to create the most boring interpretation of SS13.
- peoplearestrange
- Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2014 12:02 pm
- Byond Username: Peoplearestrange
- Location: old
Re: are multi-z stations actually a good thing?
I think it can lead to problems, but it can also lead to some really interesting map designs and clever uses.
Imagine if all of maintenance was like actual vent/crawl spaces and were UNDER the station. You could do interesting stuff like removing floor to push people into maintenance, or get ladders to climb up INTO spaces etc etc
I think theres a lot of cool potential
Imagine if all of maintenance was like actual vent/crawl spaces and were UNDER the station. You could do interesting stuff like removing floor to push people into maintenance, or get ladders to climb up INTO spaces etc etc
I think theres a lot of cool potential
Whatever
Spoiler:
-
- Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2017 12:30 am
- Byond Username: Qustinnus
Re: are multi-z stations actually a good thing?
multi-z has some design issues but nothing that can't be resolved and making a feedback thread without actually having a full multi-z map is useless as you're just all gonna end up arguing without anything to base your opinion off of and end up looking like Ungulates.
- CPTANT
- Joined: Mon May 04, 2015 1:31 pm
- Byond Username: CPTANT
Re: are multi-z stations actually a good thing?
Seriously this is so dumb. After the map is made everyone will just go "well it's already made".Qustinnus wrote:multi-z has some design issues but nothing that can't be resolved and making a feedback thread without actually having a full multi-z map is useless as you're just all gonna end up arguing without anything to base your opinion off of and end up looking like Ungulates.
>I think it can lead to problems, but it can also lead to some really interesting map designs and clever uses.
Imagine if all of maintenance was like actual vent/crawl spaces and were UNDER the station. You could do interesting stuff like removing floor to push people into maintenance, or get ladders to climb up INTO spaces etc etc
How is that different from removing a wall and doing the same?
Timberpoes wrote: ↑Tue Feb 14, 2023 3:21 pm The rules exist to create the biggest possible chance of a cool shift of SS13. They don't exist to allow admins to create the most boring interpretation of SS13.
- MMMiracles
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2014 2:27 am
- Byond Username: MMMiracles
- Github Username: MMMiracles
Re: are multi-z stations actually a good thing?
Wrong, see: the 8 maps that were removed from rotation due to a mix of lack of maintenance and layout issues.CPTANT wrote:Seriously this is so dumb. After the map is made everyone will just go "well it's already made".Qustinnus wrote:multi-z has some design issues but nothing that can't be resolved and making a feedback thread without actually having a full multi-z map is useless as you're just all gonna end up arguing without anything to base your opinion off of and end up looking like Ungulates.
Spoiler:
- Flatulent
- Forum Soft Banned
- Joined: Thu Nov 28, 2019 8:36 am
- Byond Username: FlatulentIndustrialist
- Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil
Re: are multi-z stations actually a good thing?
no because it completely fucks with how combat and engagements work in this game
Mothblocks, winter 2020, “successfully” preventing bagil death with relevant data wrote:You seem to be under the fallacy that reinforcing that Bagil is a TDM shithole where you must carry bolas and spears on you at all times, while looking for the next valid to hunt down is a positive change to the server. I don't. The data suggests other people don't.
imsxz wrote:I give up there’s too many furries
cacogen wrote:i asked oranges how often he plays and he deleted the post
cybersaber101 wrote:Welp, you guys let a terrymin become a headmin, thousand years of darkness.
Vekter wrote:I jerk off Nist a bit too much but he's honestly one of the best silicon players on the server. B.O.R.G.O. is also pretty good.
- Farquaar
- Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2018 7:20 am
- Byond Username: Farquaar
- Location: Delta Quadrant
Re: are multi-z stations actually a good thing?
Combat already needs an overhaul. Removing the stun/slip-based meta was a step in the right direction, but we’re a long way from escaping the zip-around in circles and click-until-horizontal system that we currently have.Flatulent wrote:no because it completely fucks with how combat and engagements work in this game
But you still raise a good point. Future combat innovations should keep mutli-Z in mind.
► Show Spoiler
-
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 12:18 am
- Byond Username: The unloved rock
Re: are multi-z stations actually a good thing?
multiz should be used when a map needs the extra space, it shouldn’t be “this map doesn’t have multiz, better fix it!” when the map wasn’t designed with multiz in mind and adding another layer just bloats the size of an already complete station. Multiz is interesting, but not necessarily to engage with- Eris and Lifeweb use multiz to make an environment claustrophobic and confusing while still being able to fit 60 players in a quarter the space of your average station. Those aren’t things we really need here.
- Cobby
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:19 pm
- Byond Username: ExcessiveUseOfCobby
- Github Username: ExcessiveUseOfCobblestone
Re: are multi-z stations actually a good thing?
if you map bees away from botany we can't be friends.
Voted best trap in /tg/ 2014-current
-
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:17 am
- Byond Username: Eldomtom2
Re: are multi-z stations actually a good thing?
only acceptable if they have a cool multi-level bar
- oranges
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
- Byond Username: Optimumtact
- Github Username: optimumtact
- Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED
Re: are multi-z stations actually a good thing?
we don't ask ourselves such questions.
We do because we can.
We do because we can.
- PKPenguin321
- Site Admin
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2014 7:02 pm
- Byond Username: PKPenguin321
- Github Username: PKPenguin321
- Location: U S A, U S A, U S A
Re: are multi-z stations actually a good thing?
coincidentally, we have combustible lemons in the gameoranges wrote:we don't ask ourselves such questions.
We do because we can.
i play Lauser McMauligan. clown name is Cold-Ass Honkey
i have three other top secret characters as well.
tell the best admin how good he is
i have three other top secret characters as well.
tell the best admin how good he is
Spoiler:
- PKPenguin321
- Site Admin
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2014 7:02 pm
- Byond Username: PKPenguin321
- Github Username: PKPenguin321
- Location: U S A, U S A, U S A
Re: are multi-z stations actually a good thing?
on-topic though, I really think this is the kind of thing we can only answer after playtesting. theorycrafting about how players will use mechanics in a game as open-ended as this is rarely effective.
i play Lauser McMauligan. clown name is Cold-Ass Honkey
i have three other top secret characters as well.
tell the best admin how good he is
i have three other top secret characters as well.
tell the best admin how good he is
Spoiler:
- Anonmare
- Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2015 8:59 pm
- Byond Username: Anonmare
Re: are multi-z stations actually a good thing?
Considering I think I'm one of the few players who actually regularly plays on servers with multi-z I think my opinion holds a bit of weight.
Yes, it is complicated the first few weeks as you adjust to thinking in three dimensions but you will adapt once you've explored the areas enough times. It gives you entirely new ways of approaching problems and causing/experiencing conflict in a way that's new and interesting. On Eris, for example, you can use the verticality and hollow walls around departments to set-up Excelsior workshops barely a few feet away from somebody else working in the department with them being none the wiser. Hell, the AI core can be quietly infiltrated by cutting your way through the atmospheric pipeline route on the top level and drop down into a hollow wall behind the AI Upload consoles and the AI in question wouldn't likely notice your presence.
I do agree that you can't merely adjust an existing map to be mutli-z, you have to design the station entirely with multi-z in mind or else you're going to have balance issues of assistants deconning a tile of floor, dropping down into armoury, stealing everything, making a table and climbing back out. But to be honest, Box and Meta could benefit from an overhaul if I'm being frank. The current maps don't even make use of piping and cable layers to their full potential and, with verticality, you can shrink the horizontal space a department takes up - meta always got shit for being too big, even adding one extra z-level would let you cut the space it uses up by half, and with less space being required by the essentials, mappers can be more creative in their layouts with the real estate freed up.
Yes, it is complicated the first few weeks as you adjust to thinking in three dimensions but you will adapt once you've explored the areas enough times. It gives you entirely new ways of approaching problems and causing/experiencing conflict in a way that's new and interesting. On Eris, for example, you can use the verticality and hollow walls around departments to set-up Excelsior workshops barely a few feet away from somebody else working in the department with them being none the wiser. Hell, the AI core can be quietly infiltrated by cutting your way through the atmospheric pipeline route on the top level and drop down into a hollow wall behind the AI Upload consoles and the AI in question wouldn't likely notice your presence.
I do agree that you can't merely adjust an existing map to be mutli-z, you have to design the station entirely with multi-z in mind or else you're going to have balance issues of assistants deconning a tile of floor, dropping down into armoury, stealing everything, making a table and climbing back out. But to be honest, Box and Meta could benefit from an overhaul if I'm being frank. The current maps don't even make use of piping and cable layers to their full potential and, with verticality, you can shrink the horizontal space a department takes up - meta always got shit for being too big, even adding one extra z-level would let you cut the space it uses up by half, and with less space being required by the essentials, mappers can be more creative in their layouts with the real estate freed up.
-
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2016 6:31 pm
- Byond Username: DrBee
Re: are multi-z stations actually a good thing?
I kind of look forward to department design using multiple z levels. Imagine medbay where the break room and storage room are upstairs from the rest of the department.
Slapping multi-z on the maps we have is a bad idea but if it is actually designed around it you can get some pretty compact but functional station designs.
Slapping multi-z on the maps we have is a bad idea but if it is actually designed around it you can get some pretty compact but functional station designs.
- Tarchonvaagh
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 9:30 pm
- Byond Username: Tarchonvaagh
Re: are multi-z stations actually a good thing?
Baystation has this, I think it's the 3rd zlevelpeoplearestrange wrote:I think it can lead to problems, but it can also lead to some really interesting map designs and clever uses.
Imagine if all of maintenance was like actual vent/crawl spaces and were UNDER the station. You could do interesting stuff like removing floor to push people into maintenance, or get ladders to climb up INTO spaces etc etc
I think theres a lot of cool potential
-
- Forum Soft Banned
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2018 10:27 am
- Byond Username: Cacogen
Re: are multi-z stations actually a good thing?
can you look up
technokek wrote:Cannot prove this so just belive me if when say this
NSFW:
- Flatulent
- Forum Soft Banned
- Joined: Thu Nov 28, 2019 8:36 am
- Byond Username: FlatulentIndustrialist
- Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil
Re: are multi-z stations actually a good thing?
this is actually the most important thing you can add for multiz because without it you will just get continously griefed by people upstairs who throw chinese children at you from therecacogen wrote:can you look up
Mothblocks, winter 2020, “successfully” preventing bagil death with relevant data wrote:You seem to be under the fallacy that reinforcing that Bagil is a TDM shithole where you must carry bolas and spears on you at all times, while looking for the next valid to hunt down is a positive change to the server. I don't. The data suggests other people don't.
imsxz wrote:I give up there’s too many furries
cacogen wrote:i asked oranges how often he plays and he deleted the post
cybersaber101 wrote:Welp, you guys let a terrymin become a headmin, thousand years of darkness.
Vekter wrote:I jerk off Nist a bit too much but he's honestly one of the best silicon players on the server. B.O.R.G.O. is also pretty good.
-
- Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2017 12:16 am
- Byond Username: Tlaltecuhtli
Re: are multi-z stations actually a good thing?
how do bee dynamics work on multi z tho, do they fall?
- Armhulen
- Global Moderator
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2016 4:30 pm
- Byond Username: Armhulenn
- Github Username: bazelart
- Location: The Grand Tournament
Re: are multi-z stations actually a good thing?
flying mobs do not fall, if bees aren't flying mobs i'll be shockedTlaltecuhtli wrote:how do bee dynamics work on multi z tho, do they fall?
- Flatulent
- Forum Soft Banned
- Joined: Thu Nov 28, 2019 8:36 am
- Byond Username: FlatulentIndustrialist
- Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil
Re: are multi-z stations actually a good thing?
holy shit imagine if you get crushed to death by falling beesArmhulen wrote:flying mobs do not fall, if bees aren't flying mobs i'll be shockedTlaltecuhtli wrote:how do bee dynamics work on multi z tho, do they fall?
Mothblocks, winter 2020, “successfully” preventing bagil death with relevant data wrote:You seem to be under the fallacy that reinforcing that Bagil is a TDM shithole where you must carry bolas and spears on you at all times, while looking for the next valid to hunt down is a positive change to the server. I don't. The data suggests other people don't.
imsxz wrote:I give up there’s too many furries
cacogen wrote:i asked oranges how often he plays and he deleted the post
cybersaber101 wrote:Welp, you guys let a terrymin become a headmin, thousand years of darkness.
Vekter wrote:I jerk off Nist a bit too much but he's honestly one of the best silicon players on the server. B.O.R.G.O. is also pretty good.
- Screemonster
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 7:23 pm
- Byond Username: Scree
Re: are multi-z stations actually a good thing?
well, according to all known laws of aviation...Tlaltecuhtli wrote:how do bee dynamics work on multi z tho, do they fall?
- bobbahbrown
- Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2014 1:04 am
- Byond Username: Bobbahbrown
- Location: canada
- Contact:
Re: are multi-z stations actually a good thing?
keep bees in space stationCobby wrote:if you map bees away from botany we can't be friends.
The information contained in this post is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient, you may not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you received this post in error, please notify the sender by reply post and delete and destroy the message.
L’information contenue dans ce message est destinée exclusivement aux personnes ou aux entités auxquelles le message est adressé. Le contenu de ce message (y compris toute pièce jointe) peut renfermer de l’information confidentielle et / ou privilégiée. Si ce message ne vous est pas destiné, vous ne pouvez utiliser, divulguer, diffuser, copier ou imprimer son contenu. Si vous avez reçu ce message par erreur, veuillez aviser l’expéditeur en lui faisant parvenir une réponse. De plus, veuillez supprimer et détruire le message.
-
- Confined to the shed
- Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2018 2:05 am
- Byond Username: Deedubya
- Location: shitting up your thread
Re: are multi-z stations actually a good thing?
CPTANT wrote:Imagine if all of maintenance was like actual vent/crawl spaces and were UNDER the station. You could do interesting stuff like removing floor to push people into maintenance, or get ladders to climb up INTO spaces etc etc
These are the primary issues I have with it. It's absolutely not intuitive, and the perspective we play with clearly isn't meant to account for up or down. How will you even know there's something above or below you? "just learn the map lol" isn't intuitive at all, and doesn't account for things that you'd be able to see (exposed upper walkways for example) but can't because of limited perspective.cacogen wrote:can you look up
Galatians 4:16 "Have I now become your enemy by telling you the truth?"
hey imma teegee admeme compliment me on my appearance here
flattering compliments people have given me:
hey imma teegee admeme compliment me on my appearance here
flattering compliments people have given me:
Spoiler:
- Anonmare
- Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2015 8:59 pm
- Byond Username: Anonmare
Re: are multi-z stations actually a good thing?
On most servers with mutli-z, you can unless there's a ceiling right above you.cacogen wrote:can you look up
- CDranzer
- Joined: Sun May 05, 2019 11:43 am
- Byond Username: CDranzer
Re: are multi-z stations actually a good thing?
I've thought about this before, but my biggest concern is repairs.
Let's say an explosion punches a hole in the station. Does it blow a hole in the ceiling? How do you repair that hole? Do you have to climb onto the roof to patch it? Is there some weird interface for building a ceiling from the floor below? How do you even convey a lack of ceiling in a top-down view? And What about gasses? Do they travel across Z levels? What's the extra performance cost on that?
Let's say an explosion punches a hole in the station. Does it blow a hole in the ceiling? How do you repair that hole? Do you have to climb onto the roof to patch it? Is there some weird interface for building a ceiling from the floor below? How do you even convey a lack of ceiling in a top-down view? And What about gasses? Do they travel across Z levels? What's the extra performance cost on that?
- Omni
- Joined: Sat Jul 27, 2019 7:34 pm
- Byond Username: Omni44
Re: are multi-z stations actually a good thing?
OP could literally just go to one of few servers with multi Z level maps, which are all doing fine, and save good people of this forum a bit of time.
- Anuv
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 11:34 pm
- Byond Username: Anuv
Re: are multi-z stations actually a good thing?
Vore has an amazing map, suggest everyone go play a round and run around
-
- Forum Soft Banned
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2018 10:27 am
- Byond Username: Cacogen
Re: are multi-z stations actually a good thing?
well i would but y'know
technokek wrote:Cannot prove this so just belive me if when say this
NSFW:
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: dessysalta, Xhorian