Moderators: In-Game Head Admins, In-Game Admin, TGMC Game Server Operators, Game Server Operators
[17:58:47]ADMINPRIVATE: Ticket #1: Istoprocent/(Istoprocent): Only thing retarded is screwdriving people in the head without talking. - heard by 3 non-AFK admins who have +BAN.
[18:01:18]ADMINPRIVATE: PM: Gouty/(Gouty)->Istoprocent/(Istoprocent): Ultimately you being killed was perfectly valid, the first party did not do anything that was ridiculously outside the realms of escalation and a borg saw you attack a human.
[18:01:58]ADMINPRIVATE: PM: Istoprocent/(Istoprocent)->Gouty/(Gouty): Alright, if you say so man. Me not attacking anybody and getting screwdrivered in the head is legit. No problem.
[18:03:00]ADMINPRIVATE: PM: Gouty/(Carlos Danger)->Istoprocent/(Mush-Riker): You are beginning to sound ban baity, I suggest you stop
[18:03:34]ADMINPRIVATE: PM: Istoprocent/(Mush-Riker)->Gouty/(Carlos Danger): Sorry to have wasted your time, I guess. Will try to not sign up as Assistants from this round on.
[18:03:49]OOC: Gouty/(Carlos Danger) : Why do people assume just because I am talking to you in ahelps that the other party is not getting a dressing down too? (69,160,2)
[18:04:04]OOC: Istoprocent/(Mush-Riker) : Why admins like you keep attacking people who ahelp for a legit reason? (97,129,2)
[18:04:16]OOC: Istoprocent/(Mush-Riker) : You acquse me of ban baiting? What? (97,129,2)
[18:04:57]ADMINPRIVATE: PM: Gouty/(Carlos Danger)->Istoprocent/(Mush-Riker): not a waste of time, play assistant if you want, don't don't expect people to welcome you into possibly the most dangerous part of the station because "I have access yo", imagine what might have happened if you had RP'd a little more
[18:07:45]ADMINPRIVATE: PM: Gouty/(Carlos Danger)->Istoprocent/(Mush-Riker): Hi didn't I say drop it?
[18:08:18]ADMINPRIVATE: PM: Istoprocent/(Mush-Riker)->Gouty/(Carlos Danger): Whats that all about man? You replied and then hit me up again? Man, I get it, you side with Cara in this situation. All good, just don't take it out on me for ahelping. I have played on the server for more than a few days and I don't think I have ever made a pointless or baity ahelp. I will stop playing assistants from this round on, because your ruling is punishing me for not powergaming and straight up picking scientist to learn bombmaking. Isnt the game about RPing?
[18:09:27]ADMINPRIVATE: PM: Gouty/(Carlos Danger)->Istoprocent/(Mush-Riker): I didn't side with cara at all, I told you to drop it so you took it to OOC, are you chill?
[18:10:54]ADMINPRIVATE: PM: Istoprocent/(Mush-Riker)->Gouty/(Carlos Danger): You said stuff in OOC. I am the chillest and hope that in the future somebody else will look into any matters that should arise, because I don't feel that your attitude and approach are the most approriate ones.
Istoprocent1 wrote: Never said you did a bad job investigating, just said that I felt that you were unprofessional.
Istoprocent wrote:I [] hope that in the future somebody else will look into any matters that should arise
[18:01:18]ADMINPRIVATE: PM: Gouty/(Gouty)->Istoprocent/(Istoprocent): Ultimately you being killed was perfectly valid, the first party did not do anything that was ridiculously outside the realms of escalation and a borg saw you attack a human.
[18:01:58]ADMINPRIVATE: PM: Istoprocent/(Istoprocent)->Gouty/(Gouty): Alright, if you say so man. Me not attacking anybody and getting screwdrivered in the head is legit. No problem.
Rustledjimm wrote:Gouty has already stated in this thread that in hindsight ban-baity is the wrong word. What he is saying is that he's giving you a warning to not break rule 6. In my short time as an admin I have found sentences like the one above to be the most annoying and frustrating thing, the whole "Oh so does that mean in future I can just do X no problem" or "Oh so it's perfectly legit to do X then?". So I can understand Gouty's frustration.
Stickymayhem wrote:you're right!
BeeSting12 wrote:It doesn't look like mocking, more like venting his frustration which he probably shouldn't be doing in OOC but understandable that he was that frustrated.
Istoprocent1 wrote:BeeSting12 wrote:It doesn't look like mocking, more like venting his frustration which he probably shouldn't be doing in OOC but understandable that he was that frustrated.
Speaking of BeeSting12 hitting me up last round for IC in OOC, however, the round was long over and the wizards/witches were revealed. I assume it was an honest mistake, not a way to start stacking those notes in vengence.
Stickymayhem wrote:you're right!
BeeSting12 wrote:Istoprocent1 wrote:BeeSting12 wrote:It doesn't look like mocking, more like venting his frustration which he probably shouldn't be doing in OOC but understandable that he was that frustrated.
Speaking of BeeSting12 hitting me up last round for IC in OOC, however, the round was long over and the wizards/witches were revealed. I assume it was an honest mistake, not a way to start stacking those notes in vengence.
That was a legit accident. Tabbed out, tabbed back in and saw you talking about the round- noone else was and I assumed it was IC in OOC until I realized the server rebooted. I don't like Gouty enough to give notes in vengeance or whatever, besides I didn't even realize it was you until you said something about it in ahelps.
[18:03:49]OOC: Gouty/(Carlos Danger) : Why do people assume just because I am talking to you in ahelps that the other party is not getting a dressing down too? (69,160,2)
Arm, this is the line that I thought looked more like venting than mocking the guy.
Gouty wrote:The reasons the OOC and Ahelps are slightly out of sync is because I didn't see the OOC at first (only a few minutes later when scrolling up to look at something else).
Rest assured your comments in OOC came after I had suggested you stop.
Yeah, my comment in OOC wasn't to mock, just to point out that when an admin is talking to you, you don't see the conversation you are having with anyone else, in this instance both of you accused me of favouritism and asked why I wasn't dealing with the other. It wasn't even really about this particular instance, it's something that has happened a few times so thought it was interesting to share/vent.
Armhulen wrote:I don't know how you get to attack someone and remove them from the department because they were there first and are doing it differently
Kor wrote:Armhulen wrote:I don't know how you get to attack someone and remove them from the department because they were there first and are doing it differently
To be fair he was still dressed as an assistant
oranges wrote:Kor wrote:Armhulen wrote:I don't know how you get to attack someone and remove them from the department because they were there first and are doing it differently
To be fair he was still dressed as an assistant
And it's too hard to type a question ? I thought we were trying to get away from this low effort "valid|notvalid" stuff.
Return to Successful Complaints
Users browsing this forum: No registered users