Byond account and character name OR Discord name: Iamgoofball
Admin: Scriptis
ROUND ID HERE IF APPLICABLE: N/A
Detailed summary:
I posted on the appeal for Toemas in response to Scriptis claiming the device did not lag with a link to my pull request where a fix was deployed(through the merge freeze, mind you) for this exact method of lagging.
This post contained a link to my fix PR, https://github.com/tgstation/tgstation/pull/71224, and stated that this was in fact confirmed as an exploit in response to a post by Scriptis.
Unfortunately I did not screenshot my post as I did not expect it to be censored by the admin who it was providing evidence against as usually our administration holds itself to a higher standard than covering up information that makes admins look like they made a mistake. Clearly, that was not the case today.
This is protected under the peanut rules as it directly provides evidence regarding the ticket(proving the issue was a confirmed exploit that was fixed by our maintainers via merging the PR that fixes it)
I then received this deny message.
This message, written in the first person, is clearly by Scriptis in response to my post in their ban appeal proving them wrong, per their repetition of the statement that it was "not causing lag". This is a clear abuse of authority to censor contradicting information against the admin's claims, and should not have been conducted by Scriptis in the first place.
This is a clear violation of Admin Conduct rule 4:
Scriptis removed my post that was providing evidence against them.Don't handle an adminhelp that involves you. Admins can't involve themselves as both an admin and player in a matter. This also means adminhelping like any other player would if you want to report an issue. Another admin will be needed to help you.
Additionally, note the second sentence where they acknowledge they knew all along that condenser spam created lag to grief. This is blatant admission of fault that they clearly did not think through before handing to me.
I want this admin deadminned immediately for covering up that they approved a known exploit, a known exploit that very same player had abused the previous round, and one that they knew created lag. Their claims that it "didn't make lag" does not work with the claims that this was under investigation by another admin the previous round for causing lag. This person cannot be trusted with the admin tools and cannot be trusted to make judgements against what players should be on this server if they are this duplicitous.