Iamgoofball General
- oranges
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
- Byond Username: Optimumtact
- Github Username: optimumtact
- Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED
Iamgoofball General Prequel
can you believe ausops got tilted by this thread and permabanned goof from the forum lol
- iksyp
- Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2018 9:47 pm
- Byond Username: Iksyp
- Location: usa usa usa usa usa(?)
Re: Repukan's appeal
>permaban someone because you disagreeoranges wrote:can you believe ausops got tilted by this thread and permabanned goof from the forum lol
hmmmm
- oranges
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
- Byond Username: Optimumtact
- Github Username: optimumtact
- Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED
- imblyings
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:42 pm
- Byond Username: Ausops
- Location: >using suit sensors
Re: Repukan's appeal
i have a long memory
so does goof I'm sure
if so he can silently reflect upon the many actions of his that lead to his current predicament and of course not ever admit or own up to them, as goof isn't the sort of guy to own up to the consequences of his shit-stirring otherwise he might not have done it in the first place
people can say i banned goof cause i got tilted but frankly, if every person who could do a thing about goof never did a thing when they got reminded about how shitty goof is because they were scared they'd be called out for whatever reason, he'd never be removed
so here we go, i don't care but i sure dont mind placing down the ban i should have never lifted years ago
so does goof I'm sure
if so he can silently reflect upon the many actions of his that lead to his current predicament and of course not ever admit or own up to them, as goof isn't the sort of guy to own up to the consequences of his shit-stirring otherwise he might not have done it in the first place
people can say i banned goof cause i got tilted but frankly, if every person who could do a thing about goof never did a thing when they got reminded about how shitty goof is because they were scared they'd be called out for whatever reason, he'd never be removed
so here we go, i don't care but i sure dont mind placing down the ban i should have never lifted years ago
The patched, dusty, trimmed, feathered mantle of evil +13.
- oranges
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
- Byond Username: Optimumtact
- Github Username: optimumtact
- Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED
Re: Repukan's appeal
it's going to get lifted and you're going to be reamed out for bannign someone for no good reason no matter how hard you try to defend this.
You should apologise now for being salty and kicking the toys over in the sandpit
You should apologise now for being salty and kicking the toys over in the sandpit
- Lazengann
- Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 2:26 pm
- Byond Username: Lazengann
Re: Repukan's appeal
standing with ausops
- Dax Dupont
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2014 9:07 pm
- Byond Username: DaxYeen
- Github Username: DaxDupont
- Location: Belgium
Re: Repukan's appeal
Almost the entire adminbus agrees with ausops. Including me.
- oranges
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
- Byond Username: Optimumtact
- Github Username: optimumtact
- Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED
Re: Repukan's appeal
in the last twenty minutes all ausops has managed to offer is that "goof" knows what he has done and it's not just this thread, or that he's "toxic" and that "if this ban doesn't stick the admin team isn't worth backing"
They are quite clearly tilted about this thread and have decided to use their administrative powers to punish goof instead of just laughing at them like the rest of us.
That you are actually agreeing with the ban only indicates that you're also emotionally unable to handle being an administrator, if this ban sticks it will just make the admin team look incompetent and petty and unwilling to abide by their own rules, especially given that the game ban doesn't even apply to anything he's done in game.
They are quite clearly tilted about this thread and have decided to use their administrative powers to punish goof instead of just laughing at them like the rest of us.
That you are actually agreeing with the ban only indicates that you're also emotionally unable to handle being an administrator, if this ban sticks it will just make the admin team look incompetent and petty and unwilling to abide by their own rules, especially given that the game ban doesn't even apply to anything he's done in game.
Last edited by oranges on Wed Jun 27, 2018 8:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Arianya
- In-Game Game Master
- Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2016 10:27 am
- Byond Username: Arianya
Re: Repukan's appeal
Ask not what you can do for goof.
Ask what goof can do for you.
Ask what goof can do for you.
Frequently playing as Aria Bollet on Bagil & Scary Terry
Source of avatar is here: https://i.imgur.com/hEkADo6.jpg
Source of avatar is here: https://i.imgur.com/hEkADo6.jpg
- oranges
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
- Byond Username: Optimumtact
- Github Username: optimumtact
- Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED
Re: Repukan's appeal
That's ironic considering he's done far more for this game and community than you have
- Lazengann
- Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 2:26 pm
- Byond Username: Lazengann
Re: Repukan's appeal
oranges are your squiggle marks implying that goof isn't toxic
- oranges
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
- Byond Username: Optimumtact
- Github Username: optimumtact
- Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED
Re: Repukan's appeal
yeah, if you think his shitposts are toxic then you should ideally quit the admin team and the community
- Lazengann
- Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 2:26 pm
- Byond Username: Lazengann
Re: Repukan's appeal
I guess if you pretend most of his actions were imaginary then you're right
- oranges
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
- Byond Username: Optimumtact
- Github Username: optimumtact
- Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED
Re: Repukan's appeal
the guy is making forum posts, he's not lynching people in teh real world dude
- D&B
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2016 2:23 am
- Byond Username: Repukan
- Location: *teleports behind you*
- Wyzack
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 11:32 pm
- Byond Username: Wyzack
Re: Repukan's appeal
Lol I thought he was just ignoring my saying him bringing sawrge into this was delusional, but this is way funnier.
I'll bet he thinks sawrge got him banned too
I'll bet he thinks sawrge got him banned too
Arthur Thomson says, "Since there are no admins I would loging with another account and kill you"
Caleb Robinson laughs.
Arthur Thomson catches fire!
certified good poster
Caleb Robinson laughs.
Arthur Thomson catches fire!
tusterman11 wrote:Can you stop lying? I just asked you and you are was a piece of shiit on me!!!
EngamerAzari's real number one fangirl <3Kor wrote:I wish Wyzack was still an admin.
certified good poster
- Ayy Lemoh
- Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2017 5:58 pm
- Byond Username: Jerry Derpington
Re: Repukan's appeal
Goofball isn't the type of guy who plays a fallout game with only 2 intelligence points while investing the rest into luck or some shit, I feel.Wyzack wrote:I'll bet he thinks sawrge got him banned too
I'm sure that even if he somehow thought that was true, which I strongly doubt, then SOMEONE would show him what ausops posted.
I feel like shit's gonna hit the fan one way or another now, though.
- D&B
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2016 2:23 am
- Byond Username: Repukan
- Location: *teleports behind you*
Re: Repukan's appeal
Blowout soon, fellow stalkerAyy Lemoh wrote:Goofball isn't the type of guy who plays a fallout game with only 2 intelligence points while investing the rest into luck or some shit, I feel.Wyzack wrote:I'll bet he thinks sawrge got him banned too
I'm sure that even if he somehow thought that was true, which I strongly doubt, then SOMEONE would show him what ausops posted.
I feel like shit's gonna hit the fan one way or another now, though.
Spoiler:
- Hornygranny
- Horny Police
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 4:54 pm
- Byond Username: Hornygranny
Re: Repukan's appeal
I hope the admin team is embarrassed by this fiasco, because they should be. Your leadership has failed you.
- Dax Dupont
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2014 9:07 pm
- Byond Username: DaxYeen
- Github Username: DaxDupont
- Location: Belgium
Re: Repukan's appeal
Coming from hg that's a compliment.
- Armhulen
- Global Moderator
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2016 4:30 pm
- Byond Username: Armhulenn
- Github Username: bazelart
- Location: The Grand Tournament
Re: Repukan's appeal
Definitely notDax Dupont wrote:Coming from hg that's a compliment.
- Farquaar
- Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2018 7:20 am
- Byond Username: Farquaar
- Location: Delta Quadrant
- DemonFiren
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2014 9:15 pm
- Byond Username: DemonFiren
Re: Repukan's appeal
definitely isArmhulen wrote:Definitely notDax Dupont wrote:Coming from hg that's a compliment.
- captain sawrge
- Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 6:13 pm
- Byond Username: Sawrge
Re: Repukan's appeal
Who are you againHornygranny wrote:I hope the admin team is embarrassed by this fiasco, because they should be. Your leadership has failed you.
- Rustledjimm
- Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2017 9:07 pm
- Byond Username: Rustledjimm
Re: Repukan's appeal
We'll see if Arm learns anything for once then.
So uhh, I'm an admin. Please leave feedback! Oops took me a while to strike that through.
Will Baker
Suzu Suzaku
TBC
Personal Ban Length Record: 2.1024e+006 minutes
Will Baker
Suzu Suzaku
TBC
Spoiler:
- oranges
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
- Byond Username: Optimumtact
- Github Username: optimumtact
- Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED
Re: Repukan's appeal
Day 2, headadmins still haven't come up with anything to communicate publically
we are left with the following options
A) ausops believes it's okay to ban someone for "shitposting" when in reality all they have done is consistently hold opinions that they disagreed with and post those opinions publically on the forum for the game
B) There is some reason that goof is really banned, but they believe it's ethically okay to ban someone with a fake reason, then lie about it until someone pulls them up on their shit and then evade the question with promises of "we'll figure something out later" and then radio silence, oh and also provide not a single shred of proof beyond hearsay.
C) ausops has literally baked in the sun and has gone mental and the headadmins are trying to cover that up.
All of these options are shit
A) indicates that it's now okay to ban people for holding opinions you don't like consistently, and not even for behaviour in game that contradicts the spirit of our rules, which is an incredibly sad precedent to set, at least judge people by their actions, not their words.
B) indicates that you believe the playerbase and administrative teams are untrustworthy, and don't deserve honesty and that's it's ethical to lie to people to their face while removing them, which is honestly sadder than even A, not to mention the idea that we are just going to somehow trust that you believe that these things happened without direct quotations from the people involved.
C) is the best outcome right now please lets pray for a hot australian winter
Hoping for an option D where this all makes sense and where the headadmins don't just believe the players and admin team don't deserve any clarity or that it's ethical to lie to peoples faces about why you're removing them instead of being intellectual honest about it
Lets not even cover how they convienently banned goof from the forum first so they could pretend they didn't have a right of appeal, yeah cause that's totally above board as well.
we are left with the following options
A) ausops believes it's okay to ban someone for "shitposting" when in reality all they have done is consistently hold opinions that they disagreed with and post those opinions publically on the forum for the game
B) There is some reason that goof is really banned, but they believe it's ethically okay to ban someone with a fake reason, then lie about it until someone pulls them up on their shit and then evade the question with promises of "we'll figure something out later" and then radio silence, oh and also provide not a single shred of proof beyond hearsay.
C) ausops has literally baked in the sun and has gone mental and the headadmins are trying to cover that up.
All of these options are shit
A) indicates that it's now okay to ban people for holding opinions you don't like consistently, and not even for behaviour in game that contradicts the spirit of our rules, which is an incredibly sad precedent to set, at least judge people by their actions, not their words.
B) indicates that you believe the playerbase and administrative teams are untrustworthy, and don't deserve honesty and that's it's ethical to lie to people to their face while removing them, which is honestly sadder than even A, not to mention the idea that we are just going to somehow trust that you believe that these things happened without direct quotations from the people involved.
C) is the best outcome right now please lets pray for a hot australian winter
Hoping for an option D where this all makes sense and where the headadmins don't just believe the players and admin team don't deserve any clarity or that it's ethical to lie to peoples faces about why you're removing them instead of being intellectual honest about it
Lets not even cover how they convienently banned goof from the forum first so they could pretend they didn't have a right of appeal, yeah cause that's totally above board as well.
- Saegrimr
- Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2014 4:39 pm
- Byond Username: Saegrimr
Re: Repukan's appeal
"Opinions"
Lets not pretend goof only holds opinions, and hasn't regularly pushed absolute trash PRs to prove a point when he doesn't like something that happens policy-wise. Something pretty much no regular player does or even thinks of as an option.
Lets not pretend goof only holds opinions, and hasn't regularly pushed absolute trash PRs to prove a point when he doesn't like something that happens policy-wise. Something pretty much no regular player does or even thinks of as an option.
tedward1337 wrote:Sae is like the racist grandad who everyone laughs at for being racist, but deep down we all know he's right.
- oranges
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
- Byond Username: Optimumtact
- Github Username: optimumtact
- Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED
Re: Repukan's appeal
They didn't get merged, but you know what, it's okay to have an opinion and push agenda's via PR's because that's how the game evolves you numpty, but despite us rebuffing goof at every single turn you somehow are claiming that this was a successfull strategy for him and needed to be shutdown? get off my lawn
- IkeTG
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2016 2:03 am
- Byond Username: LizardDreams
- Location: Here, Now
Re: Repukan's appeal
At least goof died doing what he loved
kicking up dust and posting in bad faith
kicking up dust and posting in bad faith
- oranges
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
- Byond Username: Optimumtact
- Github Username: optimumtact
- Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED
Re: Repukan's appeal
If only we can all go out the same way
- IkeTG
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2016 2:03 am
- Byond Username: LizardDreams
- Location: Here, Now
- DemonFiren
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2014 9:15 pm
- Byond Username: DemonFiren
Re: Repukan's appeal
wait
was the goof really remoof
that needs no justification tbh
was the goof really remoof
that needs no justification tbh
- oranges
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
- Byond Username: Optimumtact
- Github Username: optimumtact
- Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED
Re: Repukan's appeal
yeah it needs no justication until you're the person being removedDemonFiren wrote:wait
was the goof really remoof
that needs no justification tbh
whatever dude, goof deserves a proper appeal thread just like everyone else
- iksyp
- Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2018 9:47 pm
- Byond Username: Iksyp
- Location: usa usa usa usa usa(?)
Re: Repukan's appeal
First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—oranges wrote:yeah it needs no justication until you're the person being removedDemonFiren wrote:wait
was the goof really remoof
that needs no justification tbh
whatever dude, goof deserves a proper appeal thread just like everyone else
Because I was not a Socialist.
Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
- oranges
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
- Byond Username: Optimumtact
- Github Username: optimumtact
- Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED
Re: Repukan's appeal
Thank you for invoking godwins law within 2 pages
- iksyp
- Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2018 9:47 pm
- Byond Username: Iksyp
- Location: usa usa usa usa usa(?)
Re: Repukan's appeal
someone had to do itoranges wrote:Thank you for invoking godwins law within 2 pages
- Dax Dupont
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2014 9:07 pm
- Byond Username: DaxYeen
- Github Username: DaxDupont
- Location: Belgium
Re: Repukan's appeal
The reason goof got banned was a rule 0/1, for years and years of shitty behavior. Nearly every time he posts it was in bad faith. He's been arguably so detrimental to the community it made people leave over the years.
There's no reason why someone who posts in bad faith for years and doesn't even play the game should be allowed to shit up the community for no reason other than being an absolute dickhead to people.
People finally stopped listening "but its goof xd lmao" and stopped letting him get away being so utterly detrimental to the community as a whole.
Maybe it was not as fully communicated to other admins at first, but we don't need to make ban reasons public to /anyone/ aside from the affected player.
If you want to find out what lead to this, feel free to read his post history and 400 bad faith PRs.
There's no reason why someone who posts in bad faith for years and doesn't even play the game should be allowed to shit up the community for no reason other than being an absolute dickhead to people.
People finally stopped listening "but its goof xd lmao" and stopped letting him get away being so utterly detrimental to the community as a whole.
Maybe it was not as fully communicated to other admins at first, but we don't need to make ban reasons public to /anyone/ aside from the affected player.
If you want to find out what lead to this, feel free to read his post history and 400 bad faith PRs.
Last edited by Dax Dupont on Tue Jun 26, 2018 11:31 pm, edited 3 times in total.
- oranges
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
- Byond Username: Optimumtact
- Github Username: optimumtact
- Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED
Re: Repukan's appeal
latest update
day 2, midday, supplies are growing lie.
the headadmins are still organising, they have not yet told anyone the ban reason, everyone in the admin team is dismissing my concern over the quality of the ban procedure as shitposting, such is life
apparently now goof doesn't deserve a right to appeal his own ban, despite that being granted to every single other permabanned player, even those under rule 1 bans.
we're settling in for a long seige
day 2, midday, supplies are growing lie.
the headadmins are still organising, they have not yet told anyone the ban reason, everyone in the admin team is dismissing my concern over the quality of the ban procedure as shitposting, such is life
apparently now goof doesn't deserve a right to appeal his own ban, despite that being granted to every single other permabanned player, even those under rule 1 bans.
we're settling in for a long seige
- oranges
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
- Byond Username: Optimumtact
- Github Username: optimumtact
- Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED
Re: Repukan's appeal
day 2, midday, an admin proclaims that they know the truth
where are the headadmins? Why do they work through proxies, are they afraid? Why is goof forumbanned on top of the gameban, why is he not allowed to appeal his ban?
More to come surely.
where are the headadmins? Why do they work through proxies, are they afraid? Why is goof forumbanned on top of the gameban, why is he not allowed to appeal his ban?
More to come surely.
- Dax Dupont
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2014 9:07 pm
- Byond Username: DaxYeen
- Github Username: DaxDupont
- Location: Belgium
Re: Repukan's appeal
Headmins have stated the reason, which is his behavior and even said we're free to discuss it here.oranges wrote:latest update
day 2, midday, supplies are growing lie.
the headadmins are still organising, they have not yet told anyone the ban reason, everyone in the admin team is dismissing my concern over the quality of the ban procedure as shitposting, such is life
apparently now goof doesn't deserve a right to appeal his own ban, despite that being granted to every single other permabanned player, even those under rule 1 bans.
we're settling in for a long seige
They are not required to publicize people's ban reasons aside from to the affected player. I'm pretty sure most people don't want certain of their bans public.
- Hornygranny
- Horny Police
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 4:54 pm
- Byond Username: Hornygranny
Re: Repukan's appeal
I disagree.Dax Dupont wrote:They are not required to publicize people's ban reasons aside from to the affected player. I'm pretty sure most people don't want certain of their bans public.
- oranges
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
- Byond Username: Optimumtact
- Github Username: optimumtact
- Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED
Re: Repukan's appeal
You don't think they should at least make a public statement explaining some of the special circumstances of this ban and why they chose ausops to "carry out their plans"Dax Dupont wrote:Headmins have stated the reason, which is his behavior and even said we're free to discuss it here.oranges wrote:latest update
day 2, midday, supplies are growing lie.
the headadmins are still organising, they have not yet told anyone the ban reason, everyone in the admin team is dismissing my concern over the quality of the ban procedure as shitposting, such is life
apparently now goof doesn't deserve a right to appeal his own ban, despite that being granted to every single other permabanned player, even those under rule 1 bans.
we're settling in for a long seige
They are not required to publicize people's ban reasons aside from to the affected player. I'm pretty sure most people don't want certain of their bans public.
- Dax Dupont
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2014 9:07 pm
- Byond Username: DaxYeen
- Github Username: DaxDupont
- Location: Belgium
Re: Repukan's appeal
Should they tell people why george melon got banned just because other people ask?Hornygranny wrote:I disagree.Dax Dupont wrote:They are not required to publicize people's ban reasons aside from to the affected player. I'm pretty sure most people don't want certain of their bans public.
- Anonmare
- Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2015 8:59 pm
- Byond Username: Anonmare
Re: Repukan's appeal
I gotta admit, oranges has a point. Goof has the right to contest the ban, unless we're just making a special exception for goof in which case I have to ask: What the hell?
I don't even like goof, I'd normally be ambivalent about this
I don't even like goof, I'd normally be ambivalent about this
- Hornygranny
- Horny Police
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 4:54 pm
- Byond Username: Hornygranny
Re: Repukan's appeal
Yes, both the crimes of players and the punishments from admins should be matters of public record.Dax Dupont wrote:Should they tell people why george melon got banned just because other people ask?
I think it's worth mentioning that this is harsher treatment than has been given to anyone I can think of for some time by the current model of tgstation governance. The closest example I can recall is errorage's infamous "purge of shit".Anonmare wrote:I gotta admit, oranges has a point. Goof has the right to contest the ban, unless we're just making a special exception for goof in which case I have to ask: What the hell?
I don't even like goof, I'd normally be ambivalent about this
- Dax Dupont
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2014 9:07 pm
- Byond Username: DaxYeen
- Github Username: DaxDupont
- Location: Belgium
Re: Repukan's appeal
He probably wasn't confined to FNR mostly because his forum behavior was one of the major causes. Maybe he should get his one appeal a year but at the same time it's just gonna be a shitfest, maybe he should just be thrown on the blacklist because years of this shit proves he's not gonna change. There's a few people who are banned from the forum entirely iirc. It's simply not worth to keep someone who doesn't play and just tries to make people feel miserable for no reason other than strange gratification for years around.Anonmare wrote:I gotta admit, oranges has a point. Goof has the right to contest the ban, unless we're just making a special exception for goof in which case I have to ask: What the hell?
I don't even like goof, I'd normally be ambivalent about this
Probably because ausops has more forum powers than the headmins as far as I understand.\oranges wrote:You don't think they should at least make a public statement explaining some of the special circumstances of this ban and why they chose ausops to "carry out their plans"Dax Dupont wrote:Headmins have stated the reason, which is his behavior and even said we're free to discuss it here.oranges wrote:latest update
day 2, midday, supplies are growing lie.
the headadmins are still organising, they have not yet told anyone the ban reason, everyone in the admin team is dismissing my concern over the quality of the ban procedure as shitposting, such is life
apparently now goof doesn't deserve a right to appeal his own ban, despite that being granted to every single other permabanned player, even those under rule 1 bans.
we're settling in for a long seige
They are not required to publicize people's ban reasons aside from to the affected player. I'm pretty sure most people don't want certain of their bans public.
If this is the case we should make the ban database and note database public entirely.Hornygranny wrote:Yes, both the crimes of players and the punishments from admins should be matters of public record.Dax Dupont wrote:Should they tell people why george melon got banned just because other people ask?
- oranges
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
- Byond Username: Optimumtact
- Github Username: optimumtact
- Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED
Re: Repukan's appeal
It's extremely duplicitous to equate requesting some honesty about why the fuck goof has been treated like he has done something incredibly major and permaed and forum banned when all he has done is made a forum thread, to wanting every ban and note to be public.
Stop arguing nonsense
The headadmins if they are across this ban have screwed the pooch, they didn't tell the admin team anything, they discussed it privately (if they discussed it at all) and they are now reaping the rewards of that.
Stop arguing nonsense
The headadmins if they are across this ban have screwed the pooch, they didn't tell the admin team anything, they discussed it privately (if they discussed it at all) and they are now reaping the rewards of that.
- Dax Dupont
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2014 9:07 pm
- Byond Username: DaxYeen
- Github Username: DaxDupont
- Location: Belgium
Re: Repukan's appeal
I literally knew this ban was happening before ausops did it. It was actually posted in adminbus.oranges wrote:It's extremely duplicitous to equate requesting some honesty about why the fuck goof has been treated like he has done something incredibly major and permaed and forum banned when all he has done is made a forum thread, to wanting every ban and note to be public.
Stop arguing nonsense
The headadmins if they are across this ban have screwed the pooch, they didn't tell the admin team anything, they discussed it privately (if they discussed it at all) and they are now reaping the rewards of that.
- Hornygranny
- Horny Police
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 4:54 pm
- Byond Username: Hornygranny
Re: Repukan's appeal
So do I. Does that give me the right to unilaterally deny a player, or any player, access to the forum to appeal, just because it's within my phpBB permissions?Dax Dupont wrote:Probably because ausops has more forum powers than the headmins as far as I understand.
- Dax Dupont
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2014 9:07 pm
- Byond Username: DaxYeen
- Github Username: DaxDupont
- Location: Belgium
Re: Repukan's appeal
The question was "why did ausops do it instead of the headmins". Because they couldn't forum ban him. Ausops could. It was discussed with ausops because I already found out it was likely to happen before it did. Ausops did not tell me.Hornygranny wrote:So do I. Does that give me the right to unilaterally deny a player, or any player, access to the forum to appeal, just because it's within my phpBB permissions?Dax Dupont wrote:Probably because ausops has more forum powers than the headmins as far as I understand.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users