Bottom post of the previous page:
I can even blame it for getting me a girl.Sligneris wrote:appears to like a dead game
Bottom post of the previous page:
I can even blame it for getting me a girl.Sligneris wrote:appears to like a dead game
he got a multicolor-haired, nose-pierced, obese game grillcedarbridge wrote:I can even blame it for getting me a girl.Sligneris wrote:appears to like a dead game
When I give a straight forward ruling and you respond implying that there's some sort of admin conspiracy to change the rule for you and only you, you bet I'm going to be as sarcastic as the implication deserves.Deitus wrote:one of my least favorite admins to deal with. dont see him on often and ahelps are usually met with sarcasm, condescension, and general unprofessionalism. im sure this will be chalked up to "deitus is just being salty" but i've felt this way for some time now, just never cared enough to post it here.
>be revcedarbridge wrote:When I give a straight forward ruling and you respond implying that there's some sort of admin conspiracy to change the rule for you and only you, you bet I'm going to be as sarcastic as the implication deserves.Deitus wrote:one of my least favorite admins to deal with. dont see him on often and ahelps are usually met with sarcasm, condescension, and general unprofessionalism. im sure this will be chalked up to "deitus is just being salty" but i've felt this way for some time now, just never cared enough to post it here.
Who needs your notes for that?Deitus wrote:be sure to pull up all my past notes to try and discredit me, though. surprised it didnt happen with the first reply.
as ive said, its an attitude they have shown multiple times in and out of my interactions with them. being snarky right off the bat isn't "telling shitters like it is," its just having a poor attitude. and yes, i was bwoinked and warned not to hurt nonrevs as a rev before, so a stance was made clear at the time.Nilons wrote:Deitus how far do you intend to get when your primary complaint is "was very sarcastic to me"
Some feedback for cedar is goodmin as fuck tells shitters like it is
Edit: Being bwoinked =/= action was taken. It just means an admin wanted to clear something up. An admin bwoinking you in and of itself does not mean what you're doing is against the rules.
fugg u qbnerd >:^((((Qbmax32 wrote:The deitard gets salty for no reason sometimes, he will calm down eventuallu
The logs are literally in my post. Its really hard to take you seriously when you do this.Deitus wrote: for the record, the conversation went something along the lines of
not even an argument, but sure, i'll take the bait.cedarbridge wrote:The logs are literally in my post. Its really hard to take you seriously when you do this.Deitus wrote: for the record, the conversation went something along the lines of
Your feedback has been noted. Thanks for posting!Deitus wrote:this is an admin feedback thread, and here's my feedback: you are not a good admin.
Not yet but probably getting there. Mostly, I have very little patience for inane conspiracy theories.Lazengann wrote:Cedar posts like he's burned out
NESEI making new sets in FFG's place friendo. The dream lives on.Nabski wrote:This "man" is a bully and always would steal my agendas.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users