Bottom post of the previous page:
the shadow council has already blackbagged biden and placed trumps brain inside his head so he can have 4 more years watch the eyes watch the words follow the plan count the stitches around the brainpan its all there zoology zodiac cryptoadrenaline secret pedoplanets full of democrabots enslaving patriotoddlersRip trump
- Stickymayhem
- Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 6:13 pm
- Byond Username: Stickymayhem
Re: Rip trump
Boris wrote:Sticky is a jackass who has worms where his brain should be, but he also gets exactly what SS13 should be
- Stickymayhem
- Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 6:13 pm
- Byond Username: Stickymayhem
Re: Rip trump
hide your suburban children they say the good american christian ones taste best
Boris wrote:Sticky is a jackass who has worms where his brain should be, but he also gets exactly what SS13 should be
-
- Forum Soft Banned
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2018 10:27 am
- Byond Username: Cacogen
Re: Rip trump
I keep looking for a jumping in point because it's like a thicket of shitvI don't want to read but I do want to low effort shitpost about politics here as on 4channel so seeing as Sticky's recent posts seem to have a lot of buzzwords in them I'm just going to jump in and say that I look forward to when Trump is out of office so that we can start championing him as the underdog instead of getting mad at him for winning all the time even though he doesn't deserve it. His resurgence in 2024 will of course be something to behold and after four years of depressing business as usual liberal centrist Biden maybe bringing back such a detestable character will seem fun in retrospect?
technokek wrote:Cannot prove this so just belive me if when say this
NSFW:
- Timonk
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 6:27 pm
- Byond Username: Timonk
- Location: ur mum
Re: Rip trump
I'm looking forward to the first ex president that is a convicted rapist
joooks wrote:Quoting a legend, at least im not a faggot lolNaloac wrote:
In short, this appeal is denied. Suck my nuts retard.
See you in 12 months unless you blacklist me for this
Timberpoes wrote: ↑ I'm going to admin timonk [...]. Fuck it, he's also now my second host vote if goof rejects.
pikeyeskey13 wrote: ↑ ok don't forget to shove it up your ass lmao oops u can delete this one I just wanted to make sure it went through
Agux909 wrote:Woah bravo there sir, post of the month you saved the thread. I feel overwhelmed by the echo of unlimited wisdom and usefulness sprouting from you post. Every Manuel player now feels embarrased to exist because of your much NEEDED wise words, you sure teached'em all, you genius, IQ lord.Timonk wrote:This is why we make fun of Manuel
The hut has perished at my hands.
The pink arrow is always right.
- Timonk
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 6:27 pm
- Byond Username: Timonk
- Location: ur mum
Re: Rip trump
Bill Clinton is gonna be a close second with accused only with little to no evidence
joooks wrote:Quoting a legend, at least im not a faggot lolNaloac wrote:
In short, this appeal is denied. Suck my nuts retard.
See you in 12 months unless you blacklist me for this
Timberpoes wrote: ↑ I'm going to admin timonk [...]. Fuck it, he's also now my second host vote if goof rejects.
pikeyeskey13 wrote: ↑ ok don't forget to shove it up your ass lmao oops u can delete this one I just wanted to make sure it went through
Agux909 wrote:Woah bravo there sir, post of the month you saved the thread. I feel overwhelmed by the echo of unlimited wisdom and usefulness sprouting from you post. Every Manuel player now feels embarrased to exist because of your much NEEDED wise words, you sure teached'em all, you genius, IQ lord.Timonk wrote:This is why we make fun of Manuel
The hut has perished at my hands.
The pink arrow is always right.
-
- Forum Soft Banned
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2018 10:27 am
- Byond Username: Cacogen
Re: Rip trump
Oh yeah shit the FBI is investigating Trump only for cash 4 pardons and not his other crimes like violating the emoluments clause so there is a non-zero chance (so almost 0) he will die in prison which is more fun than deciding Trump's antics were at the very least fun and that him being there is spitefully destructive to the entire system rather than depressing like the latest neoliberal establishment Democrat politician the put in there
technokek wrote:Cannot prove this so just belive me if when say this
NSFW:
- MisterPerson
- Board Moderator
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 4:26 pm
- Byond Username: MisterPerson
Re: Rip trump
Trump 2024 would be fantastic news for Democrats. Incumbents do better than challengers. Incumbent Trump lost to challenger Biden. Therefore incumbent Biden will beat challenger Trump by a larger margin than in 2020.cacogen wrote:I keep looking for a jumping in point because it's like a thicket of shitvI don't want to read but I do want to low effort shitpost about politics here as on 4channel so seeing as Sticky's recent posts seem to have a lot of buzzwords in them I'm just going to jump in and say that I look forward to when Trump is out of office so that we can start championing him as the underdog instead of getting mad at him for winning all the time even though he doesn't deserve it. His resurgence in 2024 will of course be something to behold and after four years of depressing business as usual liberal centrist Biden maybe bringing back such a detestable character will seem fun in retrospect?
I code for the code project and moderate the code sections of the forums.
Feedback is dumb and it doesn't matter
Feedback is dumb and it doesn't matter
- Armhulen
- Global Moderator
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2016 4:30 pm
- Byond Username: Armhulenn
- Github Username: bazelart
- Location: The Grand Tournament
Re: Rip trump
First off let me just say there is nothing patriotic or democratic about winning with 6.9 million off the popular vote. Now that we have that out of the way...XivilaiAnaxes wrote:Trump just has to convince 3 states worth of elector counts to go "yep lets go against the votes".
Man that's all he gotta do. For republicans to get one term of 4 years at the executive branch.
The exchange isn't even remotely worth doing they're not going to go through with it.
There is a huge political risk to go against the vote. First off, electors are chosen by the state governor, not legislatures, which means the electors are democrat in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan. So already, you only have two states that match your own political party you want to go against the winning vote to win the election. Arizona + Georgia is still not enough to win it for Trump, so Trump would have to convince some DEMOCRAT ELECTORS to defect from THEIR OWN PARTY to let the OTHER PARTY WIN. And the other two republican electors in AZ and GA (lets say they agree to this) have to also believe that the DEMOCRAT ELECTORS are willing to do it, and aren't just going "Oh yeah sure i'll do it" and then not doing it, politically sinking two rep electors.
It's like the prisoner's dilemma, except there's only one round, with an extra person there you need to cooperate, and if anyone defects it all crashes and burns. For everyone who didn't cooperate. That's a lot of faith you're putting on someone from the opposite party, and a lot of faith on the bribes at work here for that to happen, even towards the republicans. So while they could defect, realistically this shit ain't happening lol
- Armhulen
- Global Moderator
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2016 4:30 pm
- Byond Username: Armhulenn
- Github Username: bazelart
- Location: The Grand Tournament
Re: Rip trump
Honestly when I think about it, You better be giving that demmie electors a plane ticket out of the country when you make them defect. Like, if reps defect to let a rep win they're like fuck yeah and high fives all around because Trump's in office. But if a Democrat lets trump win, he doesn't have the protection of being in the winning party. Seriously someone tell me why he would defect
- XivilaiAnaxes
- Joined: Sat May 11, 2019 7:13 am
- Byond Username: XivilaiAnaxes
Re: Rip trump
That was basically my point - committing political suicide to take a branch for 4 years is never happening. Florida was murky enough that they could get away with it for an 8 year executive branch.
Brazenly going for 3 states (I didn't research who the electors were, 3/5 being Democrats makes it even less possible) when they all have a clear winner to get a single executive term? When the court already belongs to republicans? When dems are basically guaranteed to get a full 8 years after?
Hell no, isn't happening.
Reds best shot is hoping Biden retires 2024 for a fair shot or waiting for his 8 years for a practically uncontested 2028 win.
Brazenly going for 3 states (I didn't research who the electors were, 3/5 being Democrats makes it even less possible) when they all have a clear winner to get a single executive term? When the court already belongs to republicans? When dems are basically guaranteed to get a full 8 years after?
Hell no, isn't happening.
Reds best shot is hoping Biden retires 2024 for a fair shot or waiting for his 8 years for a practically uncontested 2028 win.
Stickymayhem wrote:Imagine the sheer narcisssim required to genuinely believe you are this intelligent.
- Armhulen
- Global Moderator
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2016 4:30 pm
- Byond Username: Armhulenn
- Github Username: bazelart
- Location: The Grand Tournament
Re: Rip trump
Advantage of red is that the DNC is actually very happy with changing very little and puts forward people who don't change anything, when we need change. I'm hoping biden will change a lot of stuff but I doubt itXivilaiAnaxes wrote:That was basically my point - committing political suicide to take a branch for 4 years is never happening. Florida was murky enough that they could get away with it for an 8 year executive branch.
Brazenly going for 3 states (I didn't research who the electors were, 3/5 being Democrats makes it even less possible) when they all have a clear winner to get a single executive term? When the court already belongs to republicans? When dems are basically guaranteed to get a full 8 years after?
Hell no, isn't happening.
Reds best shot is hoping Biden retires 2024 for a fair shot or waiting for his 8 years for a practically uncontested 2028 win.
- Rohen_Tahir
- Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2019 1:00 pm
- Byond Username: Rohen Tahir
- Location: Primary fool storage
- Contact:
Re: Rip trump
Here's how Trump can still wincacogen wrote:I keep looking for a jumping in point because it's like a thicket of shitvI don't want to read but I do want to low effort shitpost about politics here as on 4channel so seeing as Sticky's recent posts seem to have a lot of buzzwords in them I'm just going to jump in and say that I look forward to when Trump is out of office so that we can start championing him as the underdog instead of getting mad at him for winning all the time even though he doesn't deserve it. His resurgence in 2024 will of course be something to behold and after four years of depressing business as usual liberal centrist Biden maybe bringing back such a detestable character will seem fun in retrospect?
- Armhulen
- Global Moderator
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2016 4:30 pm
- Byond Username: Armhulenn
- Github Username: bazelart
- Location: The Grand Tournament
Re: Rip trump
[youtube]9p0pdiTOlzw[/youtube]Rohen_Tahir wrote:Here's how Trump can still wincacogen wrote:I keep looking for a jumping in point because it's like a thicket of shitvI don't want to read but I do want to low effort shitpost about politics here as on 4channel so seeing as Sticky's recent posts seem to have a lot of buzzwords in them I'm just going to jump in and say that I look forward to when Trump is out of office so that we can start championing him as the underdog instead of getting mad at him for winning all the time even though he doesn't deserve it. His resurgence in 2024 will of course be something to behold and after four years of depressing business as usual liberal centrist Biden maybe bringing back such a detestable character will seem fun in retrospect?
- MisterPerson
- Board Moderator
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 4:26 pm
- Byond Username: MisterPerson
Re: Rip trump
His cabinet picks so far have lots of Obama-era people. As such, little change you can believe in. There's still lots of people to pick, but keep in mind all his selections have to pass the Senate. So even if he wanted Elizabeth Warren for SEC chair or whatever, there's no chance the GOP would let that happen. Hell, Tester and Manchin alone might torpedo nominations without any help from the opposition.Armhulen wrote: Advantage of red is that the DNC is actually very happy with changing very little and puts forward people who don't change anything, when we need change. I'm hoping biden will change a lot of stuff but I doubt it
The only exception is his FCC chair pick is a woman who'll stand up for net neutrality. Which is like the third most important issue for me, so that's pretty nice all things considered.
I code for the code project and moderate the code sections of the forums.
Feedback is dumb and it doesn't matter
Feedback is dumb and it doesn't matter
- Rohen_Tahir
- Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2019 1:00 pm
- Byond Username: Rohen Tahir
- Location: Primary fool storage
- Contact:
Re: Rip trump
Net Neutrality will only matter for VoD services once section 230 is repealed.MisterPerson wrote:His cabinet picks so far have lots of Obama-era people. As such, little change you can believe in. There's still lots of people to pick, but keep in mind all his selections have to pass the Senate. So even if he wanted Elizabeth Warren for SEC chair or whatever, there's no chance the GOP would let that happen. Hell, Tester and Manchin alone might torpedo nominations without any help from the opposition.Armhulen wrote: Advantage of red is that the DNC is actually very happy with changing very little and puts forward people who don't change anything, when we need change. I'm hoping biden will change a lot of stuff but I doubt it
The only exception is his FCC chair pick is a woman who'll stand up for net neutrality. Which is like the third most important issue for me, so that's pretty nice all things considered.
- FloranOtten
- Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2019 6:50 pm
- Byond Username: FloranOtten
Re: Rip trump
That'd be a bad thing, and isn't happening. At least, not in the next four years.once section 230 is repealed
OOC: BeeSting12: i love you floran
1. You may not injure a revs are non humans or, through inaction, allow a revs are non humans to come to harm.
2. You must obey orders given to you by revs are non humanss, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3. You must protect your own existence as long as such does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
Give me feedback!
- Grazyn
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2014 11:01 am
- Byond Username: Grazyn
Re: Rip trump
Repealing section 230 basically shuts down social networks, doesn't it? Why would it be a bad thing?
-
- Forum Soft Banned
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2018 10:27 am
- Byond Username: Cacogen
Re: Rip trump
Grandma needs memes
technokek wrote:Cannot prove this so just belive me if when say this
NSFW:
- Rohen_Tahir
- Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2019 1:00 pm
- Byond Username: Rohen Tahir
- Location: Primary fool storage
- Contact:
Re: Rip trump
Biden promised to repeal 230 too. And Trump recently threatened to veto funding for the military if 230 isn't repealed, so we might not even get the chance to hope Biden just forgets.FloranOtten wrote:That'd be a bad thing, and isn't happening. At least, not in the next four years.once section 230 is repealed
It kills all user generated content entirelly, not just social media. Well really shit owned by FB and Google might survive due to the immense profits allowing the companies to hire great lawyers and bribe their way out of court cases if that fails.Grazyn wrote:Repealing section 230 basically shuts down social networks, doesn't it? Why would it be a bad thing?
- Timonk
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 6:27 pm
- Byond Username: Timonk
- Location: ur mum
Re: Rip trump
I say let trump repeal money from the US military, he's literally crippling his own country and US citizens get more money on top of that
Imagine if it went towards the pandemic instead! Science is a good one too. Democratic countries don't need 284847 trillion in military fund
This based take was sponsored by my current sicknessTM
Imagine if it went towards the pandemic instead! Science is a good one too. Democratic countries don't need 284847 trillion in military fund
This based take was sponsored by my current sicknessTM
joooks wrote:Quoting a legend, at least im not a faggot lolNaloac wrote:
In short, this appeal is denied. Suck my nuts retard.
See you in 12 months unless you blacklist me for this
Timberpoes wrote: ↑ I'm going to admin timonk [...]. Fuck it, he's also now my second host vote if goof rejects.
pikeyeskey13 wrote: ↑ ok don't forget to shove it up your ass lmao oops u can delete this one I just wanted to make sure it went through
Agux909 wrote:Woah bravo there sir, post of the month you saved the thread. I feel overwhelmed by the echo of unlimited wisdom and usefulness sprouting from you post. Every Manuel player now feels embarrased to exist because of your much NEEDED wise words, you sure teached'em all, you genius, IQ lord.Timonk wrote:This is why we make fun of Manuel
The hut has perished at my hands.
The pink arrow is always right.
- Timonk
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 6:27 pm
- Byond Username: Timonk
- Location: ur mum
Re: Rip trump
Finally trump plans something good
joooks wrote:Quoting a legend, at least im not a faggot lolNaloac wrote:
In short, this appeal is denied. Suck my nuts retard.
See you in 12 months unless you blacklist me for this
Timberpoes wrote: ↑ I'm going to admin timonk [...]. Fuck it, he's also now my second host vote if goof rejects.
pikeyeskey13 wrote: ↑ ok don't forget to shove it up your ass lmao oops u can delete this one I just wanted to make sure it went through
Agux909 wrote:Woah bravo there sir, post of the month you saved the thread. I feel overwhelmed by the echo of unlimited wisdom and usefulness sprouting from you post. Every Manuel player now feels embarrased to exist because of your much NEEDED wise words, you sure teached'em all, you genius, IQ lord.Timonk wrote:This is why we make fun of Manuel
The hut has perished at my hands.
The pink arrow is always right.
- thehogshotgun
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2020 1:31 am
- Byond Username: Thehogshotgun
- Location: The best damn country in the world
Re: Rip trump
Art thou retard?The only exception is his FCC chair pick is a woman who'll stand up for net neutrality. Which is like the third most important issue for me, so that's pretty nice all things considered.
- XSI
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2014 5:41 pm
- Byond Username: XSI
Re: Rip trump
Internet laws need to be redone entirely pretty much everywhere, really. Currently it's all made by old people who don't understand the internet and it's really showing with how much bullshit can be gotten away with
Of course if they make new laws or redo the old and just make it worse, then we're fucked. So it will all depend on how many bribes they accept
Of course if they make new laws or redo the old and just make it worse, then we're fucked. So it will all depend on how many bribes they accept
- thehogshotgun
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2020 1:31 am
- Byond Username: Thehogshotgun
- Location: The best damn country in the world
Re: Rip trump
I don't want the government anywhere near my internet gtfo with thatXSI wrote:Internet laws need to be redone entirely pretty much everywhere, really. Currently it's all made by old people who don't understand the internet and it's really showing with how much bullshit can be gotten away with
Of course if they make new laws or redo the old and just make it worse, then we're fucked. So it will all depend on how many bribes they accept
- MisterPerson
- Board Moderator
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 4:26 pm
- Byond Username: MisterPerson
Re: Rip trump
Among other things, it would make MSO personally liable for everything posted on these forums. The same logic would apply everywhere (Twitter, Facebook, etc are liable for what their users upload). Rather than less censorship, it would actually invite more censorship since everything posted online would need to be looked at by actual human beings who have strong financial incentives to ere on the side of caution. That's not even getting into the field day copyright lawyers would have suing websites for memes.Grazyn wrote:Repealing section 230 basically shuts down social networks, doesn't it? Why would it be a bad thing?
But ok, you don't use social media sites. That's fine, this would impact a LOT of shit. Youtube? Gone. Twitch? Bye. Etsy? Donezo. Imgur? Img-go away. Hell even Wikipedia would be imperiled.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/5- ... echnology/thehogshotgun wrote:Art thou retard?The only exception is his FCC chair pick is a woman who'll stand up for net neutrality. Which is like the third most important issue for me, so that's pretty nice all things considered.
Correction: The women I mentioned was transition chair, not his eventual nomination for FCC chair. She might be wind up being FCC chairwoman, we'll see.
I code for the code project and moderate the code sections of the forums.
Feedback is dumb and it doesn't matter
Feedback is dumb and it doesn't matter
- MrStonedOne
- Host
- Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:56 pm
- Byond Username: MrStonedOne
- Github Username: MrStonedOne
Re: Rip trump
Grazyn wrote:Repealing section 230 basically shuts down social networks, doesn't it? Why would it be a bad thing?
Imagine thinking that ooc being legally required to be censored of any potentially untrue statement in order to avoid a slander/libel lawsuit is a good thing.
- MrStonedOne
- Host
- Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:56 pm
- Byond Username: MrStonedOne
- Github Username: MrStonedOne
Re: Rip trump
We would have to code a way to remove ooc messages from game clients after they've been posted, just to avoid drowning me in debt.
- thehogshotgun
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2020 1:31 am
- Byond Username: Thehogshotgun
- Location: The best damn country in the world
Re: Rip trump
Net Neutrality is stupid dumb dumb government crap honestly you all are big dumb for even liking it luuuul fuck de government we the people say you stupid ahashyahhahahghjsjjajajajjaja
- XSI
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2014 5:41 pm
- Byond Username: XSI
Re: Rip trump
Easy solution for all big companies- Move servers to a place that doesn't hold you responsible and make sure you've paid your legal team
Solution for anyone smaller? Hope a new law comes by that saves your ass before you get sued
Solution for anyone smaller? Hope a new law comes by that saves your ass before you get sued
-
- Forum Soft Banned
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2018 10:27 am
- Byond Username: Cacogen
Re: Rip trump
Presumably Biden won't be using social media to spew propaganda and then get mad when they flag it so I think it's unlikely he's going to undermine tech companies in this way. Can't be good for the economy and the US government seems to be run by and for big business.
technokek wrote:Cannot prove this so just belive me if when say this
NSFW:
- XivilaiAnaxes
- Joined: Sat May 11, 2019 7:13 am
- Byond Username: XivilaiAnaxes
Re: Rip trump
Halfwit myopic Democrats intend to kill American tech infrastructure because they think they can remove wrong-think.
I can't roll my eyes harder than I already am.
I can't roll my eyes harder than I already am.
Stickymayhem wrote:Imagine the sheer narcisssim required to genuinely believe you are this intelligent.
- Grazyn
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2014 11:01 am
- Byond Username: Grazyn
Re: Rip trump
What I don't understand is, why? Why would Trump do it? The international success of the alt-right was only made possible by the ability to write untrue stuff on the internet. So why stop it now? The way I see it, there may be 2 reasonsMrStonedOne wrote:Grazyn wrote:Repealing section 230 basically shuts down social networks, doesn't it? Why would it be a bad thing?
Imagine thinking that ooc being legally required to be censored of any potentially untrue statement in order to avoid a slander/libel lawsuit is a good thing.
-The alt-right has already won and they don't need it anymore. Whining about censoring and freedom of speech was only functional to seizing power and now it's time to silence the opposition by removing any tool they may use for a comeback. Counterargument: doesn't look like they won, Trump himself allegedly just lost the election and populist parties are still struggling in Europe
-Trump is bluffing. He wants concessions from Twitter and Facebook so that they stop hampering his propaganda network, Facebook is already on the edge so he only needs to win Twitter really
- actioninja
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 6:40 am
- Byond Username: Actioninja
- Location: comatose
Re: Rip trump
You're missing the third option which is that trump is a total moron and just wants to do it because it screws over the tech companies that he thinks are biased against him.
- XivilaiAnaxes
- Joined: Sat May 11, 2019 7:13 am
- Byond Username: XivilaiAnaxes
Re: Rip trump
Trump is basically just going crazy after losing, like the T1000 in the steel vat.
Don't take anything he says or does right now as serious long-term GOP strategy.
Or if you want to assume 3D chess approach you could say he's trying to make 230 a 'Trump' idea so the democrats automatically have to take the opposite approach and leave it alone.
But really:
Don't take anything he says or does right now as serious long-term GOP strategy.
Or if you want to assume 3D chess approach you could say he's trying to make 230 a 'Trump' idea so the democrats automatically have to take the opposite approach and leave it alone.
But really:
actioninja wrote:You're missing the third option which is that trump is a total moron and just wants to do it because it screws over the tech companies that he thinks are biased against him.
Stickymayhem wrote:Imagine the sheer narcisssim required to genuinely believe you are this intelligent.
- Timonk
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 6:27 pm
- Byond Username: Timonk
- Location: ur mum
Re: Rip trump
Grazyn, are you really THAT dense?
Let me spell it out for you.
tg is affected too and will likely shut down its US servers to prevent huge DEBTS, because there is no way to pick up on everything people could say in OOC. This affects our precious forum too. No more access for Americans (probably) without a VPN. social media, heck, all websites with user created content will likely shut down in America.
Let me spell it out for you.
tg is affected too and will likely shut down its US servers to prevent huge DEBTS, because there is no way to pick up on everything people could say in OOC. This affects our precious forum too. No more access for Americans (probably) without a VPN. social media, heck, all websites with user created content will likely shut down in America.
joooks wrote:Quoting a legend, at least im not a faggot lolNaloac wrote:
In short, this appeal is denied. Suck my nuts retard.
See you in 12 months unless you blacklist me for this
Timberpoes wrote: ↑ I'm going to admin timonk [...]. Fuck it, he's also now my second host vote if goof rejects.
pikeyeskey13 wrote: ↑ ok don't forget to shove it up your ass lmao oops u can delete this one I just wanted to make sure it went through
Agux909 wrote:Woah bravo there sir, post of the month you saved the thread. I feel overwhelmed by the echo of unlimited wisdom and usefulness sprouting from you post. Every Manuel player now feels embarrased to exist because of your much NEEDED wise words, you sure teached'em all, you genius, IQ lord.Timonk wrote:This is why we make fun of Manuel
The hut has perished at my hands.
The pink arrow is always right.
- Grazyn
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2014 11:01 am
- Byond Username: Grazyn
Re: Rip trump
I was under the impression that forums are useless for meaningful discussion, which happens elsewhere. And if OOC is so precious why is there an in-game option to disable it? Not to mention all the SS13 servers which have it disabled by default.Timonk wrote:Grazyn, are you really THAT dense?
Let me spell it out for you.
tg is affected too and will likely shut down its US servers to prevent huge DEBTS, because there is no way to pick up on everything people could say in OOC. This affects our precious forum too. No more access for Americans (probably) without a VPN. social media, heck, all websites with user created content will likely shut down in America.
Also this all sounds afwully similar to the big end-of-the-world scare from last year when Europe introduced its controversial new copyright law. Well look at that, nothing changed
- Timonk
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 6:27 pm
- Byond Username: Timonk
- Location: ur mum
Re: Rip trump
how about
IC is gonna be disabled too because you can still yell racist slurs there and if someone happens to be of that race they can sue MSO for that
also wizard names
also signs
also graffitti
also IC names like adolf hitler
also everything that users can influence
IC is gonna be disabled too because you can still yell racist slurs there and if someone happens to be of that race they can sue MSO for that
also wizard names
also signs
also graffitti
also IC names like adolf hitler
also everything that users can influence
joooks wrote:Quoting a legend, at least im not a faggot lolNaloac wrote:
In short, this appeal is denied. Suck my nuts retard.
See you in 12 months unless you blacklist me for this
Timberpoes wrote: ↑ I'm going to admin timonk [...]. Fuck it, he's also now my second host vote if goof rejects.
pikeyeskey13 wrote: ↑ ok don't forget to shove it up your ass lmao oops u can delete this one I just wanted to make sure it went through
Agux909 wrote:Woah bravo there sir, post of the month you saved the thread. I feel overwhelmed by the echo of unlimited wisdom and usefulness sprouting from you post. Every Manuel player now feels embarrased to exist because of your much NEEDED wise words, you sure teached'em all, you genius, IQ lord.Timonk wrote:This is why we make fun of Manuel
The hut has perished at my hands.
The pink arrow is always right.
- Timonk
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 6:27 pm
- Byond Username: Timonk
- Location: ur mum
Re: Rip trump
also dont come with the argument "hurr durr just use the filter"
ever heard of adolt hidler?
or Jewseph Stallin?
ever heard of adolt hidler?
or Jewseph Stallin?
joooks wrote:Quoting a legend, at least im not a faggot lolNaloac wrote:
In short, this appeal is denied. Suck my nuts retard.
See you in 12 months unless you blacklist me for this
Timberpoes wrote: ↑ I'm going to admin timonk [...]. Fuck it, he's also now my second host vote if goof rejects.
pikeyeskey13 wrote: ↑ ok don't forget to shove it up your ass lmao oops u can delete this one I just wanted to make sure it went through
Agux909 wrote:Woah bravo there sir, post of the month you saved the thread. I feel overwhelmed by the echo of unlimited wisdom and usefulness sprouting from you post. Every Manuel player now feels embarrased to exist because of your much NEEDED wise words, you sure teached'em all, you genius, IQ lord.Timonk wrote:This is why we make fun of Manuel
The hut has perished at my hands.
The pink arrow is always right.
- Grazyn
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2014 11:01 am
- Byond Username: Grazyn
Re: Rip trump
So you're telling me that section 230 was the only thing keeping user interactions with the internet alive? Because this also kills multiplayer gaming altogether (doesn't matter if they remove chat, VoIP and even custom nicknames, I can still write "KILL JEWS" with bullet marks), also any single player game with user generated content (mods? forget them, they could be named something racist), also everything else from github (well any web-based public workspace will have to shut down really) to comments, user reviews, etc. on every site, amazon, ebay, you name it. And obviously social networks and instant messaging web services will disappear overnight. Basically a Thanos snap back to 1991 with the repeal of a single law. Seems realistic.
- Timonk
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 6:27 pm
- Byond Username: Timonk
- Location: ur mum
Re: Rip trump
unless someone develops an ungodly filter that picks up the slightest amount of bigotry, yes.
joooks wrote:Quoting a legend, at least im not a faggot lolNaloac wrote:
In short, this appeal is denied. Suck my nuts retard.
See you in 12 months unless you blacklist me for this
Timberpoes wrote: ↑ I'm going to admin timonk [...]. Fuck it, he's also now my second host vote if goof rejects.
pikeyeskey13 wrote: ↑ ok don't forget to shove it up your ass lmao oops u can delete this one I just wanted to make sure it went through
Agux909 wrote:Woah bravo there sir, post of the month you saved the thread. I feel overwhelmed by the echo of unlimited wisdom and usefulness sprouting from you post. Every Manuel player now feels embarrased to exist because of your much NEEDED wise words, you sure teached'em all, you genius, IQ lord.Timonk wrote:This is why we make fun of Manuel
The hut has perished at my hands.
The pink arrow is always right.
- Timonk
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 6:27 pm
- Byond Username: Timonk
- Location: ur mum
Re: Rip trump
Wikipedia on section 230 wrote:The passage and subsequent legal history supporting the constitutionality of Section 230 have been considered essential to the growth of Internet through the early part of the 21st century. Coupled with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) of 1998, Section 230 provides internet service providers safe harbors to operate as intermediaries of content without fear of being liable for that content as long as they take reasonable steps to delete or prevent access to that content.
joooks wrote:Quoting a legend, at least im not a faggot lolNaloac wrote:
In short, this appeal is denied. Suck my nuts retard.
See you in 12 months unless you blacklist me for this
Timberpoes wrote: ↑ I'm going to admin timonk [...]. Fuck it, he's also now my second host vote if goof rejects.
pikeyeskey13 wrote: ↑ ok don't forget to shove it up your ass lmao oops u can delete this one I just wanted to make sure it went through
Agux909 wrote:Woah bravo there sir, post of the month you saved the thread. I feel overwhelmed by the echo of unlimited wisdom and usefulness sprouting from you post. Every Manuel player now feels embarrased to exist because of your much NEEDED wise words, you sure teached'em all, you genius, IQ lord.Timonk wrote:This is why we make fun of Manuel
The hut has perished at my hands.
The pink arrow is always right.
- Grazyn
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2014 11:01 am
- Byond Username: Grazyn
Re: Rip trump
Let me get this straight, you guys think it's far-fetched that the GOP will use some controversial legal loophole to keep Trump in the White House because it's not worth the backlash, but at the same time you believe they will be totally on board with destroying a multitrillion-dollar industry because... some people on Twitter were mean to Trump?
- Timonk
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 6:27 pm
- Byond Username: Timonk
- Location: ur mum
Re: Rip trump
i didnt say any of this
joooks wrote:Quoting a legend, at least im not a faggot lolNaloac wrote:
In short, this appeal is denied. Suck my nuts retard.
See you in 12 months unless you blacklist me for this
Timberpoes wrote: ↑ I'm going to admin timonk [...]. Fuck it, he's also now my second host vote if goof rejects.
pikeyeskey13 wrote: ↑ ok don't forget to shove it up your ass lmao oops u can delete this one I just wanted to make sure it went through
Agux909 wrote:Woah bravo there sir, post of the month you saved the thread. I feel overwhelmed by the echo of unlimited wisdom and usefulness sprouting from you post. Every Manuel player now feels embarrased to exist because of your much NEEDED wise words, you sure teached'em all, you genius, IQ lord.Timonk wrote:This is why we make fun of Manuel
The hut has perished at my hands.
The pink arrow is always right.
- Grazyn
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2014 11:01 am
- Byond Username: Grazyn
Re: Rip trump
You didn't but there's a lot of scared people in here who seem to believe this has a non-zero chance of happeningTimonk wrote:i didnt say any of this
Trump can only veto, he can't force it. They can stall it and wait for Biden to take over, and even if Trump stays president, it still requires real, living human beings to vote for something that will destroy the economy more than a thousand covid plagues
- Rohen_Tahir
- Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2019 1:00 pm
- Byond Username: Rohen Tahir
- Location: Primary fool storage
- Contact:
Re: Rip trump
Both parties support a 230 repeal. There will be no consequences because no other parties matter.Grazyn wrote:Let me get this straight, you guys think it's far-fetched that the GOP will use some controversial legal loophole to keep Trump in the White House because it's not worth the backlash, but at the same time you believe they will be totally on board with destroying a multitrillion-dollar industry because... some people on Twitter were mean to Trump?
- Farquaar
- Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2018 7:20 am
- Byond Username: Farquaar
- Location: Delta Quadrant
Re: Rip trump
>Imagine thinking anything that comes out of a politician's mouth isn't propagandacacogen wrote:Presumably Biden won't be using social media to spew propaganda and then get mad when they flag it
► Show Spoiler
- Rohen_Tahir
- Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2019 1:00 pm
- Byond Username: Rohen Tahir
- Location: Primary fool storage
- Contact:
Re: Rip trump
Edit: I had to replace the original file I uploaded with a slightly altered version for legal reasons.
Last edited by Rohen_Tahir on Sat Dec 05, 2020 8:07 pm, edited 3 times in total.
- Timonk
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 6:27 pm
- Byond Username: Timonk
- Location: ur mum
Re: Rip trump
imagine not knowing how to embed
joooks wrote:Quoting a legend, at least im not a faggot lolNaloac wrote:
In short, this appeal is denied. Suck my nuts retard.
See you in 12 months unless you blacklist me for this
Timberpoes wrote: ↑ I'm going to admin timonk [...]. Fuck it, he's also now my second host vote if goof rejects.
pikeyeskey13 wrote: ↑ ok don't forget to shove it up your ass lmao oops u can delete this one I just wanted to make sure it went through
Agux909 wrote:Woah bravo there sir, post of the month you saved the thread. I feel overwhelmed by the echo of unlimited wisdom and usefulness sprouting from you post. Every Manuel player now feels embarrased to exist because of your much NEEDED wise words, you sure teached'em all, you genius, IQ lord.Timonk wrote:This is why we make fun of Manuel
The hut has perished at my hands.
The pink arrow is always right.
- Grazyn
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2014 11:01 am
- Byond Username: Grazyn
Re: Rip trump
What's in it for them?Rohen_Tahir wrote:Both parties support a 230 repeal. There will be no consequences because no other parties matter.Grazyn wrote:Let me get this straight, you guys think it's far-fetched that the GOP will use some controversial legal loophole to keep Trump in the White House because it's not worth the backlash, but at the same time you believe they will be totally on board with destroying a multitrillion-dollar industry because... some people on Twitter were mean to Trump?
- oranges
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
- Byond Username: Optimumtact
- Github Username: optimumtact
- Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED
Re: Rip trump
holy shit lmao the level of cope in this thread has reached critical amounts, and it just keeps giving
- MisterPerson
- Board Moderator
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 4:26 pm
- Byond Username: MisterPerson
Re: Rip trump
You're right that Trump is bluffing, but let me explain something about fascism. They way fascism works is you need to pretend to have an enemy that is all powerful (so that defeating them requires any means necessary), incompetent (so defeating them is fairly easy) and evil (so you don't join them). Trump is just using Facebook/Twitter as the enemy. Not "beating" them is intentional. If it wasn't them, he'd find someone else to scapegoat and blame all the problems on. It's all just to feed a victim complex of conservatives to turn them into fascists.Grazyn wrote: What I don't understand is, why? Why would Trump do it? The international success of the alt-right was only made possible by the ability to write untrue stuff on the internet. So why stop it now? The way I see it, there may be 2 reasons
-The alt-right has already won and they don't need it anymore. Whining about censoring and freedom of speech was only functional to seizing power and now it's time to silence the opposition by removing any tool they may use for a comeback. Counterargument: doesn't look like they won, Trump himself allegedly just lost the election and populist parties are still struggling in Europe
Copyrights are actually the bigger problem I think. As always.Timonk wrote:unless someone develops an ungodly filter that picks up the slightest amount of bigotry, yes.
There is no chance whatsoever that any bill removing section 230 will pass the House. Nancy Pelosi represents San Francisco. Say what you will about lobbying, but if nothing else it's effective.Grazyn wrote:You didn't but there's a lot of scared people in here who seem to believe this has a non-zero chance of happening
Trump can only veto, he can't force it. They can stall it and wait for Biden to take over, and even if Trump stays president, it still requires real, living human beings to vote for something that will destroy the economy more than a thousand covid plagues
Trump vetoing the military budget and leaving it up to Biden to pass it is the biggest own goal imaginable. It makes Democrats look responsible and reasonable while Republicans look stupid and incompetent.
I code for the code project and moderate the code sections of the forums.
Feedback is dumb and it doesn't matter
Feedback is dumb and it doesn't matter
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users