Feminism

rdght91 · Post by **rdght91** » Tue Dec 08, 2015 3:24 pm #139113

Bottom post of the previous page:

Whoisthere wrote:I heard that in the Navy female latrines

The Navy doesn't have latrines.

Incomptinence · Tue Dec 08, 2015 7:18 pm

They do in the sewer fleet detachment for hunting new york gators.

Stickymayhem · Wed Oct 13, 2021 6:17 pm

When I woke up this morning I didn't think tgstation would have solved gender inequality

John_Oxford · Wed Dec 09, 2015 10:03 pm

[] not wew
[x] wew
---

All in all, if you are different (IE: i identify as a quadpesti-octigontal otherkin star master), expect to get treated different, don't scream "OMNG OPPRESSION" because YOU. and YOU ALONE. are the one who decided to be a quadpesti-octigontal otherkin star master.

EDIT:
good thread, btw

TheNightingale · Wed Dec 09, 2015 10:12 pm

What does identifying with a quadpesti-octigontal otherkin star master have to do with feminism?

Ricotez · Post by **Ricotez** » Wed Dec 09, 2015 10:33 pm #139333

TheNightingale wrote:What does identifying with a quadpesti-octigontal otherkin star master have to do with feminism?

john just used a strawman because it's easier to attack

John_Oxford · Wed Dec 09, 2015 10:46 pm

TheNightingale wrote:What does identifying with a quadpesti-octigontal otherkin star master have to do with feminism?

Feminists (see: tumblerites) have overly complicated gender identities, (see: quadpesti-octigontal otherkin starmaster)

Ricotiez wrote:john just used a strawman because its easier to attack

you know i'm better than that, jesus.

TheNightingale · Thu Dec 10, 2015 12:01 am

Okay, I'm taking the bait there. Disclaimer: I'm not autistic, I just use common sense.

Gender identity =/= feminism. That, and nobody actually calls themselves quadpesti-octigontal otherkin starmasters unironically (if you see that, it's probably satire).

Feminism is the belief that people should be treated equally and have equal rights, regardless of their gender. You're a feminist if you think that women and men should receive the same pay for the same job. You're a feminist if you believe that women shouldn't be raped for dressing provocatively. You're a feminist if you believe that someone's intrinsic moral worth is irrelevant of their gender.
Gender identity is what gender you are. I'm a woman because I say I'm a woman. You're a man because you say you're a man. If your biological sex (what the doctors called you) is female (i.e. ovaries, etc.), you're still a man, because gender and sex are different things. You can identify as a quadpesti-octigontal otherkin starmaster all you like, because that's not even gender identity ("I identify as male/female/both/neither etc"), that's just mocking otherkin (people who associate strongly with an animal or character).

Most people with nonbinary gender identities (someone who identifies as intersex is both male and female, for example) are feminists, probably. Why is that? Because feminists believe in equality, and nonbinaries are marginalised and discriminated against already (c.f. your post - 'overly complicated'), and so need equality.
Are all feminists nonbinary? Nope. Most murderers are American, but not all Americans commit murder.

I've taken the liberty of adding a simple guide to the topic, since so many people find the concept difficult.

Spoiler:

Cik · Post by **Cik** » Thu Dec 10, 2015 12:24 am #139354

that would be fine if any of it were true, it's not. feminism hasn't been about equal rights for decades at this point, they seek advantage, pure and simple.

"feminism is about equality" is just one of those stupid smokescreens they throw up when you call them on their shit, because they think they can paint you as someone who's "anti-equality" if you oppose them, and by doing so paint you as morally reprehensible.

Zilenan91 · Post by **Zilenan91** » Thu Dec 10, 2015 12:28 am #139355

We're hitting the shitpost singularity folks. People are making a joke topic serious. We need to stop soon or else we'll hit a meme singularity and the forums will go down again.

Takeguru · Post by **Takeguru** » Thu Dec 10, 2015 12:32 am #139356

Zilenan91 wrote:the forums will go down again.

Third time's the charm

TheNightingale · Thu Dec 10, 2015 12:32 am

You're thinking "radical feminism" (aka misandry) which nobody likes. They're the "we should castrate men so they feel period pain" people. Unfortunately, they make a good strawman against actual feminism (aka equality). I'll agree with you that the people you're talking about are stupid, but most feminists don't associate with them.

To use a politics analogy... Democrats are left-wing, yes? So was Stalin's regime. But most people who say "I'm left-wing" don't mean they support show trials and Great Purges and mass starvation of the Ukraine.

Zilenan91 · Post by **Zilenan91** » Thu Dec 10, 2015 12:35 am #139359

Nightingale please you're killing us

TheNightingale · Thu Dec 10, 2015 12:41 am

I do try.

TL;DR: Yes, some 'feminists' hate all men and want a matriarchy. The vast majority don't. Some Christians are in the KKK - but the vast majority aren't.
Only a Sith deals in absolutes, but you're either with it or against it - do you support gender equality?
If yes, then good, you're a feminist.
If no, then why not?

John_Oxford · Thu Dec 10, 2015 12:49 am

TheNightingale wrote: do you support gender equality?
If no, then why not?

No.
Equality implies you ARE the same, not you will be TREATED the same.
Being a realist, it's unorthodox to treat someone like something they aren't. More so when they get pissed off about me doing so.

But of course, like you said, this doesn't mean i think all women should be martini making house wives. The more the merrier, so long as said women aren't leeching off the federal goverment through unemployment and welfare checks, and taking advantage of maternity leave, then sueing the company they got fired from because they didn't show up to work because "OH NO I HAD QUINTUPLETS FOR THE NINTH TIME!". If they are contributing to society, its fantastic that they have rights.

My point is, Equal Rights =/= Equality.
You can only be equal if you are the same, which the two genders (male, female) are not.

Zilenan91 · Post by **Zilenan91** » Thu Dec 10, 2015 12:52 am #139365

That's actually a good point, gender equality can't exist without both being equal.

John_Oxford · Thu Dec 10, 2015 12:56 am

TheNightingale wrote:
To use a politics analogy... Democrats are left-wing, yes? So was Stalin's regime. But most people who say "I'm left-wing" don't mean they support show trials and Great Purges and mass starvation of the Ukraine.

Democrats identify as moderates, that's just their political belief, but democrats are just liberals in disguise. Liberals have core beliefs in what would be refered to as modern day stalinism. Just like how republicans identify as the non-moderates. But the word republican is really just a cleaner word for conservative, whom of which have core beliefs in nationalism and capitalism.

Also, even people who supported stalin as a person, may not have supported the death of 200,000 million russian citzens or causing food shortages in a neighboring country, but they would still identify as Stalinists.

TheNightingale · Thu Dec 10, 2015 1:03 am

It was a metaphor, I'm not an expert on American or USSR politics. Yes, women can exploit the maternity leave system by having 45 kids; they have to look after them, but sure. A feminist would say that men should get paternity leave as well, though - if women can take time off for their child, so can men. Equality works both ways, remember. But are your rights determined by your worth in society? Does a homeless NEET, for example, have no rights? If you believe the answer to that is 'yes'...

... then you're still a feminist. Bazinga. You don't have to treat men and women as the same - just as equals. There can still be a male and a female bathroom (and a nonbinary/unisex bathroom too, but few places have those). You like cupcakes, but you also like cookies. You think they're both rad, and like them equally. They're not the same, but you wouldn't turn down either, and choosing one over the other would be silly.

Post by **oranges** » Thu Dec 10, 2015 1:42 am #139373

this is the problem with the arguments, neither side can go anywhere because they immediately seize the most extreme example of the other and then argue against that.

John_Oxford · Post by **John_Oxford** » Thu Dec 10, 2015 1:45 am #139375

TheNightingale wrote:It was a metaphor, I'm not an expert on American or USSR politics. Yes, women can exploit the maternity leave system by having 45 kids; they have to look after them, but sure. A feminist would say that men should get paternity leave as well, though - if women can take time off for their child, so can men. Equality works both ways, remember. But are your rights determined by your worth in society? Does a homeless NEET, for example, have no rights? If you believe the answer to that is 'yes'...

... then you're still a feminist. Bazinga. You don't have to treat men and women as the same - just as equals. There can still be a male and a female bathroom (and a nonbinary/unisex bathroom too, but few places have those). You like cupcakes, but you also like cookies. You think they're both rad, and like them equally. They're not the same, but you wouldn't turn down either, and choosing one over the other would be silly.

they have to look after them
You mean, they can get pregnant, wait 9 months, abort the baby, but still have had 9 months off of work
You mean, they can have the baby, put it up for adoption, have another baby nine months later, then rinse and repeat.

a feminist would say that men should get paternity leave as well
But why would a man, who acording to traditional gender roles should be providing for the family by going to a job and making money. Stay at home and watch the kids.

but are you rights determined by your worth in society
No, but a 42 year old man convicted of 158 counts of capital murder, 593 counts of child molestation, 12 counts of animal abuse and 2000 million dollars in property damage shouldn't have the right to a fair trial, because he, for the lack of a better phrase, is absolutely fucking worthless. When our founding fathers put forth our basic inalienable rights, it was to protect us from the goverment, not from the law and society.

Also, there are many cases where people are sorted out based on their income and total spending. Which is a perfect system, because that perfect balance, where there are many corperations, but not so much so where the country is ruled by super corporations, but not to where its the late 1950's and every busniess is a ma and pa.

Capitalism works if communism doesn't try to take it over, and it has a republican backing. Otherwise it transitions into a country run by mega corporations, or it fades out due to liberal regulations.

then your a feminist

Back to what i said before, there is a big difference between equality and actually being equal. Equality [What a feminst precieves the world is like] and being equal [Not what the world is like] are two different things.

A feminist precieves that the world is a happy place, where everyone is treated equal. Then they get upset when they find out that is in correct.
A world where everyone is equal, is called absolute socialism, which does not, and can not, ever exist. Due to human nature.

other asorted things

But a man and a woman are not equal, and i don't treat them equally. They are two entirely different genders entitled to entirely different things. I don't believe they should be treated equal, because they are different, but i believe a woman should have a oppurtunity to become the same level as a man through her own will, not a will by society solely because its the "correct" thing to do.

tl;dr : No, i'm not a feminist, no, that's not what a feminist is.

John_Oxford · Post by **John_Oxford** » Thu Dec 10, 2015 1:49 am #139376

oranges wrote:this is the problem with the arguments, neither side can go anywhere because they immediately seize the most extreme example of the other and then argue against that.

Because if everyone spoke in moderate terms, we would have a argument something like this.

"Hello, good fellow non-assigned non-gender identified non-specie identified"
"Hello"
"I do believe we should have a argument, but only if you agree, but if you don't agree, i don't either, but its completely up to you, but equally with me"
"We shall"
-passive aggressie muttering for 45 minutes-
"Good argument, fellow non-assigned non-gender identified non-specific non identified speices. But it was only a good argument if you agree it is, if you don't i don't if you do i do, but only because you do or don't, but equally because i do or don't. Because equality.

John Oxford wrote:Being a realist

thats fucking bullshit, and i would never bother to have a arguement like that, but if we point out both sides extremes, it goes something like the above arguement.

TheNightingale · Thu Dec 10, 2015 1:58 am

If they were fired for being constantly on maternity leave and giving up their babies for adoption each time, I think the courts wouldn't rule in favour of the mother. They wouldn't get child tax benefits either, since the children were put up for adoption - it simply wouldn't be practical. If gender roles exist, and men should do the work whilst women look after the children, then that makes sense. The problem is, gender roles are bad, so sure, fathers can get paternity leave to look after their kids.
I disagree on the convicted criminal argument - everyone has a right to a fair trial, I'd say. You can bring it up in court ("He's done this literally 5000 times, just saying") to make the jury more likely to rule against the defendant, definitely, but the concept of 'innocent until proven guilty' requires a fair trial to determine guilt. If they're found guilty, give them life imprisonment so they can't do it again. Sorting people based on their income only really works in favour of the rich. The rich get richer, the poor get poorer, because it's easy to lose everything, but much harder to make it back. An optimist perceives the world as a happy place; a feminist believes people shouldn't be discriminated against based on gender.

This quote is quite interesting, though.
"But a man and a woman are not equally, and i don't treat them equally. [...] a woman should have an oppurtunity to become the same level as a man"
It seems like you're saying men are of a higher level than women, and women should have to actively try to become as good as men. That's called sexism.

Either way, you're entitled to an opinion, no matter how offensive it may be, and I can't make you believe in equality if you don't want to. But minds are like parachutes, my dentist once told me - they work best when they're open.

(A good argument is one like this - both sides are civil and polite, getting their point across without resorting to weeping, wailing and gnashing of teeth.)

Screemonster · Thu Dec 10, 2015 2:04 am

TheNightingale wrote:You can bring it up in court ("He's done this literally 5000 times, just saying") to make the jury more likely to rule against the defendant

Not when I did jury duty. They deliberately don't bring up the defendant's history until after the verdict is returned as they want the jury to reach a decision based upon the evidence that is presented to the court for this specific crime, and only that evidence. Speculation like "oh, he's the usual suspect so he must be guilty" is what they're trying to avoid.

Now, sentencing is where they bring the defendent's history into account.

John_Oxford · Post by **John_Oxford** » Thu Dec 10, 2015 2:17 am #139383

TheNightingale wrote:If they were fired for being constantly on maternity leave and giving up their babies for adoption each time, I think the courts wouldn't rule in favour of the mother.
If gender roles exist, and men should do the work whilst women look after the children, then that makes sense. The problem is, gender roles are bad, so sure, fathers can get paternity leave to look after their kids.
I disagree on the convicted criminal argument - everyone has a right to a fair trial, I'd say. You can bring it up in court ("He's done this literally 5000 times, just saying") to make the jury more likely to rule against the defendant, definitely, but the concept of 'innocent until proven guilty' requires a fair trial to determine guilt. If they're found guilty, give them life imprisonment so they can't do it again. Sorting people based on their income only really works in favour of the rich. The rich get richer, the poor get poorer, because it's easy to lose everything, but much harder to make it back. An optimist perceives the world as a happy place; a feminist believes people shouldn't be discriminated against based on gender.
"But a man and a woman are not equally, and i don't treat them equally. [...] a woman should have an oppurtunity to become the same level as a man"
It seems like you're saying men are of a higher level than women, and women should have to actively try to become as good as men. That's called sexism.

Either way, you're entitled to an opinion, no matter how offensive it may be, and I can't make you believe in equality if you don't want to. But minds are like parachutes, my dentist once told me - they work best when they're open.

I think the courts wouldn't rule in favour of the mother.
I bet you 10,000 USD that they would, no bullshit, come find me in 20 years if that court case ever happens

everyone has the right to a fair trial
There's a fine line between giving a high security prisoner who commited capital crimes a trial. And giving the re-incarnation of hitler, who had a deformed child with satan a trial.

sorting people based on their income
I was reffering to day to day activitys, rich people are more privlaged because they have money. Good for them, they worked hard for it and they deserve said entitlement. Poor people have no money and are treated to less than that of a rich man. America is a land of oppurtunity, generally speaking, they are at fault for their economic situation.

a optimist precieves the word as a happy place, something about what feminists do
I was speaking about realists and a feminists, a feminist believes the world will treat them equally, then get upset when they don't, a realist see's and understands that the world does not treat everyone equally.

It seems like you're saying men are of a higher level than women, and women should have to actively try to become as good as men. That's called sexism.

No, i was refering to the fact that if a wealthy white rich man with a nice house and 4 cars existed, a black hooker living in chicago on the streets with 5 kids should actively try to presue becoming the same level that the rich white man is on.

On her own will of course, once that hooker becomes the CEO of a hairdressing company, has a nice NFL linebacker husband, put her 5 kids through college, and lives on a lake, it becomes a perfect example of equality.

Women have good traits, Men have good traits, but they are extremely different, no two people on this planet are absolutely equal, pointing out that one is better ("sexism") is apparently a bad thing according to you? Now you, you out of all people, live in a world of unicorns in rainbows.

Either way, you're entitled to an opinion
Yes, yes i am, thank you for noticing.

no matter how offensive it may be,

and I can't make you believe in equality if you don't want to.

John Oxford wrote:Equality implies you ARE the same, not you will be TREATED the same.
Being a realist, it's unorthodox to treat someone like something they aren't. More so when they get pissed off about me doing so.

(also, being passive aggressive doesn't make the arguement non aggressive, if your going to try to add a insult in, please make it blatant, not a "oh i don't agree with you and think your a idiot, but if you don't like that i change my mind")

EDIT: because its very obvious i would win a shit flinging contest, fite me m8.

Ricotez · Post by **Ricotez** » Thu Dec 10, 2015 2:42 am #139386

lol saying "you shouldn't be offended by my words" is seriously the most backward thing ever, it's just an excuse used by assholes so they can justify being an asshole and stay an asshole

are you seriously so weak that you must be a complete dick to other people to maintain a shred of self-confidence?

Takeguru · Post by **Takeguru** » Thu Dec 10, 2015 3:17 am #139390

TheNightingale wrote:You like cupcakes, but you also like cookies. You think they're both rad, and like them equally. They're not the same, but you wouldn't turn down either, and choosing one over the other would be silly.

But I'm cupcake-sexual.
I only like cupcakes.
They're not the same and I'd turn one of them down

XSI · Post by **XSI** » Thu Dec 10, 2015 3:53 am #139392

Dwarf fortress is the best example of feminism
The women soldiers use their babies as shields. They actually take hits better than a wooden shield and they end up strong from it when they grow up.
Military babies become new soldiers

leibniz · Post by **leibniz** » Thu Dec 10, 2015 6:47 am #139407

Ricotez wrote:lol saying "you shouldn't be offended by my words" is seriously the most backward thing ever, it's just an excuse used by assholes so they can justify being an asshole and stay an asshole

are you seriously so weak that you must be a complete dick to other people to maintain a shred of self-confidence?

This. Come on guys, it's 2015.

Steelpoint · Post by **Steelpoint** » Thu Dec 10, 2015 7:04 am #139409

I'm offended by this damn thread.

Post by **oranges** » Thu Dec 10, 2015 7:19 am #139412

John_Oxford wrote:
oranges wrote:this is the problem with the arguments, neither side can go anywhere because they immediately seize the most extreme example of the other and then argue against that.

Because if everyone spoke in moderate terms, we would have a argument something like this.

"Hello, good fellow non-assigned non-gender identified non-specie identified"
"Hello"
"I do believe we should have a argument, but only if you agree, but if you don't agree, i don't either, but its completely up to you, but equally with me"
"We shall"
-passive aggressie muttering for 45 minutes-
"Good argument, fellow non-assigned non-gender identified non-specific non identified speices. But it was only a good argument if you agree it is, if you don't i don't if you do i do, but only because you do or don't, but equally because i do or don't. Because equality.

lol you just did it again, you seized the logical extreme endpoint of my comment and proceeded to mock that instead of addressing the point.

I can't tell if you're aware of that irony and this is just subtle trolling, or you actually believe that.

DemonFiren · Post by **DemonFiren** » Thu Dec 10, 2015 7:27 am #139414

oranges wrote:I can't tell if you're aware of that irony and this is just subtle trolling, or you actually believe that.

He linked to a 9gag image, I'm ninety-five per cent sure he's trolling.

invisty · Post by **invisty** » Thu Dec 10, 2015 11:40 am #139425

Are you guys actually arguing with John Oxford? You realise all he ever does is shitpost and hide under bridges, right?

Drynwyn · Post by **Drynwyn** » Thu Dec 10, 2015 6:32 pm #139470

invisty wrote:Are you guys actually arguing with John Oxford? You realise all he ever does is shitpost and hide under bridges, right?

That's not true, sometimes he writes up detailed proposed game mechanics and passive aggressively asks why nobody is coding this thing that would take 20+ hours to code

TechnoAlchemist · Thu Dec 10, 2015 6:40 pm

nightingale takes the bait and tries to argue with people on a space station 13 forum

a Multipart drama

imblyings · Post by **imblyings** » Thu Dec 10, 2015 6:48 pm #139476

oranges wrote:US military is america's largest social welfare program, it's only fare they extend it to females as well.

some good bantz material tbqh

John_Oxford · Post by **John_Oxford** » Thu Dec 10, 2015 7:51 pm #139492

Ricotez wrote:, it's just an excuse used by assholes so they can justify being an asshole and stay an asshole

i don't always be a asshole, but when i do, i make sure its obvious.
stay assholes my friends.

lol you just did it again, you seized the logical extreme endpoint of my comment and proceeded to mock that instead of addressing the point.

I can't tell if you're aware of that irony and this is just subtle trolling, or you actually believe that.

---

Are you guys actually arguing with John Oxford? You realise all he ever does is shitpost and hide under bridges, right?

---

That's not true, sometimes he writes up detailed proposed game mechanics and passive aggressively asks why nobody is coding this thing that would take 20+ hours to code

---

nightingale takes the bait and tries to argue with people on a space station 13 forum

a Multipart drama

irony and subtle trolling
shit! my plan has been foiled!
EDIT:
implying you are the better shitposter when you yourself think what i'm saying couldn't possibly be cancerous ammounts of irony

Are you guys actually arguing with John Oxford? You realise all he ever does is shitpost and hide under bridges, right?
Shitposting =/= intricate arguments over a baited post taken by someone inept at arguing
i do hide under bridges though, that shits cash.

That's not true, sometimes he writes up detailed proposed game mechanics and passive aggressively asks why nobody is coding this thing that would take 20+ hours to code
Yeah, i kind of gave up on that when i realized the game is shaped by do know how and do not know how's of coding. Not by people with ideas on a idea fourm.
but ty for noticing

nightingale takes the bait and tries to argue with people on a space station 13 forum

Its like you people, out of 8 months of me posting on this fourm, don't know how my baited arguements end.

Jesus, it's like passive aggressively subtlely trolling a bunch of toddlers with chronic amnesia.

Drynwyn · Post by **Drynwyn** » Thu Dec 10, 2015 7:52 pm #139494

coming out this summer:
trolling a bunch of toddlers with chronic amnesia: the real story of 2beard.

TheNightingale · Thu Dec 10, 2015 9:07 pm

TheNightingale wrote:Okay, I'm taking the bait there.

I don't deny it, that was pretty fun. It's good to refine your arguments, even if the person you're arguing against doesn't believe in their point (what do you think debates are?).

Whoisthere · Post by **Whoisthere** » Thu Dec 10, 2015 9:26 pm #139524

Is it summer already? How about we ban John Oxford and let mature people discuss the topic????????????????/

As for

TheNightingale wrote:This quote is quite interesting, though.
"But a man and a woman are not equally, and i don't treat them equally. [...] a woman should have an oppurtunity to become the same level as a man"
It seems like you're saying men are of a higher level than women, and women should have to actively try to become as good as men. That's called sexism.

First off: how fucking difficult is it to just quit shaming nonromantic-supporting females!!!! WHY CAN'T YOU JUST FUCKING ACCEPT THAT YOU CAN BE FAT & HEALTHY!!!!!!! it's literally not my goddamn job to educate you, you non-ethnic-elitist binarist!!!!!! i hope your fucking asshole prolapses, you white-privileged truscum!!!! ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I'M DEMIRACIAL THIS MONTH!!!! i'm crying right now!!!!!!!! i've repeatedly told you to quit abusing omniethnic, biromantic & nonqueer demonkins!!!! LEAVE PARASENSUAL-ASSOCIATING EQUALISTS THE FUCK ALONE, YOU NON-ETHNIC-OVERPRIVILEGED OPPRESSOR!!!!! you guys are impossible.

Zilenan91 wrote:That's actually a good point, gender equality can't exist without both being equal.

how often do I have 2 tell u 2 stop marginalizing nonspecies, & androsensual-identifying athiests, u cisgender-elitist binarist!!!!! screw cis supremacy!!! im crYING RIGHT NOW, U MALE-PRIVILEGED ASSHOLE!!!!!!! why the hell should i accept ur fedora-wearing binarist opinion??? dont u see thaT SHAMING NONETHNIC & UNDERPRIVILEGED-TYPE POCS IS, PROBLEMATIC, U CISHET-PRIVILEGED HITLER?????? its not my job 2 educate u, u, able-body-normative MRA!!! ur perpetuating height obsession, u UTERUS-BEARER-OVERPRIVILEGED KYRIARCHIST!!!! what the fuck do u have agAINST ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVISM & LESBIAN SEPARATISM???? ᕦ(ò_óˇ)ᕤ plz leave me alone.

oranges wrote:this is the problem with the arguments, neither side can go anywhere because they immediately seize the most extreme example of the other and then argue against that.

light yourself on fire!!!!!!! ALL IGNORANT BROGRAMMERS CAN GO TO IN HELL!!!!!!!! WHY THE FUCK SHOULD I ACKNOWLEDGE YOUR GODDAMN CHAUVINIST OPINION????? IS IT SO FUCKING DIFFICULT TO SHOW SOME RESPECT FOR EGALITARIANISM & GAY SEPARATISM!!!!!!! why can't you just acknowledge that middle class feminism & white womyn entitlement is annoying!!!!!! no one cares about your basement dweller middle class opinion, you binary-normative TERF!!! now go away.

TheNightingale · Thu Dec 10, 2015 9:35 pm

Oh my God. Did you use a tumblr generator for that or something?
It's time to get the Bee Movie script out again, isn't it?

Whoisthere · Post by **Whoisthere** » Thu Dec 10, 2015 9:38 pm #139529

I swear it is a deeply personal opinion from the deepest depth of my sole and no tumblr rant generators were involved in any shape of form let the admins permaban me if I am lying

DemonFiren · Post by **DemonFiren** » Thu Dec 10, 2015 9:40 pm #139530

"sole"

Yup, thought so.

John_Oxford · Thu Dec 10, 2015 10:37 pm

Whoisthere wrote:trying very fucking hard

just stop maine, just stop.

I can spout meaningless shit like a professional to. get on my level m8

Incomptinence · Fri Dec 11, 2015 5:01 am

Shitposts need love like everything does.

Post by **Thunder11** » Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:43 am #139627

The slide into shitposting begins once more. I have only one thing to say.

Kraso · Post by **Kraso** » Fri Dec 11, 2015 7:11 pm #139699

Stickymayhem wrote:When I woke up this morning I didn't think tgstation would have solved gender inequality

Whoisthere · Post by **Whoisthere** » Fri Dec 11, 2015 7:26 pm #139704

John_Oxford wrote: I can spout meaningless shit like a professional to. get on my level m8

Um what the fuck??? Who gave you the right to appropriate my culture? Do you think this will fly here on tg forums? It won't, buddy. Consider yourself banned.

XSI · Post by **XSI** » Fri Dec 11, 2015 7:53 pm #139712

I'm having a whole chicken for dinner on sunday

John_Oxford · Post by **John_Oxford** » Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:03 pm #139714

Whoisthere wrote:
John_Oxford wrote: I can spout meaningless shit like a professional to. get on my level m8
Um what the fuck??? Who gave you the right to appropriate my culture? Do you think this will fly here on tg forums? It won't, buddy. Consider yourself banned.

Spoiler:

Kraso · Post by **Kraso** » Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:04 pm #139715

John_Oxford wrote:
Whoisthere wrote:
John_Oxford wrote: I can spout meaningless shit like a professional to. get on my level m8
Um what the fuck??? Who gave you the right to appropriate my culture? Do you think this will fly here on tg forums? It won't, buddy. Consider yourself banned.

Spoiler:
What the fuck did you just fucking say about me, you little bitch? I’ll have you know I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals, and I’ve been involved in numerous secret raids on Al-Quaeda, and I have over 300 confirmed kills. I am trained in gorilla warfare and I’m the top sniper in the entire US armed forces. You are nothing to me but just another target. I will wipe you the fuck out with precision the likes of which has never been seen before on this Earth, mark my fucking words. You think you can get away with saying that shit to me over the Internet? Think again, fucker. As we speak I am contacting my secret network of spies across the USA and your IP is being traced right now so you better prepare for the storm, maggot. The storm that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call your life. You’re fucking dead, kid. I can be anywhere, anytime, and I can kill you in over seven hundred ways, and that’s just with my bare hands. Not only am I extensively trained in unarmed combat, but I have access to the entire arsenal of the United States Marine Corps and I will use it to its full extent to wipe your miserable ass off the face of the continent, you little shit. If only you could have known what unholy retribution your little “clever” comment was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your fucking tongue. But you couldn’t, you didn’t, and now you’re paying the price, you goddamn idiot. I will shit fury all over you and you will drown in it. You’re fucking dead, kiddo.

wow nice ORIGINAL CONTENT so fucking hilarious dude how many seconds did it take you to copypaste that

John_Oxford · Post by **John_Oxford** » Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:06 pm #139718

Kraso wrote:
John_Oxford wrote:
Whoisthere wrote:
John_Oxford wrote: I can spout meaningless shit like a professional to. get on my level m8
Um what the fuck??? Who gave you the right to appropriate my culture? Do you think this will fly here on tg forums? It won't, buddy. Consider yourself banned.

Spoiler:
What the fuck did you just fucking say about me, you little bitch? I’ll have you know I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals, and I’ve been involved in numerous secret raids on Al-Quaeda, and I have over 300 confirmed kills. I am trained in gorilla warfare and I’m the top sniper in the entire US armed forces. You are nothing to me but just another target. I will wipe you the fuck out with precision the likes of which has never been seen before on this Earth, mark my fucking words. You think you can get away with saying that shit to me over the Internet? Think again, fucker. As we speak I am contacting my secret network of spies across the USA and your IP is being traced right now so you better prepare for the storm, maggot. The storm that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call your life. You’re fucking dead, kid. I can be anywhere, anytime, and I can kill you in over seven hundred ways, and that’s just with my bare hands. Not only am I extensively trained in unarmed combat, but I have access to the entire arsenal of the United States Marine Corps and I will use it to its full extent to wipe your miserable ass off the face of the continent, you little shit. If only you could have known what unholy retribution your little “clever” comment was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your fucking tongue. But you couldn’t, you didn’t, and now you’re paying the price, you goddamn idiot. I will shit fury all over you and you will drown in it. You’re fucking dead, kiddo.
wow nice ORIGINAL CONTENT so fucking hilarious dude how many seconds did it take you to copypaste that

13.5 seconds, glad you asked.