Affectionate cat peanut

Talk about non-ss13 stuff here.

Moderator: testing123

User avatar
XivilaiAnaxes
 
Joined: Sat May 11, 2019 7:13 am
Byond Username: XivilaiAnaxes

Affectionate cat peanut

Postby XivilaiAnaxes » Thu Dec 17, 2020 4:03 am #584049

viewtopic.php?f=7&t=28138&view=unread#unread

I did nothing of a sexual nature at all! I'm just being friendly!! -ahelp

"Heh I'm gonna take this unconscious cat's pants off to see if she's got underwear on ;)" -quote by him in the ban appeal

BRUH
Stickymayhem wrote:Imagine the sheer narcisssim required to genuinely believe you are this intelligent.



User avatar
thehogshotgun
 
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2020 1:31 am
Location: The best damn country in the world
Byond Username: Thehogshotgun

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby thehogshotgun » Thu Dec 17, 2020 4:12 am #584050

Why haven't catpeople been removed yet?

User avatar
TheFinalPotato
Code Maintainer
 
Joined: Sun Oct 13, 2019 7:58 am
Byond Username: LemonInTheDark

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby TheFinalPotato » Thu Dec 17, 2020 4:21 am #584051

I week ban

Appeal

Good god man
Image

User avatar
saprasam
 
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2018 11:42 pm
Byond Username: Saprasam

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby saprasam » Thu Dec 17, 2020 4:46 am #584053

Image
Image
(FORMER) tgmc admin (I HAVE REGAINED MY HUMAN RIGHTS)

Fishimun
 
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2019 2:29 am
Byond Username: Fishimun

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby Fishimun » Thu Dec 17, 2020 5:56 am #584061

felinids are fetish content

User avatar
Super Aggro Crag
In Game PermaBanned
 
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2015 9:47 pm
Byond Username: Super Aggro Crag

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby Super Aggro Crag » Thu Dec 17, 2020 6:00 am #584063

what the absolute fuck is wrong with this denthead

how did this gormless sperg get admin on the fake server
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

User avatar
Farquaar
 
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2018 7:20 am
Location: Somewhere north of Hogtown
Byond Username: Farquaar

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby Farquaar » Thu Dec 17, 2020 6:21 am #584065

Somebody made a dumb image macro
Better start sniffing virtual underwear
It's just like my japanese animes!

cacogen
 
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2018 10:27 am
Byond Username: Cacogen

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby cacogen » Thu Dec 17, 2020 6:34 am #584067

/tg/station OST wrote:2. "Every Day We Slip Closer to Furcadia, or, 'Don't Furcadiate /tg/station!', or, Facehuggers are Physically Stimulating and so are TGMC Admins, or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Physical Stimulation" - 2:14
technokek wrote:Cannot prove this so just belive me if when say this

User avatar
Flatulent
 
Joined: Thu Nov 28, 2019 8:36 am
Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil
Byond Username: FlatulentIndustrialist

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby Flatulent » Thu Dec 17, 2020 6:56 am #584069

>eskkjjjjjhkkjkkjjkjj gets banned for erp
wowee!!! didnt see that one coming!!
bindy liberation front
imsxz wrote:I give up there’s too many furries

cacogen wrote:i asked oranges how often he plays and he deleted the post

cybersaber101 wrote:Welp, you guys let a terrymin become a headmin, thousand years of darkness.

Vekter wrote:I jerk off Nist a bit too much but he's honestly one of the best silicon players on the server. B.O.R.G.O. is also pretty good.

Tlaltecuhtli
 
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2017 12:16 am
Byond Username: Tlaltecuhtli

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby Tlaltecuhtli » Thu Dec 17, 2020 6:57 am #584070

manuel confirmed degenerate server

User avatar
Flatulent
 
Joined: Thu Nov 28, 2019 8:36 am
Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil
Byond Username: FlatulentIndustrialist

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby Flatulent » Thu Dec 17, 2020 6:57 am #584071

Tlaltecuhtli wrote:manuel confirmed degenerate server

eskj is b*gil player doing sex tourism on manuel
bindy liberation front
imsxz wrote:I give up there’s too many furries

cacogen wrote:i asked oranges how often he plays and he deleted the post

cybersaber101 wrote:Welp, you guys let a terrymin become a headmin, thousand years of darkness.

Vekter wrote:I jerk off Nist a bit too much but he's honestly one of the best silicon players on the server. B.O.R.G.O. is also pretty good.

User avatar
Screemonster
 
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 7:23 pm
Byond Username: Scree

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby Screemonster » Thu Dec 17, 2020 7:04 am #584075

fucking lmao

Eskjjlj wrote:To understand the logs you quoted in an erotic fashion you would need to perform olympic level mental gymnastics. The same thing happening on another /tg/ servers would not lead any admin to believe they should apply a ban.
And again I have no reason to "take responsability", as you say it, for the simple fact that I am innocent.

lmao

it's olympic level mental gymnastics to consider trying to forcibly strip someone to see their underwear (or lack thereof) as a sexual thing apparently

User avatar
Flatulent
 
Joined: Thu Nov 28, 2019 8:36 am
Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil
Byond Username: FlatulentIndustrialist

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby Flatulent » Thu Dec 17, 2020 7:08 am #584077

you are next on the chopping block screemonster your erp clique is falling apart
bindy liberation front
imsxz wrote:I give up there’s too many furries

cacogen wrote:i asked oranges how often he plays and he deleted the post

cybersaber101 wrote:Welp, you guys let a terrymin become a headmin, thousand years of darkness.

Vekter wrote:I jerk off Nist a bit too much but he's honestly one of the best silicon players on the server. B.O.R.G.O. is also pretty good.

User avatar
oranges
Code Maintainer
 
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED
Byond Username: Optimumtact
Github Username: optimumtact

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby oranges » Thu Dec 17, 2020 7:51 am #584086

say" ;cat with no undies

User avatar
Denton
Code Maintainer
 
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2017 3:53 pm
Byond Username: Denton-30
Github Username: 81Denton

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby Denton » Thu Dec 17, 2020 7:57 am #584088

>TGMC staff
>kat green
>manuel
man this appeal really got everything huh
Image

User avatar
Farquaar
 
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2018 7:20 am
Location: Somewhere north of Hogtown
Byond Username: Farquaar

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby Farquaar » Thu Dec 17, 2020 7:58 am #584090

/me gently strokes Green Dahn's hair to comfort her during those hard times.

User avatar
skoglol
Code Maintainer
 
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 5:25 am
Byond Username: Skoglol
Github Username: kriskog

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby skoglol » Thu Dec 17, 2020 10:23 am #584101

Y'all are calling the pants removal sexual, while the banned player claims it was just to confirm the lack of undies. Clearly there was no interest in the contents of the undies since the pants went back on when the lack of undies was confirmed. The "Red Pants" is also a topless jumpsuit, so I can only assume the cat with no undies was running around with her tits out on account of having no undies.

But I suppose manuel players dont like snuggly cats.

User avatar
Screemonster
 
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 7:23 pm
Byond Username: Scree

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby Screemonster » Thu Dec 17, 2020 12:37 pm #584107

Flatulent wrote:you are next on the chopping block screemonster your erp clique is falling apart

I hope you slip and catch your finger with the peeler next time you peel potatoes

Tlaltecuhtli
 
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2017 12:16 am
Byond Username: Tlaltecuhtli

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby Tlaltecuhtli » Thu Dec 17, 2020 1:58 pm #584110

can we ban whoever thinks this is how you rp?
NSFW:
Image

User avatar
thehogshotgun
 
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2020 1:31 am
Location: The best damn country in the world
Byond Username: Thehogshotgun

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby thehogshotgun » Thu Dec 17, 2020 2:02 pm #584112

jesus fucking christ that image is fucking garbage whoever made that needs to be euthanized also how is that garbage funny holy fuck I despise /tg/ players

User avatar
Cobby
 
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:19 pm
Byond Username: ExcessiveUseOfCobby
Github Username: ExcessiveUseOfCobblestone

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby Cobby » Thu Dec 17, 2020 2:30 pm #584114

Why haven’t they sent a video of them taking their pants off to show if they have undies since they are a catgirl irl.
Voted best trap in /tg/ 2014-current

User avatar
Rohen_Tahir
 
Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2019 1:00 pm
Location: Chungus planet
Byond Username: Rohen Tahir

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby Rohen_Tahir » Thu Dec 17, 2020 2:33 pm #584115

thehogshotgun wrote:jesus fucking christ that image is fucking garbage whoever made that needs to be euthanized also how is that garbage funny holy fuck I despise /tg/ players

manuel

Tlaltecuhtli
 
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2017 12:16 am
Byond Username: Tlaltecuhtli

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby Tlaltecuhtli » Thu Dec 17, 2020 2:46 pm #584117

holy shit shad0k just btfo'd banbaiter, case closed

User avatar
thehogshotgun
 
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2020 1:31 am
Location: The best damn country in the world
Byond Username: Thehogshotgun

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby thehogshotgun » Thu Dec 17, 2020 2:50 pm #584118

Tlaltecuhtli wrote:holy shit shad0k just btfo'd banbaiter, case closed


Wrong penut retard

User avatar
remanseptim
 
Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2020 7:38 pm
Byond Username: Remanseptim

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby remanseptim » Thu Dec 17, 2020 2:58 pm #584120

m*nuel...
Image
Image

Tlaltecuhtli
 
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2017 12:16 am
Byond Username: Tlaltecuhtli

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby Tlaltecuhtli » Thu Dec 17, 2020 2:59 pm #584121

holy shit timberboe just btfo'd erper, case closed

User avatar
remanseptim
 
Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2020 7:38 pm
Byond Username: Remanseptim

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby remanseptim » Thu Dec 17, 2020 3:00 pm #584122

it isn't even the rule 8 violation that is hilarious about this
it's the fact that he is attempting to play it off as something cute and innocuous
Image
Image

User avatar
stan_albatross
 
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2020 10:58 pm
Location: London
Byond Username: Stan_albatross

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby stan_albatross » Thu Dec 17, 2020 3:03 pm #584123

Super Aggro Crag wrote:what the absolute fuck is wrong with this denthead

how did this gormless sperg get admin on the fake server


the historically high tgmc standards, both for their admins, their rp level, and their balance
Karl Karlsson and never anything else

Tlaltecuhtli
 
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2017 12:16 am
Byond Username: Tlaltecuhtli

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby Tlaltecuhtli » Thu Dec 17, 2020 3:06 pm #584124

remanseptim wrote:it isn't even the rule 8 violation that is hilarious about this
it's the fact that he is attempting to play it off as something cute and innocuous


this is just the brain damage that anime causes to people, and reason why weebos shouldnt be given right to play

User avatar
remanseptim
 
Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2020 7:38 pm
Byond Username: Remanseptim

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby remanseptim » Thu Dec 17, 2020 3:11 pm #584125

okay retard
Image
Image

User avatar
Farquaar
 
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2018 7:20 am
Location: Somewhere north of Hogtown
Byond Username: Farquaar

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby Farquaar » Thu Dec 17, 2020 3:12 pm #584126

Tlaltecuhtli wrote:this is just the brain damage that anime causes to people, and reason why weebos shouldnt be given right to play

Togopal
In-Game Admin
 
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 6:38 pm
Location: 41.3071749, -74.8459928
Byond Username: Togopal

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby Togopal » Thu Dec 17, 2020 3:22 pm #584127

If this doesn't end with 'cat wit no undies' being added to the list of brain damage quotes I will be thoroughly disappointed
Image

User avatar
thehogshotgun
 
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2020 1:31 am
Location: The best damn country in the world
Byond Username: Thehogshotgun

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby thehogshotgun » Thu Dec 17, 2020 3:44 pm #584130

Tlaltecuhtli wrote:this is just the brain damage that anime causes to people, and reason why weebos shouldnt be given right to play

User avatar
Not-Dorsidarf
In-Game Admin
 
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 4:14 pm
Location: Space outside the Brig
Byond Username: Dorsidwarf

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby Not-Dorsidarf » Thu Dec 17, 2020 5:21 pm #584137

stan_albatross wrote:
Super Aggro Crag wrote:what the absolute fuck is wrong with this denthead

how did this gormless sperg get admin on the fake server


the historically high tgmc standards, both for their admins, their rp level, and their balance


I was offered tgmc adminship on the first round of tgmc I ever played.
Image
Image

User avatar
terranaut
 
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2014 11:43 pm
Byond Username: Terranaut

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby terranaut » Thu Dec 17, 2020 5:28 pm #584140

thank god you didn't accept
Image

Togopal
In-Game Admin
 
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 6:38 pm
Location: 41.3071749, -74.8459928
Byond Username: Togopal

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby Togopal » Thu Dec 17, 2020 5:52 pm #584142

Still incredibly baffled reading over the appeal again. How unaware do you have to be to not realize that their actions were uncomfortable and unwanted. The person was avoiding them and calling for help and the appealer interprets it as "roleplaying as a panicked cat". Manuel was a horrible mistake
Image

User avatar
Rohen_Tahir
 
Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2019 1:00 pm
Location: Chungus planet
Byond Username: Rohen Tahir

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby Rohen_Tahir » Thu Dec 17, 2020 6:02 pm #584143

Honestly this should have been at least a 1 month ban.

User avatar
skoglol
Code Maintainer
 
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 5:25 am
Byond Username: Skoglol
Github Username: kriskog

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby skoglol » Thu Dec 17, 2020 6:45 pm #584150

Lets ignore the contents of the ban for a little while, and look at the conduct of the banning admin. His replies in the ticket make it clear that the ban is being based on an almost 2 year old "final warning" note (not a ban, mind you) and a bunch of even older history. Old history either matters or it does not, we need to be consistent. If we keep telling players that they do not need to worry about old notes, and that we do not look at old notes (they fade out and you gotta hit a button to view them) then we also should not be basing our decisions heavily on those same old notes or use them to justify bans.
If this was a 2 year old "no tiding, final warning" note, would you be okay with a weekban referring to this two year old note as the final warning? When is history forgiven?

User avatar
iamgoofball
Github User
 
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:50 pm
Byond Username: Iamgoofball
Github Username: Iamgoofball

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby iamgoofball » Thu Dec 17, 2020 6:59 pm #584153

Togopal wrote:Still incredibly baffled reading over the appeal again. How unaware do you have to be to not realize that their actions were uncomfortable and unwanted. The person was avoiding them and calling for help and the appealer interprets it as "roleplaying as a panicked cat". Manuel was a horrible mistake

This isn't a manuel thing. Going by the banned user's scrubby, they're a Terry player who decided to join Manuel expecting everyone on manuel to also engage in the weird babyspeak roleplay stuff that Terry players do going by these logs I'm seeing.

User avatar
iamgoofball
Github User
 
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:50 pm
Byond Username: Iamgoofball
Github Username: Iamgoofball

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby iamgoofball » Thu Dec 17, 2020 7:00 pm #584155

skoglol wrote:Lets ignore the contents of the ban for a little while, and look at the conduct of the banning admin. His replies in the ticket make it clear that the ban is being based on an almost 2 year old "final warning" note (not a ban, mind you) and a bunch of even older history. Old history either matters or it does not, we need to be consistent. If we keep telling players that they do not need to worry about old notes, and that we do not look at old notes (they fade out and you gotta hit a button to view them) then we also should not be basing our decisions heavily on those same old notes or use them to justify bans.
If this was a 2 year old "no tiding, final warning" note, would you be okay with a weekban referring to this two year old note as the final warning? When is history forgiven?

Tiding and unwanted sexual conduct are two very, very different things and should be treated differently as a result. The only thing wrong with this ban was that it wasn't a permaban.

User avatar
ThanatosRa
Rarely plays
 
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 4:07 pm
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Byond Username: ThanatosRa

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby ThanatosRa » Thu Dec 17, 2020 7:12 pm #584157

I'm pro-cat but fuck this shit it should have been a permaban.
my forum gimmick is that no one knows who i am

User avatar
Yenwodyah
 
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2018 10:47 pm
Byond Username: Yenwodyah
Github Username: Yenwodyah

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby Yenwodyah » Thu Dec 17, 2020 7:16 pm #584160

delete manuel
Image

User avatar
Super Aggro Crag
In Game PermaBanned
 
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2015 9:47 pm
Byond Username: Super Aggro Crag

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby Super Aggro Crag » Thu Dec 17, 2020 7:16 pm #584161

goofball making sense
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

Togopal
In-Game Admin
 
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 6:38 pm
Location: 41.3071749, -74.8459928
Byond Username: Togopal

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby Togopal » Thu Dec 17, 2020 7:17 pm #584162

iamgoofball wrote:
skoglol wrote:Lets ignore the contents of the ban for a little while, and look at the conduct of the banning admin. His replies in the ticket make it clear that the ban is being based on an almost 2 year old "final warning" note (not a ban, mind you) and a bunch of even older history. Old history either matters or it does not, we need to be consistent. If we keep telling players that they do not need to worry about old notes, and that we do not look at old notes (they fade out and you gotta hit a button to view them) then we also should not be basing our decisions heavily on those same old notes or use them to justify bans.
If this was a 2 year old "no tiding, final warning" note, would you be okay with a weekban referring to this two year old note as the final warning? When is history forgiven?

Tiding and unwanted sexual conduct are two very, very different things and should be treated differently as a result. The only thing wrong with this ban was that it wasn't a permaban.


I agree with this. Common sense really should come into play for the person banned, here.
Image

User avatar
Screemonster
 
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 7:23 pm
Byond Username: Scree

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby Screemonster » Thu Dec 17, 2020 7:39 pm #584166

skoglol wrote:Lets ignore the contents of the ban for a little while, and look at the conduct of the banning admin. His replies in the ticket make it clear that the ban is being based on an almost 2 year old "final warning" note (not a ban, mind you) and a bunch of even older history. Old history either matters or it does not, we need to be consistent. If we keep telling players that they do not need to worry about old notes, and that we do not look at old notes (they fade out and you gotta hit a button to view them) then we also should not be basing our decisions heavily on those same old notes or use them to justify bans.
If this was a 2 year old "no tiding, final warning" note, would you be okay with a weekban referring to this two year old note as the final warning? When is history forgiven?

the only mistake made here was referencing their old notes in the ban reason at all

erping with someone who isn't comfortable with your erping and tries to get away from you is something that gets you shitcanned on the spot regardless of your prior history

User avatar
Lacran
 
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2020 3:17 am
Byond Username: Lacran

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby Lacran » Thu Dec 17, 2020 7:42 pm #584167

skoglol wrote:Y'all are calling the pants removal sexual, while the banned player claims it was just to confirm the lack of undies. Clearly there was no interest in the contents of the undies since the pants went back on when the lack of undies was confirmed.

But I suppose manuel players dont like snuggly cats.


Yes, when your uncle crept into your room and removed your pants he was just checking you were wearing underwear, its called being a "snuggly uncle."

What the fuck is wrong with you

User avatar
Super Aggro Crag
In Game PermaBanned
 
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2015 9:47 pm
Byond Username: Super Aggro Crag

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby Super Aggro Crag » Thu Dec 17, 2020 7:45 pm #584168

greenname c*der showing a startling lack of understanding of social cues?

imagine my fucking shock
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

User avatar
skoglol
Code Maintainer
 
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 5:25 am
Byond Username: Skoglol
Github Username: kriskog

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby skoglol » Thu Dec 17, 2020 8:19 pm #584178

Sexually repressed americans sees a mention of underwear, calls it ERP :oops:

User avatar
iamgoofball
Github User
 
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:50 pm
Byond Username: Iamgoofball
Github Username: Iamgoofball

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby iamgoofball » Thu Dec 17, 2020 8:22 pm #584181

skoglol wrote:Sexually repressed americans sees a mention of underwear, calls it ERP :oops:

so are you like, deliberately ignoring the whole "taking advantage of an unconscious woman to remove her clothes" thing or the "trying to restrain a woman to remove her clothing" bit, or did you just genuinely not read it

User avatar
oranges
Code Maintainer
 
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED
Byond Username: Optimumtact
Github Username: optimumtact

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Postby oranges » Thu Dec 17, 2020 8:27 pm #584182

people, it's a game, there's no actual women at risk there's no need to lose your marbles

Next

Return to Off Topic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: iamgoofball