Affectionate cat peanut
Forum rules
Only Certified™ Players™ may post in here.
If you are not able to post in here, you are not a Certified™ Player™. Play on a mainline /tg/ game server to gain posting powers in this forum. (certified gamers are only calculated once per day)
Only Certified™ Players™ may post in here.
If you are not able to post in here, you are not a Certified™ Player™. Play on a mainline /tg/ game server to gain posting powers in this forum. (certified gamers are only calculated once per day)
- XivilaiAnaxes
- Joined: Sat May 11, 2019 7:13 am
- Byond Username: XivilaiAnaxes
Affectionate cat peanut
https://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic ... ead#unread
I did nothing of a sexual nature at all! I'm just being friendly!! -ahelp
"Heh I'm gonna take this unconscious cat's pants off to see if she's got underwear on " -quote by him in the ban appeal
BRUH
I did nothing of a sexual nature at all! I'm just being friendly!! -ahelp
"Heh I'm gonna take this unconscious cat's pants off to see if she's got underwear on " -quote by him in the ban appeal
BRUH
Stickymayhem wrote:Imagine the sheer narcisssim required to genuinely believe you are this intelligent.
- thehogshotgun
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2020 1:31 am
- Byond Username: Thehogshotgun
- Location: The best damn country in the world
Re: Affectionate cat peanut
Why haven't catpeople been removed yet?
- TheFinalPotato
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Sun Oct 13, 2019 7:58 am
- Byond Username: LemonInTheDark
Re: Affectionate cat peanut
I week ban
Appeal
Good god man
Appeal
Good god man
- saprasam
- Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2018 11:42 pm
- Byond Username: Saprasam
-
- Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2019 2:29 am
- Byond Username: Fishimun
Re: Affectionate cat peanut
felinids are fetish content
- Super Aggro Crag
- In Game PermaBanned
- Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2015 9:47 pm
- Byond Username: Super Aggro Crag
Re: Affectionate cat peanut
what the absolute fuck is wrong with this denthead
how did this gormless sperg get admin on the fake server
how did this gormless sperg get admin on the fake server
- Farquaar
- Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2018 7:20 am
- Byond Username: Farquaar
- Location: Delta Quadrant
Re: Affectionate cat peanut
Somebody made a dumb image macro
Better start sniffing virtual underwear
It's just like my japanese animes!
Better start sniffing virtual underwear
It's just like my japanese animes!
► Show Spoiler
-
- Forum Soft Banned
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2018 10:27 am
- Byond Username: Cacogen
Re: Affectionate cat peanut
/tg/station OST wrote:2. "Every Day We Slip Closer to Furcadia, or, 'Don't Furcadiate /tg/station!', or, Facehuggers are Physically Stimulating and so are TGMC Admins, or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Physical Stimulation" - 2:14
technokek wrote:Cannot prove this so just belive me if when say this
NSFW:
- Flatulent
- Forum Soft Banned
- Joined: Thu Nov 28, 2019 8:36 am
- Byond Username: FlatulentIndustrialist
- Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil
Re: Affectionate cat peanut
>eskkjjjjjhkkjkkjjkjj gets banned for erp
wowee!!! didnt see that one coming!!
wowee!!! didnt see that one coming!!
Mothblocks, winter 2020, “successfully” preventing bagil death with relevant data wrote:You seem to be under the fallacy that reinforcing that Bagil is a TDM shithole where you must carry bolas and spears on you at all times, while looking for the next valid to hunt down is a positive change to the server. I don't. The data suggests other people don't.
imsxz wrote:I give up there’s too many furries
cacogen wrote:i asked oranges how often he plays and he deleted the post
cybersaber101 wrote:Welp, you guys let a terrymin become a headmin, thousand years of darkness.
Vekter wrote:I jerk off Nist a bit too much but he's honestly one of the best silicon players on the server. B.O.R.G.O. is also pretty good.
-
- Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2017 12:16 am
- Byond Username: Tlaltecuhtli
Re: Affectionate cat peanut
manuel confirmed degenerate server
- Flatulent
- Forum Soft Banned
- Joined: Thu Nov 28, 2019 8:36 am
- Byond Username: FlatulentIndustrialist
- Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil
Re: Affectionate cat peanut
eskj is b*gil player doing sex tourism on manuelTlaltecuhtli wrote:manuel confirmed degenerate server
Mothblocks, winter 2020, “successfully” preventing bagil death with relevant data wrote:You seem to be under the fallacy that reinforcing that Bagil is a TDM shithole where you must carry bolas and spears on you at all times, while looking for the next valid to hunt down is a positive change to the server. I don't. The data suggests other people don't.
imsxz wrote:I give up there’s too many furries
cacogen wrote:i asked oranges how often he plays and he deleted the post
cybersaber101 wrote:Welp, you guys let a terrymin become a headmin, thousand years of darkness.
Vekter wrote:I jerk off Nist a bit too much but he's honestly one of the best silicon players on the server. B.O.R.G.O. is also pretty good.
- Screemonster
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 7:23 pm
- Byond Username: Scree
Re: Affectionate cat peanut
fucking lmao
it's olympic level mental gymnastics to consider trying to forcibly strip someone to see their underwear (or lack thereof) as a sexual thing apparently
lmaoEskjjlj wrote: To understand the logs you quoted in an erotic fashion you would need to perform olympic level mental gymnastics. The same thing happening on another /tg/ servers would not lead any admin to believe they should apply a ban.
And again I have no reason to "take responsability", as you say it, for the simple fact that I am innocent.
it's olympic level mental gymnastics to consider trying to forcibly strip someone to see their underwear (or lack thereof) as a sexual thing apparently
- Flatulent
- Forum Soft Banned
- Joined: Thu Nov 28, 2019 8:36 am
- Byond Username: FlatulentIndustrialist
- Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil
Re: Affectionate cat peanut
you are next on the chopping block screemonster your erp clique is falling apart
Mothblocks, winter 2020, “successfully” preventing bagil death with relevant data wrote:You seem to be under the fallacy that reinforcing that Bagil is a TDM shithole where you must carry bolas and spears on you at all times, while looking for the next valid to hunt down is a positive change to the server. I don't. The data suggests other people don't.
imsxz wrote:I give up there’s too many furries
cacogen wrote:i asked oranges how often he plays and he deleted the post
cybersaber101 wrote:Welp, you guys let a terrymin become a headmin, thousand years of darkness.
Vekter wrote:I jerk off Nist a bit too much but he's honestly one of the best silicon players on the server. B.O.R.G.O. is also pretty good.
- oranges
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
- Byond Username: Optimumtact
- Github Username: optimumtact
- Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED
Re: Affectionate cat peanut
say" ;cat with no undies
- Denton
- Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2017 3:53 pm
- Byond Username: Denton-30
- Github Username: 81Denton
Re: Affectionate cat peanut
>TGMC staff
>kat green
>manuel
man this appeal really got everything huh
>kat green
>manuel
man this appeal really got everything huh
- Farquaar
- Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2018 7:20 am
- Byond Username: Farquaar
- Location: Delta Quadrant
Re: Affectionate cat peanut
/me gently strokes Green Dahn's hair to comfort her during those hard times.
► Show Spoiler
- skoglol
- Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 5:25 am
- Byond Username: Skoglol
- Github Username: kriskog
Re: Affectionate cat peanut
Y'all are calling the pants removal sexual, while the banned player claims it was just to confirm the lack of undies. Clearly there was no interest in the contents of the undies since the pants went back on when the lack of undies was confirmed. The "Red Pants" is also a topless jumpsuit, so I can only assume the cat with no undies was running around with her tits out on account of having no undies.
But I suppose manuel players dont like snuggly cats.
But I suppose manuel players dont like snuggly cats.
- Screemonster
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 7:23 pm
- Byond Username: Scree
Re: Affectionate cat peanut
I hope you slip and catch your finger with the peeler next time you peel potatoesFlatulent wrote:you are next on the chopping block screemonster your erp clique is falling apart
-
- Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2017 12:16 am
- Byond Username: Tlaltecuhtli
Re: Affectionate cat peanut
can we ban whoever thinks this is how you rp?
NSFW:
- thehogshotgun
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2020 1:31 am
- Byond Username: Thehogshotgun
- Location: The best damn country in the world
Re: Affectionate cat peanut
jesus fucking christ that image is fucking garbage whoever made that needs to be euthanized also how is that garbage funny holy fuck I despise /tg/ players
- Cobby
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:19 pm
- Byond Username: ExcessiveUseOfCobby
- Github Username: ExcessiveUseOfCobblestone
Re: Affectionate cat peanut
Why haven’t they sent a video of them taking their pants off to show if they have undies since they are a catgirl irl.
Voted best trap in /tg/ 2014-current
- Rohen_Tahir
- Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2019 1:00 pm
- Byond Username: Rohen Tahir
- Location: Primary fool storage
- Contact:
Re: Affectionate cat peanut
manuelthehogshotgun wrote:jesus fucking christ that image is fucking garbage whoever made that needs to be euthanized also how is that garbage funny holy fuck I despise /tg/ players
-
- Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2017 12:16 am
- Byond Username: Tlaltecuhtli
Re: Affectionate cat peanut
holy shit shad0k just btfo'd banbaiter, case closed
- thehogshotgun
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2020 1:31 am
- Byond Username: Thehogshotgun
- Location: The best damn country in the world
Re: Affectionate cat peanut
Wrong penut retardTlaltecuhtli wrote:holy shit shad0k just btfo'd banbaiter, case closed
- remanseptim
- Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2020 7:38 pm
- Byond Username: Remanseptim
-
- Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2017 12:16 am
- Byond Username: Tlaltecuhtli
Re: Affectionate cat peanut
holy shit timberboe just btfo'd erper, case closed
- remanseptim
- Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2020 7:38 pm
- Byond Username: Remanseptim
Re: Affectionate cat peanut
it isn't even the rule 8 violation that is hilarious about this
it's the fact that he is attempting to play it off as something cute and innocuous
it's the fact that he is attempting to play it off as something cute and innocuous
- stan_albatross
- Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2020 10:58 pm
- Byond Username: Stan_albatross
- Location: London
Re: Affectionate cat peanut
the historically high tgmc standards, both for their admins, their rp level, and their balanceSuper Aggro Crag wrote:what the absolute fuck is wrong with this denthead
how did this gormless sperg get admin on the fake server
Karl Karlsson and never anything else
-
- Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2017 12:16 am
- Byond Username: Tlaltecuhtli
Re: Affectionate cat peanut
this is just the brain damage that anime causes to people, and reason why weebos shouldnt be given right to playremanseptim wrote:it isn't even the rule 8 violation that is hilarious about this
it's the fact that he is attempting to play it off as something cute and innocuous
- remanseptim
- Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2020 7:38 pm
- Byond Username: Remanseptim
- Farquaar
- Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2018 7:20 am
- Byond Username: Farquaar
- Location: Delta Quadrant
Re: Affectionate cat peanut
Tlaltecuhtli wrote:this is just the brain damage that anime causes to people, and reason why weebos shouldnt be given right to play
► Show Spoiler
- Togopal
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 6:38 pm
- Byond Username: Togopal
- Location: 41.3071749, -74.8459928
Re: Affectionate cat peanut
If this doesn't end with 'cat wit no undies' being added to the list of brain damage quotes I will be thoroughly disappointed
- thehogshotgun
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2020 1:31 am
- Byond Username: Thehogshotgun
- Location: The best damn country in the world
Re: Affectionate cat peanut
Tlaltecuhtli wrote:this is just the brain damage that anime causes to people, and reason why weebos shouldnt be given right to play
- Not-Dorsidarf
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 4:14 pm
- Byond Username: Dorsidwarf
- Location: We're all going on an, admin holiday
Re: Affectionate cat peanut
I was offered tgmc adminship on the first round of tgmc I ever played.stan_albatross wrote:the historically high tgmc standards, both for their admins, their rp level, and their balanceSuper Aggro Crag wrote:what the absolute fuck is wrong with this denthead
how did this gormless sperg get admin on the fake server
kieth4 wrote: infrequently shitting yourself is fine imo
There is a lot of very bizarre nonsense being talked on this forum. I shall now remain silent and logoff until my points are vindicated.
Player who complainted over being killed for looting cap office wrote: ↑Sun Jul 30, 2023 1:33 am Hey there, I'm Virescent, the super evil person who made the stupid appeal and didn't think it through enough. Just came here to say: screech, retards. Screech and writhe like the worms you are. Your pathetic little cries will keep echoing around for a while before quietting down. There is one great outcome from this: I rised up the blood pressure of some of you shitheads and lowered your lifespan. I'm honestly tempted to do this more often just to see you screech and writhe more, but that wouldn't be cool of me. So come on haters, show me some more of your high blood pressure please.
- terranaut
- Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2014 11:43 pm
- Byond Username: Terranaut
- Togopal
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 6:38 pm
- Byond Username: Togopal
- Location: 41.3071749, -74.8459928
Re: Affectionate cat peanut
Still incredibly baffled reading over the appeal again. How unaware do you have to be to not realize that their actions were uncomfortable and unwanted. The person was avoiding them and calling for help and the appealer interprets it as "roleplaying as a panicked cat". Manuel was a horrible mistake
- Rohen_Tahir
- Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2019 1:00 pm
- Byond Username: Rohen Tahir
- Location: Primary fool storage
- Contact:
- skoglol
- Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 5:25 am
- Byond Username: Skoglol
- Github Username: kriskog
Re: Affectionate cat peanut
Lets ignore the contents of the ban for a little while, and look at the conduct of the banning admin. His replies in the ticket make it clear that the ban is being based on an almost 2 year old "final warning" note (not a ban, mind you) and a bunch of even older history. Old history either matters or it does not, we need to be consistent. If we keep telling players that they do not need to worry about old notes, and that we do not look at old notes (they fade out and you gotta hit a button to view them) then we also should not be basing our decisions heavily on those same old notes or use them to justify bans.
If this was a 2 year old "no tiding, final warning" note, would you be okay with a weekban referring to this two year old note as the final warning? When is history forgiven?
If this was a 2 year old "no tiding, final warning" note, would you be okay with a weekban referring to this two year old note as the final warning? When is history forgiven?
- iamgoofball
- Github User
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:50 pm
- Byond Username: Iamgoofball
- Github Username: Iamgoofball
Re: Affectionate cat peanut
This isn't a manuel thing. Going by the banned user's scrubby, they're a Terry player who decided to join Manuel expecting everyone on manuel to also engage in the weird babyspeak roleplay stuff that Terry players do going by these logs I'm seeing.Togopal wrote:Still incredibly baffled reading over the appeal again. How unaware do you have to be to not realize that their actions were uncomfortable and unwanted. The person was avoiding them and calling for help and the appealer interprets it as "roleplaying as a panicked cat". Manuel was a horrible mistake
- iamgoofball
- Github User
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:50 pm
- Byond Username: Iamgoofball
- Github Username: Iamgoofball
Re: Affectionate cat peanut
Tiding and unwanted sexual conduct are two very, very different things and should be treated differently as a result. The only thing wrong with this ban was that it wasn't a permaban.skoglol wrote:Lets ignore the contents of the ban for a little while, and look at the conduct of the banning admin. His replies in the ticket make it clear that the ban is being based on an almost 2 year old "final warning" note (not a ban, mind you) and a bunch of even older history. Old history either matters or it does not, we need to be consistent. If we keep telling players that they do not need to worry about old notes, and that we do not look at old notes (they fade out and you gotta hit a button to view them) then we also should not be basing our decisions heavily on those same old notes or use them to justify bans.
If this was a 2 year old "no tiding, final warning" note, would you be okay with a weekban referring to this two year old note as the final warning? When is history forgiven?
- ThanatosRa
- Rarely plays
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 4:07 pm
- Byond Username: ThanatosRa
- Location: Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Re: Affectionate cat peanut
I'm pro-cat but fuck this shit it should have been a permaban.
my forum gimmick is that no one knows who i am
gender is irrelevant NO UR IRRELEVANT
u a bish
y u heff 2 b med
gender is irrelevant NO UR IRRELEVANT
u a bish
y u heff 2 b med
- Yenwodyah
- Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2018 10:47 pm
- Byond Username: Yenwodyah
- Github Username: Yenwodyah
- Super Aggro Crag
- In Game PermaBanned
- Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2015 9:47 pm
- Byond Username: Super Aggro Crag
- Togopal
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 6:38 pm
- Byond Username: Togopal
- Location: 41.3071749, -74.8459928
Re: Affectionate cat peanut
I agree with this. Common sense really should come into play for the person banned, here.iamgoofball wrote:Tiding and unwanted sexual conduct are two very, very different things and should be treated differently as a result. The only thing wrong with this ban was that it wasn't a permaban.skoglol wrote:Lets ignore the contents of the ban for a little while, and look at the conduct of the banning admin. His replies in the ticket make it clear that the ban is being based on an almost 2 year old "final warning" note (not a ban, mind you) and a bunch of even older history. Old history either matters or it does not, we need to be consistent. If we keep telling players that they do not need to worry about old notes, and that we do not look at old notes (they fade out and you gotta hit a button to view them) then we also should not be basing our decisions heavily on those same old notes or use them to justify bans.
If this was a 2 year old "no tiding, final warning" note, would you be okay with a weekban referring to this two year old note as the final warning? When is history forgiven?
- Screemonster
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 7:23 pm
- Byond Username: Scree
Re: Affectionate cat peanut
the only mistake made here was referencing their old notes in the ban reason at allskoglol wrote:Lets ignore the contents of the ban for a little while, and look at the conduct of the banning admin. His replies in the ticket make it clear that the ban is being based on an almost 2 year old "final warning" note (not a ban, mind you) and a bunch of even older history. Old history either matters or it does not, we need to be consistent. If we keep telling players that they do not need to worry about old notes, and that we do not look at old notes (they fade out and you gotta hit a button to view them) then we also should not be basing our decisions heavily on those same old notes or use them to justify bans.
If this was a 2 year old "no tiding, final warning" note, would you be okay with a weekban referring to this two year old note as the final warning? When is history forgiven?
erping with someone who isn't comfortable with your erping and tries to get away from you is something that gets you shitcanned on the spot regardless of your prior history
- Lacran
- Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2020 3:17 am
- Byond Username: Lacran
Re: Affectionate cat peanut
Yes, when your uncle crept into your room and removed your pants he was just checking you were wearing underwear, its called being a "snuggly uncle."skoglol wrote:Y'all are calling the pants removal sexual, while the banned player claims it was just to confirm the lack of undies. Clearly there was no interest in the contents of the undies since the pants went back on when the lack of undies was confirmed.
But I suppose manuel players dont like snuggly cats.
What the fuck is wrong with you
- Super Aggro Crag
- In Game PermaBanned
- Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2015 9:47 pm
- Byond Username: Super Aggro Crag
Re: Affectionate cat peanut
greenname c*der showing a startling lack of understanding of social cues?
imagine my fucking shock
imagine my fucking shock
- skoglol
- Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 5:25 am
- Byond Username: Skoglol
- Github Username: kriskog
Re: Affectionate cat peanut
Sexually repressed americans sees a mention of underwear, calls it ERP
- iamgoofball
- Github User
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:50 pm
- Byond Username: Iamgoofball
- Github Username: Iamgoofball
Re: Affectionate cat peanut
so are you like, deliberately ignoring the whole "taking advantage of an unconscious woman to remove her clothes" thing or the "trying to restrain a woman to remove her clothing" bit, or did you just genuinely not read itskoglol wrote:Sexually repressed americans sees a mention of underwear, calls it ERP
- oranges
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
- Byond Username: Optimumtact
- Github Username: optimumtact
- Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED
Re: Affectionate cat peanut
people, it's a game, there's no actual women at risk there's no need to lose your marbles
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: TypicalRig