manuel doxing his bf peanut

Only Certified™ Players™ may post in here.
Forum rules
Only Certified™ Players™ may post in here.
If you are not able to post in here, you are not a Certified™ Player™. Play on a mainline /tg/ game server to gain posting powers in this forum. (certified gamers are only calculated once per day)
Tlaltecuhtli
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2017 12:16 am
Byond Username: Tlaltecuhtli

manuel doxing his bf peanut

Post by Tlaltecuhtli » #597334

Bottom post of the previous page:

lol
ttps://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=28900&view=unread#unread
User avatar
Armhulen
Global Moderator
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2016 4:30 pm
Byond Username: Armhulenn
Github Username: bazelart
Location: The Grand Tournament

Re: manuel doxing his bf peanut

Post by Armhulen » #597693

Cobby wrote:
BeeSting12 wrote:
They left out cringe no one is going to bring up and will be lost when they appeal later.

My take on it is that if the details mattered enough to keep them banned then it’s stupid to not include in the reason because it’s very possible it gets lost. Don’t have to go into details regarding anything but the thing holding back the unban being accepted.

Mfw we don’t even have public bans yet so who cares what you put into the reason.
Should have voted for me sweetheart
User avatar
Mothblocks
Code Maintainer
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2018 9:33 am
Byond Username: Jaredfogle

Re: manuel doxing his bf peanut

Post by Mothblocks » #597695

everyone voted for you, it was ranked choice voting

you won 100% of the vote !
Shaps-cloud wrote: Mon Dec 07, 2020 7:59 am May eventually become one of the illusive maintainer-headmins if they choose to pursue that path, having a coder in the senior admin leadership has usually been positive for both sides in the past.
Head Coder of /tg/station, hi!

Head Admin of /tg/station Feb 2022.

Mothblocks everywhere, >>> Say nice things about me <<<
User avatar
Misdoubtful
In-Game Game Master
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2020 7:03 pm
Byond Username: Misdoubtful
Location: Delivering hugs!

Re: manuel doxing his bf peanut

Post by Misdoubtful » #597697

Cobby wrote:
BeeSting12 wrote:
They left out cringe no one is going to bring up and will be lost when they appeal later.

My take on it is that if the details mattered enough to keep them banned then it’s stupid to not include in the reason because it’s very possible it gets lost. Don’t have to go into details regarding anything but the thing holding back the unban being accepted.

Mfw we don’t even have public bans yet so who cares what you put into the reason.
I'm pretty interested in what things will look like for this when they do appeal this in that years time.
Hugs
User avatar
YuiY1997
Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2019 2:57 am
Byond Username: YuiY1997

Re: manuel doxing his bf peanut

Post by YuiY1997 » #597704

Dox is when you tell people someone is underage now
Image
Tlaltecuhtli
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2017 12:16 am
Byond Username: Tlaltecuhtli

Re: manuel doxing his bf peanut

Post by Tlaltecuhtli » #597705

the admins fear being called childrish
User avatar
Ghilker
Joined: Mon Apr 15, 2019 9:44 am
Byond Username: Ghilker

Re: manuel doxing his bf peanut

Post by Ghilker » #597707

Ah yes revealing the age is doxxing Image
User avatar
Farquaar
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2018 7:20 am
Byond Username: Farquaar
Location: Delta Quadrant

Re: manuel doxing his bf peanut

Post by Farquaar » #597708

► Show Spoiler
User avatar
Rohen_Tahir
Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2019 1:00 pm
Byond Username: Rohen Tahir
Location: Primary fool storage
Contact:

Re: manuel doxing his bf peanut

Post by Rohen_Tahir » #597714

Farquaar wrote:
Ghilker wrote:Ah yes revealing the age is doxxing Image
We really do need to clear out all those spam accounts clogging up the birthday announcements
Do you like not want to purchase the Зубной порошок?
Image
User avatar
terranaut
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2014 11:43 pm
Byond Username: Terranaut

Re: manuel doxing his bf peanut

Post by terranaut » #597720

Misdoubtful wrote:
Cobby wrote:
BeeSting12 wrote:
They left out cringe no one is going to bring up and will be lost when they appeal later.

My take on it is that if the details mattered enough to keep them banned then it’s stupid to not include in the reason because it’s very possible it gets lost. Don’t have to go into details regarding anything but the thing holding back the unban being accepted.

Mfw we don’t even have public bans yet so who cares what you put into the reason.
I'm pretty interested in what things will look like for this when they do appeal this in that years time.
the banning admin will state that there was more to it than in the ban reason and that they should stay banned, headmins will take some vague explanation thats probably inaccurate because the details were in fact lost to time and that'll be that
[🅲 1] [🆄 1] [🅼 1]

Image
User avatar
IkeTG
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2016 2:03 am
Byond Username: LizardDreams
Location: Here, Now

Re: manuel doxing his bf peanut

Post by IkeTG » #597728

terranaut wrote:
Misdoubtful wrote:
Cobby wrote:
BeeSting12 wrote:
They left out cringe no one is going to bring up and will be lost when they appeal later.

My take on it is that if the details mattered enough to keep them banned then it’s stupid to not include in the reason because it’s very possible it gets lost. Don’t have to go into details regarding anything but the thing holding back the unban being accepted.

Mfw we don’t even have public bans yet so who cares what you put into the reason.
I'm pretty interested in what things will look like for this when they do appeal this in that years time.
the banning admin will state that there was more to it than in the ban reason and that they should stay banned, headmins will take some vague explanation thats probably inaccurate because the details were in fact lost to time and that'll be that
completely wrong
Image
User avatar
Rohen_Tahir
Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2019 1:00 pm
Byond Username: Rohen Tahir
Location: Primary fool storage
Contact:

Re: manuel doxing his bf peanut

Post by Rohen_Tahir » #597734

IkeTG wrote:
terranaut wrote:
Misdoubtful wrote:
Cobby wrote:
BeeSting12 wrote:
They left out cringe no one is going to bring up and will be lost when they appeal later.

My take on it is that if the details mattered enough to keep them banned then it’s stupid to not include in the reason because it’s very possible it gets lost. Don’t have to go into details regarding anything but the thing holding back the unban being accepted.

Mfw we don’t even have public bans yet so who cares what you put into the reason.
I'm pretty interested in what things will look like for this when they do appeal this in that years time.
the banning admin will state that there was more to it than in the ban reason and that they should stay banned, headmins will take some vague explanation thats probably inaccurate because the details were in fact lost to time and that'll be that
completely wrong
completely wrong
Image
User avatar
IkeTG
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2016 2:03 am
Byond Username: LizardDreams
Location: Here, Now

Re: manuel doxing his bf peanut

Post by IkeTG » #597735

Rohen_Tahir wrote:
IkeTG wrote:
terranaut wrote:
Misdoubtful wrote:
Cobby wrote:
BeeSting12 wrote:
They left out cringe no one is going to bring up and will be lost when they appeal later.

My take on it is that if the details mattered enough to keep them banned then it’s stupid to not include in the reason because it’s very possible it gets lost. Don’t have to go into details regarding anything but the thing holding back the unban being accepted.

Mfw we don’t even have public bans yet so who cares what you put into the reason.
I'm pretty interested in what things will look like for this when they do appeal this in that years time.
the banning admin will state that there was more to it than in the ban reason and that they should stay banned, headmins will take some vague explanation thats probably inaccurate because the details were in fact lost to time and that'll be that
completely wrong
completely wrong
you're right
Image
User avatar
XivilaiAnaxes
Joined: Sat May 11, 2019 7:13 am
Byond Username: XivilaiAnaxes

Re: manuel doxing his bf peanut

Post by XivilaiAnaxes » #597821

Two wrongs don't make a right :x :x :x :x :x :x
Stickymayhem wrote:Imagine the sheer narcisssim required to genuinely believe you are this intelligent.
Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Longestarmlonglaw, MrStonedOne, rellyreri