God cannot have human characteristics, or any kind of imperfect characteristics at all for that matter, otherwise it's not God. Plato explains it best:
http://www.gutenberg.org/files/1497/1497-h/1497-h.htm
And if a poet writes of the sufferings of Niobe—the subject of the tragedy in which these iambic verses occur—or of the house of Pelops, or of the Trojan war or on any similar theme, either we must not permit him to say that these are the works of God, or if they are of God, he must devise some explanation of them such as we are seeking; he must say that God did what was just and right, and they were the better for being punished; but that those who are punished are miserable, and that God is the author of their misery—the poet is not to be permitted to say; though he may say that the wicked are miserable because they require to be punished, and are benefited by receiving punishment from God; but that God being good is the author of evil to any one is to be strenuously denied, and not to be said or sung or heard in verse or prose by any one whether old or young in any well-ordered commonwealth. Such a fiction is suicidal, ruinous, impious.
God is simply incapable of being less than perfect in all aspects by his nature. You can also see that even though he refers to different aspects of God, such as Athene or Zeus (not necessarily by name but by actions), in the end he's talking about only one God, contrarily to the shallow understanding of the Greek religion that's being commonly taught in schools. Same goes for hinduism or any other "polytheistic" (on the surface) religion. Those "Gods" were never understood or treated as separate entities until their civilization grew corrupted and decadent. That shallow and nonsensical understanding is what most modern people derive from that though.
If you feel like learning some more, this concept is further explained here:
http://www.sophia-perennis.com/evil.pdf
Creationism is a load of crap focused on the relative universe and trying to enclose God in it like it's some kind of a powerful wizard, it makes about as much sense as atheism, no wonder they're eternally locked in their fruitless struggle (in the USA).
For obvious reasons you can't expect particular instances of objects in relativity have perfect characteristics in any regard as you describe ("Will we scorn stones next for not being perfectly round?"). The mathematical concept of a sphere
is in fact perfect, and that's precisely it's a mathematical concept, not a concrete entity anchored in relativity. As any science, geometry can be focused on the Absolute and abstract, or on the relative and concrete, and Plato sees that the first kind is infinitely superior to the latter:
Yes, I said, but for that purpose a very little of either geometry or calculation will be enough; the question relates rather to the greater and more advanced part of geometry—whether that tends in any degree to make more easy the vision of the idea of good; and thither, as I was saying, all things tend which compel the soul to turn her gaze towards that place, where is the full perfection of being, which she ought, by all means, to behold.
True, he said.
Then if geometry compels us to view being, it concerns us; if becoming only, it does not concern us?
Yes, that is what we assert.
Yet anybody who has the least acquaintance with geometry will not deny that such a conception of the science is in flat contradiction to the ordinary language of geometricians.
How so?
They have in view practice only, and are always speaking, in a narrow and ridiculous manner, of squaring and extending and applying and the like—they confuse the necessities of geometry with those of daily life; whereas knowledge is the real object of the whole science.
Certainly, he said.
Then must not a further admission be made?
What admission?
That the knowledge at which geometry aims is knowledge of the eternal, and not of aught perishing and transient.
So, my friend, I do not blame you for instinctively refusing the truth in perennial philosophy or in philosophy of any kind in general. You seem to have a lot of misconceptions that are common for everyone living in the modern west and absorbing all sorts of bullshit they teach at schools and repeat in tv nowadays, I'll be more than happy to clear them if need be. I do not really expect that you've read a single page of anything related to theology or metaphysics in your life, or if you did, it was the modernist gibberish that you weren't aware is poisonous to the soul.
