Forum rules
Only Certified™ Players™ may post in here.
If you are not able to post in here, you are not a Certified™ Player™. Play on a mainline /tg/ game server to gain posting powers in this forum. (certified gamers are only calculated once per day)
Farquaar wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 11:43 pm
Imagine my grandparents surviving nazi concentration camps only for their grandson to be accused of nazism for criticizing a citrus fruit on the internet.
/tg/station OST wrote:2. "Every Day We Slip Closer to Furcadia, or, 'Don't Furcadiate /tg/station!', or, Facehuggers are Physically Stimulating and so are TGMC Admins, or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Physical Stimulation" - 2:14
technokek wrote:Cannot prove this so just belive me if when say this
>eskkjjjjjhkkjkkjjkjj gets banned for erp
wowee!!! didnt see that one coming!!
Mothblocks, winter 2020, “successfully” preventing bagil death with relevant data wrote:You seem to be under the fallacy that reinforcing that Bagil is a TDM shithole where you must carry bolas and spears on you at all times, while looking for the next valid to hunt down is a positive change to the server. I don't. The data suggests other people don't.
imsxz wrote:I give up there’s too many furries
cacogen wrote:i asked oranges how often he plays and he deleted the post
cybersaber101 wrote:Welp, you guys let a terrymin become a headmin, thousand years of darkness.
Vekter wrote:I jerk off Nist a bit too much but he's honestly one of the best silicon players on the server. B.O.R.G.O. is also pretty good.
Tlaltecuhtli wrote:manuel confirmed degenerate server
eskj is b*gil player doing sex tourism on manuel
Mothblocks, winter 2020, “successfully” preventing bagil death with relevant data wrote:You seem to be under the fallacy that reinforcing that Bagil is a TDM shithole where you must carry bolas and spears on you at all times, while looking for the next valid to hunt down is a positive change to the server. I don't. The data suggests other people don't.
imsxz wrote:I give up there’s too many furries
cacogen wrote:i asked oranges how often he plays and he deleted the post
cybersaber101 wrote:Welp, you guys let a terrymin become a headmin, thousand years of darkness.
Vekter wrote:I jerk off Nist a bit too much but he's honestly one of the best silicon players on the server. B.O.R.G.O. is also pretty good.
Eskjjlj wrote:
To understand the logs you quoted in an erotic fashion you would need to perform olympic level mental gymnastics. The same thing happening on another /tg/ servers would not lead any admin to believe they should apply a ban.
And again I have no reason to "take responsability", as you say it, for the simple fact that I am innocent.
lmao
it's olympic level mental gymnastics to consider trying to forcibly strip someone to see their underwear (or lack thereof) as a sexual thing apparently
you are next on the chopping block screemonster your erp clique is falling apart
Mothblocks, winter 2020, “successfully” preventing bagil death with relevant data wrote:You seem to be under the fallacy that reinforcing that Bagil is a TDM shithole where you must carry bolas and spears on you at all times, while looking for the next valid to hunt down is a positive change to the server. I don't. The data suggests other people don't.
imsxz wrote:I give up there’s too many furries
cacogen wrote:i asked oranges how often he plays and he deleted the post
cybersaber101 wrote:Welp, you guys let a terrymin become a headmin, thousand years of darkness.
Vekter wrote:I jerk off Nist a bit too much but he's honestly one of the best silicon players on the server. B.O.R.G.O. is also pretty good.
Farquaar wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 11:43 pm
Imagine my grandparents surviving nazi concentration camps only for their grandson to be accused of nazism for criticizing a citrus fruit on the internet.
Y'all are calling the pants removal sexual, while the banned player claims it was just to confirm the lack of undies. Clearly there was no interest in the contents of the undies since the pants went back on when the lack of undies was confirmed. The "Red Pants" is also a topless jumpsuit, so I can only assume the cat with no undies was running around with her tits out on account of having no undies.
But I suppose manuel players dont like snuggly cats.
jesus fucking christ that image is fucking garbage whoever made that needs to be euthanized also how is that garbage funny holy fuck I despise /tg/ players
thehogshotgun wrote:jesus fucking christ that image is fucking garbage whoever made that needs to be euthanized also how is that garbage funny holy fuck I despise /tg/ players
remanseptim wrote:it isn't even the rule 8 violation that is hilarious about this
it's the fact that he is attempting to play it off as something cute and innocuous
this is just the brain damage that anime causes to people, and reason why weebos shouldnt be given right to play
Farquaar wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 11:43 pm
Imagine my grandparents surviving nazi concentration camps only for their grandson to be accused of nazism for criticizing a citrus fruit on the internet.
Super Aggro Crag wrote:what the absolute fuck is wrong with this denthead
how did this gormless sperg get admin on the fake server
the historically high tgmc standards, both for their admins, their rp level, and their balance
I was offered tgmc adminship on the first round of tgmc I ever played.
kieth4 wrote:
infrequently shitting yourself is fine imo
There is a lot of very bizarre nonsense being talked on this forum. I shall now remain silent and logoff until my points are vindicated.
Player who complainted over being killed for looting cap office wrote: ↑Sun Jul 30, 2023 1:33 am
Hey there, I'm Virescent, the super evil person who made the stupid appeal and didn't think it through enough. Just came here to say: screech, retards. Screech and writhe like the worms you are. Your pathetic little cries will keep echoing around for a while before quietting down. There is one great outcome from this: I rised up the blood pressure of some of you shitheads and lowered your lifespan. I'm honestly tempted to do this more often just to see you screech and writhe more, but that wouldn't be cool of me. So come on haters, show me some more of your high blood pressure please.
Still incredibly baffled reading over the appeal again. How unaware do you have to be to not realize that their actions were uncomfortable and unwanted. The person was avoiding them and calling for help and the appealer interprets it as "roleplaying as a panicked cat". Manuel was a horrible mistake
Lets ignore the contents of the ban for a little while, and look at the conduct of the banning admin. His replies in the ticket make it clear that the ban is being based on an almost 2 year old "final warning" note (not a ban, mind you) and a bunch of even older history. Old history either matters or it does not, we need to be consistent. If we keep telling players that they do not need to worry about old notes, and that we do not look at old notes (they fade out and you gotta hit a button to view them) then we also should not be basing our decisions heavily on those same old notes or use them to justify bans.
If this was a 2 year old "no tiding, final warning" note, would you be okay with a weekban referring to this two year old note as the final warning? When is history forgiven?
Togopal wrote:Still incredibly baffled reading over the appeal again. How unaware do you have to be to not realize that their actions were uncomfortable and unwanted. The person was avoiding them and calling for help and the appealer interprets it as "roleplaying as a panicked cat". Manuel was a horrible mistake
This isn't a manuel thing. Going by the banned user's scrubby, they're a Terry player who decided to join Manuel expecting everyone on manuel to also engage in the weird babyspeak roleplay stuff that Terry players do going by these logs I'm seeing.
skoglol wrote:Lets ignore the contents of the ban for a little while, and look at the conduct of the banning admin. His replies in the ticket make it clear that the ban is being based on an almost 2 year old "final warning" note (not a ban, mind you) and a bunch of even older history. Old history either matters or it does not, we need to be consistent. If we keep telling players that they do not need to worry about old notes, and that we do not look at old notes (they fade out and you gotta hit a button to view them) then we also should not be basing our decisions heavily on those same old notes or use them to justify bans.
If this was a 2 year old "no tiding, final warning" note, would you be okay with a weekban referring to this two year old note as the final warning? When is history forgiven?
Tiding and unwanted sexual conduct are two very, very different things and should be treated differently as a result. The only thing wrong with this ban was that it wasn't a permaban.
skoglol wrote:Lets ignore the contents of the ban for a little while, and look at the conduct of the banning admin. His replies in the ticket make it clear that the ban is being based on an almost 2 year old "final warning" note (not a ban, mind you) and a bunch of even older history. Old history either matters or it does not, we need to be consistent. If we keep telling players that they do not need to worry about old notes, and that we do not look at old notes (they fade out and you gotta hit a button to view them) then we also should not be basing our decisions heavily on those same old notes or use them to justify bans.
If this was a 2 year old "no tiding, final warning" note, would you be okay with a weekban referring to this two year old note as the final warning? When is history forgiven?
Tiding and unwanted sexual conduct are two very, very different things and should be treated differently as a result. The only thing wrong with this ban was that it wasn't a permaban.
I agree with this. Common sense really should come into play for the person banned, here.
skoglol wrote:Lets ignore the contents of the ban for a little while, and look at the conduct of the banning admin. His replies in the ticket make it clear that the ban is being based on an almost 2 year old "final warning" note (not a ban, mind you) and a bunch of even older history. Old history either matters or it does not, we need to be consistent. If we keep telling players that they do not need to worry about old notes, and that we do not look at old notes (they fade out and you gotta hit a button to view them) then we also should not be basing our decisions heavily on those same old notes or use them to justify bans.
If this was a 2 year old "no tiding, final warning" note, would you be okay with a weekban referring to this two year old note as the final warning? When is history forgiven?
the only mistake made here was referencing their old notes in the ban reason at all
erping with someone who isn't comfortable with your erping and tries to get away from you is something that gets you shitcanned on the spot regardless of your prior history
skoglol wrote:Y'all are calling the pants removal sexual, while the banned player claims it was just to confirm the lack of undies. Clearly there was no interest in the contents of the undies since the pants went back on when the lack of undies was confirmed.
But I suppose manuel players dont like snuggly cats.
Yes, when your uncle crept into your room and removed your pants he was just checking you were wearing underwear, its called being a "snuggly uncle."
skoglol wrote:Sexually repressed americans sees a mention of underwear, calls it ERP
so are you like, deliberately ignoring the whole "taking advantage of an unconscious woman to remove her clothes" thing or the "trying to restrain a woman to remove her clothing" bit, or did you just genuinely not read it