Bottom post of the previous page:
Weirdest Ban Appeal I've ever seen, also what a harsh admin jeez bro. Sybil moment.viewtopic.php?f=7&t=31566
I saw this i just HAD to make a peanut of it
Bottom post of the previous page:
Weirdest Ban Appeal I've ever seen, also what a harsh admin jeez bro. Sybil moment.Wh- Like, making a kiss blow up the supermatter crystal?Mothblocks wrote: ↑Sun Apr 24, 2022 10:06 am...Who doesBONERMASTER wrote: ↑Sun Apr 24, 2022 7:32 am Either we all go nuts on this nonsense station and stuff blows up, or you stop merging retard code.
Well, it was behind reinforced plasma glass so that's one of your requirements out of the way.
Fair point, but that's still going against common sense that the person that fault is the one shooting the laser at the crystal, not the person who put the crystal there and unmistakably tried to protect it, because in your own words he did at least try to use reinforced glass so some guy with a crowbar didn't just bash it open.
BONERMASTER wrote: ↑Sun Apr 24, 2022 7:32 am You blasting this guy, because he didn't protect against the possibility of someone blowing a kiss and detonating an SM shard, is just peak absurdity, literal Kafka at this point.
Timberpoes wrote: ↑Fri Jan 27, 2023 12:41 am From my perspective, players just want to genuinely be listened to. And I don't mean it condescendingly, but to genuinely have their say and for admins to listen, process it and reply. Even if you don't give two shits about what the player is saying, even if you disagree with every part of what they say, players are less likely to leave an ahelp pissed off if you've listened to them and given a reply that directly addresses what they've told you.
This post made my day.Rohen_Tahir wrote: ↑Sun Apr 24, 2022 11:52 amNoxVS shopping:NoxVS wrote: ↑Sun Apr 24, 2022 5:42 amThen don't mess around with supermatters?Pandarsenic wrote: ↑Sun Apr 24, 2022 5:07 am You can't really install cooling without access to an RPD and half-decent knowledge of atmos.
RPDs are easy to get, cooling is easy to set up. Scrubbers take in gas, it goes into space with the heat exchange thingies, filter out everything but nitrogen, it gets vented back in.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1btDc5xJe0
Jortymorty is the guy posting this appeal, I think the point is that they know they're line-toeing with halfassed handling of SM shards
play opus: echo of starsongSuper Aggro Crag wrote:This is what u get when u let people into your community
The person who caused the delam is responsible for it. Not anyone else.Omega_DarkPotato wrote: ↑Mon Apr 25, 2022 5:34 pmJortymorty is the guy posting this appeal, I think the point is that they know they're line-toeing with halfassed handling of SM shards
If this prediction is accurate I want to be known as the tgstation fortune-teller, and if it is not accurate I wish for you all to forget this post was made.Headmin Prediction Post wrote: It's quite obvious that this situation warranted admin intervention of some kind. Securing incredibly dangerous objects of any kind, especially SM crystals, in an almost public area will obviously cause some kind of disturbance. That being said assuming bad faith on the part of Jortymorty would be unnecessarily harsh, especially given the complexity of the situation.
Therefor we believe that a note is sufficient for the Supermatter Shards.
As for Admiral's handling of this case we believe that while the original ban was a bit harsh we're overall satisfied with how this case was handled.
Timberpoes wrote: ↑Fri Jan 27, 2023 12:41 am From my perspective, players just want to genuinely be listened to. And I don't mean it condescendingly, but to genuinely have their say and for admins to listen, process it and reply. Even if you don't give two shits about what the player is saying, even if you disagree with every part of what they say, players are less likely to leave an ahelp pissed off if you've listened to them and given a reply that directly addresses what they've told you.
A note at minimum seems fairly likely given it did in fact blow upTearling wrote: ↑Mon Apr 25, 2022 9:53 pm Here is my headmin response prediction:
Mothblocks will be the one to post it.
It'll start off with an explanation of their thoughts, (maybe even a summary of the events if it's especially complex), probably explaining the complexity of the situation or how it's a grey area
Then they will explain that a note for the SM crystals will be sufficient, and that while the banning admin made mistakes, it's clear that intentional or not Jorty's actions did create unnecessary harm to the round. At the end they'll comment on either Jorty's position in the case or Admiral's handling of the case.
I'll try to write it out as so:
If this prediction is accurate I want to be known as the tgstation fortune-teller, and if it is not accurate I wish for you all to forget this post was made.Headmin Prediction Post wrote: It's quite obvious that this situation warranted admin intervention of some kind. Securing incredibly dangerous objects of any kind, especially SM crystals, in an almost public area will obviously cause some kind of disturbance. That being said assuming bad faith on the part of Jortymorty would be unnecessarily harsh, especially given the complexity of the situation.
Therefor we believe that a note is sufficient for the Supermatter Shards.
As for Admiral's handling of this case we believe that while the original ban was a bit harsh we're overall satisfied with how this case was handled.
oh so it wasn't even a strawman it was totally sincereOmega_DarkPotato wrote: ↑Mon Apr 25, 2022 5:34 pmJortymorty is the guy posting this appeal, I think the point is that they know they're line-toeing with halfassed handling of SM shards
There was no half-ass handling. That statement was one of frustration at being told how shit I am for doing something not even close to the same level of what Brick gets away with. That was not meant to be a stab at Brick himself but of the complete absurdity of the double standard. I feel shit for throwing Brick under the bus but he's the biggest example I can think of here. Let me explain.Omega_DarkPotato wrote: ↑Mon Apr 25, 2022 5:34 pmJortymorty is the guy posting this appeal, I think the point is that they know they're line-toeing with halfassed handling of SM shards
I'm still trying to figure out how throwing flashbangs through wormholes is going to be addressed in light of it being the straw that gave the camel a 183 day ban. I didn't dive the logs for the rounds but as far as I know nobody was affected by a single one. I still laugh at the idea of the clown harassing security only for a flashbang to pop into existence out of nowhere causing security to think the clown flashbanged them.
You only see me every so often because I work, it sucks. Blink 182 warned me about this.Kendrickorium wrote: ↑Thu Apr 21, 2022 3:01 am I've had to deal with, and observed this shitter multiple times
I only see him every so often but it's pretty clear he only plays on tg to grief
good riddance to this trash, stay gone
Hello. I'm still not sure exactly how to use the new piping system and it's been my experience that anytime I start a piping project of any magnitude I get tossed around like a salad at a 24 hour truckstop. Push, shove, steal the RPED and so on. So what I tried to do and did try to explain in the post there was secure the boxes with reinforced plasma glass all around because I've never been able to break the stuff. I then left the floors unreinforced thinking that they would melt out and expose the box to space if anything went bad. There was thought put into this and I get that it's not evident given the crap note I was given which implies no steps were taken. The only way to hit the ORM shard would have been to aim directly at it. A stray shot would have been very unlikely. The other two I believe were in a position that would pretty much stop them from being hit unless somebody was firing north into QM lobby from the tram. It was highly unlikely to me that anyone would have hit it.NoxVS wrote: ↑Sun Apr 24, 2022 4:45 am
And nah, I couldn't use this same logic. If you put in the effort to stop the lowest effort sabotages, I don't really see a problem with it. Cooling, at least something like a reinforced glass so some guy with a crowbar doesn't just bash it open, that feels like adequate safety measures to me.
Then, later on in the round with the flashbangs.admiralawesome130 bwoinked jortymorty 6 days ago
Gene. Jortymorty. Dafuq.
jortymorty Reply from admiralawesome130 6 days ago
Hello there, I had some awesome SM displays going on, like, Welcome to Cargonia, here is our power and wealth.##And then a dickhead blew a kiss at one and that made it delam.
admiralawesome130 Reply from jortymorty 6 days ago
Can you give the name of the one who blew the kiss?
jortymorty Reply from admiralawesome130 6 days ago
I can try m'lord,
jortymorty Reply from admiralawesome130 6 days ago
Joe Hardie blows a kiss at the supermatter shard! other then that they were secured behind secured plasma reinforced glass.
admiralawesome130 Reply from jortymorty 6 days ago
So, full honesty, it is appreciated. HOWEVER, ordering MULTIPLE sm shards for... Swag points, basically, is really fuckin' stupid. Just make diamond statues of yourself if you wanna be vain.
jortymorty Reply from admiralawesome130 6 days ago
Well, that was coming along with a grand piano and monkey servants with the helmets but then the moth got uppity and things got whack. Alright, no multiple SM shards.##It started as one just to replace the Ore silo
admiralawesome130 Reply from jortymorty 6 days ago
So going to let you off LIGHTLY, even though I could realistically ban you for a long time. Cargo and command ban for a month.
jortymorty Reply from admiralawesome130 6 days ago
Aw don't do that, the ban for a long time. It was actually looking really pretty until someone had to be a bored-lord, what am I getting? I'm off work with a bum knee for 3 days, was hoping to SS13
admiralawesome130 Reply from jortymorty 6 days ago
And you'll still be able to play. Just not cargo or a head of staff roll.
jortymorty Reply from admiralawesome130 6 days ago
Aw I'm the only guy who even QMs anymore but, I get it, and that's fair. Well, it's actually lenient but I can dig it, I won't press my luck.
admiralawesome130 Interacted with jortymorty 6 days ago
Admiral_awesome130/(Stephanie Holmes) has created a temporary 1 month role ban from 9 roles for Jortymorty.
Right there. "So you know how I was going easy on you?" You know what I've learned at 36 and having some real shitty bosses in my time? A powertripping dick is a powertripping dick and a powertripping dick will always throw out aadmiralawesome130 bwoinked jortymorty 6 days ago
Ok why the fuck are you randomly launching flashbangs into wormholes?
jortymorty Reply from admiralawesome130 6 days ago
I mean it seemed like a good idea at the time. The first one was to see if it worked, the ones thereafter was to see if anybody said something funny on the radio about randomly getting flashbanged while feeding the clown in the cafeteria or something
admiralawesome130 Reply from jortymorty 6 days ago
Also it's a piece of paper aimed at the mouth to remove lipstick.
jortymorty Reply from admiralawesome130 6 days ago
What the lipstick what?
admiralawesome130 Reply from jortymorty 6 days ago
So you know how I was going easy on you?
jortymorty Reply from admiralawesome130 6 days ago
I am trying to wash the radioactivity off, trying to get this moth alived. And yes, why what did I do now?
admiralawesome130 Interacted with jortymorty 6 days ago
Admiral_awesome130/(Stephanie Holmes) has created a temporary 6 months server ban for Jortymorty.
ybs bwoinked jortymorty a month ago
Hey there Jorty - Need you to do me a huge favor and, once you fix him, try to stop antagonizing Ward. Obviously facepaint is subtle and that escalation was legit per IC, but I've been watching you both since last round and this is beginning to border on meta. Even if that wasn't your intention, you would be doing me a huge favor by being the bigger person. Sound good?
jortymorty Reply from ybs a month ago
Oh, I facepaint everybody my dude, but I understand.
ybs Reply from jortymorty a month ago
Yeah that is what I am figuring, but I appreciate your understanding and help.
jortymorty Reply from ybs a month ago
No worries, apologies for the headache!
dragontrance bwoinked jortymorty a month ago
Hey, is there a reason you're shooting people with morphine and alcohol?
jortymorty Reply from dragontrance a month ago
It was just booze but then I ran out of booze, nothing should be lethal here, just annoying, we all spawned as parameds not sure what to do so trying to get lynched
jortymorty Reply from dragontrance a month ago
But nobody seems to care enough for getting a little tipsy to chase me and hang me, it's not working so well. Just a crew of drunks.
dragontrance Reply from jortymorty a month ago
Well alright lmao
Maybe Admiral_Horsewank is karma for all the times I took things too seriously and was a doorknob in bwoinks, I'm no saint and I'll never claim to be one. There's plenty of shit I don't know about this game, like the current N2O revelation here. What I do know is that Captain_Crunch130 needs to look his own ass in the mirror when he's acting like this. viewtopic.php?p=638779#p638779jortymorty Opened Ticket a day ago
Hey, the roboticist is a retard and when I wanted to be borged just kinda went "Eh" and must be new or something, either way I can't be borged now and they seem to just be ok with that. I've been waiting since roundstart.
mindstormy Reply from jortymorty a day ago
I know you are going to hate this. But this is an IC issue sadly.
jortymorty Reply from mindstormy a day ago
I mean, if he's an antagonist that's fine. Why would I hate it? That's not bad, that's just how it goes. If they're new though they should be encouraged to go fix things no?
mindstormy Reply from jortymorty a day ago
Yeah its the former. Just how it goes sometimes.
jortymorty Reply from mindstormy a day ago
Just how it goes, all good in the neighbourhood mein deude, thanks for looking into it.
And if someone had intentionally tried to delaminate it by shooting it once? Say, an antagonist who was allowed to do it?jortsandshirts wrote: ↑Tue Apr 26, 2022 3:23 pmHello. I'm still not sure exactly how to use the new piping system and it's been my experience that anytime I start a piping project of any magnitude I get tossed around like a salad at a 24 hour truckstop. Push, shove, steal the RPED and so on. So what I tried to do and did try to explain in the post there was secure the boxes with reinforced plasma glass all around because I've never been able to break the stuff. I then left the floors unreinforced thinking that they would melt out and expose the box to space if anything went bad. There was thought put into this and I get that it's not evident given the crap note I was given which implies no steps were taken. The only way to hit the ORM shard would have been to aim directly at it. A stray shot would have been very unlikely. The other two I believe were in a position that would pretty much stop them from being hit unless somebody was firing north into QM lobby from the tram. It was highly unlikely to me that anyone would have hit it.NoxVS wrote: ↑Sun Apr 24, 2022 4:45 am
And nah, I couldn't use this same logic. If you put in the effort to stop the lowest effort sabotages, I don't really see a problem with it. Cooling, at least something like a reinforced glass so some guy with a crowbar doesn't just bash it open, that feels like adequate safety measures to me.
According to you, he went to great lengths to ensure his projects don't fail. You didn't. If your project results in a button that anyone can easily press to cause some catastrophic disaster, then you aren't putting in enough effort. It is hard to see things like this as anything other than attempts to "accidentally" cause a disaster.jortsandshirts wrote: ↑Tue Apr 26, 2022 11:42 am Brick, god love him will build the most insane experimental theory testing Rube Goldberg machine that is designed to haphazardly contain a singularity he spawned from donk pockets and a rainbow slime. Credit where credit is due they're usually amazing and he does go to great lengths to try and prevent them from failure. I support that.
thehogshotgun wrote:How does having jannies like you, who have more brain tumor than brain benefit the server
It baffles me that you're able to play with this HRP grudge-bearing asshole breathing down your neck. If there's even an ounce of sincerity to the massive post you made at the end of your appeal, I'll never look at this admin the same way again.jortsandshirts wrote: ↑Tue Apr 26, 2022 3:23 pm Maybe Admiral_Horsewank is karma for all the times I took things too seriously and was a doorknob in bwoinks, I'm no saint and I'll never claim to be one. There's plenty of shit I don't know about this game, like the current N2O revelation here. What I do know is that Captain_Crunch130 needs to look his own ass in the mirror when he's acting like this. viewtopic.php?p=638779#p638779
Again, thanks for the support and the benefit of the doubt from those who take pity on my half-wit ass.
Timberpoes wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2023 9:16 pm I highly doubt any other admin on the team would have given you this chance, except maybe Kieth because his brain worms are almost as bad as mine.
Vekter wrote: ↑Tue May 16, 2023 4:45 pm At what point does someone's refusal or failure to improve become malice in and of itself? If you give someone a year to stop shitting on the carpet and they keep doing it but get slightly closer to the bathroom every time and sometimes they get to the toilet before it happens, at what point does it become acceptable to just ask them to go shit in someone else's house?
Timberpoes wrote: ↑Fri Apr 28, 2023 7:00 pm I'm sorry, can we get a real player to resolve this appeal? I don't like this trial player. They can't even set their own name.
sinfulbliss wrote: ↑I almost prefer Rave's AI-generated "We cannot accept this appeal at this time. If you would like assistance appealing in the future, please dial 1-800-1984-1488."
Pandarsenic wrote: ↑Mon Dec 12, 2022 2:25 pm I think we can all agree that someone throwing a reverse revolver at Zyb as a secret test of character, and Zyb immediately fucking himself with it, is the best thing we all could have received for Christmas this year
Well, I would be right now but this is generally when I've found him to be online so.. I ain't. You can't get beaned if you're not online. Yeah I'm sincere about that last post I made there. I'm not looking to change anybody's opinion of their friend or anything, or throw them from the mountaintop. I'm just trying to shine on a light on him being a complete wanker in how he's been going on with me.. If my notes and bans stick then whatever. At least if someone else pipes up down the road who has a similar experience they can say "Well shit, he's done this before" and it'll help them out hopefully.datorangebottle wrote: ↑Tue Apr 26, 2022 4:14 pm
It baffles me that you're able to play with this HRP grudge-bearing asshole breathing down your neck. If there's even an ounce of sincerity to the massive post you made at the end of your appeal, I'll never look at this admin the same way again.
Head Coder of /tg/station, hi!Shaps-cloud wrote: ↑Mon Dec 07, 2020 7:59 am May eventually become one of the illusive maintainer-headmins if they choose to pursue that path, having a coder in the senior admin leadership has usually been positive for both sides in the past.
joooks wrote:Quoting a legend, at least im not a faggot lolNaloac wrote:
In short, this appeal is denied. Suck my nuts retard.
See you in 12 months unless you blacklist me for this
Timberpoes wrote: ↑ I'm going to admin timonk [...]. Fuck it, he's also now my second host vote if goof rejects.
pikeyeskey13 wrote: ↑ ok don't forget to shove it up your ass lmao oops u can delete this one I just wanted to make sure it went through
Agux909 wrote:Woah bravo there sir, post of the month you saved the thread. I feel overwhelmed by the echo of unlimited wisdom and usefulness sprouting from you post. Every Manuel player now feels embarrased to exist because of your much NEEDED wise words, you sure teached'em all, you genius, IQ lord.Timonk wrote:This is why we make fun of Manuel
First get out of your own peanut thread you clown.
That entire part of the appeal is completely unrelated, tacked on for absolutely no reason, and should have been an entirely separate admin complaint.sinfulbliss wrote: ↑Wed Apr 27, 2022 5:01 amFirst get out of your own peanut thread you clown.
Second any murder that wouldn’t have been allowed if you were nonantag counts as a murder as antag - round removal isn’t the marker of what’s considered murderboning. The only exception is if they started the altercation and engaged you first (as well as objectives but that goes without saying).
Third none of this matters because the admin did a very big oopsie in hinting at a player’s private ban history to posture in front of the ghost court, as well as readminning to check antags mid-round (unsure if that’s allowed but a little cringe regardless). I’d be shocked if the ban wasn’t thrown out for conduct alone.
thehogshotgun wrote:How does having jannies like you, who have more brain tumor than brain benefit the server
I agree it’s an entirely separate issue but if an admin does something like that then their judgment as a whole comes into question and it colors the appeal differently now.NoxVS wrote: ↑Wed Apr 27, 2022 5:08 am That entire part of the appeal is completely unrelated, tacked on for absolutely no reason, and should have been an entirely separate admin complaint.
I disagree. I think it is important to provide that information to show the full bredth of their failure as an admin. They outed themselves in the chatlogs in that they thought I was someone who had done them wrong in the past, not in general speaking but they specified they believed me to be someone I was not. I think when you take that information and look at that flashbang 183 day ban you may see things looking a little different.
That's what admin complaints are for. Not ban appeals. The incident you are bringing up appears (according to a brief glance over what you have said) to not have resulted in any kind of note. If it isn't documented, headmins won't be able to know it exists to consider it, and would come to a decision on whether the ban/note was too harsh or not without the incident having any impact on it.jortsandshirts wrote: ↑Wed Apr 27, 2022 5:36 amI disagree. I think it is important to provide that information to show the full bredth of their failure as an admin.
You cannot make an admin complaint for behavior you were noted/banned for. You would still be free to make an admin complaint for the admin's behavior in another round, as long as it didn't result in you being noted or banned that round as well.jortsandshirts wrote: ↑Wed Apr 27, 2022 5:36 am I was informed I would not be able to make an admincomplaint without a prior successful ban appeal.
thehogshotgun wrote:How does having jannies like you, who have more brain tumor than brain benefit the server
I keep using specific terms in reference to his malevolent intent on purpose. That "letting someone off easy" to manipulate them into graciously accepting a punishment under threat of a far more severe outcome is a glaring red flag. Beyond that let's see what happens when you don't act in accordance with his will, even unknowingly.BONERMASTER wrote: ↑Wed Apr 27, 2022 7:01 am Seems to be a reoccurring theme for this guy to wack you with a ridiculously long ban, and then "letting you off easy" by reducing it by a little bit.
I think we may have a live one here, boys.
With abusive regards
-BONERMASTER
I thought you were kidding. viewtopic.php?f=34&t=30138BOBAMA wrote: ↑Wed Apr 27, 2022 5:41 am truly there has never been a more despicable and loathsome creature as the internet moderator. I had something similar happen to me where i got banned for like a month for something i thought i shouldn't have been banned for at all, and when the ban was mercifully reduced to a mere two days i just took it to avoid further confrontation. mister jorts has inspired me to type up 2 page documents to verbally own these vile internet moderators in the future. thank you and god bless.
edit: i now realize it was the same admin, lol
jortsandshirts wrote: ↑Wed Apr 27, 2022 9:11 amI keep using specific terms in reference to his malevolent intent on purpose. That "letting someone off easy" to manipulate them into graciously accepting a punishment under threat of a far more severe outcome is a glaring red flag. Beyond that let's see what happens when you don't act in accordance with his will, even unknowingly.BONERMASTER wrote: ↑Wed Apr 27, 2022 7:01 am Seems to be a reoccurring theme for this guy to wack you with a ridiculously long ban, and then "letting you off easy" by reducing it by a little bit.
I think we may have a live one here, boys.
With abusive regards
-BONERMASTER
SM shard shit: "So going to let you off LIGHTLY, even though I could realistically ban you for a long time. "
Lightly by his standard is fucking insane. He makes sure though to remind you he's actually taking it easy on you but it could be so much worse, he has that power, be grateful.
Flashbangs later: "So you know how I was going easy on you?" *wordlessly applied a fucking SIX MONTH BAN, was I not gracious enough?
Then, you all saw what interaction with him was like the next day. The threats, the bias, all of it. He went from disturbing red flag in adminhelps, to disturbingly overboard banning and then when I dared to appeal the ban I was met with hostility beyond what you would normally even see from the saltiest shitter player in deadchat. Absolutely no fucking attempt to reign himself in when I reminded him thricely that what he was saying was being logged, blatantly expresses his frustration that HE cannot do anything personally due to his involvement, tries to fucking SHAME me with my first ban in an attempt to... impress dchat? Has me pegged as someone I'm not so outs himself as grinding an axe for someone else. The guy admins and deadmins to check on me repeatedly, through multiple rounds my friends. Like, stalking.
Here's some shit from another round. I'm absolutely sure that Brick was not implying that I somehow caused an SM shard to start lighting up. I think he meant it's ironic I was just complaining about it and now the situation is at it is. I sure as shit don't remember doing anything but beyond trying to coordinate the SMs secureness.
Round - 182134 The round right after Admiral_Cockswing had his breakdown.
02:48:57 ADMIN Admiral_awesome130/(Admiral_awesome130) has turned stealth mode ON
Bravo six, going dork.
02:53:39 ADMIN DSAY: Admiral_awesome130/(Stephanie Holmes) "I had a previous encounter with him where he set up three separate supermater shards in the lobby of cargo, in plasma glass 1x1 enclosures. No cooling, but he was assuming that things wouldn't blow up if they got out of hand, like the floor would melt and then vent the gasses." (110, 121, 2) Corporate Showroom
02:53:50 ADMIN DSAY: Admiral_awesome130/(Stephanie Holmes) "Whelp wrong chat" (110, 121, 2) Corporate
Sad.
03:07:05 ADMIN Admiral_awesome130/(Stephanie Holmes) checked the individual player panel for Jortymorty/(Gene Parmesean).
Stop looking at my panel you spazacreep.
03:15:55 ADMIN Admiral_awesome130/(Stephanie Holmes) checked the individual player panel for Jortymorty/(Gene Parmesean).
I can only theorize at this point he's either looking for shit in my notes/bans to justify being a horrible hitler with major psychological issues or he's paranoid his crap notes might get expunged.
Round - 182139
06:57:58 SAY Scriptis/(Brick Mortar) (DEAD) "the AI was complaining about me causing this sort of thing en masse yesterday"
06:58:01 SAY Scriptis/(Brick Mortar) (DEAD) "and now it's caused this" (115, 69, 4) Supermatter Engine
06:58:09 ADMIN DSAY: Admiral_awesome130/(Robusto) "HE FUCKING WHAT" (112, 69, 4) Supermatter Engine
06:58:20 ADMIN DSAY: Admiral_awesome130/(Robusto) "I JUST YELLED AT HIM LIKE TWO WEEKS AGO FOR THAT SHIT" (112, 69, 4) Supermatter Engine
Calm your assumptive ass you dork.
So yeah, I don't see much of a point in logging in with this guy riding my back. Sociopath or something, bad news. That's some predatory malevolent cringe.
I thought you were kidding. viewtopic.php?f=34&t=30138BOBAMA wrote: ↑Wed Apr 27, 2022 5:41 am truly there has never been a more despicable and loathsome creature as the internet moderator. I had something similar happen to me where i got banned for like a month for something i thought i shouldn't have been banned for at all, and when the ban was mercifully reduced to a mere two days i just took it to avoid further confrontation. mister jorts has inspired me to type up 2 page documents to verbally own these vile internet moderators in the future. thank you and god bless.
edit: i now realize it was the same admin, lol
You absolute monster, you released water vapour as a clown. Why that could have hurt someone, you did it on the Disco Inferno shuttle as well. Safety first. Wouldn't want to slip on the shuttle that's literally a flying plasma fire with anime music. A month, he gave you a month for that.
Some more ass conduct from this wizard of suck.
viewtopic.php?f=54&t=30531
23:38:41.908] ADMINPRIVATE: PM: Admiral_awesome130/(Stephanie Holmes)->Sheltton/(Mario Faccoilo): Why do you do a "Super Mario" bit each round?
23:38:59.666] ADMINPRIVATE: PM: Sheltton/(Mario Faccoilo)->Admiral_awesome130/(Stephanie Holmes): Why cant I?
23:39:08.838] ADMINPRIVATE: PM: Sheltton/(Mario Faccoilo)->Admiral_awesome130/(Stephanie Holmes): Its a RP game is it not
23:39:43.625] ADMINPRIVATE: PM: Sheltton/(Mario Faccoilo)->Admiral_awesome130/(Stephanie Holmes): all my characters i play dress up even when am not mario
23:40:47.484] ADMINPRIVATE: PM: Admiral_awesome130/(Stephanie Holmes)->Sheltton/(Mario Faccoilo): Fair enough I suppose.
Why the fuck do you care? Mario is good, Mario is fine. I literally keep my borg static name as YOSH.E because I find Mario to be a delight when he plays. Fuck me what a dork thing to grill somebody about in ahelps.
Bah.
joooks wrote:Quoting a legend, at least im not a faggot lolNaloac wrote:
In short, this appeal is denied. Suck my nuts retard.
See you in 12 months unless you blacklist me for this
Timberpoes wrote: ↑ I'm going to admin timonk [...]. Fuck it, he's also now my second host vote if goof rejects.
pikeyeskey13 wrote: ↑ ok don't forget to shove it up your ass lmao oops u can delete this one I just wanted to make sure it went through
Agux909 wrote:Woah bravo there sir, post of the month you saved the thread. I feel overwhelmed by the echo of unlimited wisdom and usefulness sprouting from you post. Every Manuel player now feels embarrased to exist because of your much NEEDED wise words, you sure teached'em all, you genius, IQ lord.Timonk wrote:This is why we make fun of Manuel
Stop posting in your own appeal thread you absolute cretin. The points have been made. The things have been said. The evidence has been provided. Scrounging up tiny little comments they made in dchat about you and going on about them is now detracting from your case. Along with the whole "I metaphorically greentexted" thing. Quit while you're ahead jesus christ.
This is a peanut thread.jortsandshirts wrote: ↑Wed Apr 27, 2022 1:13 pm This is an appeal thread? My bad. Not a regular forum person sorry.
fat chance.Tearling wrote: ↑Mon Apr 25, 2022 9:53 pm Here is my headmin response prediction:
Mothblocks will be the one to post it.
It'll start off with an explanation of their thoughts, (maybe even a summary of the events if it's especially complex), probably explaining the complexity of the situation or how it's a grey area
Then they will explain that a note for the SM crystals will be sufficient, and that while the banning admin made mistakes, it's clear that intentional or not Jorty's actions did create unnecessary harm to the round. At the end they'll comment on either Jorty's position in the case or Admiral's handling of the case.
I'll try to write it out as so:
If this prediction is accurate I want to be known as the tgstation fortune-teller, and if it is not accurate I wish for you all to forget this post was made.Headmin Prediction Post wrote: It's quite obvious that this situation warranted admin intervention of some kind. Securing incredibly dangerous objects of any kind, especially SM crystals, in an almost public area will obviously cause some kind of disturbance. That being said assuming bad faith on the part of Jortymorty would be unnecessarily harsh, especially given the complexity of the situation.
Therefor we believe that a note is sufficient for the Supermatter Shards.
As for Admiral's handling of this case we believe that while the original ban was a bit harsh we're overall satisfied with how this case was handled.
Did you wait until after they responded to say fat chance to give the illusion that you predicted my prediction would be wrong?MrStonedOne wrote: ↑Fri Apr 29, 2022 11:38 pmfat chance.Tearling wrote: ↑Mon Apr 25, 2022 9:53 pm Here is my headmin response prediction:
Mothblocks will be the one to post it.
It'll start off with an explanation of their thoughts, (maybe even a summary of the events if it's especially complex), probably explaining the complexity of the situation or how it's a grey area
Then they will explain that a note for the SM crystals will be sufficient, and that while the banning admin made mistakes, it's clear that intentional or not Jorty's actions did create unnecessary harm to the round. At the end they'll comment on either Jorty's position in the case or Admiral's handling of the case.
I'll try to write it out as so:
If this prediction is accurate I want to be known as the tgstation fortune-teller, and if it is not accurate I wish for you all to forget this post was made.Headmin Prediction Post wrote: It's quite obvious that this situation warranted admin intervention of some kind. Securing incredibly dangerous objects of any kind, especially SM crystals, in an almost public area will obviously cause some kind of disturbance. That being said assuming bad faith on the part of Jortymorty would be unnecessarily harsh, especially given the complexity of the situation.
Therefor we believe that a note is sufficient for the Supermatter Shards.
As for Admiral's handling of this case we believe that while the original ban was a bit harsh we're overall satisfied with how this case was handled.
Timberpoes wrote: ↑Fri Jan 27, 2023 12:41 am From my perspective, players just want to genuinely be listened to. And I don't mean it condescendingly, but to genuinely have their say and for admins to listen, process it and reply. Even if you don't give two shits about what the player is saying, even if you disagree with every part of what they say, players are less likely to leave an ahelp pissed off if you've listened to them and given a reply that directly addresses what they've told you.
Head Coder of /tg/station, hi!Shaps-cloud wrote: ↑Mon Dec 07, 2020 7:59 am May eventually become one of the illusive maintainer-headmins if they choose to pursue that path, having a coder in the senior admin leadership has usually been positive for both sides in the past.
"fat chance" refers to the part i bolded and underlined.
play opus: echo of starsongSuper Aggro Crag wrote:This is what u get when u let people into your community
I apparently can't read.This investigation lead to the admin being removed for misconduct.
Timberpoes wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2023 9:16 pm I highly doubt any other admin on the team would have given you this chance, except maybe Kieth because his brain worms are almost as bad as mine.
Vekter wrote: ↑Tue May 16, 2023 4:45 pm At what point does someone's refusal or failure to improve become malice in and of itself? If you give someone a year to stop shitting on the carpet and they keep doing it but get slightly closer to the bathroom every time and sometimes they get to the toilet before it happens, at what point does it become acceptable to just ask them to go shit in someone else's house?
Timberpoes wrote: ↑Fri Apr 28, 2023 7:00 pm I'm sorry, can we get a real player to resolve this appeal? I don't like this trial player. They can't even set their own name.
sinfulbliss wrote: ↑I almost prefer Rave's AI-generated "We cannot accept this appeal at this time. If you would like assistance appealing in the future, please dial 1-800-1984-1488."
Pandarsenic wrote: ↑Mon Dec 12, 2022 2:25 pm I think we can all agree that someone throwing a reverse revolver at Zyb as a secret test of character, and Zyb immediately fucking himself with it, is the best thing we all could have received for Christmas this year
Pandarsenic wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 12:29 am Well I think I speak for a lot of the gallery when I say "wow that ended up even worse under the surface than I expected"
Users browsing this forum: britgrenadier1, Timonk