i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
Forum rules
Only Certified™ Players™ may post in here.
If you are not able to post in here, you are not a Certified™ Player™. Play on a mainline /tg/ game server to gain posting powers in this forum. (certified gamers are only calculated once per day)
Only Certified™ Players™ may post in here.
If you are not able to post in here, you are not a Certified™ Player™. Play on a mainline /tg/ game server to gain posting powers in this forum. (certified gamers are only calculated once per day)
- Scriptis
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2021 12:05 am
- Byond Username: Scriptis
i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=33546
if you bring TTVs onto the shuttle without properly securing them and they go off it's your fault
it's like bringing a plasma canister onto the shuttle and saying "it was for eorg!!" when some ban evader opens it
if you bring TTVs onto the shuttle without properly securing them and they go off it's your fault
it's like bringing a plasma canister onto the shuttle and saying "it was for eorg!!" when some ban evader opens it
-
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2018 12:34 pm
- Byond Username: HommandoSA
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
Fair ban, he brought dangerous devices into an area they had no use for other than grief then the inevitable happened.
- massa
- Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2021 6:20 am
- Byond Username: Massa100
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
the only guilty party is the party that detonated the bomb
if you disagree you're a soy
if you disagree you're a soy
- Bawhoppennn
- Github User
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 11:42 pm
- Byond Username: Bawhoppennn
- Github Username: Bawhoppen
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
Oh come on, this is literally classic ss13, not everything is supposed to be bubblewrapped
It is beyond blatant that the person was not being excessively cavalier with not guarding them, or intentionally letting people take them to blow them up
How this is even a ban is beyond me... if it was a repeat offense or they were being totally careless and just leaving them on the floor, sure... but this is not that
It is beyond blatant that the person was not being excessively cavalier with not guarding them, or intentionally letting people take them to blow them up
How this is even a ban is beyond me... if it was a repeat offense or they were being totally careless and just leaving them on the floor, sure... but this is not that
I consider myself a /tg/station historian. If you're interested in the server history at all, feel free to ask me and I'll try and get you an answer! #ConcurForever
<KorMobile> you're a hero
[21:20:53] <%oranges> Baw "has cute legs" hoppen
DEAD: ADMIN(Owegno) says, "Nothing lewd happens in adminbus sadly."
[07:13:57] <Rockdtben> Keep in mind that I'm an extremely successful and wealthy male in his late twenties.
(F) DEAD: Professor DonkPocket says, "Admins preventchaos with good messages"
OOC: Pogoman122: Fun fact if someone trespasses on your kitchen just turn them into a nugget
<+KorPhaeron> russians have no souls so magic enrages them
<+KorPhaeron> people who don't like rng are not from /tg/ and are likely redditors
<KorMobile> you're a hero
[21:20:53] <%oranges> Baw "has cute legs" hoppen
DEAD: ADMIN(Owegno) says, "Nothing lewd happens in adminbus sadly."
[07:13:57] <Rockdtben> Keep in mind that I'm an extremely successful and wealthy male in his late twenties.
(F) DEAD: Professor DonkPocket says, "Admins preventchaos with good messages"
OOC: Pogoman122: Fun fact if someone trespasses on your kitchen just turn them into a nugget
<+KorPhaeron> russians have no souls so magic enrages them
<+KorPhaeron> people who don't like rng are not from /tg/ and are likely redditors
ausops wrote:apart from this there is literally nothing more to say other than that this is the first thread in five years to have achieved something.
- kinnebian
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2021 2:15 pm
- Byond Username: Kinnebian
- Location: answering irelands call
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
i was exploded by this it was a maxcap that killed all of the shuttle spare the warden and some people in the bridge, its not suprising someone got punished for this because it was manuel
respect (let him do his thing)
- Scriptis
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2021 12:05 am
- Byond Username: Scriptis
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
upon closer inspection i can safely confirm that bawhoppennn is right
a fuckin' durand busted this shit open. you can't deal with that as a poor science man
a fuckin' durand busted this shit open. you can't deal with that as a poor science man
- Scriptis
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2021 12:05 am
- Byond Username: Scriptis
- kinnebian
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2021 2:15 pm
- Byond Username: Kinnebian
- Location: answering irelands call
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
isnt this a twist- this is what i get for posting on forums as soon as i wake up
respect (let him do his thing)
- AlamoTurtle
- Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2021 3:05 pm
- Byond Username: Alamo Turtle
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
These kind of bans are the ones that really give me mixed feelings.
On one hand, the poor bastard brought bombs onto a shuttle for EORG, and you're accountable for any absolutely ridiculous EORG garbage you drag onto shuttle. Keeping them tucked away in a bag of holding or simply having all the plasma tanks detached and in a duffel bag you wear would be a safer bet, albeit tedious. I'd be pissed if some nonantag thought it was a genius play to load the shuttle up with nukes just for the risk and fun, because of course they would, then lo and behold, they go off and get away with it?
However, it was clearly not intended to be grief or to bait people. They took the effort to keep it away from the rest of the crew, and what can you do if some nosey fuckmech decides to bash down your locker and the rest of the vultures pry your bombs apart and send the signal like an idiot? Is it really on you at that point? Intent is a huge manner of this game, and that's why these bans are just sad in the end. Someone needs to get punished for being a prick, but the person just trying to spice things up is the one who gets it. It leads to a more reclusive playstyle where you do take all manners of caution and kill a lot of the fun in fear of admin retaliation. Sometimes it's deserved, but at times like these, nah.
It reminds me of an admin event that was ruined by a player rushing in and immediately opening a crate with no lock or protection aside from an ERT which lacked HAUL gloves. Of course, the event was ruined and the person who opened it was hit with a ban. How does that apply here? Why is the owner of the explosives held accountable for taking the effort to prevent trouble from occurring instead of the nosey players who JUST ABSOLUTELY NEEDED to break the locker open to satisfy their curiosity? At the end of the day, it's a pretty lenient two days for wiping an entire shuttle, but it supports a set precedent, and it's one that leads our community to be a lot more passive in their pursuit of exploring stuff.
TL;DR: shit happens, give kudos to someone wanting to make things interesting, they're not the greyshits that need the ban, I need to get sleep.
On one hand, the poor bastard brought bombs onto a shuttle for EORG, and you're accountable for any absolutely ridiculous EORG garbage you drag onto shuttle. Keeping them tucked away in a bag of holding or simply having all the plasma tanks detached and in a duffel bag you wear would be a safer bet, albeit tedious. I'd be pissed if some nonantag thought it was a genius play to load the shuttle up with nukes just for the risk and fun, because of course they would, then lo and behold, they go off and get away with it?
However, it was clearly not intended to be grief or to bait people. They took the effort to keep it away from the rest of the crew, and what can you do if some nosey fuckmech decides to bash down your locker and the rest of the vultures pry your bombs apart and send the signal like an idiot? Is it really on you at that point? Intent is a huge manner of this game, and that's why these bans are just sad in the end. Someone needs to get punished for being a prick, but the person just trying to spice things up is the one who gets it. It leads to a more reclusive playstyle where you do take all manners of caution and kill a lot of the fun in fear of admin retaliation. Sometimes it's deserved, but at times like these, nah.
It reminds me of an admin event that was ruined by a player rushing in and immediately opening a crate with no lock or protection aside from an ERT which lacked HAUL gloves. Of course, the event was ruined and the person who opened it was hit with a ban. How does that apply here? Why is the owner of the explosives held accountable for taking the effort to prevent trouble from occurring instead of the nosey players who JUST ABSOLUTELY NEEDED to break the locker open to satisfy their curiosity? At the end of the day, it's a pretty lenient two days for wiping an entire shuttle, but it supports a set precedent, and it's one that leads our community to be a lot more passive in their pursuit of exploring stuff.
TL;DR: shit happens, give kudos to someone wanting to make things interesting, they're not the greyshits that need the ban, I need to get sleep.
-
- Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2019 1:30 am
- Byond Username: Cybersaber101
- Location: Canada, eh?
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
bring bombs on shuttle
they explode
NOT MY FAULT!!!!!!
they explode
NOT MY FAULT!!!!!!
The same poster, over and over and over and over and over and-
- Not-Dorsidarf
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 4:14 pm
- Byond Username: Dorsidwarf
- Location: We're all going on an, admin holiday
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
I'm fine with this as long as the mech pilot griffer who smashed the locker open and the people who disassembled and signalled all got a shared piece of the ban pie.
kieth4 wrote: infrequently shitting yourself is fine imo
There is a lot of very bizarre nonsense being talked on this forum. I shall now remain silent and logoff until my points are vindicated.
Player who complainted over being killed for looting cap office wrote: ↑Sun Jul 30, 2023 1:33 am Hey there, I'm Virescent, the super evil person who made the stupid appeal and didn't think it through enough. Just came here to say: screech, retards. Screech and writhe like the worms you are. Your pathetic little cries will keep echoing around for a while before quietting down. There is one great outcome from this: I rised up the blood pressure of some of you shitheads and lowered your lifespan. I'm honestly tempted to do this more often just to see you screech and writhe more, but that wouldn't be cool of me. So come on haters, show me some more of your high blood pressure please.
- Timberpoes
- In-Game Head Admin
- Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2020 4:54 pm
- Byond Username: Timberpoes
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
I think in terms of "the thread of responsibility".
When you set up a dangerous or risky scenario, you are responsible for your own actions. There's always a strong thread of responsibility binding you to direct consequences of actions you directly caused or carried out.
You are somewhat responsible for the obvious or reasonably foreseeable actions of other players when you set up a dangerous or risky scenario. There's a frayed thread of responsibility for you setting up the scenario. Thinner, weaker.
And for anything not obvious or not reasonably foreseeable, you really shouldn't be held responsible for outcomes that are unreasonable or outcomes where other people break the rules. Their actions sever your thread of responsibility entirely.
The ban clearly accepted there was a frayed thread of responsibility, quote: "While the blame doesn't entirely lay on you here you still created this extremely dangerous situation by bringing TTVs onto the shuttle. Alot of folks died but Ill reduce the ban to two days due to the circumstances."
My own personal feelings are that the thread was probably severed at the point a 3rd party detatched the signaller from the first TTV and pinged it to explode the second, propped up a little by how powerless Mazur was to contest this course of action (excepting that Mazur set up the conditions for it to happen in the first place). I would usually classify this as an SS13 moment where I drop some verbal warning wisdom bombs to the involved parties and send them on their way.
Despite that, I still think Coco's approach is a totally valid interpretation. It's just a little on the heckin' harsh side of holding Player A accountable for the independent actions of Player B for me.
So I put forward some open questions for discussion:
Should such a player be genuinely punished when they are incapacitated in some way, the locker is smashed into with a mech, a player dismantles one of the two bombs and then pings the signaller on it to activate the second bomb through accident, stupidity or incompetence (from my very brief investigation)?
If you think yes, should the player always be responsible for the consequences of bringing a TTV onto the shuttle regardless of how foreseeable their actions were or whether other players broke the rules in the process of exploding it? Or is there some point you would consider that thread severed?
If you think no, at what point was the thread of responsibility severed and the player no longer responsible for what happened with the TTV they brought onto the shuttle?
When you set up a dangerous or risky scenario, you are responsible for your own actions. There's always a strong thread of responsibility binding you to direct consequences of actions you directly caused or carried out.
You are somewhat responsible for the obvious or reasonably foreseeable actions of other players when you set up a dangerous or risky scenario. There's a frayed thread of responsibility for you setting up the scenario. Thinner, weaker.
And for anything not obvious or not reasonably foreseeable, you really shouldn't be held responsible for outcomes that are unreasonable or outcomes where other people break the rules. Their actions sever your thread of responsibility entirely.
The ban clearly accepted there was a frayed thread of responsibility, quote: "While the blame doesn't entirely lay on you here you still created this extremely dangerous situation by bringing TTVs onto the shuttle. Alot of folks died but Ill reduce the ban to two days due to the circumstances."
My own personal feelings are that the thread was probably severed at the point a 3rd party detatched the signaller from the first TTV and pinged it to explode the second, propped up a little by how powerless Mazur was to contest this course of action (excepting that Mazur set up the conditions for it to happen in the first place). I would usually classify this as an SS13 moment where I drop some verbal warning wisdom bombs to the involved parties and send them on their way.
Despite that, I still think Coco's approach is a totally valid interpretation. It's just a little on the heckin' harsh side of holding Player A accountable for the independent actions of Player B for me.
So I put forward some open questions for discussion:
Should such a player be genuinely punished when they are incapacitated in some way, the locker is smashed into with a mech, a player dismantles one of the two bombs and then pings the signaller on it to activate the second bomb through accident, stupidity or incompetence (from my very brief investigation)?
If you think yes, should the player always be responsible for the consequences of bringing a TTV onto the shuttle regardless of how foreseeable their actions were or whether other players broke the rules in the process of exploding it? Or is there some point you would consider that thread severed?
If you think no, at what point was the thread of responsibility severed and the player no longer responsible for what happened with the TTV they brought onto the shuttle?
/tg/station Codebase Maintainer
/tg/station Game Master/Discord Jannie: Feed me back in my thread.
/tg/station Admin Trainer: Service guarantees citizenship. Would you like to know more?
Feb 2022-Sep 2022 Host Vote Headmin
Mar 2023-Sep 2023 Admin Vote Headmin
Sep 2024 Player and Admin Vote Headmin
/tg/station Game Master/Discord Jannie: Feed me back in my thread.
/tg/station Admin Trainer: Service guarantees citizenship. Would you like to know more?
Feb 2022-Sep 2022 Host Vote Headmin
Mar 2023-Sep 2023 Admin Vote Headmin
Sep 2024 Player and Admin Vote Headmin
- CMDR_Gungnir
- Joined: Tue May 04, 2021 11:11 am
- Byond Username: CMDR Gungnir
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
I'm torn on this.
On the one hand, I think people who do this for EORG are kinda lame. You're denying everyone else a chance to have any fun in the EORG. But at the same time, setting off Big Bomb is also very fun. (This point is largely moot in the grand scheme of things, but the schadenfreude's worth talking about as a spectator)
On the other hand...as everyone else has said, he did put in a solid effort to keep things safe and contained.
If he'd just walked onto the shuttle with the bombs in his hands, I'd probably say the ban was the right thing, but in a welded locker? Sounds like the Greyshits were the problems.
I do assume, however, that the one who actually set the bomb off got banned, too. It'd be fucking insane if they weren't, and I trust our admin team not to make that mistake.
Edit:
On the one hand, I think people who do this for EORG are kinda lame. You're denying everyone else a chance to have any fun in the EORG. But at the same time, setting off Big Bomb is also very fun. (This point is largely moot in the grand scheme of things, but the schadenfreude's worth talking about as a spectator)
On the other hand...as everyone else has said, he did put in a solid effort to keep things safe and contained.
If he'd just walked onto the shuttle with the bombs in his hands, I'd probably say the ban was the right thing, but in a welded locker? Sounds like the Greyshits were the problems.
I do assume, however, that the one who actually set the bomb off got banned, too. It'd be fucking insane if they weren't, and I trust our admin team not to make that mistake.
Edit:
I'm personally of the opinion that nobody can reasonably plan for a Mech deciding that it HAS to know what's inside a locker. If he'd just placed the signaler on a table or something, then that's rather obvious. But nobody could plan for a Mech breaking into it, nobody could STOP that from happening, and nobody could ever plan for someone deciding to disassemble one and, for reasons known only to god, signal said signaler.Timberpoes wrote: ↑Thu Mar 09, 2023 11:52 am And for anything not obvious or not reasonably foreseeable, you really shouldn't be held responsible for outcomes that are unreasonable or outcomes where other people break the rules. Their actions sever your thread of responsibility entirely.
- iwishforducks
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:48 pm
- Byond Username: Iwishforducks
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
times like these i wish we had public bans so i could gauge my feelings. 90% of my opinion is based on what the punishment was for the other players.
two days isnt that long in the grand scheme of things and i would also be inclined to tell players to be careful about what they bring onto the shuttle
on the other hand… they were stunned and had a mech break open their locker. what the fuck were they supposed to do about that? but at the same time… dragging a welded locker onto a shuttle as a scientist(?) is sorta a “act like an antag, get treated like an antag” moment. but that doesn’t excuse the fact that the other players motherfucking EXPLODED the bombs.
is a plasmaman responsible for when someone stuns and strips them, causing them to light ablaze themselves and all that dare step around them? the obvious answer is no. but why? well the intent of a plasmaman is not to light everyone ablaze. but a bomb has one purpose: EXPLODE. and so when you bring an item’s that soul intent is to explode onto the shuttle, well… can you really act that surprised?
conclusion: note them. tell them not to bring bombs onto the shuttle again. let them know it was really, really funny but that if they bring bombs that ultimately explode onto the shuttle before EORG then only god can protect them from admin punishment. 2 days is whatever. i dont think its necessary to ban for 2 days (it doesnt achieve much) but it’s also totally valid to do so.
two days isnt that long in the grand scheme of things and i would also be inclined to tell players to be careful about what they bring onto the shuttle
on the other hand… they were stunned and had a mech break open their locker. what the fuck were they supposed to do about that? but at the same time… dragging a welded locker onto a shuttle as a scientist(?) is sorta a “act like an antag, get treated like an antag” moment. but that doesn’t excuse the fact that the other players motherfucking EXPLODED the bombs.
is a plasmaman responsible for when someone stuns and strips them, causing them to light ablaze themselves and all that dare step around them? the obvious answer is no. but why? well the intent of a plasmaman is not to light everyone ablaze. but a bomb has one purpose: EXPLODE. and so when you bring an item’s that soul intent is to explode onto the shuttle, well… can you really act that surprised?
conclusion: note them. tell them not to bring bombs onto the shuttle again. let them know it was really, really funny but that if they bring bombs that ultimately explode onto the shuttle before EORG then only god can protect them from admin punishment. 2 days is whatever. i dont think its necessary to ban for 2 days (it doesnt achieve much) but it’s also totally valid to do so.
im gay (and also play the moth “bugger”)
- kieth4
- Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2020 6:17 pm
- Byond Username: Kieth4
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
I've got a simple and quick view. The bombs were secured, it's not his fault. An unrelated shitter broke the locker took apart the bomb and then blew it up. What was he meant to do? Kill the gygax?
-
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2022 3:18 pm
- Byond Username: AccountName5
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
Simply not bring TTVs to the shuttle simply for EORG. If someone wants to do something involving TTVs, there better be a good fucking reason other than "I want to grief".
It is his fault simply because EORG is the only reason why he brought the TTVs. Fail RP and cringe. People that prepare for EORG and do it wrong deserves whatever happens next. Fuck you NRPers. You don't deserve the "classic SS13" protection if you don't attempt to have any RP reason on bringing the TTVs.
It is his fault simply because EORG is the only reason why he brought the TTVs. Fail RP and cringe. People that prepare for EORG and do it wrong deserves whatever happens next. Fuck you NRPers. You don't deserve the "classic SS13" protection if you don't attempt to have any RP reason on bringing the TTVs.
- Ziiro
- Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2018 5:12 pm
- Byond Username: Ziiro
- Github Username: Ziiro
- Location: Robotics
- Contact:
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
Yeah, basically.Turbonerd wrote: ↑Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:38 pm Simply not bring TTVs to the shuttle simply for EORG. If someone wants to do something involving TTVs, there better be a good fucking reason other than "I want to grief".
It is his fault simply because EORG is the only reason why he brought the TTVs. Fail RP and cringe. People that prepare for EORG and do it wrong deserves whatever happens next. Fuck you NRPers. You don't deserve the "classic SS13" protection if you don't attempt to have any RP reason on bringing the TTVs.
Like he did his due diligence on trying to make sure this didn't happen, and it still happened. Too bad. You took the risks, eat shit.
I do think the gygax pilot should actually share the punishment though.
- rasonj
- Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2023 12:11 am
- Byond Username: Rasonj
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
Intent matters, it was obvious the intent of the bomb maker was to keep them secured and use them after the round. The intent I can't figure out is what possible intent did the signal clicker have? I cannot think of a reason to take a signaller off of a ttv and then activate it other than you are hoping to trigger the other bomb.
-
- Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2021 11:08 pm
- Byond Username: MooCow12
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
We do have an ic reason to bring ttvs onto the shuttle to centcomm though. The entire station is dedicated to plasma research and substances that are partially made of plasma (Super matter also requires plasma to be made)
One of the things being researched is the explosive capability of bombs made using plasma and substances made by plasma (trit)
So wouldnt it make sense to take a sample with you to hopefully be set for life because of the sheer $ value of a decent ttv? (Although probably in separate pieces / tanks)
Speaking of preventing it from exploding before eorg..why not just detatch one of the tanks and put it in your backpack, its only a single mouseclick to put it back on and if someone tries to take it off you itl atleast take a moment to get it before they can activate the ttv, delaying the boom quite a bit.
One of the things being researched is the explosive capability of bombs made using plasma and substances made by plasma (trit)
So wouldnt it make sense to take a sample with you to hopefully be set for life because of the sheer $ value of a decent ttv? (Although probably in separate pieces / tanks)
Speaking of preventing it from exploding before eorg..why not just detatch one of the tanks and put it in your backpack, its only a single mouseclick to put it back on and if someone tries to take it off you itl atleast take a moment to get it before they can activate the ttv, delaying the boom quite a bit.
List of my favorite TG Staff.
Spoiler:
-
- Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2021 5:43 pm
- Byond Username: Sheltton
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
I really dont understand why you guys are so mald at someone who gets pwned by a mech and gets his bombs stolen then triggered. Not only is it not his fault to begin with its only 2 mins out of the 30-60min round to miss out that is spent the next round waiting room.Turbonerd wrote: ↑Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:38 pm Simply not bring TTVs to the shuttle simply for EORG. If someone wants to do something involving TTVs, there better be a good fucking reason other than "I want to grief".
It is his fault simply because EORG is the only reason why he brought the TTVs. Fail RP and cringe. People that prepare for EORG and do it wrong deserves whatever happens next. Fuck you NRPers. You don't deserve the "classic SS13" protection if you don't attempt to have any RP reason on bringing the TTVs.
But my take here is that it should just be a note at most, dude got owned by a mech which he can't do anything about. He had no intention of blowing up the bombs early and it wanst even him who did it. The punishment is not preventing any behavior because the player wans't going to blow up the bombs early to begin with. Also I really don't care if someone misses out on 2 mins of a round that is spent afk on a shuttle
- conrad
- Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2023 11:57 am
- Byond Username: Conrad Thunderbunch
- Location: Set free
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
It's a two day ban for unintentional griefing as a non-antag. If you bring a maxcap to the escape shuttle and it goes off, it's your ass.
Coco's interpretation of "There was no ill intention, so two day ban" is perfectly valid. If it was intentional, self-antaging behaviour, a longer ban would be expected.
You people need to learn that a ban, unless it's a permaban, is not placed to prevent griefing over the banning period, but to disencourage shitty, dumb, or shitty dumb behaviour.
Coco's interpretation of "There was no ill intention, so two day ban" is perfectly valid. If it was intentional, self-antaging behaviour, a longer ban would be expected.
You people need to learn that a ban, unless it's a permaban, is not placed to prevent griefing over the banning period, but to disencourage shitty, dumb, or shitty dumb behaviour.
I play the old man Ricky Paxton, and sometimes the borg Z.E.E.P.
Tell me how'd I do here. ⋆ 𝒯𝒶𝓀𝒾𝓃𝑔 𝒶 𝓈𝒶𝒷𝒶𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓁. ⋆
And now a word from our sponsors:
Tell me how'd I do here. ⋆ 𝒯𝒶𝓀𝒾𝓃𝑔 𝒶 𝓈𝒶𝒷𝒶𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓁. ⋆
And now a word from our sponsors:
Armhulen wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 11:08 pmThe Spessmen Times wrote:Prohibition agent Sam Salamander bragged that he could find a metacord in any server in under 30 minutes. In Bagil it took him 21 minutes. In Sybil 17 minutes, and Manuel just 11 minutes. But Terry set the record of 35 seconds. Sam asked an assistant on the arrivals shuttle where to get a discord invite, and the assistant linked him one.
RedBaronFlyer wrote: ↑Wed Feb 14, 2024 3:52 pmIt would somehow manage to pick Birdshot Station for headmin if we did that
- Cobby
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:19 pm
- Byond Username: ExcessiveUseOfCobby
- Github Username: ExcessiveUseOfCobblestone
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
How many times do we have to deal with this same flavor of this scenario before people start getting the point to not setup prebuilt no fun allowed setups to btfo peeps for 5 seconds when the alternative is not being allowed to play at all for days.
End of Round is a sacred place for mischief making, up until that text though you abide as if you dont get to kill everyone in 30 seconds or pray you’ve hidden it well enough it wasn’t obvious until the text shows up.
End of Round is a sacred place for mischief making, up until that text though you abide as if you dont get to kill everyone in 30 seconds or pray you’ve hidden it well enough it wasn’t obvious until the text shows up.
Voted best trap in /tg/ 2014-current
- ekaterina
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2022 7:40 am
- Byond Username: Ekaterina von Russland
- Location: Science Maintenance
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
This. While he should've secured his bombs better, he is not at fault. He should've been warned, gotten a note at most.
Even one second of unfair ban is too long.iwishforducks wrote: ↑Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:01 pm two days isnt that long in the grand scheme of things
I have a confirmed grand total of 1 merged PR. That basically means I'm a c*der now.
sinfulbliss wrote: ↑Wed May 24, 2023 2:03 am Marina is actually a very high quality roleplayer, believe it or not, and a pretty fun and good-faith player in my experience.
Jacquerel wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2024 6:31 pmmight be more true to say they redirect the dogpile most of the time tbqh, like diving heroically onto a grenadekinnebian wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2024 6:13 pm ekaterina stops threads from becoming dogpiles (...) they just point out logical things to bring up in context of a ban and people get mad at them because they refuse to discuss it
when everyone goes into peanuts already set on what their opinion is ekat's posts are a breath of fresh air
MrStonedOne wrote: ↑ Im gonna have to quote Ekaterina at you because they ended up saying this better than i would have
Timberpoes wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2024 8:50 am No deviations allowed. All must know the meta. All must power the game.
BeeSting12 wrote: ↑ Kieth4 nonoptimal ranked play nearly results in team loss, facing disciplinary action
- iwishforducks
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:48 pm
- Byond Username: Iwishforducks
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
https://wiki.teamfortress.com/w/images/ ... eted10.wavekaterina wrote: ↑Thu Mar 09, 2023 8:18 pmEven one second of unfair ban is too long.iwishforducks wrote: ↑Thu Mar 09, 2023 1:01 pm two days isnt that long in the grand scheme of things
im gay (and also play the moth “bugger”)
- oranges
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
- Byond Username: Optimumtact
- Github Username: optimumtact
- Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
ekaterina takes another L
- saprasam
- Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2018 11:42 pm
- Byond Username: Saprasam
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
this ban is fair. i dont get why people are saying the gygax is in the wrong here though. when you see a welded locker while you aren't supposed to care, it's also a gnawing feeling that there could be something malicious in there. of which. there were bombs.
- Misdoubtful
- In-Game Game Master
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2020 7:03 pm
- Byond Username: Misdoubtful
- Location: Delivering hugs!
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
Another ban appeal to add to the tally where communication full stops with a 'I want headmin' rather than this dude taking the time to bring up relevant things in their own appeal.
Smh.
Also anyone ever notice that if you bring a welded locker onto the shuttle people will 99% of the time try and open it?
Smh.
Also anyone ever notice that if you bring a welded locker onto the shuttle people will 99% of the time try and open it?
Hugs
- Capsandi
- Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2019 10:59 pm
- Byond Username: Capsandi
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
I have no clue how ppl can spend half the round stuck in toxins making eorg bombs considering theres probably going to be an admin who logs on 3 minutes before round end who maxcaps the shuttle using admin verbs anyways.
Lower your tone with me if your tracked play time doesn't look like this:Timonk wrote:You have clearly never seen his dickWesoda25 wrote:Genuinely think they should be blacklisted.
Flatulent wrote:of course you can change religion doing it while islamic however makes you lose your head from happiness
- iwishforducks
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:48 pm
- Byond Username: Iwishforducks
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
act like an antag...saprasam wrote: ↑Thu Mar 09, 2023 10:34 pm this ban is fair. i dont get why people are saying the gygax is in the wrong here though. when you see a welded locker while you aren't supposed to care, it's also a gnawing feeling that there could be something malicious in there. of which. there were bombs.
im gay (and also play the moth “bugger”)
- CPTANT
- Joined: Mon May 04, 2015 1:31 pm
- Byond Username: CPTANT
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
Are we now shitting on people for NOT writing 5 page essays on why they need to be unbanned?Misdoubtful wrote: ↑Thu Mar 09, 2023 10:50 pm Another ban appeal to add to the tally where communication full stops with a 'I want headmin' rather than this dude taking the time to bring up relevant things in their own appeal.
Smh.
Timberpoes wrote: ↑Tue Feb 14, 2023 3:21 pm The rules exist to create the biggest possible chance of a cool shift of SS13. They don't exist to allow admins to create the most boring interpretation of SS13.
- conrad
- Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2023 11:57 am
- Byond Username: Conrad Thunderbunch
- Location: Set free
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
Every time I see someone with the headspace of absolute extremes, I feel pain and distress.CPTANT wrote: ↑Thu Mar 09, 2023 11:35 pmAre we now shitting on people for NOT writing 5 page essays on why they need to be unbanned?Misdoubtful wrote: ↑Thu Mar 09, 2023 10:50 pm Another ban appeal to add to the tally where communication full stops with a 'I want headmin' rather than this dude taking the time to bring up relevant things in their own appeal.
Smh.
There's a middle ground between a chimp grunting and a professor essaying over their space gas game ban.
I play the old man Ricky Paxton, and sometimes the borg Z.E.E.P.
Tell me how'd I do here. ⋆ 𝒯𝒶𝓀𝒾𝓃𝑔 𝒶 𝓈𝒶𝒷𝒶𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓁. ⋆
And now a word from our sponsors:
Tell me how'd I do here. ⋆ 𝒯𝒶𝓀𝒾𝓃𝑔 𝒶 𝓈𝒶𝒷𝒶𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓁. ⋆
And now a word from our sponsors:
Armhulen wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 11:08 pmThe Spessmen Times wrote:Prohibition agent Sam Salamander bragged that he could find a metacord in any server in under 30 minutes. In Bagil it took him 21 minutes. In Sybil 17 minutes, and Manuel just 11 minutes. But Terry set the record of 35 seconds. Sam asked an assistant on the arrivals shuttle where to get a discord invite, and the assistant linked him one.
RedBaronFlyer wrote: ↑Wed Feb 14, 2024 3:52 pmIt would somehow manage to pick Birdshot Station for headmin if we did that
- Misdoubtful
- In-Game Game Master
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2020 7:03 pm
- Byond Username: Misdoubtful
- Location: Delivering hugs!
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
conrad wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2023 12:11 amEvery time I see someone with the headspace of absolute extremes, I feel pain and distress.CPTANT wrote: ↑Thu Mar 09, 2023 11:35 pmAre we now shitting on people for NOT writing 5 page essays on why they need to be unbanned?Misdoubtful wrote: ↑Thu Mar 09, 2023 10:50 pm Another ban appeal to add to the tally where communication full stops with a 'I want headmin' rather than this dude taking the time to bring up relevant things in their own appeal.
Smh.
There's a middle ground between a chimp grunting and a professor essaying over their space gas game ban.
Hugs
- Bawhoppennn
- Github User
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 11:42 pm
- Byond Username: Bawhoppennn
- Github Username: Bawhoppen
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
this is the internet middlegrounds aren't real
I consider myself a /tg/station historian. If you're interested in the server history at all, feel free to ask me and I'll try and get you an answer! #ConcurForever
<KorMobile> you're a hero
[21:20:53] <%oranges> Baw "has cute legs" hoppen
DEAD: ADMIN(Owegno) says, "Nothing lewd happens in adminbus sadly."
[07:13:57] <Rockdtben> Keep in mind that I'm an extremely successful and wealthy male in his late twenties.
(F) DEAD: Professor DonkPocket says, "Admins preventchaos with good messages"
OOC: Pogoman122: Fun fact if someone trespasses on your kitchen just turn them into a nugget
<+KorPhaeron> russians have no souls so magic enrages them
<+KorPhaeron> people who don't like rng are not from /tg/ and are likely redditors
<KorMobile> you're a hero
[21:20:53] <%oranges> Baw "has cute legs" hoppen
DEAD: ADMIN(Owegno) says, "Nothing lewd happens in adminbus sadly."
[07:13:57] <Rockdtben> Keep in mind that I'm an extremely successful and wealthy male in his late twenties.
(F) DEAD: Professor DonkPocket says, "Admins preventchaos with good messages"
OOC: Pogoman122: Fun fact if someone trespasses on your kitchen just turn them into a nugget
<+KorPhaeron> russians have no souls so magic enrages them
<+KorPhaeron> people who don't like rng are not from /tg/ and are likely redditors
ausops wrote:apart from this there is literally nothing more to say other than that this is the first thread in five years to have achieved something.
- BeeSting12
- Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2016 1:11 am
- Byond Username: BeeSting12
- Github Username: BeeSting12
- Location: 'Murica
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
Agree with saprasam. If someone brings a welded locker onto the shuttle then it's reasonable to wonder what's in it. Especially if it's a scientist or chemist. Presumably, the mech pilot/roboticist would know that they were working toxins, making it even more suspicious. The player set up a situation where it was likely that a bomb would go off in a crowded area, and they had no legitimate IC reason to do so. The player who signalled the remote signaller is also somewhat at fault here. It's common sense not to signal something that just came off a bomb. I'd say that person shared 50-50 blame with the guy who brought bombs for EORG, and I'd hope he received a ban as well.
Also, it's not a matter of writing a 5 page essay to defend your actions. The appealer has shown he doesn't want to discuss it with the banning admin, he just wants to waste headmin time with an obviously correct ban. Requesting headmin review is such a no-brainer because you have nothing to lose besides your reputation of not being a crybaby. When you clearly cause grief to this many people then the onus is on you to bring up evidence and policy to support your unban and note removal.
Also, it's not a matter of writing a 5 page essay to defend your actions. The appealer has shown he doesn't want to discuss it with the banning admin, he just wants to waste headmin time with an obviously correct ban. Requesting headmin review is such a no-brainer because you have nothing to lose besides your reputation of not being a crybaby. When you clearly cause grief to this many people then the onus is on you to bring up evidence and policy to support your unban and note removal.
- Fren256
- Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2023 10:10 pm
- Byond Username: Fren256
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
This happened in LRP so I doubt they care about the lore at all. Doesn't sound like a bad reasoning for MRP tho.MooCow12 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 09, 2023 5:16 pm We do have an ic reason to bring ttvs onto the shuttle to centcomm though. The entire station is dedicated to plasma research and substances that are partially made of plasma (Super matter also requires plasma to be made)
One of the things being researched is the explosive capability of bombs made using plasma and substances made by plasma (trit)
So wouldnt it make sense to take a sample with you to hopefully be set for life because of the sheer $ value of a decent ttv? (Although probably in separate pieces / tanks)
-
- Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2021 2:08 pm
- Byond Username: Exymian
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
Misdoubtful wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2023 1:19 amconrad wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2023 12:11 amEvery time I see someone with the headspace of absolute extremes, I feel pain and distress.CPTANT wrote: ↑Thu Mar 09, 2023 11:35 pmAre we now shitting on people for NOT writing 5 page essays on why they need to be unbanned?Misdoubtful wrote: ↑Thu Mar 09, 2023 10:50 pm Another ban appeal to add to the tally where communication full stops with a 'I want headmin' rather than this dude taking the time to bring up relevant things in their own appeal.
Smh.
There's a middle ground between a chimp grunting and a professor essaying over their space gas game ban.
Yes because arguing with the admin that banned you is pointless. You could have argued about it in the ahelps and if the admin was not that sure to ban the person then he wouldnt have banned the player.
I can't even believe that some are justifying this ban on an LRP server in a videogame. Grow up
- ekaterina
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2022 7:40 am
- Byond Username: Ekaterina von Russland
- Location: Science Maintenance
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
Absolutely. Notice how many MRP players are agreeing with this ban even though it took place on LRP. If we wanted their shitty standards, we'd play MRP instead of LRP. Almost like they don't get LRP culture.exymian wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2023 8:33 am Yes because arguing with the admin that banned you is pointless. You could have argued about it in the ahelps and if the admin was not that sure to ban the person then he wouldnt have banned the player.
I can't even believe that some are justifying this ban on an LRP server in a videogame. Grow up
I have a confirmed grand total of 1 merged PR. That basically means I'm a c*der now.
sinfulbliss wrote: ↑Wed May 24, 2023 2:03 am Marina is actually a very high quality roleplayer, believe it or not, and a pretty fun and good-faith player in my experience.
Jacquerel wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2024 6:31 pmmight be more true to say they redirect the dogpile most of the time tbqh, like diving heroically onto a grenadekinnebian wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2024 6:13 pm ekaterina stops threads from becoming dogpiles (...) they just point out logical things to bring up in context of a ban and people get mad at them because they refuse to discuss it
when everyone goes into peanuts already set on what their opinion is ekat's posts are a breath of fresh air
MrStonedOne wrote: ↑ Im gonna have to quote Ekaterina at you because they ended up saying this better than i would have
Timberpoes wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2024 8:50 am No deviations allowed. All must know the meta. All must power the game.
BeeSting12 wrote: ↑ Kieth4 nonoptimal ranked play nearly results in team loss, facing disciplinary action
- Not-Dorsidarf
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 4:14 pm
- Byond Username: Dorsidwarf
- Location: We're all going on an, admin holiday
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
you ever wonder if ekaterina is aware that they lowkey sabotage every side that they agree with by making everything a culture war
kieth4 wrote: infrequently shitting yourself is fine imo
There is a lot of very bizarre nonsense being talked on this forum. I shall now remain silent and logoff until my points are vindicated.
Player who complainted over being killed for looting cap office wrote: ↑Sun Jul 30, 2023 1:33 am Hey there, I'm Virescent, the super evil person who made the stupid appeal and didn't think it through enough. Just came here to say: screech, retards. Screech and writhe like the worms you are. Your pathetic little cries will keep echoing around for a while before quietting down. There is one great outcome from this: I rised up the blood pressure of some of you shitheads and lowered your lifespan. I'm honestly tempted to do this more often just to see you screech and writhe more, but that wouldn't be cool of me. So come on haters, show me some more of your high blood pressure please.
- Misdoubtful
- In-Game Game Master
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2020 7:03 pm
- Byond Username: Misdoubtful
- Location: Delivering hugs!
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
You do realize that it takes effort to convince people that a ban is placed wrongly, yes?exymian wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2023 8:33 amMisdoubtful wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2023 1:19 amconrad wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2023 12:11 amEvery time I see someone with the headspace of absolute extremes, I feel pain and distress.CPTANT wrote: ↑Thu Mar 09, 2023 11:35 pmAre we now shitting on people for NOT writing 5 page essays on why they need to be unbanned?Misdoubtful wrote: ↑Thu Mar 09, 2023 10:50 pm Another ban appeal to add to the tally where communication full stops with a 'I want headmin' rather than this dude taking the time to bring up relevant things in their own appeal.
Smh.
There's a middle ground between a chimp grunting and a professor essaying over their space gas game ban.
Yes because arguing with the admin that banned you is pointless. You could have argued about it in the ahelps and if the admin was not that sure to ban the person then he wouldnt have banned the player.
I can't even believe that some are justifying this ban on an LRP server in a videogame. Grow up
You do realize there is always the potential that something might be missed or not factored in, yes?
That means bringing up relevant info, yes?
That that means attempting to change the admins mind, and by extension convince the headmins, yes?
Or do you just expect entitlement in the form of everyone doing the work for you?
You also understand that appealing a ban just because you don't like that you got banned isn't a valid reason to appeal, yes?
That there has to be something actively wrong with the ban, it's intent, bias, something being overly harsh for x reason, missing info that paints things in a new light, etc., yes?
That immediately wanting to 'speak to the manager' literally shut downs the entire appeal when they could have presented any possible issues and potentially not had to wait for headmins to look at it when the ban may now very well serve it's full course in the meantime, yes? (That they will now serve out entirely because they decided not to when there was the possibility that they wouldn't have to)
That instead of doing so they could have put some actual effort into their appeal, yes?
That there might be nothing to argue against the intent of this ban even with more information?
That demanding a headmin review doesn't mean you'll get one?
Per your last appeal:
Awfully similar, ain't it? Does it make sense that doing something like they did here is just an absolute waste of their time and fails to resolve the appeal in a timely fashion because they aren't proving anything?In order to successfully appeal a note, you either have to prove that the note is untruthful or unwarranted. You've done neither here.
Piss off and do some growing up yourself if you're going to choose to act like this by the way, this isn't a daycare center.
Hugs
- conrad
- Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2023 11:57 am
- Byond Username: Conrad Thunderbunch
- Location: Set free
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
I can hear hugs' sanity slipping.
I play the old man Ricky Paxton, and sometimes the borg Z.E.E.P.
Tell me how'd I do here. ⋆ 𝒯𝒶𝓀𝒾𝓃𝑔 𝒶 𝓈𝒶𝒷𝒶𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓁. ⋆
And now a word from our sponsors:
Tell me how'd I do here. ⋆ 𝒯𝒶𝓀𝒾𝓃𝑔 𝒶 𝓈𝒶𝒷𝒶𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓁. ⋆
And now a word from our sponsors:
Armhulen wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 11:08 pmThe Spessmen Times wrote:Prohibition agent Sam Salamander bragged that he could find a metacord in any server in under 30 minutes. In Bagil it took him 21 minutes. In Sybil 17 minutes, and Manuel just 11 minutes. But Terry set the record of 35 seconds. Sam asked an assistant on the arrivals shuttle where to get a discord invite, and the assistant linked him one.
RedBaronFlyer wrote: ↑Wed Feb 14, 2024 3:52 pmIt would somehow manage to pick Birdshot Station for headmin if we did that
- Misdoubtful
- In-Game Game Master
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2020 7:03 pm
- Byond Username: Misdoubtful
- Location: Delivering hugs!
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
Dude just missed the point entirely, so it clearly needed to be spelled out to them when they decided to be a toxic dickhead.
People aren't doing themselves any favors by stonewalling their own appeals like this.
When Coconut is saying something like 'At this point in time I don't see a reason to...', what he is really saying is 'you didn't do your homework yet so there is no place for this to go, or maybe there is nothing left to be said if its straight forward'.
People aren't doing themselves any favors by stonewalling their own appeals like this.
When Coconut is saying something like 'At this point in time I don't see a reason to...', what he is really saying is 'you didn't do your homework yet so there is no place for this to go, or maybe there is nothing left to be said if its straight forward'.
Hugs
- conrad
- Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2023 11:57 am
- Byond Username: Conrad Thunderbunch
- Location: Set free
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
I agree. It's a lack of empathy. Put yourself in the headmin's shoes: what are they gonna do when they read the appeal asking for a headmin ruling?
If I were headmin I would laugh and lock the thread without saying a word, as to demonstrate exatly what chimp grunting feels like from the other end.
If I were headmin I would laugh and lock the thread without saying a word, as to demonstrate exatly what chimp grunting feels like from the other end.
I play the old man Ricky Paxton, and sometimes the borg Z.E.E.P.
Tell me how'd I do here. ⋆ 𝒯𝒶𝓀𝒾𝓃𝑔 𝒶 𝓈𝒶𝒷𝒶𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓁. ⋆
And now a word from our sponsors:
Tell me how'd I do here. ⋆ 𝒯𝒶𝓀𝒾𝓃𝑔 𝒶 𝓈𝒶𝒷𝒶𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓁. ⋆
And now a word from our sponsors:
Armhulen wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 11:08 pmThe Spessmen Times wrote:Prohibition agent Sam Salamander bragged that he could find a metacord in any server in under 30 minutes. In Bagil it took him 21 minutes. In Sybil 17 minutes, and Manuel just 11 minutes. But Terry set the record of 35 seconds. Sam asked an assistant on the arrivals shuttle where to get a discord invite, and the assistant linked him one.
RedBaronFlyer wrote: ↑Wed Feb 14, 2024 3:52 pmIt would somehow manage to pick Birdshot Station for headmin if we did that
-
- Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2021 2:08 pm
- Byond Username: Exymian
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
This man posted an essay im not gonna readMisdoubtful wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2023 12:28 pmexymian wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2023 8:33 amMisdoubtful wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2023 1:19 amconrad wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2023 12:11 amEvery time I see someone with the headspace of absolute extremes, I feel pain and distress.CPTANT wrote: ↑Thu Mar 09, 2023 11:35 pmAre we now shitting on people for NOT writing 5 page essays on why they need to be unbanned?Misdoubtful wrote: ↑Thu Mar 09, 2023 10:50 pm Another ban appeal to add to the tally where communication full stops with a 'I want headmin' rather than this dude taking the time to bring up relevant things in their own appeal.
Smh.
There's a middle ground between a chimp grunting and a professor essaying over their space gas game ban.
Yes because arguing with the admin that banned you is pointless. You could have argued about it in the ahelps and if the admin was not that sure to ban the person then he wouldnt have banned the player.
I can't even believe that some are justifying this ban on an LRP server in a videogame. Grow up
You do realize that it takes effort to convince people that a ban is placed wrongly, yes?
You do realize there is always the potential that something might be missed or not factored in, yes?
That means bringing up relevant info, yes?
That that means attempting to change the admins mind, and by extension convince the headmins, yes?
Or do you just expect entitlement in the form of everyone doing the work for you?
You also understand that appealing a ban just because you don't like that you got banned isn't a valid reason to appeal, yes?
That there has to be something actively wrong with the ban, it's intent, bias, something being overly harsh for x reason, missing info that paints things in a new light, etc., yes?
That immediately wanting to 'speak to the manager' literally shut downs the entire appeal when they could have presented any possible issues and potentially not had to wait for headmins to look at it when the ban may now very well serve it's full course in the meantime, yes? (That they will now serve out entirely because they decided not to when there was the possibility that they wouldn't have to)
That instead of doing so they could have put some actual effort into their appeal, yes?
That there might be nothing to argue against the intent of this ban even with more information?
That demanding a headmin review doesn't mean you'll get one?
Per your last appeal:
Awfully similar, ain't it? Does it make sense that doing something like they did here is just an absolute waste of their time and fails to resolve the appeal in a timely fashion because they aren't proving anything?In order to successfully appeal a note, you either have to prove that the note is untruthful or unwarranted. You've done neither here.
Piss off and do some growing up yourself if you're going to choose to act like this by the way, this isn't a daycare center.
- ekaterina
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2022 7:40 am
- Byond Username: Ekaterina von Russland
- Location: Science Maintenance
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
Did something happen to the presumption of innocence while I wasn't looking?Misdoubtful wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2023 12:28 pm That there has to be something actively wrong with the ban, it's intent, bias, something being overly harsh for x reason, missing info that paints things in a new light, etc., yes?
If not, shouldn't it be up to the admin to prove that the ban was right rather than up to the player to prove that the ban was wrong?
"This [lizard] went out of her way to educate/debate me and I'm going to waste her effort by not doing the bare minimum of reading it :DDDD"
Cringe.
Last edited by ekaterina on Fri Mar 10, 2023 7:06 pm, edited 2 times in total.
I have a confirmed grand total of 1 merged PR. That basically means I'm a c*der now.
sinfulbliss wrote: ↑Wed May 24, 2023 2:03 am Marina is actually a very high quality roleplayer, believe it or not, and a pretty fun and good-faith player in my experience.
Jacquerel wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2024 6:31 pmmight be more true to say they redirect the dogpile most of the time tbqh, like diving heroically onto a grenadekinnebian wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2024 6:13 pm ekaterina stops threads from becoming dogpiles (...) they just point out logical things to bring up in context of a ban and people get mad at them because they refuse to discuss it
when everyone goes into peanuts already set on what their opinion is ekat's posts are a breath of fresh air
MrStonedOne wrote: ↑ Im gonna have to quote Ekaterina at you because they ended up saying this better than i would have
Timberpoes wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2024 8:50 am No deviations allowed. All must know the meta. All must power the game.
BeeSting12 wrote: ↑ Kieth4 nonoptimal ranked play nearly results in team loss, facing disciplinary action
- Misdoubtful
- In-Game Game Master
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2020 7:03 pm
- Byond Username: Misdoubtful
- Location: Delivering hugs!
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
Honestly, you don't really see this on servers as something that comes up in appeals. Appeals just show the cases where the extension of that innocence river has run dry, so they tend to be pretty skewed. If that makes sense.ekaterina wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:56 pmDid something happen to the presumption of innocence while I wasn't looking?Misdoubtful wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2023 12:28 pm That there has to be something actively wrong with the ban, it's intent, bias, something being overly harsh for x reason, missing info that paints things in a new light, etc., yes?
If not, shouldn't it be up to the admin to prove that the ban was right rather than up to the player to prove that the ban was wrong?
Its up to one side as much as it is the other. In this case though the events are more or less cut and dry and don't have the most weight when this ban is all about the intentions of the ban and behavior that is trying to be curtailed. The ban isn't about how secure the TTV's were, nor is it about the mech breaking into the locker, or anything like that. Its about the creation of such a hazard on the shuttle to begin with. The circumstances of how things got blown up were already baked into the ban and resulted in the bans time reduction.
While the blame doesn't entirely lay on you here you still created this extremely situation by bringing TTVs onto the shuttle
Hugs
- Kendrickorium
- Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2019 1:00 am
- Byond Username: Kendrickorium
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
I like you but you are a poor replacement for sinful, sadlyekaterina wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:56 pmDid something happen to the presumption of innocence while I wasn't looking?Misdoubtful wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2023 12:28 pm That there has to be something actively wrong with the ban, it's intent, bias, something being overly harsh for x reason, missing info that paints things in a new light, etc., yes?
If not, shouldn't it be up to the admin to prove that the ban was right rather than up to the player to prove that the ban was wrong?
"This [lizard] went out of her way to educate/debate me and I'm going to waste her effort by not doing the bare minimum of reading it :DDDD"
Cringe.
- conrad
- Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2023 11:57 am
- Byond Username: Conrad Thunderbunch
- Location: Set free
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
Timber showed up, pulled up logs. Dude went "Thanks for logs. Headmin pls. Unga bunga."
If he gets unbanned or the note gets removed I'm gonna pee each of your pants.
If he gets unbanned or the note gets removed I'm gonna pee each of your pants.
I play the old man Ricky Paxton, and sometimes the borg Z.E.E.P.
Tell me how'd I do here. ⋆ 𝒯𝒶𝓀𝒾𝓃𝑔 𝒶 𝓈𝒶𝒷𝒶𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓁. ⋆
And now a word from our sponsors:
Tell me how'd I do here. ⋆ 𝒯𝒶𝓀𝒾𝓃𝑔 𝒶 𝓈𝒶𝒷𝒶𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓁. ⋆
And now a word from our sponsors:
Armhulen wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 11:08 pmThe Spessmen Times wrote:Prohibition agent Sam Salamander bragged that he could find a metacord in any server in under 30 minutes. In Bagil it took him 21 minutes. In Sybil 17 minutes, and Manuel just 11 minutes. But Terry set the record of 35 seconds. Sam asked an assistant on the arrivals shuttle where to get a discord invite, and the assistant linked him one.
RedBaronFlyer wrote: ↑Wed Feb 14, 2024 3:52 pmIt would somehow manage to pick Birdshot Station for headmin if we did that
- Dax Dupont
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2014 9:07 pm
- Byond Username: DaxYeen
- Github Username: DaxDupont
- Location: Belgium
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
Honestly a welded locker seems sufficient, it's not like he went "oh no i dropped a bomb"
- Epoc
- Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 1:37 am
- Byond Username: Epoc
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
if you bring bombs onto the shuttle, you're asking for trouble
simple as
simple as
- Timberpoes
- In-Game Head Admin
- Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2020 4:54 pm
- Byond Username: Timberpoes
Re: i want a headmin review because the explosion wasn't my fault nut
Can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it speak.
/tg/station Codebase Maintainer
/tg/station Game Master/Discord Jannie: Feed me back in my thread.
/tg/station Admin Trainer: Service guarantees citizenship. Would you like to know more?
Feb 2022-Sep 2022 Host Vote Headmin
Mar 2023-Sep 2023 Admin Vote Headmin
Sep 2024 Player and Admin Vote Headmin
/tg/station Game Master/Discord Jannie: Feed me back in my thread.
/tg/station Admin Trainer: Service guarantees citizenship. Would you like to know more?
Feb 2022-Sep 2022 Host Vote Headmin
Mar 2023-Sep 2023 Admin Vote Headmin
Sep 2024 Player and Admin Vote Headmin
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Pumpkin0