Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
Forum rules
Only Certified™ Players™ may post in here.
If you are not able to post in here, you are not a Certified™ Player™. Play on a mainline /tg/ game server to gain posting powers in this forum. (certified gamers are only calculated once per day)
Only Certified™ Players™ may post in here.
If you are not able to post in here, you are not a Certified™ Player™. Play on a mainline /tg/ game server to gain posting powers in this forum. (certified gamers are only calculated once per day)
-
- Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2021 4:11 am
- Byond Username: Mice World
Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
viewtopic.php?t=34073
Prisoners are just like any other job. They don't have a license to grief, so you shouldn't treat them like this.
Prisoners are just like any other job. They don't have a license to grief, so you shouldn't treat them like this.
It keeps getting worse!?
- conrad
- Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2023 11:57 am
- Byond Username: Conrad Thunderbunch
- Location: Set free
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
What a crybaby lmao
I play the old man Ricky Paxton, and sometimes the borg Z.E.E.P.
Tell me how'd I do here. ⋆ 𝒯𝒶𝓀𝒾𝓃𝑔 𝒶 𝓈𝒶𝒷𝒶𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓁. ⋆
And now a word from our sponsors:
Tell me how'd I do here. ⋆ 𝒯𝒶𝓀𝒾𝓃𝑔 𝒶 𝓈𝒶𝒷𝒶𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓁. ⋆
And now a word from our sponsors:
Armhulen wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 11:08 pmThe Spessmen Times wrote:Prohibition agent Sam Salamander bragged that he could find a metacord in any server in under 30 minutes. In Bagil it took him 21 minutes. In Sybil 17 minutes, and Manuel just 11 minutes. But Terry set the record of 35 seconds. Sam asked an assistant on the arrivals shuttle where to get a discord invite, and the assistant linked him one.
RedBaronFlyer wrote: ↑Wed Feb 14, 2024 3:52 pmIt would somehow manage to pick Birdshot Station for headmin if we did that
- kinnebian
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2021 2:15 pm
- Byond Username: Kinnebian
- Location: answering irelands call
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
they got what was coming!My character was in for tax evasion
respect (let her do her thing)
► Show Spoiler
- Jackraxxus
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2020 2:59 pm
- Byond Username: Jackraxxus
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
I feel like using prisoners for experiments is the kind of based emergent RP the job is there to create.
Surely a dystopian megacorporation would absolutely use criminals for human testing.
Surely a dystopian megacorporation would absolutely use criminals for human testing.
iamgoofball wrote:Vekter and MrMelbert are more likely to enforce the roleplay rules Manuel is supposed to be abiding by than Wesoda or Jackraxxus are.
-
- Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2021 4:11 am
- Byond Username: Mice World
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
I would agree with this if prisoners had lenient escalation rules (or an antag status like abductor). You can't really have a "pick this to get griefed" role without said role being able to retaliate.Jackraxxus wrote: ↑Wed May 17, 2023 10:03 am I feel like using prisoners for experiments is the kind of based emergent RP the job is there to create.
Surely a dystopian megacorporation would absolutely use criminals for human testing.
It keeps getting worse!?
-
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 11:14 pm
- Byond Username: SkeletalElite
- Github Username: SkeletalElite
- Kendrickorium
- Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2019 1:00 am
- Byond Username: Kendrickorium
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
10/10 thread title
absolutely perfect
absolutely perfect
- Fikou
- In-Game Game Master
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2018 8:38 am
- Byond Username: Fikou
- Github Username: Fikou
- Location: Dreamland
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
whyMice World wrote: ↑Wed May 17, 2023 10:06 am You can't really have a "pick this to get griefed" role without said role being able to retaliate.
also prisoners beat up sec that come to their cell all the time is it actually against the rules??
Do NOT press this button.
Spoiler:
-
- Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2021 4:11 am
- Byond Username: Mice World
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
Because that's rather boring? Like, if you want to treat prisoner like a punching bag, go ahead... but it's clearly not designed for this.
I'm not an admin so I don't really know. I'd assume not. However, I could see an admin banning a player the only wants to fight sec.
My main issue with this is that it's an extremely one sided interaction (Good luck beating a somewhat competent secoff as solo prisoner) and prisoner isn't really designed for this. From what I've seen they're treated like a normal job (It's also recommended to new players on the wiki!), so this is the equivalent of a security officer cuffing some random MD and giving him to a heretic.
It keeps getting worse!?
- Itseasytosee2me
- Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2021 1:14 am
- Byond Username: Rectification
- Location: Space Station 13
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
I think this was chill. Prisoners being "Just like other jobs" is boing. They have inherent rp justification to fuck with.
- Sincerely itseasytosee
See you later
See you later
- Not-Dorsidarf
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 4:14 pm
- Byond Username: Dorsidwarf
- Location: We're all going on an, admin holiday
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
This is cringe and the secoff should be given a bollocking for this. It's not like it was an MD or the RD who asked, just some random hobo greyshirt walked in, demanded a prisoner and was handed him in cuffs. That's the same as just opening the brig doors and throwing the prisoners out roundstart as far as I'm concerned, and sec aren't meant to do that either.
kieth4 wrote: infrequently shitting yourself is fine imo
There is a lot of very bizarre nonsense being talked on this forum. I shall now remain silent and logoff until my points are vindicated.
Player who complainted over being killed for looting cap office wrote: ↑Sun Jul 30, 2023 1:33 am Hey there, I'm Virescent, the super evil person who made the stupid appeal and didn't think it through enough. Just came here to say: screech, retards. Screech and writhe like the worms you are. Your pathetic little cries will keep echoing around for a while before quietting down. There is one great outcome from this: I rised up the blood pressure of some of you shitheads and lowered your lifespan. I'm honestly tempted to do this more often just to see you screech and writhe more, but that wouldn't be cool of me. So come on haters, show me some more of your high blood pressure please.
- Jackraxxus
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2020 2:59 pm
- Byond Username: Jackraxxus
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
Prisoner being recommended for new players on the wiki is stupid imo we shouldn't be telling new players to try the sit there and do nothing/get trolled by sec (as content) job as their first impressions of ss13.
We should be recommending assistant so they can kill themselves on doors as their forefathers did before them, and maybe cargo tech so they can push crates / walk around delivering mail/crates so they can learn the maps.
Someone should fix this big time.
iamgoofball wrote:Vekter and MrMelbert are more likely to enforce the roleplay rules Manuel is supposed to be abiding by than Wesoda or Jackraxxus are.
- Itseasytosee2me
- Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2021 1:14 am
- Byond Username: Rectification
- Location: Space Station 13
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
I made the policy thread about releasing the prisoners roundstart.Not-Dorsidarf wrote: ↑Wed May 17, 2023 1:29 pm This is cringe and the secoff should be given a bollocking for this. It's not like it was an MD or the RD who asked, just some random hobo greyshirt walked in, demanded a prisoner and was handed him in cuffs. That's the same as just opening the brig doors and throwing the prisoners out roundstart as far as I'm concerned, and sec aren't meant to do that either.
The end result was the headmins making a ruling that didn't touch on the issue I brought at all. viewtopic.php?f=85&t=32347&p=654627&hil ... er#p654627
- Sincerely itseasytosee
See you later
See you later
-
- Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2021 4:11 am
- Byond Username: Mice World
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
I agree. But it's hard to create a job like this that balances between "This will enable RP" and "This will make sec vs prisoners every round ". Prisoner was designed to be a "chill" hangout in perma role, so it needs a complete policy and maybe even code rewrite before it can move away from being just another job.Itseasytosee2me wrote: ↑Wed May 17, 2023 1:26 pm Prisoners being "Just like other jobs" is boing. They have inherent rp justification to fuck with.
It keeps getting worse!?
- Vekter
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 10:25 pm
- Byond Username: Vekter
- Location: Fucking around with the engine.
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
I think I'm okay with using prisoners for experiments, but I'm not convinced that's what happened here? Unless I'm missing something it looks like they just gave the prisoner to a random assistant.
There's a difference between handing a prisoner over to R&D/medical for experimentation and just giving him to a person in a grey jumpsuit.
There's a difference between handing a prisoner over to R&D/medical for experimentation and just giving him to a person in a grey jumpsuit.
- WineAllWine
- In-Game Admin Trainer
- Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2019 8:17 pm
- Byond Username: Wineallwine
- Location: LANDAN
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
I think using prisoners as D-class personel is funny.
- dirk_mcblade
- Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2020 7:54 am
- Byond Username: Dirk_McBlade
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
Aside from this incident being incredibly based and exactly what you should expect from a good prisoner round, I have a vendetta against this player for changing the AI lawset to catimov one time. Admin did good.
-
- Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2021 4:11 am
- Byond Username: Mice World
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
Here's the logs for this. I'm sort of rushing so sorry if I miss something important.
Boris is the secoff. Jose is the heretic assistant. Imitates is the prisoner.
Boris and Jose meet. Boris agrees to give Jose a slave "for cruel experiments".
The disabling and cuffing.
Grabbing etc, Boris confirms that Imitates is now Jose's.
Jose starts strangling Imitates.
Earnest, the other secoff sees Jose and Boris with Imitates.
Boris tells Earnest about Imitates, Earnest tries to stop Jose, Imitates keeps calling for help.
Boris lies about Jose strangling Imitates. Jose ends up taking Imitates away.
Earnest talks with Boris while Jose beats Imitates to death.
Boris and Earnest argue while Jose starts his ritual.
**GRUESOME CAT SACRIFICE**
More arguing between B&E. (Jose and Imitates have been snipped.)
Quick edit for forum admins to answer: When I post logs like this, should I include them in the main thread or are they fine in the player's club?
Boris is the secoff. Jose is the heretic assistant. Imitates is the prisoner.
Boris and Jose meet. Boris agrees to give Jose a slave "for cruel experiments".
► Show Spoiler
► Show Spoiler
► Show Spoiler
► Show Spoiler
► Show Spoiler
► Show Spoiler
► Show Spoiler
► Show Spoiler
► Show Spoiler
► Show Spoiler
► Show Spoiler
Last edited by Mice World on Wed May 17, 2023 2:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
It keeps getting worse!?
- Archie700
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2016 1:56 am
- Byond Username: Archie700
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
You know you can just post them in the actual thread
-
- Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2021 4:11 am
- Byond Username: Mice World
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
I dunno. I just want to be 100% sure. I don't really mind posting them here anyway.
It keeps getting worse!?
- Rageguy505
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2021 12:42 am
- Byond Username: Rageguy505
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
I think it's generally fine if a antag convinces someone to do something they wouldn't normally do. It's a game with misinformation and such at it's core.
- c4g
- Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 4:11 pm
- Byond Username: C4g
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
kinda fucked up on sec's part ngl
- Archie700
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2016 1:56 am
- Byond Username: Archie700
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
Yeah the guy was talked to and did try to heal, so this was just a ban request
- iwishforducks
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:48 pm
- Byond Username: Iwishforducks
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
this is insanely funny and if someone asked for a prisoner like a pokemon i too would have given em them
im gay (and also play the moth “bugger”)
-
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 11:14 pm
- Byond Username: SkeletalElite
- Github Username: SkeletalElite
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
Sec can release the perma prisoners round start if they want to on LRPNot-Dorsidarf wrote: ↑Wed May 17, 2023 1:29 pm This is cringe and the secoff should be given a bollocking for this. It's not like it was an MD or the RD who asked, just some random hobo greyshirt walked in, demanded a prisoner and was handed him in cuffs. That's the same as just opening the brig doors and throwing the prisoners out roundstart as far as I'm concerned, and sec aren't meant to do that either.
In this thread headmins disallowed promoting the prisoners to sec FNR/round start on MRP only.
So it stands to reason that you would be allowed to promote prisoners to security roundstart if you wanted to on LRP, which is essentially the same thing as releasing them.
edit: I forgot the thread because im dumb
viewtopic.php?p=576934#p576934
Last edited by SkeletalElite on Wed May 17, 2023 3:50 pm, edited 3 times in total.
- Vekter
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 10:25 pm
- Byond Username: Vekter
- Location: Fucking around with the engine.
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
This ain't it, chief. Even if you're mad about Striders' decision, this super ain't it.Imitates-The-Lizards wrote: ↑Wed May 17, 2023 3:27 pm Actually, you know what? I was upset at the time, but I think it's much more funny and valuable to have a golden green pass from Striders to fuck with imprisoned non-antag crew with no limits. I'm gonna just go play security and start strangling people to death in the middle of the Brig if they get a perma sentence from the HoS or Captain for breaking into the Captain's office or something, or selling them off as slaves to the highest bidder after they break into Tech Storage to be used in cruel experiments (Remember, my crime was tax evasion. Literally not even as bad as b and e.). Not how I thought Security was going to work, but this incident has really opened my eyes to the possibilities of what you can do as Security. Feel free to close this, I would much rather ascend to a new higher tier of shitsec than ever before than see some random noted.
- datorangebottle
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2019 9:53 am
- Byond Username: Datorangebottle
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
"You can freely grief roundstart prisoners" is just a bad take.
Roleplay wise, they're in prison for a reason. If Central wanted them dead, they would be. If they wanted them to suffer cruel experiments, they'd tell the crew as much. Being held prisoner is implied by their title, torture is not.
Rules-wise, they're not antagonists, don't have relaxed escalation, and giving them to any rando who walks up is a huge rule 1 break- especially when the rando is stated to have violent intent.
Still, I'd worry about punishing for this- I'd rather this interaction with a prisoner than no interaction at all, which is what security usually does.
Also, agree with Vekter here, you're better than this Imitates.
Roleplay wise, they're in prison for a reason. If Central wanted them dead, they would be. If they wanted them to suffer cruel experiments, they'd tell the crew as much. Being held prisoner is implied by their title, torture is not.
Rules-wise, they're not antagonists, don't have relaxed escalation, and giving them to any rando who walks up is a huge rule 1 break- especially when the rando is stated to have violent intent.
Still, I'd worry about punishing for this- I'd rather this interaction with a prisoner than no interaction at all, which is what security usually does.
Also, agree with Vekter here, you're better than this Imitates.
Timberpoes wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2023 9:16 pm I highly doubt any other admin on the team would have given you this chance, except maybe Kieth because his brain worms are almost as bad as mine.
Vekter wrote: ↑Tue May 16, 2023 4:45 pm At what point does someone's refusal or failure to improve become malice in and of itself? If you give someone a year to stop shitting on the carpet and they keep doing it but get slightly closer to the bathroom every time and sometimes they get to the toilet before it happens, at what point does it become acceptable to just ask them to go shit in someone else's house?
Timberpoes wrote: ↑Fri Apr 28, 2023 7:00 pm I'm sorry, can we get a real player to resolve this appeal? I don't like this trial player. They can't even set their own name.
sinfulbliss wrote: ↑I almost prefer Rave's AI-generated "We cannot accept this appeal at this time. If you would like assistance appealing in the future, please dial 1-800-1984-1488."
Pandarsenic wrote: ↑Mon Dec 12, 2022 2:25 pm I think we can all agree that someone throwing a reverse revolver at Zyb as a secret test of character, and Zyb immediately fucking himself with it, is the best thing we all could have received for Christmas this year
- Epicgamer545
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2022 8:02 am
- Byond Username: Epicgamer545
- Location: Somewhere In Space, Probably
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
This analogy might be fucked up, but just hear me out. This also not me speaking as a admin, this is me speaking as a player and this opinion, unlike my other ones, suck.Imitates-The-Lizards wrote: ↑Wed May 17, 2023 3:27 pm Actually, you know what? I was upset at the time, but I think it's much more funny and valuable to have a golden green pass from Striders to fuck with imprisoned non-antag crew with no limits. I'm gonna just go play security and start strangling people to death in the middle of the Brig if they get a perma sentence from the HoS or Captain for breaking into the Captain's office or something, or selling them off as slaves to the highest bidder after they break into Tech Storage to be used in cruel experiments (Remember, my crime was tax evasion. Literally not even as bad as b and e.). Not how I thought Security was going to work, but this incident has really opened my eyes to the possibilities of what you can do as Security. Feel free to close this, I would much rather ascend to a new higher tier of shitsec than ever before than see some random noted.
Imagine, if you will, someone pushed you, or, whatever, and tumbled you over into a nearby hole. He realizes what he has done then recovers you, drags you to the hospital, and gets arrested by the proper authorities. After you recover (it wasn’t that bad of a fall) you proceed to file a complaint to the police department arguing that instead they should’ve been given the a higher/life sentience. The officers cross their arms and argue that they have already given a stern talking to not to do it again.
Then, you proceed to shout aloud “THIS HAS INSPIRED ME!! I CAN’T BELIEVE HOW MUCH POSSIBILITIES YOU CAN DO AS A PERSON! I’M GOING TO COMMIT CRIMES, STAB SOMEONE, AND PUSH THEM INTO A 10 FEET DEEP HOLE!”
Come on, you’re better than this. Not only is this stupid, it literally takes it too far for a stupid video game, where you’re supposed to accept the horrible possibilities of your character as a prisoner. But, yeah, honestly, the point of round start killing prisoners is super lame, and a ruling should be done to disallow that. I just don’t want them to be stupid and take rule enforcement the completely opposite way. It sucks.
Just because one admin allows something, doesn’t mean another allows it. Stop thinking we are omnipresent. We are not.
Epicgamer545
J. Howard, microcelebrity & ExOS
game admin - I am still a admin, please subject me to 4 hours of tickets
► Show Spoiler
- Fren256
- Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2023 10:10 pm
- Byond Username: Fren256
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
Reminder that the wiki encourages new players to take the Prisoner role to learn the basics of the game. I don't think I need to explain to you what a new player would've thought if this had happened to them.
- NoxVS
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2018 7:43 pm
- Byond Username: NoxVS
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
Anyone who says or does something like this deserves to immediately be hurled in the sun. It’s so infuriating and it happens all the time. We get it, stripping a ruling of all context and broadly applying it to every possible situation gives you freedom to run around the halls shooting people and it’s not your fault it’s the admin’s. Gold star for your original and creative thought that no one else has ever thought of in the entire history of tgstation. You truly are an innovator.Imitates-The-Lizards wrote: ↑Wed May 17, 2023 3:27 pm Actually, you know what? I was upset at the time, but I think it's much more funny and valuable to have a golden green pass from Striders to fuck with imprisoned non-antag crew with no limits. I'm gonna just go play security and start strangling people to death in the middle of the Brig if they get a perma sentence from the HoS or Captain for breaking into the Captain's office or something, or selling them off as slaves to the highest bidder after they break into Tech Storage to be used in cruel experiments (Remember, my crime was tax evasion. Literally not even as bad as b and e.). Not how I thought Security was going to work, but this incident has really opened my eyes to the possibilities of what you can do as Security. Feel free to close this, I would much rather ascend to a new higher tier of shitsec than ever before than see some random noted.
The weak should fear the strong
thehogshotgun wrote:How does having jannies like you, who have more brain tumor than brain benefit the server
- kinnebian
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2021 2:15 pm
- Byond Username: Kinnebian
- Location: answering irelands call
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
how fuckin childish
respect (let her do her thing)
► Show Spoiler
- iwishforducks
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:48 pm
- Byond Username: Iwishforducks
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
... the good ending????
this is incredibly funny. god bless.Imitates-The-Lizards wrote: ↑Wed May 17, 2023 5:24 pm Oh, I'm sorry, did you think I was being sarcastic? I wasn't. I unironically went and tried it in the next shift and sold an (apparently traitor) assistant into slavery who broke into EVA to the QM for 300cr, which was well received by the crew of the shift at large. I genuinely think we should explore the depths of what level of fuckery is allowed with prisoners, and I am in no way upset any more, and am quite thankful to you for allowing me to realize there is genuine roleplay depth to be had in this space. Perhaps this could be turned into a Policy Discussion.
im gay (and also play the moth “bugger”)
- datorangebottle
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2019 9:53 am
- Byond Username: Datorangebottle
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
Funny but also very stupid. I look forward to reading an entertaining ban appeal, if nothing else.
Timberpoes wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2023 9:16 pm I highly doubt any other admin on the team would have given you this chance, except maybe Kieth because his brain worms are almost as bad as mine.
Vekter wrote: ↑Tue May 16, 2023 4:45 pm At what point does someone's refusal or failure to improve become malice in and of itself? If you give someone a year to stop shitting on the carpet and they keep doing it but get slightly closer to the bathroom every time and sometimes they get to the toilet before it happens, at what point does it become acceptable to just ask them to go shit in someone else's house?
Timberpoes wrote: ↑Fri Apr 28, 2023 7:00 pm I'm sorry, can we get a real player to resolve this appeal? I don't like this trial player. They can't even set their own name.
sinfulbliss wrote: ↑I almost prefer Rave's AI-generated "We cannot accept this appeal at this time. If you would like assistance appealing in the future, please dial 1-800-1984-1488."
Pandarsenic wrote: ↑Mon Dec 12, 2022 2:25 pm I think we can all agree that someone throwing a reverse revolver at Zyb as a secret test of character, and Zyb immediately fucking himself with it, is the best thing we all could have received for Christmas this year
- ekaterina
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2022 7:40 am
- Byond Username: Ekaterina von Russland
- Location: Science Maintenance
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
Conrad's right.
sec gref me(perma prisoner) pls note he!1!
That plot twist, though...Imitates-The-Lizards wrote: ↑Wed May 17, 2023 3:27 pm Actually, you know what? I was upset at the time, but I think it's much more funny and valuable to have a golden green pass from Striders to fuck with imprisoned non-antag crew with no limits
I have a confirmed grand total of 1 merged PR. That basically means I'm a c*der now.
sinfulbliss wrote: ↑Wed May 24, 2023 2:03 am Marina is actually a very high quality roleplayer, believe it or not, and a pretty fun and good-faith player in my experience.
Jacquerel wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2024 6:31 pmmight be more true to say they redirect the dogpile most of the time tbqh, like diving heroically onto a grenadekinnebian wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2024 6:13 pm ekaterina stops threads from becoming dogpiles (...) they just point out logical things to bring up in context of a ban and people get mad at them because they refuse to discuss it
when everyone goes into peanuts already set on what their opinion is ekat's posts are a breath of fresh air
MrStonedOne wrote: ↑ Im gonna have to quote Ekaterina at you because they ended up saying this better than i would have
Timberpoes wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2024 8:50 am No deviations allowed. All must know the meta. All must power the game.
BeeSting12 wrote: ↑ Kieth4 nonoptimal ranked play nearly results in team loss, facing disciplinary action
- Epicgamer545
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2022 8:02 am
- Byond Username: Epicgamer545
- Location: Somewhere In Space, Probably
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
One day I’m going to admin Sybil and experience this first hand.
Epicgamer545
J. Howard, microcelebrity & ExOS
game admin - I am still a admin, please subject me to 4 hours of tickets
► Show Spoiler
- Vekter
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 10:25 pm
- Byond Username: Vekter
- Location: Fucking around with the engine.
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
I really do think there's a difference between what happened here and what Striders thinks happened here.
I'm totally okay with the idea of sec selling or giving prisoners to the research departments for experiments, not to random crewmembers to do whatever they want with them.
Random experimentation on corporate criminals is based. Slavery is cringe.
Do I think that means the complaint should be successful or that further action needs to be taken? No, I think telling the guy off is fine if he's relatively new.
E: Also the complaint is stupid and Typhnox is being even stupider.
I'm totally okay with the idea of sec selling or giving prisoners to the research departments for experiments, not to random crewmembers to do whatever they want with them.
Random experimentation on corporate criminals is based. Slavery is cringe.
Do I think that means the complaint should be successful or that further action needs to be taken? No, I think telling the guy off is fine if he's relatively new.
E: Also the complaint is stupid and Typhnox is being even stupider.
- Chadley
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2022 6:07 am
- Byond Username: Armodias
- Location: Northstar psych ward helping my patients.
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
Pretty based that THE Alice Heart then admits to doing the exact thing Stiders says isn't okay, seems the sticky conversion therapy to not be an ancap didn't pay off, still just chasing the bag with slavery as the punchline.Epicgamer545 wrote: ↑Wed May 17, 2023 4:18 pm Then, you proceed to shout aloud “THIS HAS INSPIRED ME!! I CAN’T BELIEVE HOW MUCH POSSIBILITIES YOU CAN DO AS A PERSON! I’M GOING TO COMMIT CRIMES, STAB SOMEONE, AND PUSH THEM INTO A 10 FEET DEEP HOLE!”
Come on, you’re better than this. Not only is this stupid, it literally takes it too far for a stupid video game, where you’re supposed to accept the horrible possibilities of your character as a prisoner. But, yeah, honestly, the point of round start killing prisoners is super lame, and a ruling should be done to disallow that. I just don’t want them to be stupid and take rule enforcement the completely opposite way. It sucks.
-
- Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2023 11:15 pm
- Byond Username: Cowboy Owlbear
- Location: Dusty Dunes Desert, NV
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
As a frequent prisoner player, I'd much rather get passed off to a department for extremely flimsy reasons (or otherwise be voluntold to do dangerous/unwise things, like exploring an unchecked gateway) than just get sold to some rando; I've had security and command give me offers like this, but never involving a random assistant. Prisoners are sec's responsibility, after all, so at least IC it'd make sense to get offered benefits, special treatment, parole, etc. by someone with a big hat in exchange for going along with something that's almost certainly going to go badly for me. They have the authority to do that, after all. I think it's a far more interesting solution to people not wanting to check on perma than just ignoring or freeing prisoners outright! I only play on Manuel, however, so take what I say with a grain of salt.
Also, inmates are technically still CentComm's property. They're probably going to get mad if they hear someone's trying to profit off their stuff.
Also, inmates are technically still CentComm's property. They're probably going to get mad if they hear someone's trying to profit off their stuff.
- sinfulbliss
- Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2019 8:53 am
- Byond Username: SinfulBliss
- Location: prisoner re-education chamber
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
I find it very based personally. Like, alright Mr. Admin, you REALLY think what they did was okay? You’re sure of that? Gonna just IC issue it are ya? Well how bout I do the same damn thing next round how bout that? You THAT confident in your ruling huh? Let’s find out…NoxVS wrote: ↑Wed May 17, 2023 5:22 pm Anyone who says or does something like this deserves to immediately be hurled in the sun. It’s so infuriating and it happens all the time. We get it, stripping a ruling of all context and broadly applying it to every possible situation gives you freedom to run around the halls shooting people and it’s not your fault it’s the admin’s. Gold star for your original and creative thought that no one else has ever thought of in the entire history of tgstation. You truly are an innovator.
It’s incredibly petty but I find it very funny so I’m here for it. Unfortunately it doesn’t apply here since Striders did warn them
Spoiler:
- Chadley
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2022 6:07 am
- Byond Username: Armodias
- Location: Northstar psych ward helping my patients.
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
I know what must be said, but I don't think I wanna eat a ban for it.Imitates-The-Lizards wrote: ↑Wed May 17, 2023 6:26 pmI think it would be harmful and restrictive to roleplay at this time. Also hush Chadley, this is a game, not real life, ancapping in a corporate dystopia makes sense.
viewtopic.php?p=648402#p648402
-
- Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2019 2:05 pm
- Byond Username: BlueMemesauce
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
I've been wanting to find a situation to talk about my PR "Prisoners no longer spawn with backpacks" and I guess it makes sense to put it here https://github.com/tgstation/tgstation/pull/72892
I made the PR because it makes no sense to give prisoners backpacks. They closed it because removing prisoners backpacks is griefing, so the PR would basically be griefing every prisoner via code.
But is it really griefing to remove prisoners backpacks? They're literally in prison and shouldn't have backpacks where they can store contraband. Being in the prisoner role opens you to some things that would be considered griefing for other roles.
I made the PR because it makes no sense to give prisoners backpacks. They closed it because removing prisoners backpacks is griefing, so the PR would basically be griefing every prisoner via code.
But is it really griefing to remove prisoners backpacks? They're literally in prison and shouldn't have backpacks where they can store contraband. Being in the prisoner role opens you to some things that would be considered griefing for other roles.
- conrad
- Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2023 11:57 am
- Byond Username: Conrad Thunderbunch
- Location: Set free
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
What an absolute complete fucking crybaby lmaoooo
I play the old man Ricky Paxton, and sometimes the borg Z.E.E.P.
Tell me how'd I do here. ⋆ 𝒯𝒶𝓀𝒾𝓃𝑔 𝒶 𝓈𝒶𝒷𝒶𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓁. ⋆
And now a word from our sponsors:
Tell me how'd I do here. ⋆ 𝒯𝒶𝓀𝒾𝓃𝑔 𝒶 𝓈𝒶𝒷𝒶𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓁. ⋆
And now a word from our sponsors:
Armhulen wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 11:08 pmThe Spessmen Times wrote:Prohibition agent Sam Salamander bragged that he could find a metacord in any server in under 30 minutes. In Bagil it took him 21 minutes. In Sybil 17 minutes, and Manuel just 11 minutes. But Terry set the record of 35 seconds. Sam asked an assistant on the arrivals shuttle where to get a discord invite, and the assistant linked him one.
RedBaronFlyer wrote: ↑Wed Feb 14, 2024 3:52 pmIt would somehow manage to pick Birdshot Station for headmin if we did that
- sinfulbliss
- Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2019 8:53 am
- Byond Username: SinfulBliss
- Location: prisoner re-education chamber
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
Very conflicted on this one pals. On the one hand this is emergent RP and it seems kind of perfect for a perma prisoner. On the other hand it'd really suck to have an officer pawn you off to a heretic without a chance to retaliate or defend yourself, then get sacced and sit out the round.
But given they were warned, you don't complaint this type of thing, that only incentivizes more "handled"s, sometimes you don't get the outcome you want but ya gotta just grin and bear it.
But given they were warned, you don't complaint this type of thing, that only incentivizes more "handled"s, sometimes you don't get the outcome you want but ya gotta just grin and bear it.
Spoiler:
- NoxVS
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2018 7:43 pm
- Byond Username: NoxVS
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
The thing is they never do the exact same thing.sinfulbliss wrote: ↑Wed May 17, 2023 7:31 pmI find it very based personally. Like, alright Mr. Admin, you REALLY think what they did was okay? You’re sure of that? Gonna just IC issue it are ya? Well how bout I do the same damn thing next round how bout that? You THAT confident in your ruling huh? Let’s find out…NoxVS wrote: ↑Wed May 17, 2023 5:22 pm Anyone who says or does something like this deserves to immediately be hurled in the sun. It’s so infuriating and it happens all the time. We get it, stripping a ruling of all context and broadly applying it to every possible situation gives you freedom to run around the halls shooting people and it’s not your fault it’s the admin’s. Gold star for your original and creative thought that no one else has ever thought of in the entire history of tgstation. You truly are an innovator.
It’s incredibly petty but I find it very funny so I’m here for it. Unfortunately it doesn’t apply here since Striders did warn them
I once saw a player who was caught with an AI upload, refused to explain why they had it, and insulted the officer who arrested them. They got executed for it. When told that it seemed like a pretty good reason to kill them, they drew the conclusion that if they play security they are free to execute anyone who insults them on the spot.
The weak should fear the strong
thehogshotgun wrote:How does having jannies like you, who have more brain tumor than brain benefit the server
- sinfulbliss
- Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2019 8:53 am
- Byond Username: SinfulBliss
- Location: prisoner re-education chamber
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
Euuughh... RR over an AI upload board? Man Nox...NoxVS wrote: ↑Wed May 17, 2023 9:30 pmThe thing is they never do the exact same thing.sinfulbliss wrote: ↑Wed May 17, 2023 7:31 pmI find it very based personally. Like, alright Mr. Admin, you REALLY think what they did was okay? You’re sure of that? Gonna just IC issue it are ya? Well how bout I do the same damn thing next round how bout that? You THAT confident in your ruling huh? Let’s find out…NoxVS wrote: ↑Wed May 17, 2023 5:22 pm Anyone who says or does something like this deserves to immediately be hurled in the sun. It’s so infuriating and it happens all the time. We get it, stripping a ruling of all context and broadly applying it to every possible situation gives you freedom to run around the halls shooting people and it’s not your fault it’s the admin’s. Gold star for your original and creative thought that no one else has ever thought of in the entire history of tgstation. You truly are an innovator.
It’s incredibly petty but I find it very funny so I’m here for it. Unfortunately it doesn’t apply here since Striders did warn them
I once saw a player who was caught with an AI upload, refused to explain why they had it, and insulted the officer who arrested them. They got executed for it. When told that it seemed like a pretty good reason to kill them, they drew the conclusion that if they play security they are free to execute anyone who insults them on the spot.
But yeah the proper petty response would be insta executing someone they find with AI upload in the future
Spoiler:
- oranges
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
- Byond Username: Optimumtact
- Github Username: optimumtact
- Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
reminder that literally anybody with a forum account can edit 99% of the wiki
- vect0r
- Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2022 12:37 am
- Byond Username: Vect0r
- Location: 'Murica 🦅🦅🦅🔥🔥🔥
- Itseasytosee2me
- Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2021 1:14 am
- Byond Username: Rectification
- Location: Space Station 13
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
- Sincerely itseasytosee
See you later
See you later
- Fren256
- Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2023 10:10 pm
- Byond Username: Fren256
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
- dirk_mcblade
- Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2020 7:54 am
- Byond Username: Dirk_McBlade
Re: Local shelter fails to verify adopter's religious beliefs, leading to gruesome cat sacrifice
Wow never would've expected that behavior from this player.NoxVS wrote: ↑Wed May 17, 2023 5:22 pmAnyone who says or does something like this deserves to immediately be hurled in the sun. It’s so infuriating and it happens all the time. We get it, stripping a ruling of all context and broadly applying it to every possible situation gives you freedom to run around the halls shooting people and it’s not your fault it’s the admin’s. Gold star for your original and creative thought that no one else has ever thought of in the entire history of tgstation. You truly are an innovator.Imitates-The-Lizards wrote: ↑Wed May 17, 2023 3:27 pm Actually, you know what? I was upset at the time, but I think it's much more funny and valuable to have a golden green pass from Striders to fuck with imprisoned non-antag crew with no limits. I'm gonna just go play security and start strangling people to death in the middle of the Brig if they get a perma sentence from the HoS or Captain for breaking into the Captain's office or something, or selling them off as slaves to the highest bidder after they break into Tech Storage to be used in cruel experiments (Remember, my crime was tax evasion. Literally not even as bad as b and e.). Not how I thought Security was going to work, but this incident has really opened my eyes to the possibilities of what you can do as Security. Feel free to close this, I would much rather ascend to a new higher tier of shitsec than ever before than see some random noted.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: FlapjackKong, iamgoofball, MrStonedOne, Screemonster, Tastycasey, TheBibleMelts, TheFinalPotato