Vote of no Confidence Peanut
Forum rules
Only Certified™ Players™ may post in here.
If you are not able to post in here, you are not a Certified™ Player™. Play on a mainline /tg/ game server to gain posting powers in this forum. (certified gamers are only calculated once per day)
Only Certified™ Players™ may post in here.
If you are not able to post in here, you are not a Certified™ Player™. Play on a mainline /tg/ game server to gain posting powers in this forum. (certified gamers are only calculated once per day)
- mrmelbert
- In-Game Game Master
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:26 pm
- Byond Username: Mr Melbert
Vote of no Confidence Peanut
Admin: December 2020 - Present
Code Maintainer: December 2021 - Present
Head Admin: Feburary 2022 - September 2022
Youtube Guy: sometimes
Code Maintainer: December 2021 - Present
Head Admin: Feburary 2022 - September 2022
Youtube Guy: sometimes
- dendydoom
- In-Game Head Admin
- Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2020 10:40 am
- Byond Username: Dendydoom
- Jacquerel
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 8:10 pm
- Byond Username: Becquerel
Re: Vote of no Confidence Peanut
This was about a 1 hour long ban which expired (if I am reading correctly) 15 minutes after posting the initial appeal thread.
-
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2022 3:18 pm
- Byond Username: AccountName5
Re: Vote of no Confidence Peanut
He wasted this much time on a 1 hour ban lmao.
- dendydoom
- In-Game Head Admin
- Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2020 10:40 am
- Byond Username: Dendydoom
Re: Vote of no Confidence Peanut
he still hasn't answered the question that was posed multiple times:
why did you choose to shoot them?
if you don't answer that question we don't have enough information to make a ruling, hence why it's upheld, because you've made it impossible to resolve.
goodness gracious...
EDIT: oh my god he (barely) answered it, nevermind what i said. it only took a headmin complaint to get it out of him. good luck getting him to answer any subsequent investigative questions, though!
why did you choose to shoot them?
if you don't answer that question we don't have enough information to make a ruling, hence why it's upheld, because you've made it impossible to resolve.
goodness gracious...
EDIT: oh my god he (barely) answered it, nevermind what i said. it only took a headmin complaint to get it out of him. good luck getting him to answer any subsequent investigative questions, though!
Last edited by dendydoom on Thu Jul 20, 2023 8:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
MrStonedOne wrote:I always read dendy's walls of text
NSFW:
- Riggle
- Global Moderator
- Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2021 10:48 pm
- Byond Username: Riggle
- kieth4
- In-Game Head Admin
- Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2020 6:17 pm
- Byond Username: Kieth4
Re: Vote of no Confidence Peanut
Complaints have a purpose, someone has to watch the watchmen. It's just determining if there is validity or not to the claims that he makes.
- Misdoubtful
- In-Game Game Master
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2020 7:03 pm
- Byond Username: Misdoubtful
- Location: Delivering hugs!
Re: Vote of no Confidence Peanut
Too many people take this game way too seriously. Its a game smh who cares.
Hugs
- Tastycasey
- Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2021 11:36 pm
- Byond Username: Tastycasey
- Location: WAH
Re: Vote of no Confidence Peanut
man is digging his heels in so hard he is doing a favor by plowing the fields for future peanuts
- Sightld2
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2021 1:45 am
- Byond Username: Sightld2
- Timberpoes
- In-Game Game Master
- Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2020 4:54 pm
- Byond Username: Timberpoes
Re: Vote of no Confidence Peanut
Let's be real here.
The madlad/madlass/madthey just can't get enough of longform forum posts. All they want is the appeal re-opened and re-decided so that they can do even more minor essays!
And if they want the appeal re-opened so that Kieth and Misdoutbful can come up with their own much nicer way of phrasing things - hell, maybe even overturn the ban and note in its entirety if they take the very short time needed to read his concise posts and dive through the logs to verify facts and information - well, who are we to deny this person their greatest desires?
The madlad/madlass/madthey just can't get enough of longform forum posts. All they want is the appeal re-opened and re-decided so that they can do even more minor essays!
And if they want the appeal re-opened so that Kieth and Misdoutbful can come up with their own much nicer way of phrasing things - hell, maybe even overturn the ban and note in its entirety if they take the very short time needed to read his concise posts and dive through the logs to verify facts and information - well, who are we to deny this person their greatest desires?
/tg/station Codebase Maintainer
/tg/station Game Master/Discord Jannie: Feed me back in my thread.
/tg/station Admin Trainer: Service guarantees citizenship. Would you like to know more?
Feb 2022-Sep 2022 Host Vote Headmin
Mar 2023-Sep 2023 Admin Vote Headmin
/tg/station Game Master/Discord Jannie: Feed me back in my thread.
/tg/station Admin Trainer: Service guarantees citizenship. Would you like to know more?
Feb 2022-Sep 2022 Host Vote Headmin
Mar 2023-Sep 2023 Admin Vote Headmin
- dendydoom
- In-Game Head Admin
- Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2020 10:40 am
- Byond Username: Dendydoom
Re: Vote of no Confidence Peanut
the crux of this whole thing is that they don't like having a note on their account. we should let them know that almost every single admin (headmins included) have notes on their accounts. it's just part of the game and a way to keep track of what you've been told by admins, that's literally it.
even if we accept his FACTS about lag and communication issues, then it would still be worth a note, because what if these FACTUAL lag and communication issues happen regularly? it would shit up the game for everyone and we'd have no formal record of it.
unless the note is inaccurate or misleads admins, there's no reason to remove it. change it to be more accurate based on new information, sure! but the only reason to remove it is if he didn't shoot someone in the back 5 times with incendiary shells, which he did. (see, sinful? I can keep it to 3 paragraphs! i hope you're proud of me!)
even if we accept his FACTS about lag and communication issues, then it would still be worth a note, because what if these FACTUAL lag and communication issues happen regularly? it would shit up the game for everyone and we'd have no formal record of it.
unless the note is inaccurate or misleads admins, there's no reason to remove it. change it to be more accurate based on new information, sure! but the only reason to remove it is if he didn't shoot someone in the back 5 times with incendiary shells, which he did. (see, sinful? I can keep it to 3 paragraphs! i hope you're proud of me!)
MrStonedOne wrote:I always read dendy's walls of text
NSFW:
- Vekter
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 10:25 pm
- Byond Username: Vekter
- Location: Fucking around with the engine.
Re: Vote of no Confidence Peanut
I think he's hoping that he does a long enough complaint that someone just goes "oh my god fuck it" and removes the note.
Anyway this is just a skill issue, he very obviously fucked up.
Anyway this is just a skill issue, he very obviously fucked up.
AliasTakuto wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 1:11 pm As for the ear replacing stuff, you can ask Anne but I don't think this is what I was banned for. If I was all I can say is "Sorry for being hilarious"...
Omega_DarkPotato wrote:This sucks, dude.
Spoiler:
- Jacquerel
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 8:10 pm
- Byond Username: Becquerel
Re: Vote of no Confidence Peanut
I can guarantee that this process has given them a much more outsized reputation among the game admins than the note for a one hour ban would have done.
- Super Aggro Crag
- In Game PermaBanned
- Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2015 9:47 pm
- Byond Username: Super Aggro Crag
- Epoc
- Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 1:37 am
- Byond Username: Epoc
Re: Vote of no Confidence Peanut
this guy's a fucking moron
- kinnebian
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2021 2:15 pm
- Byond Username: Kinnebian
- Location: answering irelands call
- WineAllWine
- In-Game Admin Trainer
- Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2019 8:17 pm
- Byond Username: Wineallwine
- Location: LANDAN
Re: Vote of no Confidence Peanut
I find it genuinely hilarious how much time will have been spent on this one hour ban. If 20 people spent the, what, 3 minutes required to read the ban appeal and have thoughts about it we're already in the negative. Now there's an admin complaint which would take I guess 4 mins to read properly? I've already taken at least a couple of minutes typing up this response and you've taken maybe 20 seconds reading it.
My conclusion is this was written by a delighted Reaper, intent on wasting as many of our finite seconds on this planet as possible
My conclusion is this was written by a delighted Reaper, intent on wasting as many of our finite seconds on this planet as possible
Last edited by WineAllWine on Thu Jul 20, 2023 11:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Chadley
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2022 6:07 am
- Byond Username: Armodias
- Location: Northstar psych ward helping my patients.
- Kendrickorium
- Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2019 1:00 am
- Byond Username: Kendrickorium
- WineAllWine
- In-Game Admin Trainer
- Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2019 8:17 pm
- Byond Username: Wineallwine
- Location: LANDAN
Re: Vote of no Confidence Peanut
If I received an appeal/ complain like this I think I would genuinely say "Cool, I didn't read all that, can you surmise your main point in 200 words or fewer please?" We're admins in a 2D space game not lawyers
- conrad
- Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2023 11:57 am
- Byond Username: Conrad Thunderbunch
- Location: 𝑀𝑜𝒾𝓈𝓉
Re: Vote of no Confidence Peanut
He died on the hill, was put in a cave, woke up three days later beelined for the same hill and promptly died again.
Like a peanut jesus.
Like a peanut jesus.
I normally go by Ricky. Tell me how'd I do here. ⋆ 𝒯𝒶𝓀𝒾𝓃𝑔 𝒶 𝓈𝒶𝒷𝒶𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓁. ⋆
And now a word from our sponsors:
And now a word from our sponsors:
Armhulen wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 11:08 pmThe Spessmen Times wrote:Prohibition agent Sam Salamander bragged that he could find a metacord in any server in under 30 minutes. In Bagil it took him 21 minutes. In Sybil 17 minutes, and Manuel just 11 minutes. But Terry set the record of 35 seconds. Sam asked an assistant on the arrivals shuttle where to get a discord invite, and the assistant linked him one.
RedBaronFlyer wrote: ↑Wed Feb 14, 2024 3:52 pmIt would somehow manage to pick Birdshot Station for headmin if we did that
- ekaterina
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2022 7:40 am
- Byond Username: Ekaterina von Russland
- Location: Science Maintenance
Re: Vote of no Confidence Peanut
Timberpoes screwed up closing the appeal without posting all 3 headmins' votes. That's the extent of the validity I see in a complaint about Timberpoes.
I have a confirmed grand total of 1 merged PR. That basically means I'm a c*der now.
sinfulbliss wrote: ↑Wed May 24, 2023 2:03 am Marina is actually a very high quality roleplayer, believe it or not, and a pretty fun and good-faith player in my experience.
Timberpoes wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2024 8:50 am No deviations allowed. All must know the meta. All must power the game.
- WineAllWine
- In-Game Admin Trainer
- Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2019 8:17 pm
- Byond Username: Wineallwine
- Location: LANDAN
Re: Vote of no Confidence Peanut
Power corrupts.
Absolute Power corrupts Absolutely.
I don't think timber has done anything wrong on this case I just want to look clever by quoting someone clever
- Timberpoes
- In-Game Game Master
- Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2020 4:54 pm
- Byond Username: Timberpoes
Re: Vote of no Confidence Peanut
Good news.
This complaint is now, by both word count and character count, longer than my academic research paper on trade mark law that was published in my University's student research journal; minus abstract and bibliography.
I have been thoroughly unravelled and there is a new King of Timberposting.
This complaint is now, by both word count and character count, longer than my academic research paper on trade mark law that was published in my University's student research journal; minus abstract and bibliography.
I have been thoroughly unravelled and there is a new King of Timberposting.
/tg/station Codebase Maintainer
/tg/station Game Master/Discord Jannie: Feed me back in my thread.
/tg/station Admin Trainer: Service guarantees citizenship. Would you like to know more?
Feb 2022-Sep 2022 Host Vote Headmin
Mar 2023-Sep 2023 Admin Vote Headmin
/tg/station Game Master/Discord Jannie: Feed me back in my thread.
/tg/station Admin Trainer: Service guarantees citizenship. Would you like to know more?
Feb 2022-Sep 2022 Host Vote Headmin
Mar 2023-Sep 2023 Admin Vote Headmin
- Riggle
- Global Moderator
- Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2021 10:48 pm
- Byond Username: Riggle
Re: Vote of no Confidence Peanut
I checked the word count again and it has doubled
Last edited by Riggle on Fri Jul 21, 2023 2:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
Look at my cool text
- mrmelbert
- In-Game Game Master
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:26 pm
- Byond Username: Mr Melbert
Re: Vote of no Confidence Peanut
they went out of their way to highlight the important parts and you still want a tl;dr? jeez...
Admin: December 2020 - Present
Code Maintainer: December 2021 - Present
Head Admin: Feburary 2022 - September 2022
Youtube Guy: sometimes
Code Maintainer: December 2021 - Present
Head Admin: Feburary 2022 - September 2022
Youtube Guy: sometimes
- mstachife
- Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2019 11:00 am
- Byond Username: Mstachife
Re: Vote of no Confidence Peanut
TLDR:
The rest of it was just "rule 1 everyone must be nice to me" over and over again.I don't have to "work " with the head admin. I present REASONS with FACTS AND LOGS to JUSTIFY my IC actions. I have no desire and never will shape events on a certain way nor make excuses just to please or satisfy certain conditions that weren't even presented to me and EVEN IF THEY WERE, I would completely DISREGARD them. Regards this as a waste of time.
- Sightld2
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2021 1:45 am
- Byond Username: Sightld2
Re: Vote of no Confidence Peanut
TLDR OF THE TLDR:
He found Timber's tone too aggro. When Xemo and Timber pointed out that his reasons weren't good enough. He thought they were dismissing them entirely and not listening.
And now a slightly more detailed analysis
Ok so, this will include no direct quotes in the interest of keeping it short. Also, he numbers his own arguments weirdly. Mine are one ahead because of this. Also, I'm probably biased as hell.
There are three rules our hero is accusing Timber of breaking, when I reference them below, these are the numbers keyed to them:
- 1.No Attacks/harassment towards players
2. No threats of banning specific players in public channels.
3. All posts by admins in FNR should be meaningful and contribute to the discussion
- 1. Timberpoes asked a guiding question and Instructed our hero not to rely on assumption to answer it. Our hero (ironically) assumes this statement to mean that Timberpoes has already made up his mind and intends to disregard his arguments. Finding them a breach of rule 3.
2. Timber tells him he is responsible for his decisions and that his justifications aren't good enough to bypass the rules. He thought the verbiage with which Timber said this constituted harassment, as well being unhelpful. Citing rules 1&
3. Timber says lagging is not an excuse for excessive friendly fire. Our hero disagrees and thereby calls it a rule 3 violation.
4. Timber used the word "seemed" Implying uncertainty and assumption. A rule 3 violation.
5. Timber says IC disability are not an excuse either. Once again he found the words timber used to be insulting and disagreed. A rule 1 and 3 violation.
6. Again, Timber says something he disagrees with. Rule 3 violation.
7. Timber accuses him of using lag and IC disabilities to bypass his responsibilities to the rules. A rule 1 and 3 violation. Even I agree the language here is a touch hostile.
8. Again, Timber says something he disagrees with. Rule 3 violation.
9. Timber says he would have banned him for a day instead. Our hero takes this to be a threat and it is a rule 2 violation.
10. Timber says that our hero didn't work with him or Xemo. That he wasted everyone's time. Our hero finds this insulting and a rule 1 violation.
11. Timber tells him to think before he acts next time. Rule 1 and 3 violation.
12. Timber is practically begging for him to stop blaming lag or IC disabilities, just so they can wrap the damn appeal up. But our hero finds these valid reasons for his decision making. So he calls this a rule 1 and 3 violation.
- Sightld2
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2021 1:45 am
- Byond Username: Sightld2
Re: Vote of no Confidence Peanut
Xemo's ban can be summarized with: "You are still responsible for your lag and IC disabilties."
Our hero's Complaint can be summarized with: "Firstly, I disagree. Secondly, watch yo tone mf"
Our hero's Complaint can be summarized with: "Firstly, I disagree. Secondly, watch yo tone mf"
- dirk_mcblade
- Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2020 7:54 am
- Byond Username: Dirk_McBlade
Re: Vote of no Confidence Peanut
Ban him for longer next time given that he's going to appeal hella long regardless
- TypicalRig
- Joined: Sat May 01, 2021 8:18 pm
- Byond Username: TypicalRig
Re: Vote of no Confidence Peanut
Personally Timber replies tl;dr so often that the only way to wean him out of this is to reply with a post of double, no... TRIPLE length every single time he says that. Beat away at the Headmin's weakness or let him perish.
- AsbestosSniffer
- Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2023 4:44 am
- Byond Username: The Asbestos Sniffer
- Location: England
Re: Vote of no Confidence Peanut
He just...keeps going! And going! And going!
Avatar by MatrixOne.
Observer main. Otherwise I play Lucy Trelawney on Manuel.
Observer main. Otherwise I play Lucy Trelawney on Manuel.
- conrad
- Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2023 11:57 am
- Byond Username: Conrad Thunderbunch
- Location: 𝑀𝑜𝒾𝓈𝓉
Re: Vote of no Confidence Peanut
Honestly, it's basically this.
This entire argument and discussion has nothing to do with with the ban, the note or w/e. It's 'cos he got banned (and incidentally noted) due to fucking up on lag. Every else was objectively put down (the IC disabilities, in this case, and the general lack of awareness as to who was the ghoul). Dude is fixated on the lag 'cos "it's not fair" or smth.
It then escalated 'cos Timber, like anyone in this community, pokes people with a needle when they talk. Which is fine, dude just has membrane thin skin.
This entire complaint is fucking dumb. If someone needs four 19" laptop screens to justify their point, the point isn't very good to begin with, since the person doesn't even know why they think they're right.
It's next level Karen energy. Ya ain't gonna topple the ocelot like that son.Not my problem if you think that was a "thesis". Not surprised that you think it is though.
I normally go by Ricky. Tell me how'd I do here. ⋆ 𝒯𝒶𝓀𝒾𝓃𝑔 𝒶 𝓈𝒶𝒷𝒶𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓁. ⋆
And now a word from our sponsors:
And now a word from our sponsors:
Armhulen wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 11:08 pmThe Spessmen Times wrote:Prohibition agent Sam Salamander bragged that he could find a metacord in any server in under 30 minutes. In Bagil it took him 21 minutes. In Sybil 17 minutes, and Manuel just 11 minutes. But Terry set the record of 35 seconds. Sam asked an assistant on the arrivals shuttle where to get a discord invite, and the assistant linked him one.
RedBaronFlyer wrote: ↑Wed Feb 14, 2024 3:52 pmIt would somehow manage to pick Birdshot Station for headmin if we did that
- BONERMASTER
- Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2018 2:28 pm
- Byond Username: BONERMASTER
Re: Vote of no Confidence Peanut
"I didn't hear no bell."
- Legendary Ban Appeal Poster
With epic regards
-BONERMASTER
SIGNATURE UNDER CONSTRUCTION
*YOUR ADVERTISEMENT COULD BE HERE* - Contact BONERMASTER & Associates for further information
*YOUR ADVERTISEMENT COULD BE HERE* - Contact BONERMASTER & Associates for further information
- NoxVS
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2018 7:43 pm
- Byond Username: NoxVS
Re: Vote of no Confidence Peanut
How the fuck do you start with a 1788 word complaint and after editing it down to be more concise end up with 3279 words.1jovemtr00 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 12:37 am Hello, once again, thanks for the heads up. I have changed it quite a bit to be more concisive and listed point by point which conducts were broken, where exactly and why I thought so. Hope it's better now. Apologies
The weak should fear the strong
thehogshotgun wrote:How does having jannies like you, who have more brain tumor than brain benefit the server
- WineAllWine
- In-Game Admin Trainer
- Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2019 8:17 pm
- Byond Username: Wineallwine
- Location: LANDAN
Re: Vote of no Confidence Peanut
If I had more time I would have written a shorter peanutNoxVS wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 9:15 amHow the fuck do you start with a 1788 word complaint and after editing it down to be more concise end up with 3279 words.1jovemtr00 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 12:37 am Hello, once again, thanks for the heads up. I have changed it quite a bit to be more concisive and listed point by point which conducts were broken, where exactly and why I thought so. Hope it's better now. Apologies
- WineAllWine
- In-Game Admin Trainer
- Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2019 8:17 pm
- Byond Username: Wineallwine
- Location: LANDAN
Re: Vote of no Confidence Peanut
I burst out laughing at this responseTimberpoes wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 3:05 am And please don't post another thesis in reply to this if you disagree. My co-headmins are liable to throw themselves off a bridge if that happens.
- Lacran
- Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2020 3:17 am
- Byond Username: Lacran
Re: Vote of no Confidence Peanut
Timbers behaviour is very self indulgent in appeals. Though I wouldn't say it breaks admin conduct in this example especially as while cringe timber is genuinely trying to help players for the most part.
This dude is refusing to learn. I've played with him and he's a generally bad sec player. I would've preferred the ban be a job ban instead of an hour ban.
He's not going to learn as long as he has the option to argue or fight it I think.
This dude is refusing to learn. I've played with him and he's a generally bad sec player. I would've preferred the ban be a job ban instead of an hour ban.
He's not going to learn as long as he has the option to argue or fight it I think.
- dendydoom
- In-Game Head Admin
- Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2020 10:40 am
- Byond Username: Dendydoom
Re: Vote of no Confidence Peanut
when even i think your posts are getting too long you know shit is fucked up.
against my better judgement i read the entire essay.
he's fighting it on the basis of lag because he's under the impression that if he can convince us that these circumstances were totally out of his control, like a lag demon entered his sanctum, shoved him out the way and grabbed his mouse to shoot his fellow sec officer 5 times in the back with incendiary shells, then we'll be obligated to remove the note. unfortunately, we'd still note this. at most it would just include the important context that the player admits to oftentimes experiencing lag which can make gameplay difficult so that we can factor it into any further rulings if this becomes a common occurrence.
his point about not being told what the alternative is also isn't true. he's been told multiple times that he should've examined the heretic and the secoff before gunning them both down, because it would've given him enough information to know that he didn't need to break out the pump action in a blind panic-stricken fury and use it so incompetently that he killed his own comrade instead of the stationary, supine, cuffed and helpless target. you're responsible for the collateral you cause, especially when you can't be bothered to examine the situation properly before using violence.
timber was trying to throw him a bone the entire appeal by spoonfeeding him the exact questions he'd need to answer to have a chance of overturning the note but he was too busy digging his own grave on the smallest hill in the world to notice.
finally, just because someone isn't saying what you want to hear doesn't suddenly mean it's not contributing to the discussion. that's just silly. we're a video game community, not the united nations. we're entitled to a little sassiness every now and then.
against my better judgement i read the entire essay.
he's fighting it on the basis of lag because he's under the impression that if he can convince us that these circumstances were totally out of his control, like a lag demon entered his sanctum, shoved him out the way and grabbed his mouse to shoot his fellow sec officer 5 times in the back with incendiary shells, then we'll be obligated to remove the note. unfortunately, we'd still note this. at most it would just include the important context that the player admits to oftentimes experiencing lag which can make gameplay difficult so that we can factor it into any further rulings if this becomes a common occurrence.
his point about not being told what the alternative is also isn't true. he's been told multiple times that he should've examined the heretic and the secoff before gunning them both down, because it would've given him enough information to know that he didn't need to break out the pump action in a blind panic-stricken fury and use it so incompetently that he killed his own comrade instead of the stationary, supine, cuffed and helpless target. you're responsible for the collateral you cause, especially when you can't be bothered to examine the situation properly before using violence.
timber was trying to throw him a bone the entire appeal by spoonfeeding him the exact questions he'd need to answer to have a chance of overturning the note but he was too busy digging his own grave on the smallest hill in the world to notice.
finally, just because someone isn't saying what you want to hear doesn't suddenly mean it's not contributing to the discussion. that's just silly. we're a video game community, not the united nations. we're entitled to a little sassiness every now and then.
MrStonedOne wrote:I always read dendy's walls of text
NSFW:
- WineAllWine
- In-Game Admin Trainer
- Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2019 8:17 pm
- Byond Username: Wineallwine
- Location: LANDAN
- conrad
- Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2023 11:57 am
- Byond Username: Conrad Thunderbunch
- Location: 𝑀𝑜𝒾𝓈𝓉
Re: Vote of no Confidence Peanut
Eh, it's funny until he gets something wrong. I don't like the idea of how much you can bend conduct hinging on how witty you are. He's headmin tho, and all we can do is sit and watch.WineAllWine wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 10:54 amI agree with this but honestly I love it. It makes brilliant peanuts and that "ocelot plays with his food" appeal was one of the funniest things to happen on these forums
I do hope that if he gets a complaint with actual solid ground, he conducts himself accordingly.
I'm saying this because:
I don't see how this helps anything. If I'm a player and I'm seeing this from an outside perspective, or if I'm a new forumite learning the ropes, kinda comes off like the material from the tusks of elephants.
I normally go by Ricky. Tell me how'd I do here. ⋆ 𝒯𝒶𝓀𝒾𝓃𝑔 𝒶 𝓈𝒶𝒷𝒶𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓁. ⋆
And now a word from our sponsors:
And now a word from our sponsors:
Armhulen wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 11:08 pmThe Spessmen Times wrote:Prohibition agent Sam Salamander bragged that he could find a metacord in any server in under 30 minutes. In Bagil it took him 21 minutes. In Sybil 17 minutes, and Manuel just 11 minutes. But Terry set the record of 35 seconds. Sam asked an assistant on the arrivals shuttle where to get a discord invite, and the assistant linked him one.
RedBaronFlyer wrote: ↑Wed Feb 14, 2024 3:52 pmIt would somehow manage to pick Birdshot Station for headmin if we did that
- Timberpoes
- In-Game Game Master
- Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2020 4:54 pm
- Byond Username: Timberpoes
Re: Vote of no Confidence Peanut
I cannot take that complaint seriously at this point. There's no way. No how. No chance.
Am I sassy and could I have toned the sassiness down? Sure.
Will I engage seriously with them after they're this Internet outraged? I'm not in that arc. The only response to them after thay latest post was lol.
It says everything that needs to be said about the entire setup to this.
We've gone from ca/tg/irls to /tg/ (touch grass).
There is no de-escalation willpower in me for this person. I tried to guide them through a denied appeal to genuinely help them express the information we needed to do anything at all except deny it.
Now they've burned through enough of my goodwill I'm lolposting them.
Am I sassy and could I have toned the sassiness down? Sure.
Will I engage seriously with them after they're this Internet outraged? I'm not in that arc. The only response to them after thay latest post was lol.
It says everything that needs to be said about the entire setup to this.
We've gone from ca/tg/irls to /tg/ (touch grass).
There is no de-escalation willpower in me for this person. I tried to guide them through a denied appeal to genuinely help them express the information we needed to do anything at all except deny it.
Now they've burned through enough of my goodwill I'm lolposting them.
/tg/station Codebase Maintainer
/tg/station Game Master/Discord Jannie: Feed me back in my thread.
/tg/station Admin Trainer: Service guarantees citizenship. Would you like to know more?
Feb 2022-Sep 2022 Host Vote Headmin
Mar 2023-Sep 2023 Admin Vote Headmin
/tg/station Game Master/Discord Jannie: Feed me back in my thread.
/tg/station Admin Trainer: Service guarantees citizenship. Would you like to know more?
Feb 2022-Sep 2022 Host Vote Headmin
Mar 2023-Sep 2023 Admin Vote Headmin
- ekaterina
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2022 7:40 am
- Byond Username: Ekaterina von Russland
- Location: Science Maintenance
Re: Vote of no Confidence Peanut
LOL. Bro really thinks Timberpoes should be forced to put on a fake consumer service smile and treat him with "kid gloves". Why not appreciate the honesty instead?1jovemtr00 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 5:49 am 1. Yes they were. When you're trying to guide someone, you don't use that kind of language or tone, regardless being read fully or not. Words like "shitty", "ignorance", "stubborn" are just not necessary for that purpose. Sentences that implies intentional misconduct, call outs for it being a "waste of time" and ultimatums are also out of place and not required. More examples above on the "thesis".
To be fair, it did seem to me initially as well that Timberpoes was ignoring his arguments on the facts, not addressing them, and just repeating what the banning admin had already said. Complaining about the content could possibly be legitimate. Complaining about Timber's form, though, is lol-worthy. "yOUr ToNE"
I have a confirmed grand total of 1 merged PR. That basically means I'm a c*der now.
sinfulbliss wrote: ↑Wed May 24, 2023 2:03 am Marina is actually a very high quality roleplayer, believe it or not, and a pretty fun and good-faith player in my experience.
Timberpoes wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2024 8:50 am No deviations allowed. All must know the meta. All must power the game.
- Timberpoes
- In-Game Game Master
- Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2020 4:54 pm
- Byond Username: Timberpoes
Re: Vote of no Confidence Peanut
Wait, is this a rare hinged ekat post with a balanced and sensible take on both sides?
Damn.
Damn.
/tg/station Codebase Maintainer
/tg/station Game Master/Discord Jannie: Feed me back in my thread.
/tg/station Admin Trainer: Service guarantees citizenship. Would you like to know more?
Feb 2022-Sep 2022 Host Vote Headmin
Mar 2023-Sep 2023 Admin Vote Headmin
/tg/station Game Master/Discord Jannie: Feed me back in my thread.
/tg/station Admin Trainer: Service guarantees citizenship. Would you like to know more?
Feb 2022-Sep 2022 Host Vote Headmin
Mar 2023-Sep 2023 Admin Vote Headmin
- dirk_mcblade
- Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2020 7:54 am
- Byond Username: Dirk_McBlade
Re: Vote of no Confidence Peanut
Honestly I'd probably be more courteous than timber but I'd definitely be writing less because this debacle is a waste of time. This guy got a whole lot of attention and explanation concerning his case but he's bitchy about politeness for something he's receiving for free. Honestly he's a snowflake.
- Timberpoes
- In-Game Game Master
- Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2020 4:54 pm
- Byond Username: Timberpoes
Re: Vote of no Confidence Peanut
Also I'm fully aware that I could have tone policed myself way better in the appeal (and this complaint) and if I sincerely apologised they'd probably be sorta okay with that and the complaint would probably go away.
But this is way, way more entertaining as it is now.
But this is way, way more entertaining as it is now.
/tg/station Codebase Maintainer
/tg/station Game Master/Discord Jannie: Feed me back in my thread.
/tg/station Admin Trainer: Service guarantees citizenship. Would you like to know more?
Feb 2022-Sep 2022 Host Vote Headmin
Mar 2023-Sep 2023 Admin Vote Headmin
/tg/station Game Master/Discord Jannie: Feed me back in my thread.
/tg/station Admin Trainer: Service guarantees citizenship. Would you like to know more?
Feb 2022-Sep 2022 Host Vote Headmin
Mar 2023-Sep 2023 Admin Vote Headmin
- Jacquerel
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 8:10 pm
- Byond Username: Becquerel
Re: Vote of no Confidence Peanut
Surely if nothing else this should be the cue for this guy to pack it in, there is literally no devil's advocate in this thread.Timberpoes wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 1:03 pm Wait, is this a rare hinged ekat post with a balanced and sensible take on both sides?
-
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2022 1:34 pm
- Byond Username: Nickup9
Re: Vote of no Confidence Peanut
Goddammit I’m too drunk to read all this bullshit
Jackasses on manuel have 200x times the notes of this guy assuming it’s his first and get along fine
All parties are advised to chill
Jackasses on manuel have 200x times the notes of this guy assuming it’s his first and get along fine
All parties are advised to chill
► Show Spoiler
- Vekter
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 10:25 pm
- Byond Username: Vekter
- Location: Fucking around with the engine.
Re: Vote of no Confidence Peanut
You would think that, eventually, he would see that so many people disagree with him and something in his brain would make him go "Wait, am I actually wrong here?".
AliasTakuto wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 1:11 pm As for the ear replacing stuff, you can ask Anne but I don't think this is what I was banned for. If I was all I can say is "Sorry for being hilarious"...
Omega_DarkPotato wrote:This sucks, dude.
Spoiler:
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users