![Image](https://i.imgur.com/XQroeJ7.png)
i made the peanut for kieths ban appeal in advance so i can be first
joooks wrote:Quoting a legend, at least im not a faggot lolNaloac wrote:
In short, this appeal is denied. Suck my nuts retard.
See you in 12 months unless you blacklist me for this
Timberpoes wrote: ↑ I'm going to admin timonk [...]. Fuck it, he's also now my second host vote if goof rejects.
pikeyeskey13 wrote: ↑ ok don't forget to shove it up your ass lmao oops u can delete this one I just wanted to make sure it went through
Agux909 wrote:Woah bravo there sir, post of the month you saved the thread. I feel overwhelmed by the echo of unlimited wisdom and usefulness sprouting from you post. Every Manuel player now feels embarrased to exist because of your much NEEDED wise words, you sure teached'em all, you genius, IQ lord.Timonk wrote:This is why we make fun of Manuel
Super Aggro Crag wrote: ↑Fri Mar 03, 2023 5:11 pm I assume he did it elsewhere because it's fucking goofball and he never half-asses his shitty ideas, he full asses them so both cheeks are absolutely slathered in shit
AGED
Armhulen wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2023 11:08 pmThe Spessmen Times wrote:Prohibition agent Sam Salamander bragged that he could find a metacord in any server in under 30 minutes. In Bagil it took him 21 minutes. In Sybil 17 minutes, and Manuel just 11 minutes. But Terry set the record of 35 seconds. Sam asked an assistant on the arrivals shuttle where to get a discord invite, and the assistant linked him one.
RedBaronFlyer wrote: ↑Wed Feb 14, 2024 3:52 pmIt would somehow manage to pick Birdshot Station for headmin if we did that
joooks wrote:Quoting a legend, at least im not a faggot lolNaloac wrote:
In short, this appeal is denied. Suck my nuts retard.
See you in 12 months unless you blacklist me for this
Timberpoes wrote: ↑ I'm going to admin timonk [...]. Fuck it, he's also now my second host vote if goof rejects.
pikeyeskey13 wrote: ↑ ok don't forget to shove it up your ass lmao oops u can delete this one I just wanted to make sure it went through
Agux909 wrote:Woah bravo there sir, post of the month you saved the thread. I feel overwhelmed by the echo of unlimited wisdom and usefulness sprouting from you post. Every Manuel player now feels embarrased to exist because of your much NEEDED wise words, you sure teached'em all, you genius, IQ lord.Timonk wrote:This is why we make fun of Manuel
Timberpoes wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2023 9:16 pm I highly doubt any other admin on the team would have given you this chance, except maybe Kieth because his brain worms are almost as bad as mine.
Vekter wrote: ↑Tue May 16, 2023 4:45 pm At what point does someone's refusal or failure to improve become malice in and of itself? If you give someone a year to stop shitting on the carpet and they keep doing it but get slightly closer to the bathroom every time and sometimes they get to the toilet before it happens, at what point does it become acceptable to just ask them to go shit in someone else's house?
Timberpoes wrote: ↑Fri Apr 28, 2023 7:00 pm I'm sorry, can we get a real player to resolve this appeal? I don't like this trial player. They can't even set their own name.
sinfulbliss wrote: ↑I almost prefer Rave's AI-generated "We cannot accept this appeal at this time. If you would like assistance appealing in the future, please dial 1-800-1984-1488."
Pandarsenic wrote: ↑Mon Dec 12, 2022 2:25 pm I think we can all agree that someone throwing a reverse revolver at Zyb as a secret test of character, and Zyb immediately fucking himself with it, is the best thing we all could have received for Christmas this year
it seems fine, it's not like he's supposed to write a whole book.... like come on man
I think that if Kieth saw what people were saying and proceeded to say something along the same lines himself, he did go into the situation with bad intentions.Lizardistaken wrote: ↑Mon Nov 13, 2023 12:32 pmit seems fine, it's not like he's supposed to write a whole book.... like come on man
anyways, as someone who was at the funeral, i'd say the appeal seems pretty genuine. i saw the whole thing, he kept it IC and was just going along with the joke like most of the people there. not once did i get the impression that he was being malicious in any way, so it kind of sucks that kieth got lumped in with people who, unlike himself, actually had bad intentions.
Istoprocent1 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2024 4:36 pm Baseless claims. I have been to the vault minimum of 38 times, how many suicides?
except they only said the ckey long into the funeral when it was close to ending. it doesn't really seem fair to instantly assume bad faith for someone who doesn't even have any kind of history of doing this when you neither experienced it, read any logs or watched the literal recording of the events, especially when it comes to something as serious as genuine harassment.BonChoi wrote: ↑Mon Nov 13, 2023 1:58 pm I think that if Kieth saw what people were saying and proceeded to say something along the same lines himself, he did go into the situation with bad intentions.
If I were to go into the chapel during a round and I saw people saying an admin's ckey IC followed by them telling the admins to "kill themselves," I would absolutely get the fuck outta there so quickly it would've made a drag race look like time stood still. Kieth didn't do that and he actually joined in, so as a result he got punished accordingly.
Except I did those things, and I 100% can tell you that I'd sure as hell stay away from it anyways, regardless of what context there was for it. I dunno why you're putting so much effort into defending someone that has already began to atone for what they did and recognizes that what they themselves did was wrong.Lizardistaken wrote: ↑Mon Nov 13, 2023 2:22 pmexcept they only said the ckey long into the funeral when it was close to ending. it doesn't really seem fair to instantly assume bad faith for someone who doesn't even have any kind of history of doing this when you neither experienced it, read any logs or watched the literal recording of the events, especially when it comes to something as serious as genuine harassment.BonChoi wrote: ↑Mon Nov 13, 2023 1:58 pm I think that if Kieth saw what people were saying and proceeded to say something along the same lines himself, he did go into the situation with bad intentions.
If I were to go into the chapel during a round and I saw people saying an admin's ckey IC followed by them telling the admins to "kill themselves," I would absolutely get the fuck outta there so quickly it would've made a drag race look like time stood still. Kieth didn't do that and he actually joined in, so as a result he got punished accordingly.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Am8tDZwwhpo check the 6:55 mark when someone starts mentioning a ckey, lukas doesn't say anything, and in fact leaves the room about 20 seconds later. how is that "actually joining in"?
Istoprocent1 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2024 4:36 pm Baseless claims. I have been to the vault minimum of 38 times, how many suicides?
which one of those things did you do? what you are saying is just outright not descriptive of the events at all considering you're making it seem as if he genuinely joined in when it's pretty easily proven otherwise.BonChoi wrote: ↑Mon Nov 13, 2023 2:32 pm Except I did those things, and I 100% can tell you that I'd sure as hell stay away from it anyways, regardless of what context there was for it. I dunno why you're putting so much effort into defending someone that has already began to atone for what they did and recognizes that what they themselves did was wrong.
I read the logs and I watched the video. I wasn't there but I can tell you by the other two things what the smart thing to do during that round would've been to just not be involved in any way, shape or form. And as for the last part, if he didn't join in, then why did he get banned? It's not like everyone on the server that day got banned 4noraisin. Even he admits to what he's done, so my question is once again: why are you so adamant on proving that he did nothing wrong when the actual person in the appeal this peanut thread is for said they did the wrong thing?Lizardistaken wrote: ↑Mon Nov 13, 2023 2:39 pmwhich one of those things did you do? what you are saying is just outright not descriptive of the events at all considering you're making it seem as if he genuinely joined in when it's pretty easily proven otherwise.BonChoi wrote: ↑Mon Nov 13, 2023 2:32 pm Except I did those things, and I 100% can tell you that I'd sure as hell stay away from it anyways, regardless of what context there was for it. I dunno why you're putting so much effort into defending someone that has already began to atone for what they did and recognizes that what they themselves did was wrong.
Istoprocent1 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2024 4:36 pm Baseless claims. I have been to the vault minimum of 38 times, how many suicides?
Hey man lying is bad, if you really read the logs you wouldn’t have said this,BonChoi wrote: ↑Mon Nov 13, 2023 2:43 pmI read the logs and I watched the video. I wasn't there but I can tell you by the other two things what the smart thing to do during that round would've been to just not be involved in any way, shape or form. And as for the last part, if he didn't join in, then why did he get banned? It's not like everyone on the server that day got banned 4noraisin. Even he admits to what he's done, so my question is once again: why are you so adamant on proving that he did nothing wrong when the actual person in the appeal this peanut thread is for said they did the wrong thing?Lizardistaken wrote: ↑Mon Nov 13, 2023 2:39 pmwhich one of those things did you do? what you are saying is just outright not descriptive of the events at all considering you're making it seem as if he genuinely joined in when it's pretty easily proven otherwise.BonChoi wrote: ↑Mon Nov 13, 2023 2:32 pm Except I did those things, and I 100% can tell you that I'd sure as hell stay away from it anyways, regardless of what context there was for it. I dunno why you're putting so much effort into defending someone that has already began to atone for what they did and recognizes that what they themselves did was wrong.
…because from the logs, it is clear that Lukas was not present during any of the ckey dropping…If I were to go into the chapel during a round and I saw people saying an admin's ckey IC followed by them telling the admins to "kill themselves,"
at least 20 people were involved in the funeral as a whole, few of which were even admins, everyone was just having fun for the greater part of it. and you do realize unfair or exaggerated punishments can happen, right? if you had actually read the logs or even watched the video (i even gave you a timestamp to make things easier...) it'd be pretty clear he wasn't harassing anyone. he himself says in the appeal he never meant to direct the "centcom kys" at any individuals nor that he had any intentions of offending anyone. i don't know why you're making it seem as if he said he was harassing people in the appeal when he clearly never said anything like that? as for why i'm defending him; i just don't like to see a person slandered over mere assumptions.BonChoi wrote: ↑Mon Nov 13, 2023 2:43 pm I read the logs and I watched the video. I wasn't there but I can tell you by the other two things what the smart thing to do during that round would've been to just not be involved in any way, shape or form. And as for the last part, if he didn't join in, then why did he get banned? It's not like everyone on the server that day got banned 4noraisin. Even he admits to what he's done, so my question is once again: why are you so adamant on proving that he did nothing wrong when the actual person in the appeal this peanut thread is for said they did the wrong thing?
I never claimed that he was harassing people in the appeal thread, I don't know where you're getting that from. But I'm telling you right now that telling Centcomm to kill themselves is absolutely in no way a smart move whatsoever. Also, I don't think it's slander nor do I think that they're a victim to any sort of grand conspiracy. What they said was abhorrent and I think the right punishment was handed down here, however I also believe in their ability to be able to appeal the permaban given that they realize all of the things I've said before.Lizardistaken wrote: ↑Mon Nov 13, 2023 2:57 pmat least 20 people were involved in the funeral as a whole, few of which were even admins, everyone was just having fun for the greater part of it. and you do realize unfair or exaggerated punishments can happen, right? if you had actually read the logs or even watched the video (i even gave you a timestamp to make things easier...) it'd be pretty clear he wasn't harassing anyone. he himself says in the appeal he never meant to direct the "centcom kys" at any individuals nor that he had any intentions of offending anyone. i don't know why you're making it seem as if he said he was harassing people in the appeal when he clearly never said anything like that? as for why i'm defending him; i just don't like to see a person slandered over mere assumptions.BonChoi wrote: ↑Mon Nov 13, 2023 2:43 pm I read the logs and I watched the video. I wasn't there but I can tell you by the other two things what the smart thing to do during that round would've been to just not be involved in any way, shape or form. And as for the last part, if he didn't join in, then why did he get banned? It's not like everyone on the server that day got banned 4noraisin. Even he admits to what he's done, so my question is once again: why are you so adamant on proving that he did nothing wrong when the actual person in the appeal this peanut thread is for said they did the wrong thing?
Istoprocent1 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2024 4:36 pm Baseless claims. I have been to the vault minimum of 38 times, how many suicides?
okay so why are you blatantly lying now?BonChoi wrote: ↑Mon Nov 13, 2023 3:15 pm I never claimed that he was harassing people in the appeal thread, I don't know where you're getting that from. But I'm telling you right now that telling Centcomm to kill themselves is absolutely in no way a smart move whatsoever. Also, if you think this is "slander" or some sort of grand conspiracy against this person, you may need to adjust your tinfoil hat because it's cutting off the blood flow to your brain. What they said was abhorrent and I think the right punishment was handed down here, however I also believe in their ability to be able to appeal the permaban given that they realize all of the things I've said before.
here is you referring to him joining in again, then specifically saying that he admitted to itBonChoi wrote: ↑Mon Nov 13, 2023 1:58 pm I think that if Kieth saw what people were saying and proceeded to say something along the same lines himself, he did go into the situation with bad intentions.
If I were to go into the chapel during a round and I saw people saying an admin's ckey IC followed by them telling the admins to "kill themselves," I would absolutely get the fuck outta there so quickly it would've made a drag race look like time stood still. Kieth didn't do that and he actually joined in, so as a result he got punished accordingly.
but yeah you never claimed he was harassing people for sure man.
Yea but I did it in advance
Make me the most interesting thing about this appeal is that the peanut thread got made before the ban appeal got released
joooks wrote:Quoting a legend, at least im not a faggot lolNaloac wrote:
In short, this appeal is denied. Suck my nuts retard.
See you in 12 months unless you blacklist me for this
Timberpoes wrote: ↑ I'm going to admin timonk [...]. Fuck it, he's also now my second host vote if goof rejects.
pikeyeskey13 wrote: ↑ ok don't forget to shove it up your ass lmao oops u can delete this one I just wanted to make sure it went through
Agux909 wrote:Woah bravo there sir, post of the month you saved the thread. I feel overwhelmed by the echo of unlimited wisdom and usefulness sprouting from you post. Every Manuel player now feels embarrased to exist because of your much NEEDED wise words, you sure teached'em all, you genius, IQ lord.Timonk wrote:This is why we make fun of Manuel
MrStonedOne wrote:I always read dendy's walls of text
personally i think Justice should decide on thatWineAllWine wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 12:30 am I want to leak some hints from looking at the raw logs. But I shouldn't. I would like to know who complained about kieth's behaviour.
I certainly think a perma ban is over the top and kieth's sincere apology should be accepted.
(statement of interest:I consider kieth a friend)
joooks wrote:Quoting a legend, at least im not a faggot lolNaloac wrote:
In short, this appeal is denied. Suck my nuts retard.
See you in 12 months unless you blacklist me for this
Timberpoes wrote: ↑ I'm going to admin timonk [...]. Fuck it, he's also now my second host vote if goof rejects.
pikeyeskey13 wrote: ↑ ok don't forget to shove it up your ass lmao oops u can delete this one I just wanted to make sure it went through
Agux909 wrote:Woah bravo there sir, post of the month you saved the thread. I feel overwhelmed by the echo of unlimited wisdom and usefulness sprouting from you post. Every Manuel player now feels embarrased to exist because of your much NEEDED wise words, you sure teached'em all, you genius, IQ lord.Timonk wrote:This is why we make fun of Manuel
To play devil's advocate some admins did use the backroom to say some incredibly horrible shit/throw fake horrid accusations around (tee hee). If I was to be malicious I have full reason to be.....dendydoom wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 1:11 am good post from tbm as always.
kieth never struck me as the type of mf to have the level of malice in his heart to truly try to target admins and say heinous shit to them, especially not off the back of literally sharing channels and hearing all our life stories for 6 months.
it was a shitty thing of him to do but i'm glad he knows this and that there's been a good understanding formed about the situation.
does this mean i will now have to finally play terry sec with lukas? only time will tell
I agree, I'm sorry I didn't mention that in my original postTimonk wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 1:58 ampersonally i think Justice should decide on thatWineAllWine wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 12:30 am I want to leak some hints from looking at the raw logs. But I shouldn't. I would like to know who complained about kieth's behaviour.
I certainly think a perma ban is over the top and kieth's sincere apology should be accepted.
(statement of interest:I consider kieth a friend)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users