not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Only Certified™ Players™ may post in here.
Forum rules
Only Certified™ Players™ may post in here.
If you are not able to post in here, you are not a Certified™ Player™. Play on a mainline /tg/ game server to gain posting powers in this forum. (certified gamers are only calculated once per day)
Locked
User avatar
Scriptis
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2021 12:05 am
Byond Username: Scriptis

not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by Scriptis » #648768

viewtopic.php?f=23&t=32204

mate i'm not gonna lie to you, nobody knows how atmos works and you shouldn't blame a silicon for trying to scrub hot tritium out of a room. it's not malicious
Image
Spoiler:
Image

Image

Image
User avatar
Qbmax32
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 4:05 am
Byond Username: Qbmax32
Github Username: qbmax32
Location: in your walls

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by Qbmax32 » #648769

most mentally well atmos player
my admin feedback thread


quotes
Spoiler:
wesoda25 wrote: Wed Mar 03, 2021 5:02 am Qbmax32 is quite literally one of the dumbest individuals I have ever had the misfortune of coming into contact with. He has zero redeemable traits, and honestly I have to suppress my gag reflex every time he shows up in a conversation.
Malkraz wrote:YES
DRINK THE PISS QB
angelstarri wrote:qbmax is a retard
imsxz wrote:mythic please stop you’ve hit rock bottom and you KEEP DIGGING
deedubya wrote:I'll defend to the death your right to scream "NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER" on a constant basis, but I'll also equally defend the right of people to call you a fuckin' pillock for doing it.
datorangebottle wrote:what, not having to act like customer service in a volunteer customer service position?

Here's a rebuttal: you're literally in a customer service slash celebrity position. Volunteer or not.
Malkraz wrote:can you stop posting this shit
Nalzul wrote:Fuck Blob (can you imagine how hot it would be to be gangbanged by a bunch of blobbernauts, the blob, and spores)
Wyzack wrote:qbmax your pathetic display of abhorrent burgercraft has brought shame onto the omnivores
Plapatin wrote:i AM the senate
BONERMASTER wrote:I am a big thinker, and it would only be logical if my character had a big head as well. And glasses. Because only people that think, wear glasses.
feem wrote:i tried to send canisters of urine to the station but ended up turning all oxygen into urine and breaking lavaland and also breathing
Anonmare wrote:Each post in this thread can't settle on what it wants to be, but yet, each one is more cursed than the last.
Beesting12 wrote:please write an apology to this forums, this community, the host, and the internet as a whole for the data storage space you wasted with this complaint.
Vile Beggar wrote:i don't like this thread
imsxz wrote:nervore
FantasticFwoosh wrote:I will whisper sweet nothings that will confuse and perhaps scare you a little, but enhance the experience no-less.
afelinidisfinetoo wrote:By the way, the person who posted that catgirl porn on the github page was me. If anyone wants my private stash just PM me
Nervere wrote:Anything for a femoid.....
Qbopper wrote:I'm a dumb poopy butthead
CitrusGender wrote:god i love it when people feed me my own fried legs
User avatar
mindstormy
In-Game Admin
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2018 1:59 pm
Byond Username: Mindstormy

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by mindstormy » #648770

If you do not want an AI to try and help a situation just cut the cams and wires. Also I'm pretty sure most AI's only know about the contaminated and siphon buttons on air alarms.
User avatar
san7890
In-Game Game Master
Joined: Mon Apr 15, 2019 8:12 pm
Byond Username: San7890
Github Username: san7890
Location: here
Contact:

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by san7890 » #648771

The way I decided to tackle dealing with issues of people messing up my projects would be to breathe in, remember that it's a round-based game and I can try again next time, and then breathe out.

I would no-life toxins for weeks at a time and this is how I kept sane whenever someone screwed me up somehow. It held true for robotics as well. Although then, the major obstruction was other scientists screwing up a task you entrust to them, the miners not mining, etc. People make mistakes, and it's important to realize that everything within a round is very transient compared to what a great amount of rage will do to your soul.
Simultaneously making both the best and worst jokes on the internet. I like looking at maps and code. Learn how to map today!. You may rate me here.
User avatar
Lacran
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2020 3:17 am
Byond Username: Lacran

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by Lacran » #648773

If it's such a continuous issue I don't understand why they wouldn't discuss this with the A.I before the tritium leak.
User avatar
CPTANT
Joined: Mon May 04, 2015 1:31 pm
Byond Username: CPTANT

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by CPTANT » #648774

People really like to abuse rule 1 as a reason to ban anyone they don't like don't they.

The player got genuine IC conflict due to a misunderstanding but decided that this ruins his entire day.
Timberpoes wrote: Tue Feb 14, 2023 3:21 pm The rules exist to create the biggest possible chance of a cool shift of SS13. They don't exist to allow admins to create the most boring interpretation of SS13.
User avatar
Pandarsenic
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 11:56 pm
Byond Username: Pandarsenic
Location: AI Upload

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by Pandarsenic » #648775

In the spirit of viewtopic.php?f=83&t=32199 I think if you leak tritium everywhere and the AI cleans up your tritium and you threaten to make an admincomplaint about the AI not being banned for cleaning up your tritium leak and you actually make the admincomplaint you should be permabanned on the spot
(2:53:35 AM) scaredofshadows: how about head of robutts
I once wrote a guide to fixing telecomms woohoo
User avatar
NoxVS
In-Game Admin
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2018 7:43 pm
Byond Username: NoxVS

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by NoxVS » #648777

Muffindrake wrote: Fri Aug 05, 2022 7:14 pmShould I use code like 'I strongly disagree with your admin decision' or 'Your decision warrants further scrutiny' next time I have a problem with an admin?
I just can't get over this "Your decision warrants further scrutiny"

One of my favorite things to come out of an admin complaint recently
The weak should fear the strong
thehogshotgun wrote:How does having jannies like you, who have more brain tumor than brain benefit the server
User avatar
Farquaar
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2018 7:20 am
Byond Username: Farquaar
Location: Delta Quadrant

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by Farquaar » #648784

He should have played a human if he wanted to bomb his own department. AIs can handle crisis situations according to their laws without being bossed around by lizards.
► Show Spoiler
User avatar
Archie700
In-Game Admin
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2016 1:56 am
Byond Username: Archie700

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by Archie700 » #648785

Edit 2: I would like to assert that the AI has absolutely no say in what the atmospheric composition in Atmospherics proper is. We can literally do whatever the fuck we want in there, including flooding it with plasma, n2o, and spacing it completely, and we're not supposed to be messed with by the AI for it since it's not going to affect crew that isn't even supposed to be there.
MOONLIGHTING IS NOT OK
Harusha wrote: Sun Apr 14, 2024 4:07 pm Archie, are you a Christian?
User avatar
TheSmallBlue
Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2019 3:55 pm
Byond Username: SmallBlue

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by TheSmallBlue » #648786

Let me get this straight:

* Guy blows up his own tritium tanks
* AI probably saw it, begins trying to fix it to the best of their ability
* Guy tells AI to stop, for all they know the guy fucking did it on purpose so AI ignores them
* Guy ahelps and says "hey bwoink them" admin responds "they didn't break any rule and I don't like your tone" and closes the ticket
* Guy ahelps again JUST TO SAY "you better do it or I'll complain!"

This guy sucks!
When human I go by Bluti Kabooti, when AI I go by Azure
Image
Comm from
HommandoSA
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2018 12:34 pm
Byond Username: HommandoSA

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by HommandoSA » #648787

Lizard man has huffed too much tritium.
User avatar
Drag
In-Game Admin
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2021 3:16 am
Byond Username: Thedragmeme

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by Drag » #648790

Any player that threatens me with an admin complaint is eating a day ban, we don't play those games in my fucking house.

Edit: This was in fact a very poor attempt at a joke
Last edited by Drag on Sat Aug 06, 2022 6:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
NoxVS
In-Game Admin
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2018 7:43 pm
Byond Username: NoxVS

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by NoxVS » #648791

Drag wrote: Sat Aug 06, 2022 3:00 am Any player that threatens me with an admin complaint is eating a day ban, we don't play those games in my fucking house.
The secret is to not take it as a threat. 99% of the time there's nothing actionable, so call their bluff. They threaten you with an admin complaint, you respond with a link to the complaints board and instructions on how to fill it out. It's also great for shutting down arguments because you can just say "my decision is final, here's where you can go if you think it was wrong of me".
The weak should fear the strong
thehogshotgun wrote:How does having jannies like you, who have more brain tumor than brain benefit the server
User avatar
san7890
In-Game Game Master
Joined: Mon Apr 15, 2019 8:12 pm
Byond Username: San7890
Github Username: san7890
Location: here
Contact:

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by san7890 » #648792

NoxVS wrote: Sat Aug 06, 2022 3:23 am -snip-
The secret is to not take it as a threat. 99% of the time there's nothing actionable, so call their bluff. They threaten you with an admin complaint, you respond with a link to the complaints board and instructions on how to fill it out. It's also great for shutting down arguments because you can just say "my decision is final, here's where you can go if you think it was wrong of me".
+1
Simultaneously making both the best and worst jokes on the internet. I like looking at maps and code. Learn how to map today!. You may rate me here.
User avatar
Archie700
In-Game Admin
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2016 1:56 am
Byond Username: Archie700

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by Archie700 » #648793

Drag wrote: Sat Aug 06, 2022 3:00 am Any player that threatens me with an admin complaint is eating a day ban, we don't play those games in my fucking house.
Don't do that. They'll use it as ammunition.
Harusha wrote: Sun Apr 14, 2024 4:07 pm Archie, are you a Christian?
User avatar
Kendrickorium
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2019 1:00 am
Byond Username: Kendrickorium

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by Kendrickorium » #648799

i swear timbers end of thread posts are fucking great
Image
User avatar
dirk_mcblade
Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2020 7:54 am
Byond Username: Dirk_McBlade

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by dirk_mcblade » #648808

To be honest all good silicon players should be engineer/atmos mains first though.
User avatar
technokek
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 12:27 am
Byond Username: Technokek

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by technokek » #648815

mindstormy wrote: Fri Aug 05, 2022 11:04 pm If you do not want an AI to try and help a situation just cut the cams and wires. Also I'm pretty sure most AI's only know about the contaminated and siphon buttons on air alarms.
Please do not encourage AI access sabotage for no reason. Cutting cams or ai access wires without a VERY GOOD REASON (ai keeps fucking with you/it's CONFIRMED subverted or malf). Just cutting cables because you don't want the ai interaction with your workplace preemptively is against the rules. This does not apply to a antags.
Image
User avatar
Pandarsenic
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 11:56 pm
Byond Username: Pandarsenic
Location: AI Upload

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by Pandarsenic » #648846

Can't wait to see an atmotech robusted because they cut cameras and made a bunch of tritium, which sounds suspiciously like exactly what an antag who wants to flood pure tritium would do
(2:53:35 AM) scaredofshadows: how about head of robutts
I once wrote a guide to fixing telecomms woohoo
toemas
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2020 7:55 pm
Byond Username: Realthoman_

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by toemas » #648849

lol btfo
User avatar
KniraTwo
Joined: Wed May 18, 2022 1:11 am
Byond Username: Knira

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by KniraTwo » #648856

I feel bad for any admin who has to deal with this person.
Image
User avatar
Shadowflame909
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2017 10:18 pm
Byond Username: Shadowflame909
Location: Think about something witty and pretend I put it here

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by Shadowflame909 » #648859

>told not to ahelp about their tritium setup being flushed down the drain and instead disable ai access to scrubbers

>Told not to do that until ai drains their tritium setup down the drain or causes lethal havoc

Atmos was a mistake even for the 5 people out of hundreds who know how to do it
► Show Spoiler
Muffindrake
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2021 7:19 am
Byond Username: Muffindrake

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by Muffindrake » #648865

Shadowflame909 wrote: Sat Aug 06, 2022 4:30 pm >told not to ahelp about their tritium setup being flushed down the drain and instead disable ai access to scrubbers

>Told not to do that until ai drains their tritium setup down the drain or causes lethal havoc

Atmos was a mistake even for the 5 people out of hundreds who know how to do it
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=32211

This but unironically.
User avatar
CPTANT
Joined: Mon May 04, 2015 1:31 pm
Byond Username: CPTANT

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by CPTANT » #648869

Muffindrake wrote: Sat Aug 06, 2022 5:22 pm
Shadowflame909 wrote: Sat Aug 06, 2022 4:30 pm >told not to ahelp about their tritium setup being flushed down the drain and instead disable ai access to scrubbers

>Told not to do that until ai drains their tritium setup down the drain or causes lethal havoc

Atmos was a mistake even for the 5 people out of hundreds who know how to do it
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=32211

This but unironically.
This is pure gold, I mean salt.
Timberpoes wrote: Tue Feb 14, 2023 3:21 pm The rules exist to create the biggest possible chance of a cool shift of SS13. They don't exist to allow admins to create the most boring interpretation of SS13.
User avatar
Pandarsenic
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 11:56 pm
Byond Username: Pandarsenic
Location: AI Upload

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by Pandarsenic » #648887

Muffindrake wrote: Sat Aug 06, 2022 9:00 pm
Timberpoes wrote: Sat Aug 06, 2022 8:28 pm https://tgstation13.org/wiki/Rules
Rule 2 Precedents
4. Atmos techs are not allowed to edit atmos at roundstart so that the AI cannot use it for malicious purposes. While this might not make sense IC, it's a necessary OOC precedent for some game mechanics to work. Atmos techs are allowed if they have any reasonable suspicion of the AI being rogue.
What FatalX1 tried to communicate to you is that if the AI is doing something to actively interfere with you and they don't stop when asked, it is reasonable and proportionate to cut cameras and AI wires so you can continue in peace. But you can't pre-emptively cut cams and wires just because you have an entire tree lodged up your ass about people interfering with your pet projects.

What Nameless is trying to communicate to you is that if the admin team feels you're cutting wires and cameras for no reason, or for a reason so poor that it's basically the same as no reason, they'll may step in.

Your behaviour is virtually indistinguishable from cutting wires and cameras "just in case the AI is malf/subverted". For gameplay and game mechanic reasons, this is generally prohibited.
We have problem then, because the atmos grief happens even without any antagonist being involved. I could repeat what I said about past rounds with people overriding air alarm settings just because, but I'm not going to. We have no recourse, we can only use the 'suicide verb' and go to the 60 minute waiting room for the next round, because atmos setups are nuanced and are broken so badly by bad settings that you might as well do that. I've had it happen too many times, and nothing visible has ever been done against that.

Also, what the fuck do you mean 'pet projects'? I am providing clothes spaceproofing for the entire crew, upgrading medbay healing with Healium, and providing Cleansing crystals to them. Even a singular disruption in the form of an ignorant AI player doing aforementioned is enough to ensure nothing of the sort gets to the crew, that would require you to play the game to notice, though.

Further edit: The rules do not say that we can't edit atmos at all, and they do not state every possible malicious purpose must be left open. Since I never edit atmos pipes in a manner that prevents station gas floods, which is the main purpose of atmos for malf AI anyway, I ask you kindly to remove the note then, since I've not broken rules here.
Have you considered talking to the AI

While some players don't use this mechanic much, if you put :e or ; at the beginning of a "say," you can use your headset to communicate with the AI on a departmental or common radio to explain your project to them instead of just yelling DEAN BAD when someone shows up to kill you
(2:53:35 AM) scaredofshadows: how about head of robutts
I once wrote a guide to fixing telecomms woohoo
Muffindrake
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2021 7:19 am
Byond Username: Muffindrake

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by Muffindrake » #648893

Pandarsenic wrote: Sat Aug 06, 2022 9:19 pm
Muffindrake wrote: Sat Aug 06, 2022 9:00 pm
Timberpoes wrote: Sat Aug 06, 2022 8:28 pm https://tgstation13.org/wiki/Rules
Rule 2 Precedents
4. Atmos techs are not allowed to edit atmos at roundstart so that the AI cannot use it for malicious purposes. While this might not make sense IC, it's a necessary OOC precedent for some game mechanics to work. Atmos techs are allowed if they have any reasonable suspicion of the AI being rogue.
What FatalX1 tried to communicate to you is that if the AI is doing something to actively interfere with you and they don't stop when asked, it is reasonable and proportionate to cut cameras and AI wires so you can continue in peace. But you can't pre-emptively cut cams and wires just because you have an entire tree lodged up your ass about people interfering with your pet projects.

What Nameless is trying to communicate to you is that if the admin team feels you're cutting wires and cameras for no reason, or for a reason so poor that it's basically the same as no reason, they'll may step in.

Your behaviour is virtually indistinguishable from cutting wires and cameras "just in case the AI is malf/subverted". For gameplay and game mechanic reasons, this is generally prohibited.
We have problem then, because the atmos grief happens even without any antagonist being involved. I could repeat what I said about past rounds with people overriding air alarm settings just because, but I'm not going to. We have no recourse, we can only use the 'suicide verb' and go to the 60 minute waiting room for the next round, because atmos setups are nuanced and are broken so badly by bad settings that you might as well do that. I've had it happen too many times, and nothing visible has ever been done against that.

Also, what the fuck do you mean 'pet projects'? I am providing clothes spaceproofing for the entire crew, upgrading medbay healing with Healium, and providing Cleansing crystals to them. Even a singular disruption in the form of an ignorant AI player doing aforementioned is enough to ensure nothing of the sort gets to the crew, that would require you to play the game to notice, though.

Further edit: The rules do not say that we can't edit atmos at all, and they do not state every possible malicious purpose must be left open. Since I never edit atmos pipes in a manner that prevents station gas floods, which is the main purpose of atmos for malf AI anyway, I ask you kindly to remove the note then, since I've not broken rules here.
Have you considered talking to the AI

While some players don't use this mechanic much, if you put :e or ; at the beginning of a "say," you can use your headset to communicate with the AI on a departmental or common radio to explain your project to them instead of just yelling DEAN BAD when someone shows up to kill you
Funny you should ask. I talked to the AI in the same round. I was trying really hard to lead them through looking at the air alarm and telling me why it would be a bad idea to just hit DECON there. However, they went the boneheaded route of 'can't be arsed lol' and completely ignored me. So you can't tell me I didn't try.
User avatar
Lacran
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2020 3:17 am
Byond Username: Lacran

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by Lacran » #648894

Have you tried developing basic social skills so you don't sound fucking manic when you talk about atmos
Muffindrake
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2021 7:19 am
Byond Username: Muffindrake

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by Muffindrake » #648896

Lacran wrote: Sat Aug 06, 2022 10:48 pm Have you tried developing basic social skills so you don't sound fucking manic when you talk about atmos
You shouldn't mistake sardonic tone towards players that deserve nothing better as a deficit. I've been arguing with admins about this for too long.

I'd try and contribute changes to the code base that make accidental mistakes like this harder, but then I'd need to get the changes past people who don't even play the game, and judging from my success with admins so far, I am not holding my breath.
User avatar
Lacran
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2020 3:17 am
Byond Username: Lacran

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by Lacran » #648897

Okay, imagine I'm an A.I. it's round start and you want to make sure I don't interfere with your work. What do you say to me to build an understanding?
Muffindrake
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2021 7:19 am
Byond Username: Muffindrake

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by Muffindrake » #648898

Lacran wrote: Sat Aug 06, 2022 11:16 pm Okay, imagine I'm an A.I. it's round start and you want to make sure I don't interfere with your work. What do you say to me to build an understanding?
I did exactly this earlier today. I asked the AI (Golem) whether I could cut the AI wire to prevent accidents in Atmospherics. They pretty much told me to 'fuck off Lizard' and 'I do whatever I want'.

Your repeated attempts at theorizing more interesting ingame interactions do not work with this community, I'm afraid.
HommandoSA
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2018 12:34 pm
Byond Username: HommandoSA

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by HommandoSA » #648901

A "fuck off" is warranted if you're asking the AI if you can remove its ability to interact with the air alarms.
User avatar
Lacran
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2020 3:17 am
Byond Username: Lacran

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by Lacran » #648907

Muffindrake wrote: Sat Aug 06, 2022 11:21 pm
Lacran wrote: Sat Aug 06, 2022 11:16 pm Okay, imagine I'm an A.I. it's round start and you want to make sure I don't interfere with your work. What do you say to me to build an understanding?
I did exactly this earlier today. I asked the AI (Golem) whether I could cut the AI wire to prevent accidents in Atmospherics. They pretty much told me to 'fuck off Lizard' and 'I do whatever I want'.

Your repeated attempts at theorizing more interesting ingame interactions do not work with this community, I'm afraid.
That's not building an understanding, that's just you asking if you can remove their ability to intervene. Have you made an attempt to sit down an A.I and explain what your setup will look like and how they can intervene should things go wrong? What attempts do you make to CO-OPERATE with the A.I whom you share a department with
User avatar
Farquaar
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2018 7:20 am
Byond Username: Farquaar
Location: Delta Quadrant

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by Farquaar » #648911

Muffindrake wrote: Sat Aug 06, 2022 11:21 pm I did exactly this earlier today. I asked the AI (Golem) whether I could cut the AI wire to prevent accidents in Atmospherics. They pretty much told me to 'fuck off Lizard' and 'I do whatever I want'.
Just don't play a lizard lmao
► Show Spoiler
User avatar
BONERMASTER
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2018 2:28 pm
Byond Username: BONERMASTER

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by BONERMASTER » #648920

I encountered this "dilemma" myself as an HOP, and I convened with the admins on this:

You do have a degree of autonomy in your department, you can do whatever projects you want in atmos, AS LONG AS it remains safe to enter for other crewmembers.
Failing that, there is no admin backing you from the chain of command / AI intervening to restore safety, which may include demoting you.
You don't own the department, you just work there. And no matter if you have seven PHDs in atmospherics, if your entire department is set ablaze and it starts burning holes into the station hull, it is perfectly valid for the AI / whoever to intervene to stop the fire to the best of their abilities.

Besides, not checking the air alarm sounds like a skill issue to me.


With WARM regards
-BONERMASTER
SIGNATURE UNDER CONSTRUCTION

*YOUR ADVERTISEMENT COULD BE HERE* - Contact BONERMASTER & Associates for further information
Deirun
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2014 11:09 pm
Byond Username: Deirun

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by Deirun » #648926

Muffindrake wrote: Sat Aug 06, 2022 11:21 pm
Lacran wrote: Sat Aug 06, 2022 11:16 pm Okay, imagine I'm an A.I. it's round start and you want to make sure I don't interfere with your work. What do you say to me to build an understanding?
I did exactly this earlier today. I asked the AI (Golem) whether I could cut the AI wire to prevent accidents in Atmospherics. They pretty much told me to 'fuck off Lizard' and 'I do whatever I want'.

Your repeated attempts at theorizing more interesting ingame interactions do not work with this community, I'm afraid.
You somehow forgot to mention that the first thing I told you was that I could not see how cutting that wire would prevent accidents. You IMMEDIATELY resorted to threats (Which you also forgot, huffed too much BZ maybe?). I only told you to fuck off after that.
User avatar
dirk_mcblade
Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2020 7:54 am
Byond Username: Dirk_McBlade

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by dirk_mcblade » #648939

Lizards deserve to be told to fuck off by the AI. The AI is literally bigoted.
User avatar
Timberpoes
In-Game Game Master
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2020 4:54 pm
Byond Username: Timberpoes

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by Timberpoes » #648940

Deirun wrote: Sun Aug 07, 2022 8:50 am
Muffindrake wrote: Sat Aug 06, 2022 11:21 pm I did exactly this earlier today. I asked the AI (Golem) whether I could cut the AI wire to prevent accidents in Atmospherics. They pretty much told me to 'fuck off Lizard' and 'I do whatever I want'.

Your repeated attempts at theorizing more interesting ingame interactions do not work with this community, I'm afraid.
You somehow forgot to mention that the first thing I told you was that I could not see how cutting that wire would prevent accidents. You IMMEDIATELY resorted to threats (Which you also forgot, huffed too much BZ maybe?). I only told you to fuck off after that.
https://tgstation13.org/parsed-logs/ter ... 4/game.txt
Did the conversation go something like this?:

Code: Select all

05:25:37    SAY    Muffindrake/(Baal-Fur) "AI, may I cut AI access to the air alarm in Atmospherics to prevent accidents?"    (61, 143, 2)    Greater Port Maintenance
05:26:04    SAY    Deirun/(Golem) "I have no idea who me having access to that air alarm would cause accidents."    (214, 144, 2)    AI Chamber
05:26:19    SAY    Deirun/(Golem) "How, even."    (214, 144, 2)    AI Chamber
05:27:25    SAY    Muffindrake/(Baal-Fur) "On the off-chance that you do cause an accident, do I have your permission to throw you at the supermatter or blow up your satellite?"    (77, 114, 2)    Port Maintenance
05:28:15    SAY    Deirun/(Golem) "No you have not. I would be very careful with making threats, cosindering that you are not a human."    (214, 144, 2)    AI Chamber
05:29:35    SAY    Muffindrake/(Baal-Fur) "Then for your own sake, do not touch the Atmospherics air alarm"    (169, 117, 2)    Atmospherics
/tg/station Codebase Maintainer
/tg/station Game Master/Discord Jannie: Feed me back in my thread.
/tg/station Admin Trainer: Service guarantees citizenship. Would you like to know more?
Feb 2022-Sep 2022 Host Vote Headmin
Mar 2023-Sep 2023 Admin Vote Headmin
User avatar
Lacran
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2020 3:17 am
Byond Username: Lacran

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by Lacran » #648942

How can you be this autistic. You just have to establish a basic fucking rapport with the A.I like you would for any other co-worker in atmos, it's not rocket science.

Be polite and wait until they are free to explain the gist of the setup, how it will help the crew and how they can interfere in a way that doesn't fuck you over if things go wrong. It's what you do whenever you share any workplace with someone.
Deirun
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2014 11:09 pm
Byond Username: Deirun

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by Deirun » #648943

Timberpoes wrote: Sun Aug 07, 2022 12:53 pm
Deirun wrote: Sun Aug 07, 2022 8:50 am
Muffindrake wrote: Sat Aug 06, 2022 11:21 pm I did exactly this earlier today. I asked the AI (Golem) whether I could cut the AI wire to prevent accidents in Atmospherics. They pretty much told me to 'fuck off Lizard' and 'I do whatever I want'.

Your repeated attempts at theorizing more interesting ingame interactions do not work with this community, I'm afraid.
You somehow forgot to mention that the first thing I told you was that I could not see how cutting that wire would prevent accidents. You IMMEDIATELY resorted to threats (Which you also forgot, huffed too much BZ maybe?). I only told you to fuck off after that.
https://tgstation13.org/parsed-logs/ter ... 4/game.txt
Did the conversation go something like this?:

Code: Select all

05:25:37    SAY    Muffindrake/(Baal-Fur) "AI, may I cut AI access to the air alarm in Atmospherics to prevent accidents?"    (61, 143, 2)    Greater Port Maintenance
05:26:04    SAY    Deirun/(Golem) "I have no idea who me having access to that air alarm would cause accidents."    (214, 144, 2)    AI Chamber
05:26:19    SAY    Deirun/(Golem) "How, even."    (214, 144, 2)    AI Chamber
05:27:25    SAY    Muffindrake/(Baal-Fur) "On the off-chance that you do cause an accident, do I have your permission to throw you at the supermatter or blow up your satellite?"    (77, 114, 2)    Port Maintenance
05:28:15    SAY    Deirun/(Golem) "No you have not. I would be very careful with making threats, cosindering that you are not a human."    (214, 144, 2)    AI Chamber
05:29:35    SAY    Muffindrake/(Baal-Fur) "Then for your own sake, do not touch the Atmospherics air alarm"    (169, 117, 2)    Atmospherics
You missed my last reply to them:

Code: Select all

[2022-08-06 17:29:51.278] SAY: Deirun/(Golem) "I will touch it as much as I want to, lizard." (AI Chamber (214,144,2))
I never actually touched it. Not that I could have done so anyways, considering they walled off the sightline my camera had to it.
To be fair to them here: I think they build some sort of chamber for their atmos needs and blocked the sightline accidentally.
Lacran wrote: Sun Aug 07, 2022 1:02 pm How can you be this autistic. You just have to establish a basic fucking rapport with the A.I like you would for any other co-worker in atmos, it's not rocket science.

Be polite and wait until they are free to explain the gist of the setup, how it will help the crew and how they can interfere in a way that doesn't fuck you over if things go wrong. It's what you do whenever you share any workplace with someone.
If they had done that, I would have had absolutely no problem with cooperating. I follow most requests non-humans make, as long as they ask nicely.
Last edited by Deirun on Sun Aug 07, 2022 1:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Timberpoes
In-Game Game Master
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2020 4:54 pm
Byond Username: Timberpoes

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by Timberpoes » #648944

Deirun wrote: Sun Aug 07, 2022 1:25 pm I never actually touched it. Not that I could have done so anyways, considering they walled off the sightline my camera had to it.
That is galaxy brain.

> "The admin team won't let me cut AI cams for no reason"
> Builds walls instead of block camera line of sight

[Disappointedpoes Edit: To be fair to Muffindrake:
Deirun wrote: Sun Aug 07, 2022 1:25 pmI think they build some sort of chamber for their atmos needs and blocked the sightline accidentally.
was added since then so no conspiracy dipshittery for me. Sssad!]
/tg/station Codebase Maintainer
/tg/station Game Master/Discord Jannie: Feed me back in my thread.
/tg/station Admin Trainer: Service guarantees citizenship. Would you like to know more?
Feb 2022-Sep 2022 Host Vote Headmin
Mar 2023-Sep 2023 Admin Vote Headmin
Deirun
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2014 11:09 pm
Byond Username: Deirun

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by Deirun » #648945

Edited my post, I do not think they actually blocked it on purpose.
User avatar
Timberpoes
In-Game Game Master
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2020 4:54 pm
Byond Username: Timberpoes

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by Timberpoes » #648946

Oh, that's way more boring. Damn. Can I stick with the original conspiracy?
/tg/station Codebase Maintainer
/tg/station Game Master/Discord Jannie: Feed me back in my thread.
/tg/station Admin Trainer: Service guarantees citizenship. Would you like to know more?
Feb 2022-Sep 2022 Host Vote Headmin
Mar 2023-Sep 2023 Admin Vote Headmin
User avatar
Archie700
In-Game Admin
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2016 1:56 am
Byond Username: Archie700

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by Archie700 » #648952

I would have gone with "Excuse me, is this code for "Please kill me horribly in a secluded room somewhere and make sure that I am never revived.", lizard?"
Harusha wrote: Sun Apr 14, 2024 4:07 pm Archie, are you a Christian?
User avatar
sinfulbliss
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2019 8:53 am
Byond Username: SinfulBliss
Location: prisoner re-education chamber

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by sinfulbliss » #648966

What a baby
Spoiler:
Image
Image
Image
cybersaber101
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2019 1:30 am
Byond Username: Cybersaber101
Location: Canada, eh?

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by cybersaber101 » #649007

Atmos techs man, can't trust em.
The same poster, over and over and over and over and over and-
User avatar
Armhulen
Global Moderator
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2016 4:30 pm
Byond Username: Armhulenn
Github Username: bazelart
Location: The Grand Tournament

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by Armhulen » #649010

dirk_mcblade wrote: Sun Aug 07, 2022 12:42 pm Lizards deserve to be told to fuck off by the AI. The AI is literally bigoted.
That's what I'm saying. As soon as a non-human atmos tech is leaking tritium, the silicons can take care of it any which way they see fit and the most the non-human should feel is lucky that the tritium didn't hurt anyone which would move this from "oh great, cleaning up after this guy" into "oh great, turning this guy into red paste"
Archie700 wrote: Sat Aug 06, 2022 1:26 am
Edit 2: I would like to assert that the AI has absolutely no say in what the atmospheric composition in Atmospherics proper is. We can literally do whatever the fuck we want in there, including flooding it with plasma, n2o, and spacing it completely, and we're not supposed to be messed with by the AI for it since it's not going to affect crew that isn't even supposed to be there.
MOONLIGHTING IS NOT OK
► Show Spoiler
Imitates-The-Lizards
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2021 2:28 am
Byond Username: Typhnox

Re: not having a phd in atmos is griefing peanut

Post by Imitates-The-Lizards » #649228

Good grief. Someone mark this as a social skill issue.

And that's coming from me of all people.
Image
Image
Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: britgrenadier1