Forum rules
Only Certified™ Players™ may post in here.
If you are not able to post in here, you are not a Certified™ Player™. Play on a mainline /tg/ game server to gain posting powers in this forum. (certified gamers are only calculated once per day)
I didn't think this one warranted a peanut since he's appealing a ban for an unofficial server that has nothing to do with the forums here, and that most of the humour of it is things that are personally amusing to me (like him offering to get his banning admin NSFW art in exchange for an unban)
But the fact that he acts this smug and stuck up about it and "AM I REALLY THAT RENT FREE" while he actively lists all of his videos as saying they're from /tg/manuel because, quote,
Of course it's not tg you moron, I put that in all my descriptions to fuck with you wierdos.
The story about him moving the mouse one tile off might be true. He moved it back after he got killed, so maybe he didn't like it when playing nightmare?
Proof of character for a cheater and a ban evader who makes an appeal that surely must only and honestly paint good intent from them to clean the slate of a definitely dishonest note, no other motives at all. <:
The same poster, over and over and over and over and over and-
toemas wrote: ↑Wed Jan 25, 2023 10:41 pm
manuelmin SHOCKED and BEMUSED when they see a guy clicking on people
HOW IS HE DOING THAT??? he must be cheating
toemas wrote: ↑Wed Jan 25, 2023 10:41 pm
manuelmin SHOCKED and BEMUSED when they see a guy clicking on people
HOW IS HE DOING THAT??? he must be cheating
I call it how I see it until proven otherwise
So wait, was his original ban for aimbotting?
Timberpoes wrote: ↑Fri Jan 27, 2023 12:41 am
From my perspective, players just want to genuinely be listened to. And I don't mean it condescendingly, but to genuinely have their say and for admins to listen, process it and reply. Even if you don't give two shits about what the player is saying, even if you disagree with every part of what they say, players are less likely to leave an ahelp pissed off if you've listened to them and given a reply that directly addresses what they've told you.
toemas wrote: ↑Wed Jan 25, 2023 10:41 pm
manuelmin SHOCKED and BEMUSED when they see a guy clicking on people
HOW IS HE DOING THAT??? he must be cheating
I call it how I see it until proven otherwise
So wait, was his original ban for aimbotting?
No.
Edit: Pieguys original ban was because they stated in dchat their intention for taking an offered antagonist roll was to metagrudge the station. While you are allowed to metagrudge as an antagonist you are not allowed to seek out antagonist rolls for the PURPOSE of metagrudging. In addition to that there was a lot of bad faith plays and a lack of a willingness to improve.
Last edited by Drag on Sun Feb 05, 2023 5:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
toemas wrote: ↑Wed Jan 25, 2023 10:41 pm
manuelmin SHOCKED and BEMUSED when they see a guy clicking on people
HOW IS HE DOING THAT??? he must be cheating
I call it how I see it until proven otherwise
So wait, was his original ban for aimbotting?
No.
Edit: Pieguys original ban was because they stated in dchat their intention for taking an offered antagonist roll was to metagrudge the station. While you are allowed to metagrudge as an antagonist you are not allowed to seek out antagonist rolls for the PURPOSE of metagrudging. In addition to that there was a lot of bad faith plays and a lack of a willingness to improve.
Oh pfft. Silly way to go.
Timberpoes wrote: ↑Fri Jan 27, 2023 12:41 am
From my perspective, players just want to genuinely be listened to. And I don't mean it condescendingly, but to genuinely have their say and for admins to listen, process it and reply. Even if you don't give two shits about what the player is saying, even if you disagree with every part of what they say, players are less likely to leave an ahelp pissed off if you've listened to them and given a reply that directly addresses what they've told you.
Drag wrote: ↑Tue Jan 24, 2023 7:51 am
The rabbit hole continues to go deeper
Edit: Ngl this looks like some kind of macro/edited client now that I'm seeing the raw footage. However, thats still not allowed.
I've streamed ss13 private servers a few times over discord and vice versa, and it does the same thing. Doesn't use the client panels and just shows the game viewport. Not an edited client at all, or at least, that's not provable using that alone.
Drag wrote: ↑Tue Jan 24, 2023 7:51 am
The rabbit hole continues to go deeper
Edit: Ngl this looks like some kind of macro/edited client now that I'm seeing the raw footage. However, thats still not allowed.
I've streamed ss13 private servers a few times over discord and vice versa, and it does the same thing. Doesn't use the client panels and just shows the game viewport. Not an edited client at all, or at least, that's not provable using that alone.
Honestly, I would be willing to believe that explanation from Pieguy were it not for the fact they: already gave a completely out-there explanation, refuse to acknowledge it without insulting me and other /TG/ staff, and changed their story more than once.
