AI Andy peanut

[kinnebian]

viewtopic.php?f=7&t=33798

Posting a video of someone being lit on fire is wrong for several reasons. First and foremost, it is a form of violence that can cause harm, both physical and psychological, to the person being burned and those who view the video. It is a violation of human dignity and can lead to traumatic effects on individuals.

Additionally, sharing such videos is often done without the consent of the victim or their loved ones, which is a breach of their privacy and can cause them further distress.

Moreover, posting such videos can encourage and normalize violent and dangerous behavior, which can have severe consequences. It can also desensitize people to violence and make them indifferent to the suffering of others.

In summary, posting a video of someone being lit on fire is morally wrong, disrespectful, and harmful to both the victim and society as a whole. It should never be done, and those who come across such videos should refrain from sharing them or encouraging their circulation.

this is the most AI generated response ive ever seen

[Armhulen]

viewtopic.php?f=33&t=33878

[kinnebian]

i thought it was a link to another peanut..

[ekaterina]

You asked him for an essay on "why [thing you did] is bad", primary school style, and that's exactly what you got, lack of belief in his own words included. Why are you surprised? WHY ARE YOU SURPRISED, VEKTER?!

[Shellton(Mario)]

Frankly who cares if someone uses ai to write an am sorry message. If they are truly sorry then they will learn and it is a non issue, if not then all it takes is 2 clicks and a short sentence to earn a 1 way trip back to brazil and still ends up being a non issue.

[Armhulen]

Frankly who cares if someone uses ai to write an am sorry message. If they are truly sorry then they will learn and it is a non issue, if not then all it takes is 2 clicks and a short sentence to earn a 1 way trip back to brazil and still ends up being a non issue.

Because it's going to make people automatically treat AI as a bad faith option if every lazy low effort appealer just runs their appeal through AI and if you unban them with their intent being not to apologize or learn from anything you've in essence griefed one round

[Vekter]

You asked him for an essay on "why [thing you did] is bad", primary school style, and that's exactly what you got, lack of belief in his own words included. Why are you surprised? WHY ARE YOU SURPRISED, VEKTER?!

I'm surprised because I expect our players to at least behave like they're adults even if they very clearly aren't.

That includes you.

[datorangebottle]

Frankly who cares if someone uses ai to write an am sorry message. If they are truly sorry then they will learn and it is a non issue, if not then all it takes is 2 clicks and a short sentence to earn a 1 way trip back to brazil and still ends up being a non issue.

Because it's going to make people automatically treat AI as a bad faith option if every lazy low effort appealer just runs their appeal through AI and if you unban them with their intent being not to apologize or learn from anything you've in essence griefed one round

I already treat them this way regardless.
There have already been too many low-effort forum posts generated by AIs. Jackrip's blacklist appeal was funny, because at the time it was unique. Then we saw it in the election with Goofball feeding people a bunch of bullshit, and in other ban appeals. It's past the point of no return, to me.
Having an AI write your appeal for you puts an extra step of obfuscation between the appellant and the banning admin/the headmins. Now, because the words weren't typed by the person who submitted the appeal, every single statement has to go through a mental filter of, "do they actually mean this, or is the AI blowing smoke up my ass?" How can you judge it fairly after that point? Why should admins be expected to apply the minimal effort that the appellant refused to?

[Striders13]

All AI generated appeal responces will be met with AI generated denials

[cybersaber101]

All AI generated appeal responces will be met with AI generated denials

Based.

[ekaterina]

You asked him for an essay on "why [thing you did] is bad", primary school style, and that's exactly what you got, lack of belief in his own words included. Why are you surprised? WHY ARE YOU SURPRISED, VEKTER?!

(...) very clearly aren't. That includes you.

How arrogant must you be to think that anyone who disagrees with your incorrect statements is just a kid who knows no better?
I remember another forum user wrote a good and proper reply to statements like this: not every adult fits into your view of what an adult should be.
Sadly I don't recall whose words those are.

[the rest of vekter's shitpost]

You treated him like a preschooler and he responded to you like one. I don't know what else to tell your misguided self.

Now, because the words weren't typed by the person who submitted the appeal, every single statement has to go through a mental filter of, "do they actually mean this, or is the AI blowing smoke up my ass?"

You know people can write words they don't mean without having an AI do it for them, right? They had to do that screening anyway.
For example: I think Vekter is a great admin and don't find his forum conduct repulsive at all, much less to be in violation of the expected decorum!

All AI generated appeal responces will be met with AI generated denials

Now THIS, this is based.

[kinnebian]

AI Generated Ban Appeals: Bad Idea.

Using an AI to generate a ban appeal for a game is a bad idea because AI lacks the ability to understand the nuances of human behavior and communication. A ban appeal requires a personalized approach that takes into account the specific circumstances of the ban and the unique situation of the player.

An AI-generated ban appeal would likely lack the empathy and understanding necessary to address the concerns of the player effectively. Additionally, an AI may not be able to detect or respond appropriately to certain situations that require more nuanced judgment, such as cases of harassment or abuse.

Furthermore, the use of an AI in this context could also lead to potential ethical issues, such as the player feeling that their appeal was not taken seriously or not receiving fair treatment.

Ultimately, a human touch is needed to effectively address ban appeals and ensure that all players are treated fairly and equitably. AI can assist in various aspects of game development and moderation, but in this specific case, it is not a suitable replacement for human judgment and empathy.

[conrad]

You asked him for an essay on "why [thing you did] is bad", primary school style, and that's exactly what you got, lack of belief in his own words included. Why are you surprised? WHY ARE YOU SURPRISED, VEKTER?!

Extremes are often seen as a way to achieve success or greatness in a particular area. However, in reality, extremes are often inaccurate and can be detrimental to one's well-being. Balance, on the other hand, is key to achieving success and leading a fulfilling life. This essay will explore the dangers of extremes and the importance of balance in various aspects of life.

In politics, extremism can lead to division and conflict. When political parties become extreme in their views, they often refuse to compromise, which can lead to a government shutdown, a breakdown of communication, and a lack of progress. On the other hand, when politicians are willing to work together and find a middle ground, progress can be made, and people can work towards achieving their goals.

In economics, extremism can lead to financial instability. When people invest too much of their money in one industry or asset, they become vulnerable to market fluctuations. If that industry or asset crashes, they could lose everything. However, if they diversify their investments, they can reduce their risk and create a more stable financial future.

In social interactions, extremes can lead to alienation and hurt. When people take extreme positions on issues, they can alienate those who hold different views. This can lead to resentment, anger, and conflict. However, when people are willing to listen to each other and find common ground, relationships can be strengthened, and social bonds can be formed.

In health, extremes can lead to physical and mental health problems. When people take extreme measures to achieve a certain body type or fitness level, they can develop eating disorders, injuries, or other health problems. However, when people take a balanced approach to exercise and nutrition, they can improve their health and well-being without sacrificing their overall quality of life.

In conclusion, extremes are often inaccurate and can be harmful in various aspects of life. Balance, on the other hand, is key to achieving success and leading a fulfilling life. It is important to find a middle ground, listen to other viewpoints, and create a stable and healthy lifestyle. By embracing balance, we can lead happier, healthier, and more fulfilling lives.

[Vekter]

You asked him for an essay on "why [thing you did] is bad", primary school style, and that's exactly what you got, lack of belief in his own words included. Why are you surprised? WHY ARE YOU SURPRISED, VEKTER?!

(...) very clearly aren't. That includes you.

How arrogant must you be to think that anyone who disagrees with your incorrect statements is just a kid who knows no better?

Nope, it's literally just you.

[Omega_DarkPotato]

You asked him for an essay on "why [thing you did] is bad", primary school style, and that's exactly what you got, lack of belief in his own words included. Why are you surprised?

Because he literally posted a video of people burning to death, jesus fuck
the extremely-small smidgen of hope we have for our users includes the idea that they know that videos of people burning to death is bad and shouldnt be shared
we're shocked and disappointed when we have some people who don't think that its bad


burning to death is literally the most painful way to die i dont understand how some people think its a hilarious meme to show people suffering in such an extreme way

[datorangebottle]

Now, because the words weren't typed by the person who submitted the appeal, every single statement has to go through a mental filter of, "do they actually mean this, or is the AI blowing smoke up my ass?"

You know people can write words they don't mean without having an AI do it for them, right? They had to do that screening anyway.

Except there's an element of believability when a person writes it. Sure, they could just be lying. Anyone can lie. When they have an AI write an appeal, they throw out any ability for the admin to take it at face value by making a machine write it for them instead of putting in the basic effort required to write it themselves. There's no way the admin can fairly screen that post, because the appellant didn't write it and can't mean a single word the AI put in the post.

[Epicgamer545]

get this robot OUT of here

[Misdoubtful]

Don't need an AI checker for this one

[dirk_mcblade]

Can someone post this video? No one died after all

[dirk_mcblade]

You asked him for an essay on "why [thing you did] is bad", primary school style, and that's exactly what you got, lack of belief in his own words included. Why are you surprised?

Because he literally posted a video of people burning to death, jesus fuck
the extremely-small smidgen of hope we have for our users includes the idea that they know that videos of people burning to death is bad and shouldnt be shared
we're shocked and disappointed when we have some people who don't think that its bad


burning to death is literally the most painful way to die i dont understand how some people think its a hilarious meme to show people suffering in such an extreme way

I thought he said no one died though are you saying the AI cheater is lying?

[BeeSting12]

You asked him for an essay on "why [thing you did] is bad", primary school style, and that's exactly what you got, lack of belief in his own words included. Why are you surprised?

Because he literally posted a video of people burning to death, jesus fuck
the extremely-small smidgen of hope we have for our users includes the idea that they know that videos of people burning to death is bad and shouldnt be shared
we're shocked and disappointed when we have some people who don't think that its bad


burning to death is literally the most painful way to die i dont understand how some people think its a hilarious meme to show people suffering in such an extreme way

i dont think anyone died in the video if it makes you feel better

still fucked up to share in a public discord with thousands of people, best to keep that shit to amongst friends/people who you know are chill with it. not going to criticize people for watching gory videos although they def should not be laughing at them.