Player's club weeps for two nuts removed

[conrad]

viewtopic.php?f=83&t=35226
viewtopic.php?f=83&t=35230

Is this the end of peanut threads? Or maybe permaban peanut threads? Is this an isolated incident 'cos one peanut was locked for...reasons, and the other was locked 'cos the first one was as well in a short amount of time?

Should the player's club be denutted? The horror.

Obviously don't discuss the actual bans like this is a peanut for both unless you want the thread locked. Or do, I can't tell you what to do :^)

[Capsandi]

local gamemin forgets peanutting locked threads ends in forum BLACKLIST BLACKLIST YOU FUCKED UP YOU FUCKED UP!!!
BLACKLIST BLACKLIST YOU FUCKED UP YOU FUCKED UP!!!
BLACKLIST BLACKLIST YOU FUCKED UP YOU FUCKED UP!!!
KILL HIM I NEED TO SEE FORUM BLOOD

[Ziiro]

>can't peanut post
1984

[Atlanta-Ned]

stop posting badly and the threads won’t get locked
4head

[zergking]

Minor complaint, peanut threads are made for everyone. Why are these players exempt from a peanut thread?

[Kendrickorium]

asking an admin politely to close a thread is fine. not everyone gets a laugh at everyone flinging shit on their windows.

i'm convinced its just to stop me from starsector posting though which they have now done THREE TIMES.

[Chadley]

That dog in me was neutered. Headmins hate us.

[dirk_mcblade]

Minor complaint, peanut threads are made for everyone. Why are these players exempt from a peanut thread?

Because one of them outed themselves as having some sort of mental illness. If they stay permabanned and that peanut thread stays up dog piling them then the narrative becomes tgstation is a place that cyberbullies the mentally ill. Regardless of how factual that narrative is.

Seth's thread should stay open though, literally 1984.

[Jacquerel]

my bals

[Constellado]

What happened in Seth's thread anyway? Why did it even get locked? Was there deleted posts or something?

Looking at it after not looking at the forums for a few days and I'm so confused.

[Constellado]

Holy shit some big things happened while I was not checking the forums.

Goodness me.

[oranges]

What happened in Seth's thread anyway? Why did it even get locked? Was there deleted posts or something?

Looking at it after not looking at the forums for a few days and I'm so confused.

the admins got caught out being biased towards one person so they had to close seths to not look sus instead of just admitting they like other people better than seth

[RedBaronFlyer]

Holy shit some big things happened while I was not checking the forums.

Goodness me.

The one day I don't check the forums this happens, figures.

[saprasam]

this new headmin term is terrible at letting the peanuts actually play out instead of forcibly leading them out back to be shot

[Constellado]

What happened in Seth's thread anyway? Why did it even get locked? Was there deleted posts or something?

Looking at it after not looking at the forums for a few days and I'm so confused.

the admins got caught out being biased towards one person so they had to close seths to not look sus instead of just admitting they like other people better than seth

That can't be the whole story.
...is it?

There are no rule breaking posts in there... Some wonderful memes. Talks about golems... Was stuff deleted or was it really locked for a single comment referencing another peanut thread?

[cSeal]

forget starsector im just gonna mention xpokee whenever i want a thread to get closed

[Vekter]

this new headmin term is terrible at letting the peanuts actually play out instead of forcibly leading them out back to be shot

tbh most of the peanuts that outlive the actual appeal process turn into goddamn cesspools so I'd be perfectly okay with a rule that we lock them once the appeal is resolved.

[TheLoLSwat]

Xpokee’s peanut shouldn’t have been locked because there wasn’t a legitimate reason for it and now whenever a peanut is opened it has to be held to similar standards (or it doesn’t but it would look really odd)

I understand xpokee was a liked person but peanut threads are a catharsis, where everyone gives their 2 cents from players to admins to MSO and then leave it at that. The person in question wouldn’t even be exposed to the peanut thread as they are not in the players club

[conrad]

The person in question wouldn’t even be exposed to the peanut thread as they are not in the players club

It is a common practice in the admin team to let banning admins know not to go to peanut threads as there is nothing to be gained there. If your ruling is wrong you should just handle it in the appeal and take the L in that case.

Players should honestly do the same; don't go to your own peanut.

Folks ignore it anyway but there you go.

[dendydoom]

i don't think we need to hold player's club to such high standards it's the shitposting gossip circle forum

sometimes peanuts are good because bans can be complex and it helps to hear alternative viewpoints to different aspects of them but people were just looking to tear into seth and marianne who were banned on pretty clear grounds so i really don't care that they were locked

[Bawhoppennn]

Which jackass is genuinely locking nuts

This is the goddang revived Hut, we should not be moderating it like the rest of the forums

[Misdoubtful]

I only ever really care when a peanut has very clearly outlived its ability to be valuable (have actual discussion) or becomes a toxic cesspit.

[Bawhoppennn]

I don't suppose that means you're going to actually unlock them though

[Misdoubtful]

No lol, not my call to make (or forum jannies/GM's anyways) really even if I wanted to. Not that I'm invested enough to begin with, but y'all need to trust there is a reason for it.

[Constellado]

So there really was not any deleted posts in Seth's peanut? It was litterally locked because the ban appeal is over?

Since when was that a thing? Closing peanuts when the ban appeal is finished... When the discussions in the peanut are not over and still have fun memes and unfinished discussions about game mechanics. I wanted to make a comment about one of the images posted there, but alas. I cannot.

I understand xpokees one being locked, but not Seth's thread.

[iwishforducks]

So there really was not any deleted posts in Seth's peanut? It was litterally locked because the ban appeal is over?

Since when was that a thing? Closing peanuts when the ban appeal is finished... When the discussions in the peanut are not over and still have fun memes and unfinished discussions about game mechanics. I wanted to make a comment about one of the images posted there, but alas. I cannot.

I understand xpokees one being locked, but not Seth's thread.

xpokee's thread was locked because... uh... truth be told i don't think they can handle the nastiness of a peanut thread.

seth's peanut was locked to save face for that decision. on any other day seth's thread would have stayed open but lolswat/lisa kinda pointed out the hypocrisy neatly:

does this peanut thread stay up because seth is slightly more of a lolcow with his (clearly unhealthy) ss13 addiction than xpokee?

tbh not too sure where i stand on whether or not the peanut(s) should've stayed open. in a mean way i think xpokee's should've stayed open, because clearly xpokee has admin friends and clearly that tipped the favor of closing the thread. seth's thread would've never been closed because admins liked him- quite the opposite, even. at the same time i have talked to both xpokee and seth before and so i think xpokee's should've been locked and seth's should've stayed open.

/shrug so i simply do not care that those two threads were locked

[TheBibleMelts]

if seth says he wants his peanut open, i'll reopen it

[Kendrickorium]

The person in question wouldn’t even be exposed to the peanut thread as they are not in the players club

It is a common practice in the admin team to let banning admins know not to go to peanut threads as there is nothing to be gained there. If your ruling is wrong you should just handle it in the appeal and take the L in that case.

Players should honestly do the same; don't go to your own peanut.

Folks ignore it anyway but there you go.

admins should absolutely be ENCOURAGED to go into peanut threads especially the banning ones

i shouldn't have to explain why

[Not-Dorsidarf]

The person in question wouldn’t even be exposed to the peanut thread as they are not in the players club

It is a common practice in the admin team to let banning admins know not to go to peanut threads as there is nothing to be gained there. If your ruling is wrong you should just handle it in the appeal and take the L in that case.

Players should honestly do the same; don't go to your own peanut.

Folks ignore it anyway but there you go.

admins should absolutely be ENCOURAGED to go into peanut threads especially the banning ones

i shouldn't have to explain why

explain why.

[iwishforducks]

admins should absolutely be ENCOURAGED to go into peanut threads especially the banning ones

i shouldn't have to explain why

explain why.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=sXE8LdXzeHM

[TheBibleMelts]

The person in question wouldn’t even be exposed to the peanut thread as they are not in the players club

It is a common practice in the admin team to let banning admins know not to go to peanut threads as there is nothing to be gained there. If your ruling is wrong you should just handle it in the appeal and take the L in that case.

Players should honestly do the same; don't go to your own peanut.

Folks ignore it anyway but there you go.

admins should absolutely be ENCOURAGED to go into peanut threads especially the banning ones

i shouldn't have to explain why

explain why.

it can help give perspective on player actions from a side that isn't the all-seeing eye type that the ban was likely made on. it can help brainstorm what people feel the proper response should have been, or help the players/admin find precedents together or point out possible hypocrisies.

[conrad]

The person in question wouldn’t even be exposed to the peanut thread as they are not in the players club

It is a common practice in the admin team to let banning admins know not to go to peanut threads as there is nothing to be gained there. If your ruling is wrong you should just handle it in the appeal and take the L in that case.

Players should honestly do the same; don't go to your own peanut.

Folks ignore it anyway but there you go.

admins should absolutely be ENCOURAGED to go into peanut threads especially the banning ones

i shouldn't have to explain why

explain why.

it can help give perspective on player actions from a side that isn't the all-seeing eye type that the ban was likely made on. it can help brainstorm what people feel the proper response should have been, or help the players/admin find precedents together or point out possible hypocrisies.

No.

The peanut does not matter. I should never matter.

It's there for entertainment.

[TheBibleMelts]

The person in question wouldn’t even be exposed to the peanut thread as they are not in the players club

It is a common practice in the admin team to let banning admins know not to go to peanut threads as there is nothing to be gained there. If your ruling is wrong you should just handle it in the appeal and take the L in that case.

Players should honestly do the same; don't go to your own peanut.

Folks ignore it anyway but there you go.

admins should absolutely be ENCOURAGED to go into peanut threads especially the banning ones

i shouldn't have to explain why

explain why.

it can help give perspective on player actions from a side that isn't the all-seeing eye type that the ban was likely made on. it can help brainstorm what people feel the proper response should have been, or help the players/admin find precedents together or point out possible hypocrisies.

No.

The peanut does not matter. I should never matter.

It's there for entertainment.

it shouldn't, but sometimes it do

[Jacquerel]

i pray that if i were an admin i would have the self restraint not to violate the posters code and start arguing in my own peanut
also if i was a player but im a perfect angel who isnt going to need to make an appeal (I dont play the game)

[Kendrickorium]

The person in question wouldn’t even be exposed to the peanut thread as they are not in the players club

It is a common practice in the admin team to let banning admins know not to go to peanut threads as there is nothing to be gained there. If your ruling is wrong you should just handle it in the appeal and take the L in that case.

Players should honestly do the same; don't go to your own peanut.

Folks ignore it anyway but there you go.

admins should absolutely be ENCOURAGED to go into peanut threads especially the banning ones

i shouldn't have to explain why

explain why.

it can help give perspective on player actions from a side that isn't the all-seeing eye type that the ban was likely made on. it can help brainstorm what people feel the proper response should have been, or help the players/admin find precedents together or point out possible hypocrisies.

It's there for entertainment.

so's your local news station

[Bawhoppennn]

Honestly it woulda been kinda funny if TBM insta-locked this thread too