syndicate shuttle
- imblyings
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:42 pm
- Byond Username: Ausops
- Location: >using suit sensors
syndicate shuttle
tbh quite sick of unwritten policies, it's not on the rules page and we had a round where admins spawned a L6 turret that shreked a borg that found the shuttle through following a pinpointer, as it was originally just trying to find the disk. Then there are people saying you shouldn't be allowed to board the shuttle via a borg or whatever nonsense.
Anyway, it's fucking stupid to ban for critical thinking skills for what is ultimately a mapping/coding problem but if it has to be a policy, can it be discussed here, formalized, finalized, and put into writing into the rules page on the wiki.
Anyway, it's fucking stupid to ban for critical thinking skills for what is ultimately a mapping/coding problem but if it has to be a policy, can it be discussed here, formalized, finalized, and put into writing into the rules page on the wiki.
The patched, dusty, trimmed, feathered mantle of evil +13.
- Scones
- Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2014 2:46 am
- Byond Username: Scones
- Location: cooler than thou
Re: syndicate shuttle
It's been my understanding that if you are lead to the shuttle via pinpointer by virtue of an operative aboard the shuttle having the disk, you are 100% green to board it.
What is NOT allowed is boarding the shuttle by metaing it's position (Typically as silicon) and spacing the nuke/flying it elsewhere.
That particular situation was the result of miscommunication and misinformation.
What is NOT allowed is boarding the shuttle by metaing it's position (Typically as silicon) and spacing the nuke/flying it elsewhere.
That particular situation was the result of miscommunication and misinformation.
plplplplp WOOOOooo hahahhaha
- Steelpoint
- Github User
- Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 6:37 pm
- Byond Username: Steelpoint
- Github Username: Steelpoint
- Location: The Armoury
Re: syndicate shuttle
From what I know on this issue, so long as your led to the shuttle legitimately (Pinpointer or following a Nuke Op) then you can freely board the ship.
However even that can sometimes be a grey area for some admins, as its not common scenario.
However even that can sometimes be a grey area for some admins, as its not common scenario.
- imblyings
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:42 pm
- Byond Username: Ausops
- Location: >using suit sensors
Re: syndicate shuttle
Well we currently have being allowed to get on the shuttle via following a pinpointer or nuke op.
And Scones, do you mean if we're on the shuttle, we're not allowed to drive it elsewhere or space the nuke.
It's thing like this that need to be ironed out because a lot of it makes common sense or doesn't seem wrong to do.
And Scones, do you mean if we're on the shuttle, we're not allowed to drive it elsewhere or space the nuke.
It's thing like this that need to be ironed out because a lot of it makes common sense or doesn't seem wrong to do.
The patched, dusty, trimmed, feathered mantle of evil +13.
-
- Github User
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:41 pm
- Byond Username: Incoming
- Github Username: Incoming5643
Re: syndicate shuttle
Once I stole a bloodred hardsuit and followed a trail of emagged doors and bullet shells back to an airlock (they had gone in from the engineering airlock for some reason). Thinking this was reason enough to suspect that the ship was nearby I flung myself south and found it. I then proceeded to board the ship and act natural, not actually inhibiting the ops at all and only getting shot down without a fight after the nuke was set when someone finally realized I didn't have the HUD icon. Of course if I had started spacing their guns or moving the ship around or trying to gun them down from the entrance I'd call that shitty behavior, which is of course why I didn't do that.
I guess what I'm saying here is that there's some value in loose poorly defined rules when people are not assholes with the wiggle room. By and large they seem not to be in this case either.
I guess what I'm saying here is that there's some value in loose poorly defined rules when people are not assholes with the wiggle room. By and large they seem not to be in this case either.
Developer - Datum Antags: Feburary 2016
Poly the Parrot - All Seeing Bird Transcends Universe, Joins Twitter.
Kofi - Make A Poor Life Choice
Good ideas backed by cruddy code since 2012!™
Poly the Parrot - All Seeing Bird Transcends Universe, Joins Twitter.
Kofi - Make A Poor Life Choice
Good ideas backed by cruddy code since 2012!™
- imblyings
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:42 pm
- Byond Username: Ausops
- Location: >using suit sensors
Re: syndicate shuttle
most of our policy is loose but it at least exists within the rules page of the wiki.
It's unfair and unprofessional to have rules that a player would only know about if they broke or if they played long enough to learn about it. There also seems to be some sort of variance about the rule beyond 'following nuke ops/pinpointers to the shuttle is allowed'. We've got Scones saying it's okay to board it if that condition is met but not if you can fly it elsewhere, space the nuke, take the guns etc. And we've got yourself calling certain behaviour poor, which may well be an opinion shared by other admins.
I'm not saying there is no value in loosely defined rules sometimes but the syndicate shuttle seems a pretty clear cut case and at the bare minimum, it needs to be mentioned in the rules page.
and while this really is just opinion and not entirely policy related, it might be preferable to just allow boarding the shuttle with the caveat that there are several un-bombable LMG turrets you have to deal with if you enter it.
It's unfair and unprofessional to have rules that a player would only know about if they broke or if they played long enough to learn about it. There also seems to be some sort of variance about the rule beyond 'following nuke ops/pinpointers to the shuttle is allowed'. We've got Scones saying it's okay to board it if that condition is met but not if you can fly it elsewhere, space the nuke, take the guns etc. And we've got yourself calling certain behaviour poor, which may well be an opinion shared by other admins.
I'm not saying there is no value in loosely defined rules sometimes but the syndicate shuttle seems a pretty clear cut case and at the bare minimum, it needs to be mentioned in the rules page.
and while this really is just opinion and not entirely policy related, it might be preferable to just allow boarding the shuttle with the caveat that there are several un-bombable LMG turrets you have to deal with if you enter it.
The patched, dusty, trimmed, feathered mantle of evil +13.
- Stickymayhem
- Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 6:13 pm
- Byond Username: Stickymayhem
Re: syndicate shuttle
Good point. I'll get on writing up this rule today. It's universal and undisputed, just not written down.
Boris wrote:Sticky is a jackass who has worms where his brain should be, but he also gets exactly what SS13 should be
- Saegrimr
- Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2014 4:39 pm
- Byond Username: Saegrimr
Re: syndicate shuttle
Those turrets used to be on the syndie shuttle by default, but got removed for unknown reasons.
If those turrets were there all the time there wouldn't even need to be a rule about the shuttle. If you found it then good luck doing anything with it.
If those turrets were there all the time there wouldn't even need to be a rule about the shuttle. If you found it then good luck doing anything with it.
tedward1337 wrote:Sae is like the racist grandad who everyone laughs at for being racist, but deep down we all know he's right.
- imblyings
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:42 pm
- Byond Username: Ausops
- Location: >using suit sensors
Re: syndicate shuttle
ayy lmao
it's happened again this time with tonnes of salt and with me on the receiving end of ahelps
I said this was important and none of you listened.
edit
It's really a mapping issue like I'm sure I've said many times and I won't blame a lack of coder/mapper effort because they're just volunteers but I fucking did say it numerous times in places I'm sure people who could affect the rules were capable of reading.
it's happened again this time with tonnes of salt and with me on the receiving end of ahelps
I said this was important and none of you listened.
edit
It's really a mapping issue like I'm sure I've said many times and I won't blame a lack of coder/mapper effort because they're just volunteers but I fucking did say it numerous times in places I'm sure people who could affect the rules were capable of reading.
The patched, dusty, trimmed, feathered mantle of evil +13.
-
- TGMC Administrator
- Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 4:40 am
- Byond Username: Lumipharon
Re: syndicate shuttle
Turrets solve all problems. Except for bombs. And maybe borgs/mechs.Saegrimr wrote:Those turrets used to be on the syndie shuttle by default, but got removed for unknown reasons.
If those turrets were there all the time there wouldn't even need to be a rule about the shuttle. If you found it then good luck doing anything with it.
- Scones
- Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2014 2:46 am
- Byond Username: Scones
- Location: cooler than thou
Re: syndicate shuttle
Problem has been exacerbated by the fact that the walls are deconstructable now
plplplplp WOOOOooo hahahhaha
- imblyings
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:42 pm
- Byond Username: Ausops
- Location: >using suit sensors
Re: syndicate shuttle
Turrets would be an ideal solution.
The patched, dusty, trimmed, feathered mantle of evil +13.
- Oldman Robustin
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2014 2:18 pm
- Byond Username: ForcefulCJS
Re: syndicate shuttle
Turrets are not an ideal solution.
You can board the shuttle from almost any direction now due to walls being destroyable/deconstructable, so you need to have turrets all over the damn thing.
Then you have to contend with people who have RCD's, drag bulletproof objects (girders), etc. who can easily soak a shot while setting up to board with impunity.
Then under the old turrets they would shoot anyone without an agent ID card, so sometimes when I'd grab cap's PDA and use it to quickly escape, I'd be greeted by gunfire from our turret and I'm sure at least one op round was lost due to the diskop being gunned down by his own turret.
Plus it removes the very fun possibility that crew are able to track the disk back to shuttle and there's one last firefight for the fate of the station... whereas turrets let you safely chill on the shuttle and fly it to the opposite corner of the map if someone is chasing you.
You can board the shuttle from almost any direction now due to walls being destroyable/deconstructable, so you need to have turrets all over the damn thing.
Then you have to contend with people who have RCD's, drag bulletproof objects (girders), etc. who can easily soak a shot while setting up to board with impunity.
Then under the old turrets they would shoot anyone without an agent ID card, so sometimes when I'd grab cap's PDA and use it to quickly escape, I'd be greeted by gunfire from our turret and I'm sure at least one op round was lost due to the diskop being gunned down by his own turret.
Plus it removes the very fun possibility that crew are able to track the disk back to shuttle and there's one last firefight for the fate of the station... whereas turrets let you safely chill on the shuttle and fly it to the opposite corner of the map if someone is chasing you.
- Saegrimr
- Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2014 4:39 pm
- Byond Username: Saegrimr
Re: syndicate shuttle
They were all over the damn thing. Every corner tile had a turret on it. It was also the old 60 brute LMG rounds coming out of those things so you get once chance and then you're done.Oldman Robustin wrote:You can board the shuttle from almost any direction now due to walls being destroyable/deconstructable, so you need to have turrets all over the damn thing.
You're right about the destructible tiles thing though. Really does create a lot of new problems.
Before they were removed (likely due to map merge conflict) they were based on the faction flag, which isn't easily changeable through in-game means.Oldman Robustin wrote:Then under the old turrets they would shoot anyone without an agent ID card,
tedward1337 wrote:Sae is like the racist grandad who everyone laughs at for being racist, but deep down we all know he's right.
- imblyings
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:42 pm
- Byond Username: Ausops
- Location: >using suit sensors
Re: syndicate shuttle
They're not meant to be destructible, afaik.
The patched, dusty, trimmed, feathered mantle of evil +13.
- Wyzack
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 11:32 pm
- Byond Username: Wyzack
Re: syndicate shuttle
Cant we just make the syndieshuttle non-deconstructable and leave other shuttles the way they are?
Arthur Thomson says, "Since there are no admins I would loging with another account and kill you"
Caleb Robinson laughs.
Arthur Thomson catches fire!
certified good poster
Caleb Robinson laughs.
Arthur Thomson catches fire!
tusterman11 wrote:Can you stop lying? I just asked you and you are was a piece of shiit on me!!!
EngamerAzari's real number one fangirl <3Kor wrote:I wish Wyzack was still an admin.
certified good poster
-
- Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2015 3:36 am
- Byond Username: Roadhog1
Re: syndicate shuttle
One solution would be a syndie only access door guarded by a turret and non-destructable tiles/extra-difficut to destroy. That way, if you want to attack the shuttle, your odds are like 1 in 50.
-
- Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2014 2:21 pm
- Byond Username: QuartzCrystal
Re: syndicate shuttle
Or we stop trying to impact gameplay with coding changes when it's easily impacted by roleplay rules changes. Not everything has to be coded to enforce, we have the instances where boarding the shuttle is allowed and we have the instances where it's not. If you know the rules (which are now going to be made explicit) then it's a non-issue.
- NikNakFlak
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 5:08 pm
- Byond Username: NikNakflak
Re: syndicate shuttle
Coding solutions are more concrete and more effective than just written words that state you can or can't do something
- Xhagi
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2015 2:45 am
- Byond Username: Aliannera
- Location: Cat Place
Re: syndicate shuttle
So a round just happened where the nuke was spaced (and flooded with plasma). The syndicate killed everyone. So the dead had to sit around for a good while before an admin showed up (none was on, thanks Scones for appearing to save the day) to actually give the on station codes for the nuke so the round would end as everyone was dead.
Spacing the nuke and all that is just something nuke ops can't defend against and is also horribly meta. In the long run it creates more problems than it solves. A turret would also not be a bad idea, but it's best to just not let people onto the syndicate shuttle who aren't the ops.
Spacing the nuke and all that is just something nuke ops can't defend against and is also horribly meta. In the long run it creates more problems than it solves. A turret would also not be a bad idea, but it's best to just not let people onto the syndicate shuttle who aren't the ops.
Professional Catgirl and Gayboy Supreme.
-
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 11:46 pm
- Byond Username: Shad0vvs
Re: syndicate shuttle
As the nuke op in the situation, that was no fun for anyone as we had to kill everyone while everyone was icking in oocking waiting for an admin to come on just because some atmos tech wanted to fuck with us with his meta. Literally ruining the whole gamemode(and not just for the ops) for his kicks/pay2win/meta attitude.Aliannera wrote:So a round just happened where the nuke was spaced (and flooded with plasma). The syndicate killed everyone. So the dead had to sit around for a good while before an admin showed up (none was on, thanks Scones for appearing to save the day) to actually give the on station codes for the nuke so the round would end as everyone was dead.
Spacing the nuke and all that is just something nuke ops can't defend against and is also horribly meta. In the long run it creates more problems than it solves. A turret would also not be a bad idea, but it's best to just not let people onto the syndicate shuttle who aren't the ops.
[03:37:46]SAY: Uriel Sutton/Shad0vvs : Alright
[03:37:47]SAY: Uriel Sutton/Shad0vvs : Shoot her in the face
[03:37:54]SAY: Sabella Rose/Burningone : Space law
[03:38:02]SAY: Uriel Sutton/Shad0vvs : If she says space law again
[03:38:04]SAY: Uriel Sutton/Shad0vvs : Space her
[03:38:09]SAY: Phoebe Lotsu/Shaps : The true space law
[03:37:47]SAY: Uriel Sutton/Shad0vvs : Shoot her in the face
[03:37:54]SAY: Sabella Rose/Burningone : Space law
[03:38:02]SAY: Uriel Sutton/Shad0vvs : If she says space law again
[03:38:04]SAY: Uriel Sutton/Shad0vvs : Space her
[03:38:09]SAY: Phoebe Lotsu/Shaps : The true space law
- Saegrimr
- Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2014 4:39 pm
- Byond Username: Saegrimr
Re: syndicate shuttle
Person in question is gone now for 3 days.
tedward1337 wrote:Sae is like the racist grandad who everyone laughs at for being racist, but deep down we all know he's right.
- Screemonster
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 7:23 pm
- Byond Username: Scree
Re: syndicate shuttle
How badly would it fuck things if ops got the code to the on-station nuke as well as their own? They'd still have to get dat fukken disk and it'd get rid of things like that time a mime put in a secban request because security arrested them for breaking into the vault and stealing the nuke (since, yanno, the nuke would actually be a thing to guard)
- imblyings
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:42 pm
- Byond Username: Ausops
- Location: >using suit sensors
Re: syndicate shuttle
I'd prefer code solutions like that or the turret over policy changes.
The patched, dusty, trimmed, feathered mantle of evil +13.
- oranges
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
- Byond Username: Optimumtact
- Github Username: optimumtact
- Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED
Re: syndicate shuttle
I've asked WJ to readd teh syndicate shuttle turrets,
I have no idea why they disappeared in the first place
I suspect foul play.
Hopefully that should fix things
I have no idea why they disappeared in the first place
I suspect foul play.
Hopefully that should fix things
- Not-Dorsidarf
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 4:14 pm
- Byond Username: Dorsidwarf
- Location: We're all going on an, admin holiday
Re: syndicate shuttle
[quote="Screemonster" it'd get rid of things like that time a mime put in a secban request because security arrested them for breaking into the vault and stealing the nuke (since, yanno, the nuke would actually be a thing to guard)[/quote]
That was the prime reason that I added the Station Self Destruct Terminal (The big nuke egg) in the first place
That was the prime reason that I added the Station Self Destruct Terminal (The big nuke egg) in the first place
kieth4 wrote: infrequently shitting yourself is fine imo
There is a lot of very bizarre nonsense being talked on this forum. I shall now remain silent and logoff until my points are vindicated.
Player who complainted over being killed for looting cap office wrote: ↑Sun Jul 30, 2023 1:33 am Hey there, I'm Virescent, the super evil person who made the stupid appeal and didn't think it through enough. Just came here to say: screech, retards. Screech and writhe like the worms you are. Your pathetic little cries will keep echoing around for a while before quietting down. There is one great outcome from this: I rised up the blood pressure of some of you shitheads and lowered your lifespan. I'm honestly tempted to do this more often just to see you screech and writhe more, but that wouldn't be cool of me. So come on haters, show me some more of your high blood pressure please.
- Takeguru
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2014 5:20 pm
- Byond Username: TakeGuru
Re: syndicate shuttle
A bit of a necropost
But, if the ops just emag their way through the station, is it alright to go
"Oh, all the emagged doors are leading to this solar array, their ship is probably here" and then go ransack it?
Don't space the nuke and all that, I get, but is it in the wrong to use the ops boarding point to locate the shuttle?
Is it wrong to take it for a joyride after one locates it?
But, if the ops just emag their way through the station, is it alright to go
"Oh, all the emagged doors are leading to this solar array, their ship is probably here" and then go ransack it?
Don't space the nuke and all that, I get, but is it in the wrong to use the ops boarding point to locate the shuttle?
Is it wrong to take it for a joyride after one locates it?
- imblyings
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:42 pm
- Byond Username: Ausops
- Location: >using suit sensors
Re: syndicate shuttle
I don't really care what you do onboard it, you can put six max cap prox sensor welcoming gifts on it along with spacing the nuke for all I care. What matters is whether you were searching the syndie shuttle docking points at roundstart for no reason or not.
The patched, dusty, trimmed, feathered mantle of evil +13.
- Takeguru
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2014 5:20 pm
- Byond Username: TakeGuru
Re: syndicate shuttle
Oh, if it's just about roundstart meta searching, never mind then.
I thought we were starting to get on about not touching the shuttle ever
I thought we were starting to get on about not touching the shuttle ever
- Fayrik
- Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2014 11:27 pm
- Byond Username: Fayrik
Re: syndicate shuttle
Why don't we just let the nuke ops chose where to land the shuttle? Given that now that we have shuttle code that can handle that sort of crazy idea.
I mean, sure, you could crash directly onto the bridge, but it'd risk destroying the disk, and there literally wouldn't be a louder entrance you could make.
(Or, you could have the game ensure there's nothing clipping within the shuttle's docking box, for all you fun haters out there.)
I mean, sure, you could crash directly onto the bridge, but it'd risk destroying the disk, and there literally wouldn't be a louder entrance you could make.
(Or, you could have the game ensure there's nothing clipping within the shuttle's docking box, for all you fun haters out there.)
-
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2014 3:01 am
- Byond Username: Incomptinence
Re: syndicate shuttle
They have a pretty alright array choices already a lot of them go at south east of engineering/solars and get meta'd though because it is a popular boarding point with advantages like option of hitting grav gen, board storage for subversion etc.
- Not-Dorsidarf
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 4:14 pm
- Byond Username: Dorsidwarf
- Location: We're all going on an, admin holiday
Re: syndicate shuttle
One simple tactic is to have the nuker who plants the tcomms bomb go back to the shuttle while the others getdat fukkendisk, and either muller people as they try to decon their way in or move it to a different prearranged spot
kieth4 wrote: infrequently shitting yourself is fine imo
There is a lot of very bizarre nonsense being talked on this forum. I shall now remain silent and logoff until my points are vindicated.
Player who complainted over being killed for looting cap office wrote: ↑Sun Jul 30, 2023 1:33 am Hey there, I'm Virescent, the super evil person who made the stupid appeal and didn't think it through enough. Just came here to say: screech, retards. Screech and writhe like the worms you are. Your pathetic little cries will keep echoing around for a while before quietting down. There is one great outcome from this: I rised up the blood pressure of some of you shitheads and lowered your lifespan. I'm honestly tempted to do this more often just to see you screech and writhe more, but that wouldn't be cool of me. So come on haters, show me some more of your high blood pressure please.
- Cobby
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:19 pm
- Byond Username: ExcessiveUseOfCobby
- Github Username: ExcessiveUseOfCobblestone
Re: syndicate shuttle
Looking for shuttles at roundstart FNR = bad,
Finding the shuttle for whatever reason = ok,
What you do past then should be up to you. If you don't want people messing with the shuttle then have one guy move it to another location and make them defend.
The reason why code solutions should ALWAYS be chosen over rule solutions is because enforcing someone through code isn't immershun breaking like getting bwoinked with "pls don't do that sir". We're trying to move things away from administration / towards IC, not the other way.
Finding the shuttle for whatever reason = ok,
What you do past then should be up to you. If you don't want people messing with the shuttle then have one guy move it to another location and make them defend.
The reason why code solutions should ALWAYS be chosen over rule solutions is because enforcing someone through code isn't immershun breaking like getting bwoinked with "pls don't do that sir". We're trying to move things away from administration / towards IC, not the other way.
Voted best trap in /tg/ 2014-current
Re: syndicate shuttle
*mullerNot-Dorsidarf wrote:One simple tactic is to have the nuker who plants the tcomms bomb go back to the shuttle while the others getdat fukkendisk, and either muller people as they try to decon their way in or move it to a different prearranged spot
Did I play planetside 2 with you?
- Not-Dorsidarf
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 4:14 pm
- Byond Username: Dorsidwarf
- Location: We're all going on an, admin holiday
Re: syndicate shuttle
Planetside 2 killed my PC for good so probbably not.
kieth4 wrote: infrequently shitting yourself is fine imo
There is a lot of very bizarre nonsense being talked on this forum. I shall now remain silent and logoff until my points are vindicated.
Player who complainted over being killed for looting cap office wrote: ↑Sun Jul 30, 2023 1:33 am Hey there, I'm Virescent, the super evil person who made the stupid appeal and didn't think it through enough. Just came here to say: screech, retards. Screech and writhe like the worms you are. Your pathetic little cries will keep echoing around for a while before quietting down. There is one great outcome from this: I rised up the blood pressure of some of you shitheads and lowered your lifespan. I'm honestly tempted to do this more often just to see you screech and writhe more, but that wouldn't be cool of me. So come on haters, show me some more of your high blood pressure please.
- kevinz000
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2014 8:41 am
- Byond Username: Kevinz000
- Github Username: kevinz000
- Location: Dorm Room 3
Re: syndicate shuttle
Dunno if this thread is old or not, but why is there a MG turret on the shuttle in its walls now? I find it unnecessary, since if you followed the nukeops to their shuttle you should deserve a chance to fight (implying they either left blast windows open or you stole a card from them)
Local catgirl scratching post - Shezza
Usually seen as Skylar Lineman/Mekhi Anderson.
Commissions way too much art...
https://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic ... 7&p=239075 - IN GAME ADMINISTRATOR
Usually seen as Skylar Lineman/Mekhi Anderson.
Commissions way too much art...
https://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic ... 7&p=239075 - IN GAME ADMINISTRATOR
NSFW:
- Scones
- Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2014 2:46 am
- Byond Username: Scones
- Location: cooler than thou
Re: syndicate shuttle
While I agree it was a code change and not a policy changekevinz000 wrote:Dunno if this thread is old or not, but why is there a MG turret on the shuttle in its walls now? I find it unnecessary, since if you followed the nukeops to their shuttle you should deserve a chance to fight (implying they either left blast windows open or you stole a card from them)
I guess the people who made it feel that people should NEVER be on the nuke ship
plplplplp WOOOOooo hahahhaha
-
- TGMC Administrator
- Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 4:40 am
- Byond Username: Lumipharon
Re: syndicate shuttle
Because you can just roam around the station as soon as someone call ops, find the shuttle an 'lelnot meta', weld through a wall and space the nuke/move the shuttle.
it's fucking shit, and nofunning blueballer keep fucking doing it.
The turrets didn't even fix this, because you can still safely break into the ship on more then 50% of the hull that isn't protected by turrets.
it's fucking shit, and nofunning blueballer keep fucking doing it.
The turrets didn't even fix this, because you can still safely break into the ship on more then 50% of the hull that isn't protected by turrets.
Re: syndicate shuttle
Whats the range on the turrets anyway?
If you're trying to do proper assault you should being using a jetpack to stabilise you whilst you pop the turrets from a safe distance using projectile weapons.
If you're trying to do proper assault you should being using a jetpack to stabilise you whilst you pop the turrets from a safe distance using projectile weapons.
- Takeguru
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2014 5:20 pm
- Byond Username: TakeGuru
-
- Confined to the shed
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2015 8:09 pm
- Byond Username: Zilenan91
Re: syndicate shuttle
Takeguru wrote:Screen range, from what I recall.
Can't you bust in from the bottom of the ship in the turrets blind spot? I can't remember if you need a bomb (not even a maxcap, like 2 or 3 ping gibtonite) or can actually weld through it at no risk to yourself.
Spoiler:
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users