The central discussion i wish to debate is whether AI asimov is right in labelling nexus'es particularly as harmful, and whether this would branch out to other station religious structures. Corporate AI laws for instance would not prioritise it within the same league unless law one or law two was violated (station crew and property) unless IC reasoning around law 4 expenditure was called into question.
Some structures are linked to potential harm, such as altars and crafting stations (I dont play HOG from a prophet/acolyte perspective almost ever so forgive my lack of intimate knowledge) in which can be associated with harm and (forgive me if im wrong) a turret could inflict harm. The nexus itself is not a harmful object though, just the being tied to it and potentially its followers associated to it can be harmful (sacrifices and being complicit and accomplicing harm)
Bringing into question would direct witness evidence of a confirmed prophet harming someone in being accountable to the god be enough to warrant hostile AI ASIMOV engagement with the nexus or would a acolyte be individualistically responsible for commiting harm by sacrificing.
Suggestion relevant to the discussion that could help resolve AI engagement with HOG/Cult rounds besides altering lawsets
Spoiler:
