Bottom post of the previous page:
I've fallen into a pitfall that only Rule 0 should address. It's one of the drawbacks of the anti-rule-lawyering approach, and I see why it fits.Doesn't stop me from being angry as all hell though.
So players and admins, what the hell do you define as Ooc in Ic? For me, it'd have to be a term that doesn't logically exist in ss13.
I was also thinking of a way to say, "A term that signifies knowledge of IC events of past rounds." But that also has its pitfalls. Considering we encourage ic knowledge of antagonist items and features, in another ruleset.
What do you guys think? Should this vague rule have more limitations, so the scenario of getting in trouble of one admin but not another has a minimized chance of occurring?
Might provoke anti-rule-lawyering arguments with this one. But I point towards admin shopping, which is also against the rules. As the other end of the stick.
Edit: To summarize why I think this deserves a Policy Discussion. Currently, OOC in IC is literally a more used Rule 0. Pretty big issue huh.