There's some grey area here that I'm not comfortable with regarding what constitutes a confirmed antagonist. We've had situations on LRP where people justify killing someone because they were found with contraband or tangentially connected to a crime, the implication being "There's no reason you would have this if you aren't an antag". The problem is that some items are obtainable without needing to be an antag, or players may have obtained them from other antagonists.Lone antagonists can do whatever they want, except metagaming/comms, bug/exploit abuse, erotic/creepy stuff, OOC in IC or IC in OOC, and spawn-camping arrivals. Team antagonists can do whatever they want as per lone antagonists, as long as it doesn’t harm their team. Non-antagonists can do whatever they want to antagonists as per lone antagonists, but non-antagonists are not allowed to pre-emptively search for, hinder or otherwise seek conflict with antagonists without reasonable prior cause. Non-antags acting like an antag can be treated as an antag.
I'm making this in good faith, mind you - players who are painfully, obviously being antagonistic (attempting to kill people or break into high-security areas) or are caught actively doing antagonist objectives (stealing the bomb core, sacrificing someone, using runes) are obviously valid, but do we extend the same to people who've done nothing but have minor contraband (ie a door mag or a chameleon kit), or have had their prints found near a Heretic rift?
In short, are we okay with sec killing people over having an emag and nothing else on LRP?
None of this applies to MRP, obviously - there's already rules there on handling antags without killing them.